logo
Notting Hill residents ‘trapped in homes' by counter-terror concrete blocks

Notting Hill residents ‘trapped in homes' by counter-terror concrete blocks

Telegraph3 days ago
Notting Hill residents are taking legal action after being being 'imprisoned' in their houses by concrete barriers set up to prevent terror attacks.
Kensington and Chelsea Borough Council put in place controversial ' hostile vehicle mitigation ' measures down Portobello Road as part of counter-terrorism guidance issued by the Metropolitan Police.
The large concrete bollards and temporary barriers are dotted along the famed street in an effort to protect residents, traders and tourists from potential vehicle-based terror attacks.
Residents of Portobello Road – which played a starring role in the Hugh Grant and Julia Roberts romantic comedy film Notting Hill – are now launching a legal challenge against the council.
Law firm Broadfield, which represents the residents, claim the new security barriers were introduced without consultation and effectively stop residents accessing their homes by vehicle between 10am and 4pm every day of the week.
They claim affected parties include elder and infirm individuals, young families, doctors and local shop and market traders.
Patrick Somers, a resident involved in the legal action said: 'We feel trapped in our houses.'
He described that in order to get access in or out of their street 'you have to drive to the barrier and just sort of wait for someone in a high-vis to turn up'.
Philippe van den Abeele, who lives on the road, argued he should have the right to park in front of his own house.
'There are better ways of securing the road, like bollards that go up and down, much nicer. But the council just doesn't want to spend the money, and they haven't consulted residents,' he said.
A security guard, standing by one of the 'H-stop' barriers defended the scheme, claiming its aim is 'to stop terrorism'. He argued that 'many attacks from all over the world have happened, using cars'.
A number of residents have also complained that only emergency vehicles are exempt, with disabled blue badge holders not able to access the street.
Kapu Lewis said he 'can no longer care for a relative with disability issues because it's almost impossible to get a vehicle to the property.'
However, the council claim that the blue badge issue has been addressed, with new bays and drop-off areas created to support those with mobility issues.
Mr Somers said traders and business owners on the market street are also struggling since the introduction of the road blocks, warning that 'it'll seriously impact their livelihoods'.
He added that 'one local shop has already seen its takings drop by 50 per cent' because customers – who rely on their cars to take purchases home – can no longer park near the shops.
Judy Fox, an antique dealer who's been trading in Notting Hill for over 50 years, said: 'The council has imprisoned us here. Customers cannot get in to collect large antiques. People just use [the blocks] to sit on and take photographs.'
However, the council maintains that the barriers are a requirement to ensure public safety.
A council spokesman said: 'Our top priority remains the safety and wellbeing of everyone in the community and we believe the current measures strike a reasonable balance between protecting the public and supporting the needs of individuals.'
Despite these worries, the council insists that changes are necessary to combat the growing threat of vehicle-based terrorism.
The spokesman added: 'The temporary Anti-Terrorism Traffic Regulation Order on Portobello Road was introduced to protect residents, traders, and visitors from the potential threat of vehicle attacks during busy trading periods.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man who tried to kidnap Britain's Princess Anne in 1974 claims innocence
Man who tried to kidnap Britain's Princess Anne in 1974 claims innocence

BreakingNews.ie

time5 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Man who tried to kidnap Britain's Princess Anne in 1974 claims innocence

The gunman who attempted to kidnap Britain's Princess Anne in 1974 has claimed he is innocent nearly six years after his release from a secure hospital, according to a report. Ian Ball tried to abduct Anne and her then-husband Captain Mark Phillips as they were driven along The Mall to Buckingham Palace on March 20th, 1974. Advertisement Anne kept her cool and when Ball, then 26, told her to 'come with me for a day or two' because he wanted £2 million, she replied 'not bloody likely, and I haven't got £2 million'. The Daily Mail reported that Ball was released from Broadmoor Hospital on probation in 2019 and has subsequently self-published an autobiographical novel called To Kidnap A Princess. In an interview with the newspaper, Ball, now 77, said: 'I'm an innocent, sane man because I had good reason to believe the gunpowder had been taken out of the bullets and another girl had been substituted for Princess Anne.' Discussing Anne, Ball said: 'She wasn't bothered on the night. Advertisement 'I didn't scare her. I was more scared than she was.' The description of Ball's book on Amazon reads that it 'opens with the dramatic and thrilling attempted kidnapping of Princess Anne' and details the author's 'eventful and turbulent 45-year stay in Rampton and Broadmoor criminal lunatic asylums'. It adds: 'The book is an emotive read and it will make you laugh, make you cry, shock you even, but ultimately it will leave you in wonder at the indomitability of the human spirit.' Ball pleaded guilty at the Old Bailey in May 1974 to charges of attempted murder and attempted kidnap and was detained without time limit under the Mental Health Act. Advertisement A UK Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: 'Restricted patients can be recalled back to hospital if their mental health deteriorates to such a level that the risk they pose becomes unmanageable in the community.' Anne, who was 23 at the time of the attempted kidnapping, later said she was 'furious at this man who was having a tug of war with me' and for ripping her favourite blue velvet dress. Anne's father, Prince Philip, later quipped of the attempted kidnapping: 'If the man had succeeded in abducting Anne, she would have given him a hell of a time in captivity.' Ball had blocked the princess's car with his own as it drove along the Mall and fired a series of shots through the rear window as he tried to kidnap her. Advertisement Anne and Mark Phillips in the grounds of Buckingham Palace in 1973 (PA) Anne Captain Phillips were unhurt during the late-night ambush but Anne's bodyguard, chauffeur, a police constable and a journalist were all shot by Ball, who was armed with two revolvers. Anne's bodyguard, former Metropolitan Police inspector Jim Beaton, was awarded the George Cross after being shot three times as he protected Anne. Passer-by, former heavyweight boxer Ronnie Russell punched Ball twice in the head as he tried to kidnap the princess. For his bravery Mr Russell was awarded the George Medal by Queen Elizabeth II, who told him: 'The medal is from the Queen, but I want to thank you as Anne's mother.' Advertisement Discussing the incident, Mr Russell previously said Ball was trying to drag Anne from her car while her husband was pulling her back. 'She was very, very together, telling him, 'Just go away and don't be such a silly man',' he said. 'He stood there glaring at me with the gun and I hit him. I hit him as hard as I could – if he had been a tree he would have fallen over – and he was flat on the floor face down.'

