Finance expert warns savers ‘loyalty does not pay' after Bank of England holds base rate
Savers are being warned not to pay the price for leaving money sitting in pots with poor returns after the Bank of England base rate remained on hold at 4.25 per cent on Thursday. Average savings rates have been on a downward path in recent weeks, but there was a ray of light for savers as some providers unveiled new products on Thursday.
Rachel Springall, a finance expert at Moneyfactscompare.co.uk, said: 'Loyalty does not pay so it comes down to savers to proactively review rates and switch their account if they are getting a poor return on their hard-earned cash.
'It is vital that savers look beyond the high street banks and instead take notice of the many challenger banks and mutuals competing in the savings arena.'
She added: 'The biggest high street banks pay an average of 1.56 per cent across easy access accounts, but even this pitiful return is being eaten away by inflation, which sits above its 2 per cent target.
'It may be convenient to leave pots with such prominent brands, but it's costing savings in better returns available elsewhere.'
According to Moneyfacts, the average easy access savings rate on offer across the market fell from 2.79 per cent at the start of May to 2.72 per cent at the start of June, based on someone having a £10,000 deposit. The average easy access Isa rate fell from 3.03 per cent to 2.98 per cent over the period.
Alice Haine, a personal finance analyst at Bestinvest by Evelyn Partners said: 'With interest rates still offering savers a decent return, it's never been more important to keep an eye on the personal savings allowance (PSA) – a threshold that's remained the same since 2016.
'Under the PSA, basic rate taxpayers can receive up to £1,000 of interest tax-free, while for higher rate taxpayers this is limited to just £500. Additional rate taxpayers get no PSA at all.
'Higher-rate taxpayers are particularly at risk of breaching the PSA, especially if they've secured one of the market's top-paying accounts.
'To sidestep an unexpected tax bill, savers should consider a more tax-efficient approach. Making full use of the £20,000 Isa allowance and boosting pension contributions can help shelter returns from the taxman, while also supporting long-term wealth goals.'
On Thursday, Yorkshire Building Society announced it had refreshed its range of fixed-rate saving options, including a one-year fixed-rate bond at 4.00% AER (annual equivalent rate), a 4.05% two-year fixed-rate bond, a 3.80% three-year fixed-rate bond, and a 3.70% five-year fixed-rate bond.
It is also offering a 3.75% one-year fixed-rate cash Isa and a 3.80% three-year fixed-rate cash Isa.
Harry Walker, senior savings manager at Yorkshire Building Society, said: 'With interest rate movements making it harder for savers to plan ahead, we're proud to offer fixed-rate options that combine strong returns with peace of mind.'
Another mutual, Skipton Building Society, has launched a 'bonus saver' easy access account, at 4.50%, which includes a 1.70% fixed bonus for the first 12 months.
The launch follows the introduction of Skipton's new cash Isa base rate tracker last week. The tracker is linked to the Bank of England base rate, currently offering savers a rate of 4.10%. The rate of interest is guaranteed to track 0.15 percentage points below the Bank of England base rate for 12 months from the first payment into the account.
The base rate hold on Thursday may disappoint some mortgage holders looking to switch to a new deal.
According to figures from UK Finance, around 1.6 million fixed-rate homeowner mortgage deals will end or have already ended in 2025.
The Bank of England has said interest rates 'remain on a gradual downward path,' despite being left on hold on Thursday.
Nicholas Mendes, mortgage technical manager at John Charcol, said: 'Markets still expect a cut or two later this year, possibly as soon as August,' although: 'The rate path is still anything but settled.
'Borrowers would be wise not to wait passively. If your current fixed deal is due to end this year, it's worth reviewing your options early, as some lenders allow new deals to be secured up to six months in advance.'
