Odessa groundwater funding in proposed Senate budget
The OGWRP is a long-running effort to supply surface water to replace the groundwater wells in use for irrigation in a section of the Columbia Basin Project known as the Odessa Subarea.
The Senate Ways and Means Committee reviewed the request Thursday afternoon, after press time. If the committee approves it, it will be considered by the whole Senate Saturday.
"It aims to ensure a stable water supply for farmers, which is crucial to maintaining or even expanding their farming operations in that region. The funding in the Senate capital budget will help this project continue to move forward," Schoesler said.
Schoesler, the Republican leader in the capital budget process, said he appreciated the assistance of 13th District Senator Judy Warnick, R-Moses Lake.
"Senator Warnick has been very important in making sure other legislators realize how important the Odessa water project is and helping to ensure the necessary funding," he said.
"In the course of developing the Senate capital budget these past few months, I emphasized how important it is to provide strong funding for the Odessa groundwater program and other water programs in Eastern Washington," Schoesler said. "I'm thankful that the rest of the senators working with me on the capital budget request agreed."
The Senate request also provides $53 million for Yakima River Basin Water Supply Program and $13 million for the Yakima-Tieton Canal. The canal was damaged by wildfire.
The capital budget funds the construction and maintenance of assets statewide, including K-12 and higher education projects, state facilities, parks, water infrastructure and public lands, among other things.
"(The Senate proposal) lives within our means while doing a good job addressing needs throughout Washington," Schoesler said. "Many K-12 education projects are funded. It strongly funds fish hatcheries and is a good budget for water projects, as well as housing and other needs."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump promises clean water. His proposed budget guts needed protections.
President Donald Trump promises clean water for every American, but his latest budget eviscerates federal funding to replace toxic lead pipes, filter out forever chemicals and keep sewage out of lakes and streams. Clean water grants to states would be cut to $303.5 million, down from $2.76 billion set aside in President Joe Biden's last budget. Illinois' share would dip to $11 million, compared with $105.5 million this year. States loan the money to cities and towns at low interest rates, enabling communities to spread out the cost of critical government services people take for granted, such as replacing leaky street mains, maintaining treatment plants and rehabbing water towers. Principal payments often are waived for low-income municipalities. Under Biden the government expanded decades-old programs to speed up the removal of lead pipes in older cities like Chicago and begin to protect Americans from forever chemicals — cancer-causing compounds also known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances or PFAS. Trump and his far-right acolytes are pushing to shortchange those efforts in part to award tax breaks that largely would benefit the ultra-wealthy. The Republican-controlled Congress appears to be along for the ride. 'These programs are key reasons why we have cleaner water across the country,' said Mary Gade, who served as Midwest administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Republican President George W. Bush. 'What they are doing is creating a chaotic situation where we won't be able to provide basic protections.' Among other things, the loan programs this year will replace 16 miles of water mains in Chicago, build a station to receive Lake Michigan water in west suburban Yorkville and finance new pumps in northwest suburban Lake Zurich. Scores of other projects were delayed even before Trump moved to all but eliminate the grant programs. In 2023, the EPA estimated $650 billion is needed nationwide during the next 20 years to catch up. To put that into further perspective, as of June 24 the Chicago Department of Water Management had only replaced 8,915 of more than 400,000 lead service lines across the city. Asked how significantly pared-down grant programs square with Trump's promises of a clean, healthy environment, the EPA issued a statement: 'These resources reflect the administration's commitment to environmental stewardship, cooperative federalism, and delivering results that make a real difference in Americans' lives. EPA is focused on returning the agency to administering core statutory obligations as Congress intended.' Congress created what are known as state revolving funds to carry out the goals of the Clean Water Act, one of the bedrock environmental laws approved by bipartisan majorities during the early 1970s. Illinois received more than $72 million this year for wastewater projects and $33 million to protect drinking water. In May, the Illinois EPA approved $10 million in loans for Chicago to replace lead service lines next year as part of a $138 million outlay for similar projects statewide. Replacements worth another $239 million were delayed because funding wasn't available, according to state records. If Illinois only gets $11 million in revolving fund grants next year, as Trump is proposing, the waiting list will get longer. Other projects that could be on the chopping block include a new well and treatment plant in Cary and new filtration equipment in Fox Lake to remove PFAS from drinking water. Trump's proposed cuts follow the agenda of Project 2025, an anti-government blueprint written in part by Russell Vought, now chief of the White House budget office. The spending plan Vought's office drafted for Trump would further reduce federal support for clean water, air and energy programs gutted last week by congressional Republicans. 