Elite counter-terror dog unit scrapped to cut costs
Elite counter-terror dog unit scrapped to cut costs

Telegraph

time29 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Elite counter-terror dog unit scrapped to cut costs

Scotland Yard is getting rid of its elite attack dogs which are trained to take down marauding terrorists, the Telegraph can reveal. The Belgian malinois dogs, which were introduced in 2016, have been a key part of the Met's Counter Terrorist Specialist Firearms Officer (CTSFO) unit. The highly trained and fearless animals have been deployed on dozens of armed operations and have been credited with helping to detain a large number of dangerous criminals and terrorist suspects without the need for officers to discharge their weapons. Unlike general duty police dogs, the euphemistically titled, Conflict Management Dogs (CMD), are trained to bite and incapacitate a target even if they stop fleeing. The breed can be trained to ignore loud bangs such as gunfire and explosions and are used by Special Forces units around the world, including the SAS and US Navy Seals. They have even been trained to be parachuted out of helicopters and onto battlefields. The Met initially bought and trained two dogs but doubled the unit in 2018 amid rising concern about the possibility that Britain could become the target of a terror attack. They were attached to the Met's elite CTSFO team, which as well as responding to terror attacks are also deployed on intelligence-led operations such as armed robberies. Reduced fatal shootings Since the dogs became operational, CTSFO officers have not been involved in a single fatal shooting. The breed are noted for their agility, extremely high intelligence and loyalty to their owners. But after undergoing intense training with the Met, the animals are unable to be housed with their handlers and have to live in special kennels at a secret police HQ in London. The cost of training and caring for the dogs is estimated to run into the hundreds of thousands of pounds each year and with the Met having to plug a £260 million black hole in its finances, senior figures have made the difficult decision to get rid of them. One source familiar with the unit said the animals were worth their weight in gold because of their ability to quickly neutralise hostile targets and diffuse dangerous situations. The source said: 'The CMD dogs have been an invaluable tool in the armoury of the CTSFO. They are incredibly effective and since their introduction there has not been a single shooting of a suspect. 'To see them in action is really something. You can have the most determined and ruthless armed criminal at large but when they come nose to nose with one of these dogs it is remarkable how quickly they shrink and comply. 'They are mega beasts. Their bite is definitely worse than their bark and their intelligence and agility is off the charts.' Another police insider added: 'These dogs are a less lethal option than using firearms and their use is supported by the Department for Professional Standards and the Independent Office for Police Conduct. 'There are plenty of other far more expensive counter terror tactics that have been developed only by the Met that have never been deployed but these dogs are used daily and have undoubtedly prevented countless lethal confrontations. Even the use of Taser has been dramatically reduced. 'It is a real shame that the Met has decided to pull the plug because I fear in the long run we will be left counting the cost.' The decision to get rid of the dogs comes amid a funding crisis at Scotland Yard, which is trying to plug a £260 million shortfall in its budget. As well as reducing officer numbers, the force has had to make difficult choices in other areas including cutting schools officers and axing its Royal Parks team. Sir Mark Rowley, the Met Commissioner, has established a panel of senior officers, known as 'The Engine Room', who are tasked with making the tough budget choices over what areas to axe. A Met spokesman said: 'We're prioritising resources and putting more officers on the beat in the busiest parts of London to focus on core policing priorities, protect the public, and tackle areas with high crime. 'Due to our financial constraints, we're making tough choices and we've made the decision to withdraw the use of Conflict Management Dogs, which are not used in other forces across the country. 'The Met continues to have a sizeable dog unit with multiple capabilities.'

