Boston city councilors and local Girl Scout troop propose Styrofoam ban
Advertisement
Two members of the troop, Eleanor Pelletier, 18, and Calida Beliveau, 19, testified at the hearing.
City councilors and those testifying at Wednesday's hearing at city hall, left to right: Gabriella Coletta Zapata, Calida Beliveau, Eleanor Pelletier, Christen Dellorco, Ruthzee Louijeune.
Sierra Rothberg
'It's also a lot about convenience. It's easy to just throw away Styrofoam rather than bring it to a big [recycling] place. The best thing for the city to do is make it convenient for people so then more people will do it,' Beliveau said.
Beliveau, Pelletier and other troop members felt that Bostonians needed to know more about the impacts of Styrofoam, which led them to proposing the ban to city councilors.
'A lot of people in Boston want to recycle and want to do the right things... I feel like the people of Boston are ready for it, they just need the resources,' Pelletier said.
Louijeune testified the ban would help the city achieve the goals of
Advertisement
'The city of Boston has already made strong commitments to reducing our footprint... However, a significant barrier remains in the presence of polystyrene,' said Louijeune. 'It is not accepted by curbside recycling, persists in landfills for centuries and poses serious environmental and public health risks.'
Polystyrene is most commonly seen in food packaging, such as takeout containers or cups. Styrene, a chemical used to create polystyrene, is known to damage the central nervous system and the upper respiratory tract, and may be a cause for cancer, according to the
Coletta-Zapata urged prompt action to improve the environment and public health in neighborhoods.
'I can foresee that areas that are low income and historically Black and brown communities that we would see that trash and litter of this sort of product is more prevalent,' Coletta Zapata said. 'It underscores the urgency that the city of Boston should take in trying to meet our zero-waste goals. We are behind the curve on this.'
Several Massachusetts communities have already banned polystyrene, including Cambridge, Melrose and Newton.
One environmentalist thinks the Boston ban would be a good thing, but would rather see a statewide ban on polystyrene.
'Boston has an opportunity to be a leader in reducing the production and use of single-use polystyrene foam products,' said Nancy Downes, the Massachusetts campaign manager for Oceana, an international conservation group, who did not attend at the council hearing.
But she she spoke at the State House during a legislative hearing on Tuesday to have a polystyrene ban included in the
Advertisement
Boston's proposed ban would be beneficial as it would 'be protecting the residents . . . and the environment,' she said in an interview.
Boston's public hearing is the first step toward enacting a ban in the city. A majority of the 13-member council would have to approve the ordinance. Mayor Michelle Wu would then have to sign it for it to become law in Boston.
This process could take up to a few months, Coletta Zapata said.
During the hearing, councilors and others testified about the impact that a ban may have on lower-income communities, both environmentally and financially.
'The burden of pollution falls hardest on low income and environmental justice communities, where landfills and incinerators are disproportionately located and where low-cost, toxic packaging is frequently used,' said Alice Brown, director of environmental quality from the city's environmental department.
Donald Wright, deputy chief of staff for economic opportunity and inclusion for Wu, cautioned that polystyrene ban could pose a challenge for small businesses.
Many have a well-established supply chain, making the switch to eco-friendly materials more difficult, he noted.
