Ireland ‘prepared to take further action' over Gaza, says Harris
Simon Harris is one of 26 signatories to a joint statement on Monday which calls for an end to the war in Gaza.
Advertisement
Mr Harris, who is also Minister for Foreign Affairs, said the 'suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths'.
He said Israel must immediately lift restrictions on the flow of aid and urgently enable the UN to do 'life-saving work safely and effectively' in the region, adding that Hamas must also release all hostages immediately.
The letter is signed by the foreign ministers of the UK, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland.
Tents sheltering displaced Palestinians amid war-damaged infrastructure in Gaza City. Photo: Jehad Alshrafi/AP.
It is also signed by the EU Commissioner for Equality, Preparedness and Crisis Management.
Advertisement
It states that Israel must comply with obligations under international humanitarian law.
'The Israeli government's aid delivery model is dangerous, fuels instability and deprives Gazans of human dignity.
'We condemn the drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of water and food.
'It is horrifying that over 800 Palestinians have been killed while seeking aid. The Israeli Government's denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable.'
Advertisement
The ministers added: 'The hostages cruelly held captive by Hamas since October 7 2023 continue to suffer terribly.
'We condemn their continued detention and call for their immediate and unconditional release.
'A negotiated ceasefire offers the best hope of bringing them home and ending the agony of their families.'
It says that proposals to remove the Palestinian population into a 'humanitarian city' are completely unacceptable.
Advertisement
'Permanent forced displacement is a violation of international humanitarian law.'
The ministers also oppose steps for 'demographic change in the Occupied Palestinian Territories', including proposals for accelerated settlements in the West Bank.
The authors conclude: 'We are prepared to take further action to support an immediate ceasefire and a political pathway to security and peace for Israelis, Palestinians and the entire region.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
22 minutes ago
- Reuters
German government to approve 2026 budget with record investment and borrowing surge, sources say
BERLIN, July 28 (Reuters) - The German government will on Wednesday back a 2026 draft budget which includes record investment of 126.7 billion euros and borrowing of 174.3 billion euros as part of its fiscal bazooka for infrastructure and defence, finance ministry sources said. Germany is throwing off decades of fiscal conservatism in the hope of reviving economic growth, modernising its crumbling infrastructure and scaling up military spending, as Europe's biggest economy has gone from economic powerhouse to the euro zone's laggard. It is the only G7 economy that failed to grow for the last two years and the government forecast in the spring that it would stagnate again this year. The sources said that with the budget plans, the economic environment should improve noticeably over 2025 and 2026 compared with those forecasts. The 2026 draft budget comes together with a medium-term financial framework until 2029, with the whole package expected to be approved by the cabinet. The budget discussions will then start in parliament at the end of September before expected approval in both houses of parliament at the end of the year. The 2026 draft budget, with total spending of 520.5 billion euros ($606.80 billion), includes 126.7 billion euros ($147.71 billion) in investments earmarked for the modernisation of the country. That is an increase from 74.5 billion euros in 2024 and 115.7 billion euros in 2025. The investment surge in 2026 and subsequent three years will be possible thanks to a special 500 billion euro ($583 billion) infrastructure fund and an exemption from debt rules for defence spending approved in March. The special fund for infrastructure, which is also excluded from Germany's "debt brake" that limits borrowing to 0.35% of GDP, will add borrowing of 58.9 billion euros in 2026. For defence, the 100-billion-euro special fund created by former Chancellor Olaf Scholz following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which will be exhausted in 2027, will add 25.5 billion euros in borrowing in 2026. In the core budget, borrowing will go up from 33.3 billion euros in 2024 to 89.9 billion euros in 2026, the sources said. Adding those three components, total borrowing in 2026 will be 174.3 billion euros ($203.20 billion). It compares with total borrowing of 50.5 billion euros in 2024, under the previous government. Interest expenses will rise more sharply than previously forecast, the sources said, forecasting an increase to 66.5 billion euros in 2029, which compares with the 61.9 billion previously expected. Germany will raise defence spending to 3.5% of economic output by 2029, sources said on Monday. After low spending following the end of the Cold War, Germany complied with the NATO defence alliance's target of 2% of GDP for the first time in three decades in 2024 due to Scholz's special fund. NATO countries committed in June to spend 2.8% of GDP on defence in 2026 and then increase it to 5% - a new target to be achieved over the next 10 years, representing a jump worth hundreds of billions of dollars a year from the current goal. Germany's total defence spending will go up from 95.1 billion euros ($110.90 billion) in the draft budget for 2025 to 161.8 billion euros ($188.67 billion) in 2029, the sources said. Germany would be able to borrow a total 380 billion euros for defence between 2025 and 2029 thanks to debt brake reform from March, they said. ($1 = 0.8519 euros)
Metro
24 minutes ago
- Metro
Trump says Gaza children 'look very hungry' after Israel denies any starvation