'We want their funding to be shut down so that the EPA can't do all of the rules against our energy industry because they have no bandwidth financially to do so,' Vought told supporters of his pro-Trump think tank in 2023, according to a video first reported by ProPublica, a nonprofit journalism organization. 'We want to put them in trauma.' People outside Trump's MAGA orbit have sharply criticized the dramatic changes. 'If approved (by Congress), we believe these cuts … will have unintended yet foreseeable negative impacts for business, jobs growth and economic development,' a bipartisan group of former environmental officials from 31 states wrote in a June 23 statement. 'This is a reckless and short-sighted proposal that will lead to higher levels of toxic pollution in the air we breathe and water we drink across the nation,' said Michelle Roos, executive director of the nonprofit Environmental Protection Network, a group of former U.S. EPA officials. 'This is a wrecking ball approach that would gut America's frontline defense for protecting people's health and environment.' Nicole Cantello, president of the union for EPA employees based in Chicago, said morale at the agency is far worse than it was during Trump's first term. 'The Trump people talk out of both sides of their mouths,' Cantello said. 'They repeatedly attack people who believe in the agency's mission. It breaks your heart.' More than 270 EPA employees from across the country signed a letter last week condemning what they called the Trump administration's moves to benefit polluters, reverse progress to address pollution in low-income communities of color and dismantle the agency's science office. On Thursday, 144 of the agency officials who signed the letter received emails saying they had been placed on leave for two weeks 'pending an administrative investigation.'
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Letters: State measure that expands mental health screenings for children will save lives
Illinois is facing an unprecedented youth mental health crisis. More than 365,000 Illinois children and adolescents have been diagnosed with anxiety, depression or behavior/conduct problems, as estimated by the 2023 National Survey of Children's Health, yet the number of school mental health professionals remains depleted, limiting critical opportunities to address these children's needs. Fortunately, state legislators in Springfield took meaningful action to ensure our children receive the lifesaving care they deserve. Most crucial was SB1560, expanding mental health screenings to all school-age children beginning in third grade. Many more children who struggle with mental health will be identified early and get the support they need. Unfortunately, critics have spread dangerous disinformation and lies about SB1560 and its lifesaving mission, recklessly claiming the bill has no safeguards, inadequate parental oversight or hidden agendas. These false attacks are harmful to the children who need our help most. The truth is undeniable: This bill will save lives across Illinois. By expanding on existing mental health screening policy, this bill will ensure that thousands more students across the state can finally access the resources they desperately need, and it preserves parents' right to opt out of these screenings. This bill ensures schools equip parents with vital information they need to best help their children. Just like with physical health, these results are treated with the utmost transparency. Schools are required to tell parents if they see signs that their children may be struggling with their mental health. No secrets, no shortcuts, just an honest conversation — an effective way for schools and parents to be partners in supporting Illinois children. The legislators in Springfield proved that the imperative of supporting our children transcends partisan politics. SB1560 passed with a 2-to-1 margin in the House and unanimous approval in the Senate — a powerful testament to its merit. Our children are facing a mental health crisis, and these struggles know no political party. This legislation ensures more Illinois children will have the early identification and intervention that is so effective in addressing mental health needs and preventing many of the long-term struggles that can be so devastating. We are grateful to Sen. Sara Feigenholtz and Rep. Lindsey LaPointe for championing this legislation, and their colleagues in the legislature for passing it. We know this will have a significant impact on the mental health of Illinois's Tribune Editorial Board is right to worry about artificial intelligence giving dangerous mental health advice ('AI therapy? We won't be lying on that couch,' June 18). But HB1806, as written, would ban the wrong AI. If Gov. JB Pritzker signs this bill, purpose-built mental health AI designed with clinical oversight would be illegal in Illinois. Meanwhile, ChatGPT — which might tell someone to use heroin — remains perfectly legal because it disclaims therapeutic intent. At Slingshot, we have worked with over 40 