Katarina Schmeiszer can be reached at
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Birth Equity Pioneer: How Latham Thomas Is Helping Mamas Glow
Author, birth educator, celebrity doula, and now, Parents Next Gen winner Latham Thomas, is training the next generation of leaders in Black maternal health and changing outcomes for parents. For Black women, giving birth in the U.S. can be incredibly dangerous. According to the CDC, they are 3 times more likely to die during childbirth than their white counterparts, experiencing complications and other (often preventable) medical emergencies. But the black maternal health crisis goes deeper than education, income, or social status. Behind these troubling statistics lie systemic racism and deep-rooted biases that contribute to the significant disparities. Meet Latham Thomas, bestselling author, celebrity doula, and the founder of the Mama Glow Foundation. Driven by a deep commitment to transforming maternal health, her nonprofit tackles birth inequities through education and advocacy. Her renowned doula immersion program, offered at training centers in New York City, Los Angeles, Miami, and Paris, attracts participants from across the U.S. and six continents, preparing aspiring doulas to become the next generation of birth professionals. While she's worked with celebrities like Alicia Keys, Venus and Serena Williams, and Rebecca Minkoff, her main goal is to support moms from all walks of life. Whether during pregnancy, at birth, or through postpartum care, she helps women become the best versions of themselves. For Latham, it's all about "mothering the mother" and fostering empowerment. We sat down with Thomas to discuss all things motherhood, her ongoing support of a global community of mothers and caregivers, and, of course, her status as a Parents Next Gen winner. What motivates you to do the work that you do? What is your 'why'? I'm motivated to get up every day to do the work that we do, to transform lives through maternal health access. As a mom and a woman, I'm someone who has also gone through the birth process, and I know how challenging and isolating it can be for new parents. And so, every day, my team and I work to improve access to maternal health for families across the country. I'm also dedicated to teaching, and it's important for me to train the next generation of leaders who will help impact our care systems and improve maternal health in this country. For me, the why is really about committing to my community, making a difference, and showing up to pour every part of myself forward to support the work and advance our mission. On a personal level, what helps you and your family thrive? What helps me and my family thrive is the time we spend together. I like celebrating tiny moments and spending time around the dinner table, cooking together, doing activities, and just relaxing. It helps me stay charged as a person and go back out into the world to do the work that we do. How did you work to instill some of these lessons in your son as he grew up? Being a mom of a 21-year-old who just graduated from college, I remember when he could fit in my arms. I remember when he was so small. I remember the day I took him home. And when I really think back to the time when my son was really small, I think about how I felt capable, but also like I didn't have enough resources or tools or information. Today, people have so many resources to turn to, not just for information, but also for community. When I think about raising him, it was really a community effort. We had family members and a village that helped us raise him. My philosophy was really just keeping our village tight so I could have that support to raise my son. It wasn't just me or his father; it was all of us who really helped shape his journey as a child and his upbringing. He had a lot of powerful influences that shaped him as a person, and I think that we can see that in how he's expressed himself as a young adult. Having raised someone for almost a quarter of a century, I would say that there's so much they teach us, and there's so much for us to learn from the privilege of raising a child. And now, a little bit more about Mama Glow—the book and the nonprofit. What inspired you to create it? Mama Glow was inspired by the birth of my son. I was navigating pregnancy, living in New York City, and at the time, I wanted to have a birth at the birth center. And I wanted resources. And this was really challenging to find the time. If you think back 20 years, to a time when people weren't on the internet in the same way, I actually found my provider in the phone book, which is now a relic. And so, for me, I was thinking about how I could make this easier for people, while also sharing resources, tools, practitioners, and even brands and products that would help them navigate this journey more easily. This would essentially become the foundation of the Mama Glow book, which was published in 2012. And then the foundation work came out of that, from wanting to improve the overall birthing experience for families. Twenty minutes after my son was born, I was like, I have to help people with this process and help preserve this experience for others. And that was how Mama Glow became. What happened next? I had a calling. I started working as a doula, practicing prenatal yoga and nutrition, and supporting individuals in these areas. The calling then evolved to becoming a teacher, and I had to move from doing the solo work. And that's how we developed our doula training program, which launched in 2018. Since then, we have trained over 3,000 doulas and caregivers globally in all corners of the U.S. and six continents. What do you wish people knew about maternal health and the Black Maternal Health Crisis? I wish people understood how vast birthing experiences can be for people of different backgrounds. When we're talking about births in the United States, it's quite different for black women. What we see is birth disparity: black women are 3 to 4 times more likely to die during childbirth or due to childbirth-related causes. And in places like New York City, that number moves from 8 to 12 times. Part of our work is not only to help people