logo
Ancient rocks tie Roman Empire's collapse to a mini ice age

Ancient rocks tie Roman Empire's collapse to a mini ice age

Yahoo11-04-2025
Exactly what caused the collapse of the mighty Roman Empire has been hotly debated practically since the fall itself. Was economic stagnation primarily to blame, or was it societal decay? Did political conflicts mortally weaken Rome's power, or is its decline owed mostly to a series of invasions from abroad? Was it lead?
In reality, the fall of the empire almost certainly occurred through a complex interplay of socio-political factors—but recent research suggests a brief climate crisis may have contributed more than we thought. The new findings were published on April 11 in the journal Geology by a collaborative team from Queen's University Canada, the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing.
Previous analysis indicates that Earth endured a roughly 200–300 year long ice age starting around 540 CE. Scientists believe that powerful volcanic eruptions that hurled massive amounts of ash and debris into the planet's atmosphere lowered global temperatures and reduced sunlight. While it was not as intense as other major ice ages, some researchers have argued that this geologic era helped usher in the final days of Rome. Others, meanwhile, contend that the Late Antique Little Ice Age simply coincided with imperial decline.
New evidence supporting the former argument comes from oddly out-of-place rocks collected not from modern areas of the ancient Roman empire, but from Iceland. Although the region is known primarily for its basalt, researchers recently determined certain samples contained miniscule crystals of the mineral zircon.
'Zircons are essentially time capsules that preserve vital information including when they crystallised as well as their compositional characteristics,' said Christopher Spencer, an associate professor at Queen's University and study's lead author. 'The combination of age and chemical composition allows us to fingerprint currently exposed regions of the Earth's surface, much like is done in forensics.'
After crushing the rocks and separating out the zircon crystals, Spencer and colleagues determined the minerals spanned three billion years of geologic history that trace specifically back to Greenland.
'The fact that the rocks come from nearly all geological regions of Greenland provides evidence of their glacial origins,' said Tom Gernon, a study co-author and a professor of Earth Science at the University of Southampton. 'As glaciers move, they erode the landscape, breaking up rocks from different areas and carrying them along, creating a chaotic and diverse mixture—some of which ends up stuck inside the ice.'
The team argues that the zircon-rich ice could only have formed and drifted hundreds of miles away due to the Late Antique Little Ice Age. According to Gernon, this timing also lines up with a known period of ice-rafting, in which large slabs of ice break off glaciers, drift across the ocean, and subsequently melt to scatter its debris on foreign shores.
Although the team obviously can't tie zircon minerals to the Roman Empire's collapse, their lengthy migration inside frozen chunks of glacier further underscore the 6th century ice age's severity. Knowing this, it's easy to see how the chillier era's effects on crops, civil unrest, and mass migrations could further weaken an already shaky Rome.
'When it comes to the fall of the Roman Empire, this climate shift may have been the straw that broke the camel's back,' said Gernon.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Environmental Consulting Team Publishes Soils Guide
Environmental Consulting Team Publishes Soils Guide

Associated Press

timean hour ago

  • Associated Press

Environmental Consulting Team Publishes Soils Guide

People should know what they're standing on and feel safe about their soil. 'This book delivers a practical yet profound understanding of soil formation, classification, and evaluation.'— Brian Oram, founder of B.F. Environmental Consultants WILKES-BARRE, PA, UNITED STATES, July 31, 2025 / / -- B.F. Environmental Consultants (BFE), an environmental consulting and education firm providing a range of services throughout the Northeast, announced today the publication of a new booklet entitled 'Guide to Soils: The Vital Life-Giving Layers Beneath Our Feet.' Authored by licensed geologists Brian Oram, founder of BFE, and Dr. Brian Redmond, the guide distills over 30 years of applied experience in geology, soil science, and environmental consulting into an engaging and accessible format. 'Whether you're studying for professional licensure, working in agriculture, engineering, or environmental science, preparing for an Envirothon, or simply curious about the world beneath us, this book delivers a practical yet profound understanding of soil formation, classification, and evaluation,' Oram said. Guide to Soils is more than a textbook—it's a field-ready companion for students, professionals, and anyone fascinated by the rich complexity of the soil that supports life on Earth. It introduces the intuitive and memorable 'POT Process"—Prepare, Observe, Translate—designed to help users assess soils in real-world applications. Rich with illustrations, field-tested insights, and plain-language explanations, Guide to Soils is an essential resource for anyone who wants to understand and work with Earth's most overlooked, life-giving system. 'This booklet was written by a soil scientist/geologist with decades of practical experience,' Redmond said. 'Its primary purpose is to provide an introduction to the practical application of soil science in real-world problems while including sections of interest, with a bit of whimsy, to more experienced professionals. Readers of all levels should be able to find it interesting and useful.' Find out more about the booklet online at To order copies, visit About B.F. Environmental Consultants, Inc. B.F. Environmental Consultants, based in Northeastern Pennsylvania and the Poconos, has been providing professional geological, soils, hydrogeological, and environmental consulting services, as well as professional and environmental training courses, and outreach since 1985. Rick Grant RGA Public Relations +1 570-497-1026 [email protected] Visit us on social media: Facebook X Legal Disclaimer: EIN Presswire provides this news content 'as is' without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.