clinicians for months to build these principles into our AI, which Illinoisans are already using. We're not alone: Innovative companies across the country are tackling different aspects of the mental health crisis with thoughtfully designed AI tools. With mental health professional shortages and monthslong waits, we can't afford to ban the very innovations that might help. When general-purpose AI assistants encounter someone in distress, they do what they're trained to do: Follow instructions and please the user. That's how you might get an AI chatbot encouraging heroin use. Our AI can recognize concerning patterns and knows when to push back, when to validate and when to challenge. And it understands that sometimes being helpful means making users a little bit uncomfortable. Some states are getting this right. They're partnering with industry to develop thoughtful policies that acknowledge both risks and benefits — protecting people from dangerous AI while supporting innovations that expand access to care. Illinois can follow this lead. Thoughtful regulation distinguishes between general-purpose AI that happens to give mental health advice and purpose-built mental health AI that uses clinical validation. No one is suggesting AI replace human connection or professional care. But what happens to those who can't access human support? The choice isn't between human therapists and robots. It's between purpose-built, clinically informed AI and the dangerous alternatives people will inevitably turn to when there are no other often say that in today's political climate, it feels like we can't agree on anything. I understand the frustration — but I don't believe that's entirely true. At its core, public policy is a reflection of our shared values. And one of the values I know most of us still hold dear is this: We take care of our elders. Our seniors have spent their lives working, raising families, contributing to their communities and strengthening the very systems we benefit from today. They've earned the right to age with dignity, stability and purpose. That's not a partisan idea — it's a moral obligation. One way we can honor that obligation is by protecting and expanding programs that improve the quality of life for older adults. That includes Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security — but also programs such as the Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP), which too often fly under the radar. SCSEP provides paid, on-the-job training for low-income adults age 55 and older — people who want or need to keep working. It's a lifeline for many, helping cover the basics: rent, medicine, food and more. And it benefits our communities, too, by connecting employers with experienced, reliable workers. But right now, this critical program is in jeopardy. Although Congress has already approved funding for SCSEP for the upcoming program year starting in July, the U.S. Department of Labor has yet to release the funds. This delay is already causing stress for the very people SCSEP is meant to help. Here in Chicago, organizations such as community assistance programs are bracing for real consequences — program suspensions, income loss and seniors being left without the resources they rely on. If this funding isn't released soon, hundreds of older adults could lose the wages they depend on to survive. That's unacceptable. I'm working with my colleagues to explore what we can do at the state level. But this is a federal issue — and we need your voice. I'm urging everyone who believes in protecting our seniors to contact your federal representatives and demand immediate action. Programs such as SCSEP don't just help older adults — they also strengthen our entire workforce and honor the generations that came before us. Let's not turn our backs on those who helped build the world we now stand on. Let's stand with the recent enactment of SB126, Illinois will become the first state in the nation to mandate that state-regulated insurance plans cover federally approved Alzheimer's treatments — a historic step toward better care, earlier diagnosis and a future with more hope for families affected by this devastating disease. Gov. JB Pritzker's signing of this landmark law also ensures that patients will no longer be delayed by 'step therapy,' an insurance practice that forces individuals to try less expensive — and often ineffective — treatments before gaining access to the medications or treatments their doctors originally prescribed. For people living with Alzheimer's, time is not a luxury. Every moment matters. This legislation removes harmful obstacles and affirms that those impacted by dementia deserve timely, evidence-based care. Additionally, the law requires insurance coverage for diagnostic testing at a physician's request, ensuring that patients receive accurate diagnoses before treatment begins. Currently, more than 250,000 Illinoisans are living with Alzheimer's or a related dementia — a number that is expected to grow. The need for accessible and affordable care has never been greater. This victory would not have been possible without the tireless efforts of advocates, families and legislators, as well as a willingness to collaborate with the insurance industry. We're grateful for the leadership of legislative sponsors Sen. Laura Murphy, D-Des Plaines, and Rep. Mary Gill, D-Chicago, and for the bipartisan commitment to addressing one of the most urgent health challenges of our time. Illinois is a national leader in access to Alzheimer's care. We urge other states to follow our example — because patients and caregivers everywhere deserve the same chances at more time, more memories, and more dignity.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Democrats might be ‘overthinking' strategy to recapture voters