deal with the pain and discomfort of disparity, but also to examine the structural inequities that continue to drive these statistics forward and identify how we can interrupt and implement solutions. That's really what this work is about. While it's frightening, it is also something that we can change and gain control over. I also wish that people understood that birth is, in many ways, a form of meditation. It's transformative. It's a joyful experience, and it should be for all. And so it is our birthright to birth in joy, to birth in empowerment, and to feel safety and dignity and connection, community and belonging. And so, all that we teach is to root people in those principles, to improve maternal health, and to make it not just a clinical experience. It's not only about managing care and risk, but also about considering the experience that people will have. It's not a women's issue or a Black women's issue. It's a human rights issue. It's an issue that really impacts all of us. Can you tell us about when you decided to become a doula and how things have changed since then? So when I decided to become a doula decades ago, this was not a word that people understood or even knew what a doula did. I feel that a lot of the work I have done, along with others, has been to continue beating the drum of education so that people can understand the role doulas play in various community, academic, industry, and institutional settings. My journey began as a solopreneur doula, where I worked alongside families and assisted with a couple of births a month. And that transformed into developing a training program so that I could actually train more doulas. My primary commitment now is to education, teaching, developing systems and supports, as well as solutions, for both the community and organizations. What advice would you give parents as they move on to different stages of parenting — from birthing, postpartum, and beyond? I think that when you watch television or go on social media, you'll see people talking about how challenging it can be. And it's true. There are some challenges with every life stage. You know, like the newborn stage. There are challenges, but it's fun, right? And then when they're two and running circles around you, it's challenging, but it's also fun. But somehow, when you get to these teen years, a version of them shows up that really needs you, that really needs your parenting in a different way. And so the relationship really transforms, and it's one where they also have agency, but they also really still have needs that you can meet. How do I meet you and be the parent you need me to be today? Because who you needed when you were two is different from who you need when you're 16, and who you need when you're like 20. And so that's the challenge and the beauty. The beauty of raising kids is that they keep you constantly growing, shedding parts of your ego to become a better parent. And that better parent that shows up also shows up better in other spaces. One thing I really wish I knew, you know, going from pregnancy to postpartum, is that parenthood can be extremely isolating. Build up that village before the baby is born. Find people in your community, family members, friends, and chosen family who can show up for you, and figure out what roles people can play. What do you hope for the future of birth equity? I hope that we can be in a space where birth is safe, affordable, equitable, and respectful in this country. Everyone deserves a safe and dignified birth, not only for the birthing people but also for the providers. I hope that providers are respected and provided the opportunity to practice in ways that are humane and align with patients' needs. What's on the horizon for the Mama Glow Foundation? There are so many things on the horizon for us. We are continuing on this path of commitment and furthering our mission to improve maternal health and make birth safe for everyone. We continue to offer doula training, and there's a soft space in Brooklyn where people can convene with us. We have our doula expo for birth workers and families. And, of course, we are committed to ensuring that people have access to doulas and that doulas receive training through our advocacy and educational efforts. We achieve this through various projects. I'm thankful for what lies the original article on Parents Solve the daily Crossword
Los Angeles Times
16 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Severe obesity in U.S. children has more than tripled since 2008
The proportion of severely overweight children in the U.S. has skyrocketed in recent years, with the highest rates seen in adolescents and Black children, a new study found. Roughly 23% of all children were obese in 2023, up from 19% in 2008, according to the survey published this month in JAMA Network Open. Additionally, more than 1% of children between the ages of 2 and 18 had 'extremely severe obesity' — a 250% increase from the start of the study, the researchers from UC San Diego found. Phillipp Hartmann, the study's corresponding author, said he hopes the results lead to more trials that test the benefits of powerful weight loss drugs called GLP-1s for children and adolescents with severe obesity. 'It might be reasonable in those patients to have the weight loss medications very early,' he said in an interview. Medical professionals may be open to broadening the use of the popular weight loss drugs to treat obesity and diabetes in ever-younger patients. The Food and Drug Administration has approved only semaglutide, the main ingredient in Novo Nordisk's Ozempic and Wegovy, for children 12 and older. But weight-loss medicines have been tested on kids as young as 6. Severe obesity also came with a higher risk of other health complications, such prediabetes and diabetes, severe insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome — a cluster of conditions that can increase the chance of heart disease and stroke. The results were based on information from more than 25,000 children gathered as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is managed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Center for Health Statistics. Amponsah writes for Bloomberg.
