logo
Investors react to US attack on Iran nuclear sites

Investors react to US attack on Iran nuclear sites

Yahoo22-06-2025
(Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump on Saturday said that a "very successful attack" on three nuclear sites in Iran had been carried out. In a posting on Truth Social, Trump added, "All planes are safely on their way home" and he ended his posting saying, "Now is the time for peace."
Following are comments from some financial and corporate analysts:
JAMIE COX, MANAGING PARTNER, HARRIS FINANCIAL GROUP, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA:
'Oil is sure to spike on this initial news, but will likely level in a few days. With this demonstration of force and total annihilation of its nuclear capabilities, they've lost all of their leverage and will likely hit the escape button to a peace deal."
MARK MALEK, CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, SIEBERT FINANCIAL, NYC:
"I think it's going to be very positive for the stock market. I believe that on Friday if you'd asked me, I would have expected two weeks of volatility with markets trying to analyze every drib and drab of information coming out of the White House and I would have said that it would have been better to make a decision last week.
"So this will be reassuring, especially since it seems like a one and done situation and not as if (the US) is seeking a long, drawn out conflict. The biggest risk still out there is the Strait of Hormuz. It could certainly change everything if Iran has the capability to close it."
JACK ABLIN, CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER OF CRESSET CAPITAL:
"This adds a complicated new layer of risk that we'll have to consider and pay attention to... This is definitely going to have an impact on energy prices and potentially on inflation as well."
(Compiled by the Global Finance & Markets Breaking News team)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GOP Rep. Tim Burchett doubles down on call for release of Epstein files
GOP Rep. Tim Burchett doubles down on call for release of Epstein files

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

GOP Rep. Tim Burchett doubles down on call for release of Epstein files

Tennessee Republican Rep. Tim Burchett on Sunday again called for the release of the Department of Justice's evidence against the late accused pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, part of a growing cadre of Republicans calling for transparency in the case. Speaking with "This Week" co-anchor Martha Raddatz, Burchett said he wanted the Epstein files to be released, but cautioned against releasing material that might expose the identities of victims and others in the files who may be innocent. But Burchett pushed back against criticism leveled by President Donald Trump, who earlier this week called Republicans demanding the release of the documents 'foolish' and baselessly claimed the Epstein files were a hoax concocted by Democrats. 'Was I a little ticked off he said that stuff? Sure, I was, but I'm a big boy, Ma'am,' Burchett said. 'We're playing in the big leagues right now.' Trump has since directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to move to unseal grand jury evidence in Epstein's case, which Burchett called 'a start.' 'I don't think we're ever going to get to the bottom of … all of it, Ma'am,' Burchett said. 'You know, this town doesn't give up its secrets very easy.' Asked by Raddatz if he believed Bondi should resign, Burchett said he criticized her communication on the issue but stopped short of calling for her to step down. 'I have a saying: It's not how you start, it's how you finish. If she finishes strong on this, then I'm all for it,' Burchett said. 'I'm sure the learning curve is steep, and I think she blundered in the beginning, I really do, as most Americans do.'

Institutional investors have a lot riding on Vertiv Holdings Co (NYSE:VRT) with 82% ownership
Institutional investors have a lot riding on Vertiv Holdings Co (NYSE:VRT) with 82% ownership

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Institutional investors have a lot riding on Vertiv Holdings Co (NYSE:VRT) with 82% ownership

Key Insights Institutions' substantial holdings in Vertiv Holdings Co implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 46% ownership Insiders have been selling lately This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. Every investor in Vertiv Holdings Co (NYSE:VRT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 82% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 4.7% last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 51% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Vertiv Holdings Co, beginning with the chart below. View our latest analysis for Vertiv Holdings Co What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Vertiv Holdings Co? Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. We can see that Vertiv Holdings Co does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Vertiv Holdings Co's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Vertiv Holdings Co. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.9% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.9% and 2.1% of the stock. A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority. While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future. Insider Ownership Of Vertiv Holdings Co While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Vertiv Holdings Co in their own names. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$162m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling. General Public Ownership The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies. Next Steps: It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Vertiv Holdings Co better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Vertiv Holdings Co is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about... Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Here's How Much You Must Make To Afford a Home in the West's Most Livable Cities
Here's How Much You Must Make To Afford a Home in the West's Most Livable Cities

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Here's How Much You Must Make To Afford a Home in the West's Most Livable Cities