Democrats are rethinking ways to recapture voters they've lost to President Trump in recent election cycles, and they may have been offered an important lesson in the New York mayoral primary. In various post-mortems and focus groups done on the heels of their devastating 2024 election loss, Democrats have thoroughly examined exit polls and voter demographics in search of the gaps in their party's appeal. But Democratic strategist Chuck Rocha, who served as a senior adviser on Sen. Bernie Sanders's (I-Vt.) presidential campaign in 2020, said Democrats are 'overthinking' the solution by analyzing the voters who flipped sides or skipped voting during the last election. 'It's more simple than that,' Rocha said. 'Just concentrate on people who are frustrated as hell and get both of them.' Rocha pointed to the New York mayoral race as proof. He says progressive upstart-turned-party nominee Zohran Mamdani (D) was able to capture voters — including those who did not vote a few months ago in the presidential election — by talking about affordability and other tangible economic issues that appealed to them. Rocha said voters 'want anything that's different' from the status quo when it comes to the cost of living. 'It shows how desperate people are,' he said. While many Democrats disagree with Mamdani's politics, they say the campaign he ran shows the unwavering preeminence of economic issues. And Trump taught the same lesson in 2024, political observers say, by telling voters what they wanted to hear on the economy and his message on 'draining the swamp.' 'Donald Trump and Zohran Mamdani just showed, in very different elections, that economic issues are still king — and that you can appeal to a wide, bipartisan swath of voters by saying you'll bring down the cost of living,' said Democratic strategist Christy Setzer. 'Working-class voters have been drifting away from the Democratic Party on so-called 'cultural' issues for a long time, but they're still very gettable through a clear message and from a compelling messenger.' According to exit polls, Democrats in 2024 lost significant ground with middle-class voters, a cornerstone of their traditional base, down 10 percentage points from 2020. At the same time, there is a decreasing sense of strong party leadership and little optimism about the party's future, respective CNN/SSRS and AP/NORC polling out in May revealed. But Mamdani, a self-proclaimed democratic socialist, took aim at the Democratic establishment, calling for draining the swamp to make room for change. It was an echo of Trump's messaging in his 2024 campaign. 'Donald Trump was successful because … he wasn't afraid to be against and call out people in his own party and other parties,' said Susan Del Percio, a longtime New York-based Republican strategist who does not support Trump. 'Mamdani was the exact same. He was calling out everybody, and then that's when you get to act with no fear.' Mamandi strayed from the Democratic establishment with a clear message of affordability and came out on top in a crowded and competitive primary. Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, Mamdani's only serious competition, ran on a message of protecting New York City from Trump. But the New York City electorate is drastically different from the rest of the country, political observers say, noting someone like Mamdani may not appeal to moderates and centrists. 'Being a self-proclaimed democratic socialist … doesn't play in swing districts. It plays in New York City primaries,' Del Percio said. 'The Democratic candidates have to look more like Elissa Slotkin talking about the cost of living than they do Mamdani talking about the cost of living.' Realizing they need to do more to appeal to the middle class, Democrats across the country have begun to put forward plans and back legislation to regain lost ground. Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) recently came out with her 'Economic War Plan,' the goals of which, she has said, are to reconnect the Democratic Party with the middle class. At the same time, Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.) signed a bill this week overhauling California's environmental protection laws to accelerate much-needed housing construction in the state. In the name of bringing down the cost of living, Newsom's move goes against a history of California Democrats unconditionally defending the state's environmental protection laws. But the New York race gave some Democrats an injection of hope that their party was starting to turn things around after the crushing loss last year. 'We have proof now, and the proof is the NYC mayor's race,' Rocha said. Mamdani won 'the same precincts in New York City where Donald Trump overperformed in the general election,' he explained. Democratic strategist Jamal Simmons said while not every voter is gettable, 'a lot of them are,' and he said some of the people who supported Trump are Democrats who simply found Trump's message more compelling than the Democratic ticket in the 2024 race. 'Voters are not captive to any political party,' Simmons added. 'They have agency. They get to make their own choices, and if politicians aren't speaking to them, they'll look elsewhere.'
