Saudi issues new rules: Grocery stores face product bans
Saudi Arabia has issued new regulations banning grocery stores, locally known as baqalas, from selling tobacco, dates, meat, fruit, and vegetables. The directive, announced by Minister of Municipalities and Housing Majed Al Hogail, takes effect immediately, with existing stores allowed a correction period of up to six months,
Read-
Under the new rules, kiosks and grocery stores or mini markets are prohibited from selling tobacco products—including regular and electronic cigarettes and shisha—as well as fresh dates, meat, fruit, and vegetables. These products may only be sold in supply stores (supermarkets) and hypermarkets, with meat sales requiring a separate license. The regulations also specify that charger cables and prepaid recharge cards can be sold across grocery stores, supermarkets, and hypermarkets.
Additionally, the government has set minimum floor space requirements: grocery stores must have at least 24 square meters, supermarkets at least 100 square meters, and hypermarkets at least 500 square meters.
In a separate development, King Faisal University has achieved a major academic milestone by earning international accreditation from the US Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH) for its Bachelor of Public Health program at the College of Applied Medical Sciences. This accreditation, valid through 2030, makes the program the first outside the United States—and the first in the Middle East—to receive CEPH recognition, a globally respected authority in public health education,
This accomplishment highlights the university's dedication to academic excellence and aligns with Saudi Vision 2030's goals to enhance education quality and prepare national talent to meet the evolving needs of sectors such as healthcare.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
33 minutes ago
- The National
Gaza clinics shut and aid warehouse raided as Israel intensifies attacks on Deir Al Balah
A British charity has accused Israel of 'accelerating the systemic dismantling' of Gaza 's healthcare system after its clinic in Deir Al Balah was forced to close as Israel widens its military offensive. Medical Aid for Palestinians' staff were given only six hours to evacuate by the Israelis, according to Liz Allcock, the charity's head of humanitarian protection. Shelling is now taking place around the premises. 'Nine clinics, five shelters, and a vital community kitchen have been forced to shut down,' the group said. The facilities affected include a polyclinic that provides life-saving help along with physiotherapy and mental health services to an average of 320 patients a day. The closure comes after the Israeli army launched ground operations in Deir Al Balah, an area of central Gaza it had not entered since the Gaza war began. Deir Al Balah plays host to most of the UN and international aid agencies operating in the enclave. It was previously designated a safe zone by Israel. The clearance of the area means 88 per cent of Gaza is now under some sort of eviction order by Israel. A World Health Organisation (WHO) aid warehouse also fell victim to the Israeli military operation on Monday night when it was raided by Israeli forces. Male staff and family members were 'handcuffed, stripped, interrogated on the spot and screened at gunpoint', the WHO said in a statement. One staff member is still in detention. The warehouse was also sheltering displaced civilians. Women and children were told to move south towards Al Mawasi, where Israel's defence minister has announced plans for a camp to house 600,000 Palestinians. The living quarters of the staff were attacked three times, while air strikes caused fires and extensive damage to the warehouse, the WHO said. 'The Israeli military entered the premises, forcing women and children to evacuate on foot towards Al Mawasi amid active conflict,' it added. The WHO called the episode 'part of a pattern of systemic destruction of health facilities'. Israel has sought to shift aid operations in Gaza away from the UN and other established humanitarian groups by launching the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a US and Israel-backed group. But the GHF's operations have been marred by deaths near its aid sites, with the Israeli military accused of repeatedly opening fire on Palestinian civilians seeking supplies. More than 1,000 people have been killed since the end of May while seeking food from the GHF, the UN says. Meanwhile, the humanitarian crisis in Gaza continues to worsen, with reports of children starving to death. Essential workers are fainting on duty due to hunger, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA) chief Philippe Lazzarini said on Tuesday. The threat of air strikes was adding to the danger, added Ms Allcock. 'You cannot deliver medicine, water or nutritional supplements while under attack, or drive ambulances on streets with ground troops,' she said. But many workers were carrying on regardless, she added. 'People are telling us they'd rather die from bombing than slowly through starvation.'