‘A sign of how we live now': friction in Notting Hill over counter-terrorism barriers
‘A sign of how we live now': friction in Notting Hill over counter-terrorism barriers

The Guardian

time35 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

‘A sign of how we live now': friction in Notting Hill over counter-terrorism barriers

If Richard Curtis had shot his romcom classic Notting Hill over the past month, things might have turned out very differently. Julia Roberts would have had to stumble past huge concrete blocks while losing the hand of her British sweetheart and Hugh Grant might have missed his departing lover as he struggled to exit the area in an overstuffed Peugeot 406. This is because of new rules that ban all cars from Portobello Road between 10am and 4pm, where much of the 1999 film was shot. In some sections of the famed street market the restrictions cover the whole week, while in others only three days. To enforce the new rules, large grey concrete slabs and garish red barriers have been placed along the street. Amid the bustle of Portobello Road market on Friday afternoon, tourists were lining up outside Will Thacker's famed blue door to have their picture taken. 'It feels like I'm watching the movie again,' said Ella, 14, a fan of the hit romantic comedy. Metres away from the door, which was replaced after being sold at auction for £5,750 in 1999, sat the concrete blocks and imposing barriers. If Notting Hill were filmed today, the visible restrictions 'would take away' from the movie, said Ella's mother, Katie Alasky. The barriers and travel restrictions were put in place on the advice of counter-terror police who have warned of the potential threat of vehicle attacks. The 44-year-old lawyer, who was visiting London from New Orleans, said: 'We love it here, it's a great atmosphere with all of the stands and the unique things, minus the barriers. It's so unfortunate – seeing them is a sign of how we live now.' James Darcy, 33, who works in construction, has seen Notting Hill about '20 times'. He was visiting the blue door from Melbourne, Australia. 'If filmed today, it probably wouldn't be the same, that's for sure.' While he acknowledged the new restrictions had been imposed for everybody's safety, he said they detracted 'from the historic and vintage vibe'. While some regard the roadblocks as an eyesore, there have been practical and financial consequences for market traders. Some have struggled to restock their stalls as vehicles are not allowed behind the barriers before 4pm. Charlotte Preval-Reed, 47, sells prints that promote 'positive thoughts'. 'If Notting Hill was filmed here today, I think it would look a bit sad,' she said. Preval-Reed said business had been significantly affected by the measures and that footfall had plummeted since they had been erected. She said it had been '100% the worst' period of trading since Covid. 'If it carries on, I could potentially not be able to run my business at all because it just wouldn't be worth it in terms of how much of an income loss I've suffered,' she said. Local residents have also been affected. 'I'm not a designer but I'm sure I could design something better than that,' said Patrick Somers, 65, a former lawyer who lives in a side-road behind the market. Somers said people had only found out about the restrictions a few days before they had been implemented on 1 July. He is now leading a legal challenge, with the help of the law firm Broadfield, on behalf of residents and traders against Kensington and Chelsea council, who enacted the changes. 'They have not thought this through. We've got all sorts of unintended consequences here,' said Somers. He feared the curtailed access could pose a danger in an emergency situation. 'My wife's mother was very ill and unfortunately died in April. We had a call that she was getting to that end-of-life stage in the middle of the afternoon.' If the barriers had been in place at the time, they would not have been able to drive out of his road, Somers said. Recently, an ambulance had been unable to get past barriers to attend to a child who was having respiratory problems, Somers said. 'The ambulance arrived but couldn't get in.' They parked farther away and had to carry 'huge backpacks' with them, but 'didn't have the right equipment so had to go all the way back again'. Somers said the child was fine in the end but 'might not have been'. He said: 'We can't be having a situation where there's not easy access for an emergency vehicle.' The council said emergency services had been consulted about the scheme and maintained they were able to access the road. Somers conceded that the area did need anti-terror measures, as long as they were introduced in the right way. 'There should be bollards but they've done it in the wrong way. We've seen them being implemented and managed really effectively in other parts of London.' While the concrete slabs are meant to be a security deterrent, many tourists are using them for something else. 'They're great for sitting,' said Anna Twigg, 39, an artist who was visiting London from Oban, Scotland, with her mother, Dolina, 65, a former social worker. The two women agreed there should be some form of barrier to act as an anti-terror measure, but thought there was room for improvement. 'They could be a wee bit more attractive,' said Dolina. A Kensington and Chelsea council spokesperson said: 'Our top priority remains the safety and wellbeing of everyone in the community and we believe the current measures strike a reasonable balance between protecting the public and supporting the needs of individuals. 'We continue to speak with residents and businesses, addressing concerns case by case to help inform proposals for a permanent scheme.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store