Jenny Ross, Which? Money editor, said: 'Anyone concerned about meeting their payments should speak to their lender as soon as possible – they're obliged to help.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
12 hours ago
- Daily Record
NS&I launches new one-year British Savings Bonds offering higher interest rates
NS&I is backed by the Treasury, so money held with it has 100 per cent security. Savings giant NS&I has launched new versions of its one-year British Savings Bonds with increased interest rates. One finance expert described the move as bucking 'the trend in a falling market'. British Savings Bonds are fixed-term issues of NS&I's Guaranteed Growth Bonds and Guaranteed Income Bonds. They are available to new customers and those with existing bonds which are due to mature. The new rate for the one-year Growth and Income options is 4.18 per cent AER (annual equivalent rate), the previous rate was 4.05 per cent AER. NS&I is backed by the Treasury, so money held with it has 100 per cent security. Andrew Westhead, NS&I retail director, said: 'I am pleased that we can offer savers - both new and those with our existing one-year bonds which are about to mature - this new opportunity to save. 'In launching this new issue, NS&I continues to balance the interests of its savers, taxpayers and the broader financial services sector - and to work towards its annual net financing target.' Guaranteed Growth Bonds and Guaranteed Income Bonds are available to customers wanting a guaranteed rate for a fixed-term of one, two, three or five years. Funds cannot be withdrawn early with fixed-term accounts. Savers need a minimum investment of £500 and can invest a maximum of £1 million per person in each issue. After the fixed-term period, savers have the choice to withdraw their cash or reinvest into a new term. Guaranteed Growth Bonds are a lump sum investment that earns a fixed rate of interest over a set period. Interest is added to the bond on each anniversary of the investment. Guaranteed Income Bonds are a lump sum investment that pays out monthly income at a fixed rate of interest over a set period. Earlier in July, NS&I launched some new versions of its two, three and five-year British Savings Bonds with lower rates than previously offered. It also lowered the rate on a Junior Isa from July 18, from 4.00 per cent to 3.55 per cent. Many commentators expect the Bank of England base rate to be cut further this year, which could be a further blow to savers. Sarah Coles, head of personal finance at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'NS&I has bucked the trend in a falling market and boosted the rate on its one-year bonds. 'Elsewhere, savings have been gradually dropping across the board. Fixed terms have generally held up slightly better than easy access accounts, but they're still trending downwards. 'NS&I itself cut the rate on its bonds fixed for two, three and five years earlier this month – along with cuts to the Premium Bond prize rate in August. 'It's not worth getting too excited about though. The one-year bond went back on sale in April this year, and the rate at the time was a dismal 4.05%. 'NS&I has to offer a rate somewhere in the middle of the pack, so it doesn't tend to be market leading, but clearly at this rate it wasn't pulling in enough cash. 'The rise today still leaves it well behind the market leaders - which offer more than 4.5 per cent - but it will be hoping it has done enough to retain savers with maturing one-year bonds and to attract new cash.' Laura Suter, director of personal finance at AJ Bell, said: 'The rate on offer is a far cry from the original one-year British Savings Bond that launched two years ago which proved to be a sell-out success, being pulled from sale after just five weeks. 'But back then savers were offered a generous 6.2% – a rate that now looks like a relic from another era. With interest rates edging down and other providers trimming their fixed-rate deals, NS&I has clearly tried to find a middle ground that will be attractive enough to draw in some money but not so generous that it's swamped by demand. 'For some savers, the government-backing of NS&I will be the main draw. With full protection on deposits up to £1 million, it removes the hassle of having to split savings across multiple banks to stay under the FSCS (Financial Services Compensation Scheme) limit of £85,000. 'But for others, that safety net comes at a cost. You can get better returns elsewhere if you're willing to forgo the government guarantee.'
Metro
16 hours ago
- Metro
Top tips to help you save money at each stage of your life
Saving money is a habit we should prioritise throughout our lives. There will be times – like when you're just starting out in the world of work or you have children to look after – this falls by the wayside. But changing lifestyle and spending needs doesn't need to stop you saving altogether. Instead, it's about changing your strategy to fit. Here, we look at what to focus on depending on your age, from building a rainy day fund in your 20s to maximising a pension pot in your 60s. People in their 20s find it particularly hard to save. Many have just graduated with student debt and, unless they're living with family, are likely to be spending a large proportion of their income on rent and household bills. Figures from Yorkshire Building Society show that many members of Gen Z (aged 17-24) are struggling to build up savings balances, with 5 millionhaving not saved anything in two years. However, starting small with savings in your 20s can pay big dividends, as money you put away for your old age will have time to grow thanks to the magic of compound interest. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video It's important that you also put money into a savings account you can access in the short term, so you're not blindsided by unexpected costs such as having to replace a car or broken household appliance. If you pick the right accounts, you can even benefit from tax breaks or free money from the government. Consider doing the following: Automating your savings so they come out of your account each month after payday before you pay for anything else. Using your £20,000 a year ISA allowance to grow your savings in a tax-free environment. Opening a LISA (Lifetime ISA) if you want to save for a first property. You can put up to £4,000 into one every year and the government will top it up with up to £1,000 a year. This money can only be used to buy a first property worth less than £450,000 or withdrawn at the age of 65 to help pay for retirement. If you have an employer who will contribute to your pension, make sure you don't miss out on the chance of these contributions. It can be tempting to opt out of your company pension scheme if you need the money now, but if you do, you're missing out on the chance to save tax-free for retirement as well as additional cash from your employer. Expenses are high in your 30s, with people often getting married or having children. The average age of a first-time buyer is 34, meaning many will spend the early part of this decade scraping together a deposit and the latter part paying a mortgage. Between the ages of 35 and 44, the average person ends up with total wealth of £209,000, but this includes housing equity as well as savings and investments. So while you're prioritising a house deposit and the various outgoings that crop up, make sure you also consider: Your emergency fund. Target having easy-access savings of between three and six months of basic expenses. Target having easy-access savings of between three and six months of basic expenses. Your pension. Money saved for retirement now will have time to grow. Money saved for retirement now will have time to grow. Tax-free savings options. If you're a higher-rate taxpayer, even £12,000 of savings at 5% results in you paying tax on some of your savings interest — unless you continue to shelter your savings in an ISA that is. Have children? Starting to save for them early could make all the difference to their later years. Contributing regularly to a tax-free Junior ISA in either cash or shares could grow them a nest egg that could help with university, driving lessons or even a house deposit. Put £50 a month in a savings account for them from birth and they could have over £17,000 by 18 if the money grows at 5%. Many of us reach our highest earnings potential in our 40s and 50s, giving us more money to set aside. As such, now's the time to ensure your savings are in the highest-paying accounts possible, considering your tax-free allowance of £20,000 a year. More Trending Financial planner Ryan Kingsley describes this as the 'catch-up decade' for saving, telling Metro: 'This is a time to get intentional if you haven't already, and you should be looking to save around 20% or more of your income.' Some of the savings techniques to consider: Once you have an emergency fund, consider locking up some of your money for longer. You may receive better returns by fixing an account for several years. Spread your savings into pots that mature at different times so that you get the best rates available but are also able to hit financial goals. Continue to prioritise pension saving. Once you hit 55 – rising to 57 in April 2028 – you can take 25% of the money from your pension tax-free. But consider the tax implications of doing this – especially if you are still working – and take financial advice if you're unsure. Now's the time to check your state pension records to ensure you'll receive a full state pension after you retire. You'll usually need 35 full years of national insurance contributions to receive the full amount. You can check online on the government website whether you're close to the necessary years of contributions and can pay to 'buy' extra years of contributions if you're not. As you approach retirement, you may be thinking about spending some of your hard-earned savings. Many people in this age bracket have quite high savings balances amassed over time – government figures suggest that over-65s have an average ISA balance of £63,365. View More » However, you can still maximise your savings: If you have large balances in savings, ensure you get the highest interest rate possible so that it doesn't decrease in value with inflation. Most best-selling savings products drop their rates after a set time, so ensure you check yours regularly. When withdrawing from savings and using your pension, consider the tax implications. The government offers a free PensionWise appointment to those with defined contribution pension pots once they reach 50 or more, and this may help with your strategy. Ensure your emergency fund is keeping track with your expenses and top it up as necessary. Want to give some of your savings to your children or grandchildren? Check the inheritance tax (IHT) rules to ensure you give away money tax-free. Under the current rules, any gifts you give seven years or more before your death are free of IHT, while you also have a 'gifting allowance', meaning you can give a certain amount away each year without attracting tax on it. The allowance includes £3,000 of gifts every tax year, plus some other exemptions. Do you have a story to share? Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@ MORE: Best summer holiday money-saving deals, from free kids meals to discount days out MORE: I'm a frugal mum of two — I ditched loo roll and cut my own hair MORE: Martin Lewis' MSE warns parents with kids aged 47 to 15 they could be owed thousands Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
Telegraph
16 hours ago
- Telegraph
Money-printing has impoverished Britain and no one is accountable
Quantitative easing (QE) entered the lexicon in 2009 when, for reasons which remain obscure to this day, the world's Western central banks decided to push not only short-term rates, but also long-term interest rates to near-zero. It was a coordinated monetary response to the very severe 2008-9 global financial crisis. The Bank of England was an enthusiastic partner in this enterprise, singing the praises of the policy at the time. It argued it would pump money into the economy and hence stimulate economic activity in the post-credit crunch period when economic and investment confidence was low. How did QE work? Announced in March 2009, the Bank of England started buying long-dated bonds (mostly government bonds or gilts) to push down interest rates (by pushing up the price of the bonds). The Bank of England had already reduced the Bank Rate from 5.5pc at the start of 2008 to 0.5pc in March 2009. For most people, this was hard to understand, since it meant that governments issued debt which their central banks (guaranteed by the state) bought using money borrowed from commercial banks by way of a central bank 'overdraft'. The growing central bank