Weirdly Hot Rocks in New England Traced to 80-Million-Year-Old Greenland Rift
Weirdly Hot Rocks in New England Traced to 80-Million-Year-Old Greenland Rift

Gizmodo

time3 hours ago

  • Gizmodo

Weirdly Hot Rocks in New England Traced to 80-Million-Year-Old Greenland Rift

Roughly 124 miles (200 kilometers) beneath the Appalachian Mountains in New England lies the aptly named Northern Appalachian Anomaly (NAA), a mysterious 218-mile-wide (350-km) region of unusually hot rock. Researchers have long believed that the NAA resulted from the plate tectonic movement that broke North America off northwest Africa 180 million years ago. In a new study published Tuesday in the journal Geology, however, a team of international researchers argue that the hot, subsurface rocks are related to when North America and Greenland split near the Labrador Sea between 90 and 80 million years ago. The NAA 'lies beneath part of the continent that's been tectonically quiet for 180 million years, so the idea it was just a leftover from when the landmass broke apart never quite stacked up,' Tom Gernon, lead author of the study and an Earth scientist at the University of Southampton, said in a university statement. To reach this conclusion, the team used advanced computer simulations, seismic tomography data (like an ultrasound, but for Earth's interior), and tectonic plate reconstructions. According to the study, the NAA may have developed around 1,119 miles (1,800 km) from its current position and, at the rate of around 12 miles (20 km) per million years, slowly moved southwestward to where it sits now. 'Our research suggests it's part of a much larger, slow-moving process deep underground that could potentially help explain why mountain ranges like the Appalachians are still standing,' Gernon added. The slow-moving process is the team's previously proposed 'mantle wave' theory, which hypothesizes that hot, dense chunks of material detach from the base of tectonic plates after continents separate, like blobs in a lava lamp. 'Heat at the base of a continent can weaken and remove part of its dense root, making the continent lighter and more buoyant, like a hot air balloon rising after dropping its ballast,' Gernon explained. 'This would have caused the ancient mountains to be further uplifted over the past few million years.' As the blobs slowly 'drip' from the lithosphere—the layer including Earth's crust and upper part of the mantle—hotter mantle rocks rise to fill up the space, which creates a thermal anomaly. The same team's earlier work also revealed that these blobs can move over time. 'The feature we see beneath New England is very likely one of these drips, which originated far from where it now sits,' said Sascha Brune, study co-author and head of the Geodynamic Modelling Section at GFZ, Germany's national research center for Earth sciences. According to the team, the center of the NAA will likely move under New York in the next 15 million years. 'The idea that rifting of continents can cause drips and cells of circulating hot rock at depth that spread thousands of kilometres inland makes us rethink what we know about the edges of continents both today and in Earth's deep past,' admitted Derek Keir, another co-author of the study and a tectonics expert at the University of Southampton and the University of Florence. The researchers argue that their mantle wave theory could explain a similar anomalous hot zone under north-central Greenland—basically a reflection of the NAA on the other side of the Labrador Sea. The study is ultimately a reminder to never judge a book by its cover—or the Earth by its surface-level tectonic activity.

Why the Tsunami from Russia's Earthquake Wasn't as Large as Feared
Why the Tsunami from Russia's Earthquake Wasn't as Large as Feared

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Why the Tsunami from Russia's Earthquake Wasn't as Large as Feared