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
In the fight against obesity and diabetes, the UAE's new sugar tax policy could be a handy arrow in its quiver
The UAE's decision to switch from a fixed tax on sugary drinks to one that depends on the sugar content per 100 millilitres is a positive step in the fight against obesity and diabetes. Embedding such interventions in holistic approaches to public health is equally important, as humans will always struggle with the innate attractiveness of carbohydrates. While there are a number of ways to induce changes in people's behaviour, economists will invariably suggest using prices. In the case of convincing people to consume less sugar, that means applying a tax that makes sugar-laden commodities more expensive to purchase, also known as a 'sin tax'. This straightforward principle can be applied in different ways. The nation's leadership has long been using a holistic strategy to address the complex problems associated with poor health choices The most straightforward is applying a tax to goods that have high sugar content, which is the approach that the UAE has taken – and many other countries took in the past. The key advantage of this approach is administrative simplicity: authorities need only to determine whether a good is subject to the tax, and then to apply it. One of the most salient applications of this method is cigarettes, which cost consumers a lot more to buy than the production cost due to steep excise duties that governments around the world levy. One of the potential drawbacks to this approach, however, is that it creates an incentive for producers to redefine what constitutes a unit of the good to minimise the tax's impact. This dynamic is illustrated by the 18th-century stamp duty that the British government imposed on newspapers based on the number of pages in an issue. Editors responded by increasing the size of each page and cutting down the number of pages, spawning what is now referred to as the unwieldy 'broadsheet' newspaper. In the context of modern sugary drinks, the analogous process is producers increasing the volume of sugar in drinks either by upping the concentration or simply filling the container with more liquid. Thus, while the tax does make some people less likely to purchase sugary drinks, those who continue to purchase them may end up consuming more sugar than they would have done absent the tax. The result is a muted and potentially indeterminate net effect on the societal consumption of sugar. Governments are aware of this possibility, and some – such as Mexico and the UK – have responded by applying a tax that depends proportionately on the volume of sugar supplied in a unit of the good, rather than the binary (on-off) form that can motivate producers to increase sugar concentrations. This closing of the loophole follows in the footsteps of the highly successful application to petrol. In the earlier part of the 20th century, vehicles were taxed at a flat rate. This created an incentive to purchase bigger cars, and did not dissuade people from driving more since the tax would be paid whether the car stood stationary in your driveway or travelled 100,000 kilometres a year. Once states transitioned towards taxing petrol proportionately, drivers now had an incentive to buy smaller cars, and to use their cars less, switching to walking, cycling and availing of public transport to economise on travel expenditure. This can clearly be seen when comparing the large cars that people own and operate in a low fuel tax environment with the petite ones seen in high fuel tax countries. The UAE is aiming for something analogous to occur in the case of sugary drinks. One of the associated challenges will be administrative: measuring sugar content precisely and ensuring that producers do not fraudulently report the figure require significant resources, and reflect one of the reasons why some governments continue to prefer the flat taxes. The more serious challenge that policymakers are likely to face is that the consumption of sugary drinks makes a small contribution at best to the adverse societal outcomes they are looking to abate – obesity, diabetes, heart disease and so on. After all, several other dietary factors also play a role, as do lifestyle ones such as exercise and sleep patterns. Yet, this is a step in the right direction towards addressing some of the critical public health challenges of our time. And so, the UAE government is correct in its decision to avoid the 'drop in the bucket' fallacy, whereby people defeatedly avoid taking small steps because they believe that the impact will be negligible, even though big results are typically built on accumulated micro efforts. The nation's leadership has long been using a holistic strategy to address the complex problems associated with poor health choices, and there is no doubt that every little helps, including this sugar tax.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Clinics shut down and aid warehouse raided as Israel intensifies attacks on Deir Al Balah
A British charity has accused Israel of 'accelerating the systemic dismantling' of Gaza 's healthcare system after its clinic in Deir Al Balah was forced to close as Israel widens its military offensive. Medical Aid for Palestinians' staff were given only six hours to evacuate by the Israelis, according to Liz Allcock, the charity's head of humanitarian protection. Shelling is now taking place around the premises. 'Nine clinics, five shelters, and a vital community kitchen have been forced to shut down,' the group said. The facilities affected include a polyclinic that provides life-saving help along with physiotherapy and mental health services to an average of 320 patients a day. The closure comes after the Israeli army launched ground operations in Deir Al Balah, an area of central Gaza it had not entered since the Gaza war began. Deir Al Balah plays host to most of the UN and international aid agencies operating in the enclave. It was previously designated a safe zone by Israel. The clearance of the area means 88 per cent of Gaza is now under some sort of eviction order by Israel. A World Health Organisation (WHO) aid warehouse also fell victim to the Israeli military operation on Monday night when it was raided by Israeli forces. Male staff and family members were 'handcuffed, stripped, interrogated on the spot and screened at gunpoint', the WHO said in a statement. One staff member is still in detention. The warehouse was also sheltering displaced civilians. Women and children were told to move south towards Al Mawasi, where Israel's defence minister has announced plans for a camp to house 600,000 Palestinians. The living quarters of the staff were attacked three times, while air strikes caused fires and extensive damage to the warehouse, the WHO said. 'The Israeli military entered the premises, forcing women and children to evacuate on foot towards Al Mawasi amid active conflict,' it added. The WHO called the episode 'part of a pattern of systemic destruction of health facilities'. Israel has sought to shift aid operations in Gaza away from the UN and other established humanitarian groups by launching the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a US and Israel-backed group. But the GHF's operations have been marred by deaths near its aid sites, with the Israeli military accused of repeatedly opening fire on Palestinian civilians seeking supplies. More than 1,000 people have been killed since the end of May while seeking food from the GHF, the UN says. Meanwhile, the humanitarian crisis in Gaza continues to worsen, with reports of children starving to death. Essential workers are fainting on duty due to hunger, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA) chief Philippe Lazzarini said on Tuesday. The threat of air strikes was adding to the danger, added Ms Allcock. 'You cannot deliver medicine, water or nutritional supplements while under attack, or drive ambulances on streets with ground troops,' she said. But many workers were carrying on regardless, she added. 'People are telling us they'd rather die from bombing than slowly through starvation.'