overdraft was dressed up, presumably to reassure the public, as 'creating central bank reserves' – which sounds a lot better. If you're not confused already, then you're doing well. To summarise: QE involved rigging the government bond market so that interest rates were ultra-low, nearly zero, across the board, and in most of the developed Western economies. How did it work out for us in the UK? Well of course, this wasn't an experiment with a control, so we can't know definitively. But let's look at some sample figures – and start with economic growth. According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), between 1958 and 2008, UK real growth per capita averaged 2.2pc per year. QE started in early 2009, so measuring from then, the real growth rate between 2009 and the end of QE in 2022 was about a quarter of the previous growth, at 0.6pc a year. Now there were lots of mitigating factors – such as the 2020-21 Covid crisis – but if we stop counting in 2019, to avoid the Covid years, growth between 2009 and 2019 was only 0.7pc a year. So we can't really blame Covid. So, the answer to the basic question, did QE promote growth?, is no. What about government prudence? In my opinion, by far the most important aspect of QE was that it lasted so long, and became so embedded in our collective psyche, politicians around the world began to believe that borrowing money was free. For more than a decade, it certainly looked like that. Investors sat quietly buying very, very expensive government bonds to finance widening fiscal deficits. Many of these investors, particularly pension funds, were effectively forced to do so to satisfy pension regulators' demands for what is known as 'asset-liability matching', for which long-dated government bonds, particularly index-linked bonds, were a near perfect liability match. The global financial crisis, which had revealed very 'unmatched' portfolios, encouraged governments to strengthen the rules about asset-liability matching, hence the willing investors buying gilts at any price. In any case, gilts performed very well in the period between 2010 and 2021: as interest rates continually fell, their prices continually rose. Businesses that normally would have gone bankrupt didn't because they could finance or refinance their debt at almost zero cost. There was even an academic movement called Modern Monetary Theory, which argued that borrowing money was, in effect, free, so governments could loosen their purse strings without constraint. As a result of this perception that borrowing was very cheap or 'free', the Government borrowed like it has never borrowed before. According to the ONS, the total financial liabilities of the public sector rose from £1.4tn at the end of 2009 to £3.4tn at the end of 2021 – a more-than-doubling of overall government debt in just over a decade. And this in a period of suppressed inflation. What's more, this figure does not include the unfunded public sector pension liability, which at the end of March 2022 stood at another £2.6tn. You might wonder why the Government doesn't recognise the public sector pension liabilities in its main accounts, but this is a separate topic for discussion. A very important secondary effect of QE was that real assets – those that produced returns for investors – rose in value very substantially. House prices, shares and commercial property were all buoyed by the fact that they yielded much higher income than the interest payable on the borrowing to buy them. It was a simple income arbitrage – borrow money very cheaply, and invest in anything that yielded a higher return. In the UK, buy-to-let residential property exploded as an investment activity. This shouldn't have been surprising: a saver could borrow money with a mortgage at 2pc or less, and invest in property that yielded 5pc or more. Property prices themselves were strong, so both income and capital gains seemed attractive. It is also worth mentioning that individual savers, a much-ignored and abused section of the UK economy, were horribly treated during the whole QE period. Interest rates (particularly after tax) failed by a long way to keep up with (even modest) inflation, so saving became a way to lose money – and borrowing became a way to make money. These observations turned into habits and ways of thinking for people – instilling exactly the opposite of good financial instincts into the general population. Finally, on the direct effects of QE, let's look at the effect on the Bank of England. The Bank was used by the Government as its agent – some might say poodle – to buy the Government's own debt with money the Bank borrowed from the private banking system. The Government indemnified the Bank against any losses that it might incur in this hedge fund-like market activity. That indemnity was necessary, as it turned out, as at the end of QE the gilts the Bank owned turned out to be worth several hundred billion pounds less than the overdraft used to fund their purchase. The effect was for the Government to borrow about £800bn of very short-term money on overdraft with a variable interest rate, instead of long-term, low-interest issues of gilts. So when interest rates went up, as they were ultimately always going to do, the taxpayer had much less cheap borrowing secured. We are now paying dearly for something the public didn't understand and wasn't consulted on, and now appears to be utterly pointless. Let's summarise. QE was designed to 'pump money into the economy' to stimulate investment and economic activity. From the growth figures, it appeared to do the opposite (although there are many other factors in play). No mention was made of the possible downsides, and these now appear to be legion and severe. They include: Extreme laxity in public sector finances; a disregard for the long-term effects of public sector indebtedness; much higher valuations of real assets (largely residential property); a stealth tax on savers; a central bank with a weakened reputation and a bloated negative balance sheet guaranteed by the Government. Has anyone who served in government been criticised for this decision? Has anyone lost their job? Does anyone even know who made the decision? Do we know the identities of the economic advisers who suggested and promoted this idea? Have we as a nation thought about the consequences so we can learn lessons for the future? The answer to all these questions is 'no'.