Boston Globe
4 days ago
- Boston Globe
Boston city councilors and local Girl Scout troop propose Styrofoam ban
The troop hosted specialty recycling drives in their community, where they collected over 800 pounds of Styrofoam. This made them realize how much Styrofoam was being used and thrown away in the Boston area. Advertisement Two members of the troop, Eleanor Pelletier, 18, and Calida Beliveau, 19, testified at the hearing. City councilors and those testifying at Wednesday's hearing at city hall, left to right: Gabriella Coletta Zapata, Calida Beliveau, Eleanor Pelletier, Christen Dellorco, Ruthzee Louijeune. Sierra Rothberg 'It's also a lot about convenience. It's easy to just throw away Styrofoam rather than bring it to a big [recycling] place. The best thing for the city to do is make it convenient for people so then more people will do it,' Beliveau said. Beliveau, Pelletier and other troop members felt that Bostonians needed to know more about the impacts of Styrofoam, which led them to proposing the ban to city councilors. 'A lot of people in Boston want to recycle and want to do the right things... I feel like the people of Boston are ready for it, they just need the resources,' Pelletier said. Louijeune testified the ban would help the city achieve the goals of Advertisement 'The city of Boston has already made strong commitments to reducing our footprint... However, a significant barrier remains in the presence of polystyrene,' said Louijeune. 'It is not accepted by curbside recycling, persists in landfills for centuries and poses serious environmental and public health risks.' Polystyrene is most commonly seen in food packaging, such as takeout containers or cups. Styrene, a chemical used to create polystyrene, is known to damage the central nervous system and the upper respiratory tract, and may be a cause for cancer, according to the Coletta-Zapata urged prompt action to improve the environment and public health in neighborhoods. 'I can foresee that areas that are low income and historically Black and brown communities that we would see that trash and litter of this sort of product is more prevalent,' Coletta Zapata said. 'It underscores the urgency that the city of Boston should take in trying to meet our zero-waste goals. We are behind the curve on this.' Several Massachusetts communities have already banned polystyrene, including Cambridge, Melrose and Newton. One environmentalist thinks the Boston ban would be a good thing, but would rather see a statewide ban on polystyrene. 'Boston has an opportunity to be a leader in reducing the production and use of single-use polystyrene foam products,' said Nancy Downes, the Massachusetts campaign manager for Oceana, an international conservation group, who did not attend at the council hearing. But she she spoke at the State House during a legislative hearing on Tuesday to have a polystyrene ban included in the Advertisement Boston's proposed ban would be beneficial as it would 'be protecting the residents . . . and the environment,' she said in an interview. Boston's public hearing is the first step toward enacting a ban in the city. A majority of the 13-member council would have to approve the ordinance. Mayor Michelle Wu would then have to sign it for it to become law in Boston. This process could take up to a few months, Coletta Zapata said. During the hearing, councilors and others testified about the impact that a ban may have on lower-income communities, both environmentally and financially. 'The burden of pollution falls hardest on low income and environmental justice communities, where landfills and incinerators are disproportionately located and where low-cost, toxic packaging is frequently used,' said Alice Brown, director of environmental quality from the city's environmental department. Donald Wright, deputy chief of staff for economic opportunity and inclusion for Wu, cautioned that polystyrene ban could pose a challenge for small businesses. Many have a well-established supply chain, making the switch to eco-friendly materials more difficult, he noted. Katarina Schmeiszer can be reached at