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Donald Trump has pushed against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the issue of starvation in Gaza, saying children in the region 'look very hungry'. Yesterday, Netanyahu flatly denied there were any such problems in Gaza after his government was accused of deliberately blocking off food. He told a Christian conference in Jerusalem this is a 'bold-faced lie', adding: 'There is no policy of starvation in Gaza and there is no starvation in Gaza.' Despite the status of the US as Israel's biggest international supporter, President Trump appeared to disagree with this assessment while answering questions ahead of a meeting with Keir Starmer today. Asked by a reporter if he agreed with Netanyahu's comment, Trump replied: 'I don't know. 'Based on television, I would say not particularly, cause those children look very hungry. 'But we're giving a lot of money and a lot of food, and other nations are now stepping up. I know this nation [the UK] is, right here.' Attention has been drawn to the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza in recent days, as images of malnourished children circulate widely on TV and in print. Philippe Lazzarini, the Commissioner-General for the UN's Palestine refugee agency UNRWA, said last week his health workers were surviving on 'one small meal a day, often just lentils, if at all'. UN humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher has accused the Israeli government of forcing starvation on the people of Gaza, which is classified as a war crime. Israel, in turn, has accused the UN of failing to distribute aid properly, saying Hamas has been allowed to siphon it off. Netanyahu's government announced at the weekend that secure routes would be opened in Gaza for aid delivery, while the UK is preparing to airdrop aid as part of plans led by Jordan. Starmer described the situation as a 'humanitarian crisis' and an 'absolute catastrophe' as he stood beside Trump, adding: 'I think people in Britain are revolted at what they're seeing on their screens.' More Trending The crisis in Gaza is among the top priorities as the two leaders talk at Trump's Turnberry golf resort in Ayrshire, with the PM pushing for a ceasefire. He has come under pressure in recent days to announce the UK will formally recognise Palestinian statehood, but has held off, with government figures saying the move should come when it would have the maximum impact. A No 10 spokesperson today repeated Starmer's recent comment that Palestinians have an 'inalienable right to statehood', adding it is a 'question of when, not if' the UK would recognise it. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Joey Barton branded 'bitter and twisted' after vile posts about England's Euro 2025 win MORE: Donald Trump labelled 'Commander in Cheat' after caddie drops golf ball next to bunker MORE: Gaza becomes 'most expensive place to eat in the world'
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Britain has no business laughing at Trump's EU trade deal
In a world where Donald Trump's tariffs and trade wars make everyone a loser, are there any winners from his latest deal, sealed by a handshake with the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, in a ballroom at one of the president's Scottish golf courses, of all places? One very clear loser is von der Leyen herself. If body language is anything to go by, she looked like she'd been badly bullied by the Big Orange Man – and, truthfully, so she had. In her own clipped remarks, she admits that a reduction in tariffs to 15 per cent, while 'not to be underestimated', was 'the best we could get'. President Macron has declared the US-EU trade deal a 'dark day' for Europe – and you can understand why. A general tariff level of 15 per cent – better than the 20 per cent proposed by Trump on his infamous 'Liberation Day' in April, and even better than the 30 per cent he was threatening a couple of weeks ago – is still prohibitive. It is certainly way above the 2 to 3 per cent levels that most EU exporters used to face. A trade war has been avoided, but this looks like the kind of deal the Americans have forced on the likes of Vietnam or Indonesia. So it is something of a humiliation for the mighty European Union, a global trade superpower. The feeling in some parts of Europe must be that if von der Leyen had played hard ball like the Chinese, a more evenly balanced and more advantageous relationship could have been reached in the long run. We will never know the truth about that. For European pride and for many of its great industrial concerns, the deal is disappointing, and will be expensive – the Volkswagen group is just one to speak out. But for European consumers, it is surely good news. They will be able to enjoy cheaper imports from the United States; it is American customers who will have to pay more for their French wines and Italian sports cars. Could it be that the EU's trade deal – which Trump has, well, trumpeted as the 'biggest ever', and whose biggest 'win' is the removal of a threat to raise tariffs to 30 per cent later this week – is marginally worse than the one Starmer did with Trump in May? Britain's trade deal lowered tariffs of UK goods imported into the US to 10 per cent, and imposed a lesser, 25 per cent tariff on the UK steel industry, with room for further concessions, while the 50 per cent 'worldwide rate' will remain for the EU. For those now cheering this as a rare Brexit benefit, it is a hollow victory. For the concessions to Britain are so minor, they cannot hope to make up for the ground lost since Brexit – essentially, a GDP loss in excess of 5 per cent. And we're not out of the rough, by any stretch. As Keir Starmer meets the US president for further trade discussions at the Trump Turnberry golf course, he will be acutely conscious of his counterpart's unpredictability. Starmer has milked the modest concessions he managed to wangle, particularly on cars and food standards, but much remains vague and far from nailed-down. The greatest danger is the fuzzy UK commitment to improve the trading environment for the US pharma groups will eventually mean an enormous increase in the drugs bill for the National Health Service, which it can ill-afford. Trump also omitted virtually the whole of the service sector from his UK deal, where the British actually enjoy a surplus, which is great until he decides otherwise. There are no legally binding rules here. The world economy remains highly inter-dependent, and globalisation, while receding, cannot sensibly be ended, as even Elon Musk tries to argue. All barriers to trade harm the country that erects them both directly and, in their depressing effects on world growth, indirectly. Consumers are charged more, on a highly regressive basis, companies are forced to pay more for inputs, and be less cost-effective, and competition and dynamic structural change are deliberately impeded. Whatever the details of the individual deals counties are trying to strike with one another, tariffs make us all poorer in the long run.