Russia's magnitude 8.8 earthquake spawned serious tsunami warnings, but waves have been moderate so far. Here's the geological reason why Why the Tsunami from Russia's Earthquake Wasn't as Large as Feared The moment seismologists got word that a magnitude 8.8 earthquake had struck near Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula, they felt an acute sense of anxiety. This location—where the Pacific plate is plunging below an arm of the North American plate and in the vicinity of the Eurasian plate—can produce widespread, highly destructive tsunamis. It did just that in 1952, when a magnitude 9.0 quake effortlessly washed away a nearby Russian town while also causing extensive damage in far-off Hawaii. When the seafloor next to Kamchatka violently buckled at 11:24 A.M. local time on Wednesday (7:24 P.M. EDT on Tuesday), everything seemed primed for a dangerous tsunami. Early forecasts by scientists (correctly) predicted that several countries around the Pacific Ocean would be inundated to some degree. Millions of people were evacuated from coastal Japan, and many in Hawaii were ordered to seek higher ground. People across swaths of Central and South America were also advised to flee from the receding ocean. And as an initial smaller tsunami formed on the northern Japanese island of Hokkaido, there was some preliminary concern that waves could reach a height of nearly 10 feet. But for the most part (at the time of writing), plenty of countries in the firing line didn't get hit by an extremely lethal wall of water. It appears that waves of just more than four feet hit Japan and Hawaii—two locations that have now significantly downgraded their tsunami alerts and rescinded some evacuation notices. One tourist in Hawaii told BBC News that 'the disaster we were expecting did not come.' Parts of California have seen water up to eight feet but without considerable damage. [Sign up for Today in Science, a free daily newsletter] READ MORE: Tsunami Warnings Issued after Magnitude 8.8 Earthquake Strikes off Russian Coast This raises a key question: Considering that the Kamchatka oceanic megaquake had a magnitude of 8.8—one of the most powerful ever recorded—why wasn't the resulting tsunami more devastating? The answer, in short, is this: the specific fault that ruptured produced pretty much exactly the tsunami it was capable of making, even if we intuitively feel like the effect should have been worse. 'First, it's important to recognize that the issuance of any warning at all is a success story,' says Diego Melgar, an earthquake and tsunami scientist at the University of Oregon. A tsunami doesn't have to be 30 feet tall to cause intense destruction and death; even a relatively modest one can wash people and structures away with ease. So far, it looks like there won't be a high number of casualties—and that's in part because 'the warnings went out, and they were effective,' Melgar says: people got out of danger. It's also fair to say that, for Kamchatka and its surroundings, there actually was some localized destruction. The earthquake itself severely shook the eastern Russian city of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky and did scattered damage to buildings there. And tsunami waves reached heights of up to 16 feet in Severo-Kurilsk, a town in the northern Kuril Islands just south of Kamchatka. Houses and sections of a port have been wrecked or swept out to sea. READ MORE: Russia's 8.8 Earthquake Is One of the Strongest Ever Recorded The way each nation issues a tsunami warning differs slightly. But in general, if a tsunami is very likely incoming and is thought to be potentially dangerous, an evacuation order for those on the afflicted coastline is issued. When such alerts go out, some tsunami-wave-height estimates are often given, but these numbers are initially difficult to nail down. One reason is because, when a tsunami-making quake happens, 'the tsunami energy is not distributed symmetrically,' says Amilcar Carrera-Cevallos, an independent earthquake scientist. A tsunami does not move outward in all directions with the same momentum because faults don't rupture in a neat linear break. Nor does the seafloor movement happen smoothly and in one direction. 'Initial warnings are based only on the estimated size and location of the source, but this alone doesn't determine how much water is displaced or where waves will concentrate,' Melgar says. 'To forecast impacts accurately, scientists need to know how much the fault slipped, over what area and how close to the trench the slip occurred.' And that information is usually gleaned one or two hours after the tsunami has appeared. A tsunami like today's is tracked by a network of deep-ocean pressure sensors, which helps scientists update their forecasts in real time. But 'the network is sparse. It doesn't always catch the full complexity of wave energy radiating across the basin,' Melgar notes. This means it gives scientists only a partial understanding of the ocean-wide tsunami. Another issue is that a tsunami's wave height when the wave reaches the shore is influenced by the shape and height (technically called the bathymetry) of the seafloor it's passing over. Tsunamis are also hindered, or helped, by the shape and nature of the coastline they slam into. 'Features like bays can amplify wave heights; tsunami waves can also be diffracted (bent) around islands,' says Stephen Hicks, an earthquake scientist at University College London. It may also be tempting to compare today's magnitude 8.8 quake with the 2011 magnitude 9.1 quake that struck off eastern Japan, triggering a tsunami with a maximum wave height of 130 feet—one that killed more than 15,000 people. The 2004 magnitude 9.1 earthquake and tsunami in the Indian Ocean—which claimed the lives of more than 280,000 people across a vast area—may also come to mind. That's understandable, but today's magnitude 8.8 quake was not quite powerful as one might think. The magnitude scale for earthquakes is not linear; in other words, a small increase in magnitude equals a huge jump in energy unleashed. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, a magnitude 9.1 quake (like the 2011 Japanese example) is nearly three times stronger than today's. The 2004 and 2011 cataclysms 'were actually quite a lot larger than this event,' says Judith Hubbard, an earthquake scientist at Cornell University. They were simply more capable of pushing a giant volume of water across the ocean than today's temblor. Not knowing the exact height of an incoming tsunami at multiple locations all around the Pacific, though, is a secondary concern. What matters most is that the tsunami warnings went out to those in harm's way quickly and accurately conveyed the times at which the tsunamis would arrive at each coastline. 'The current strategy of preventative evacuation does a good job of saving lives,' Hubbard says.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store