If you're thinking of heading west and looking for affordable, livable locales, Oregon may be worth a look. Also See: Learn More: The Beaver State boasts six of the 10 best blends of livability and affordability in the Western U.S., based on a recent GOBankingRates analysis of data from AreaVibes, Sperling's BestPlaces and other sources. Before you pack your bags, though, it's worth learning how much you would need to make to afford a home. Here's GBR's full list, along with the minimum salary required for homeownership, median household income and some additional information about each location. Kaysville, Utah Livability score: 89 Salary needed (annual cost of living): $69,593 Median household income: $128,996 You'll find Kaysville in northern Utah, about 20 miles north of Salt Lake City. A single-family home in Kaysville is worth about $650,000. Living costs will run you about $5,800 a month. Check Out: Find Out: Orem, Utah Livability score: 89 Salary needed (annual cost of living): $59,815 Median household income: $81,292 Orem is located just north of Provo and about 40 miles south of Salt Lake City. Only about 10 percent of Orem's 97,000+ residents are age 65 or older. You'll spend just shy of $5,000 a month on average for living costs here. Discover More: Raleigh Hills, Oregon Livability score: 89 Salary needed (annual cost of living): $92,776 Median household income: $109,306 Raleigh Hills is a suburb of Portland with about 7,000 residents. Single-family homes aren't cheap here, with average values approaching $1 million. An average monthly mortgage here will run you about $5,700. Beaverton, Oregon Livability score: 89 Salary needed (annual cost of living): $65,363 Median household income: $94,279 Beaverton is located about 10 miles west of Portland and has about 100,000 residents. Beaverton's average monthly cost of living (around $5,400) places it in the middle of the pack among AreaVibes' most livable cities. Single-family homes in Beaverton are worth $565,000 on average. Gladstone, Oregon Livability score: 89 Salary needed (annual cost of living): $62,124 Median household income: $90,395 Another Portland suburb, Gladstone is located about 12 miles to the south. About a fifth of Gladstone's 12,000 residents are 65 and older. Gladstone is somewhat less expensive than some other Portland suburbs, with average single-family homes valued at $514,000 and average monthly living costs coming in around $5,200. Central Point, Oregon Livability score: 90 Salary needed (annual cost of living): $52,234 Median household income: $80,450 Central Point is located in southern Oregon, a few miles northwest of Medford. With average monthly living costs around $4,300, Central Point is significantly less expensive than many options in the Portland area. See More: Lafayette, Colorado Livability score: 90 Salary needed (annual cost of living): $75,764 Median household income: $110,431 Lafayette sits about 25 miles north of Denver. Single-family homes in Lafayette are worth $731,000 on average, with monthly mortgages around $4,300. Battle Ground, Washington Livability score: 90 Salary needed (annual cost of living): $68,256 Median household income: $100,185 Battle Ground is located near the Washington-Oregon border, about 25 miles north of Portland. Average monthly mortgages in Battle Ground are less than $3,600, and average monthly living costs are about $5,700. On average, single-family homes here are worth just over $600,000. Milwaukie, Oregon Livability score: 91 Salary needed (annual cost of living): $61,690 Median household income: $82,422 Milwaukie is a suburb of Portland with about 22,000 residents and average monthly mortgages of around $3,000. Single-family homes in Milwaukie are worst just over $500,000. Sherwood, Oregon Livability score: 92 Salary needed (annual cost of living): $72,351 Median household income: $110,616 You'll find Sherwood about 20 miles southwest of Portland. Sherwood is a somewhat young city, with less than 11% of its 21,000 residents aged 65 or older. Homes here are worth around $660,000 on average. Monthly living costs will run you about $6,000. Editor's note: Photos are for representational purposes only and might not reflect the exact locations listed. Methodology: For this study, GOBankingRates analyzed cities across the United States with the highest livability scores, as sourced from AreaVibes. The 30 most livable cities in each state were identified. To qualify for this study, each city had to have all data points available and a total population of at least 5,000. All relevant data was sourced from the U.S. Census American Community Survey, Sperling's BestPlaces, the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey, Zillow Home Value Index and Federal Reserve Economic Data. All data was collected on and is up to date as of May 14, 2025. More From GOBankingRates 10 Unreliable SUVs To Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on Here's How Much You Must Make To Afford a Home in the West's Most Livable Cities Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store