The Myths and Misconceptions About STIs.
MEAN GIRLS, MOVIE (2004): You will get chlamydia, and die.
THE OFFICE, TV SHOW (2010): I know tonnes and tonnes of people who have herpes. I have it myself.
SEX EDUCATION, DRAMA SERIES (2020): Why is it like the walking dead in here? What is going on? Chlamydia. Everyone's got it!
Sexually transmitted infections are really common, but apart from a few pop culture references, we don't really talk about them. And it's left us exposed to growing infection rates, stigma, and a whole lot of misinformation.
SEX EDUCATION, DRAMA SERIES: One for a fiver, three for ten. You cannot catch chlamydia from the air. You have to have sexual contact with the carrier. Shh, they don't know that do they.
So if you're having sex or think you might one day, this is important stuff.
NIKKI BRANDON, SEXUAL HEALTH NURSE, SHINE SA: My name's Nikki Brandon, I am a sexual health nurse. In sexual health, we do things like STI screening, so screening for sexually transmitted infections, and we also do lots of work around contraceptions. Oh I love my job.
Nikki has been doing this for more than 30 years. So, we sat down with her to try and work through some of the big myths and misconceptions about STIs.
NIKKI BRANDON: Oh well probably the, the most obvious one is, 'oh it won't happen to me' but of course STIs don't discriminate. If you're sexually active, then it can certainly happen to you.
A sexually transmitted infection, or a STI, is an infection that can be passed from one person to another through sexual contact.
NIKKI BRANDON: Obviously they're spread through sexual intercourse, so through vaginal sex, oral sex, and anal sex, but they can also be spread through some close contact, so sometimes skin-to-skin contact is enough.
But what exactly are we spreading here? Well, first we have chlamydia, the most common STI in Australia.
NIKKI BRANDON: The main thing with chlamydia is it doesn't always have symptoms, or if it does have symptoms the symptoms just aren't enough to be recognised.
And here's a good spot to address misconception number two.
NIKKI BRANDON: People think if they don't have any symptoms, then they must be okay. A lot of the sexually transmitted infections don't actually have symptoms, so you can't rely on symptoms alone. If there are symptoms, it will be things like a genital discharge, pain passing urine, and sometimes it can cause pain in the belly.
Gonorrhoea is another big player and is quite similar to chlamydia in its symptoms. So again, you might get pain passing urine, discharge, irregular bleeding between periods or bleeding after sex. Next, we have syphilis.
NIKKI BRANDON: Syphilis has got a few stages of symptoms. So initially, there might be an initial sore, which usually doesn't hurt. And then what can happen with syphilis is you can have a rash that will go all over the body, but it can affect their hands and the soles of the feet as well. And that's quite unusual for a rash.
And one that you might have heard of is herpes.
NIKKI BRANDON: Herpes is certainly one of those infections that causes a lot of concern with people. It's a cold sore. So cold sores are very common. Genital herpes is basically just a cold sore down there. So, while it's annoying and it can be a bit painful, it's not there all the time. The virus will stay in your nervous system, but it doesn't mean you're always going to have the symptoms and it doesn't mean that you're always going to be infectious. But when the symptoms are on the skin surface, so when the blisters are out, that's when you're the most infectious and that's where you shouldn't have any activity. But when the symptoms have gone and the sores are all healed up, you're good to go.
But whether or not you have symptoms, STIs shouldn't go untreated. Chlamydia and gonorrhoea can actually progress to cause other conditions, which can lead to infertility or chronic pelvic pain. And with syphilis, it can end up damaging someone's vision, heart, lungs and bones, and can have devastating impacts on a pregnancy or the health of a baby.
NIKKI BRANDON: There certainly can be consequences of untreated STIs. That's why regular screening is so important because if you wait to rely on symptoms, the infection can actually be causing more damage than it should.
It's important to note that while we've mentioned some of the most common STIs, there are still others out there. In Australia, STI awareness really came into the spotlight in the 1980s during the HIV AIDS epidemic. At the time, some pretty full-on campaigns were shown on TV.
OLD HIV AIDS TV CAMPAIGN: One person dies from AIDS in Australia every second day and many more are becoming infected. AIDS is spread by sexual intercourse.
NIKKI BRANDON: Obviously HIV had put a lot of fear into people, so there was a lot fear, there was a lot terror actually. You probably remember the campaign with the Grim Reaper, it was, it was scary times, and, and you know everyone was so scared.
OLD HIV AIDS TV CAMPAIGN: AIDS can be stopped and you can help stop it. If you have sex, have just one safe partner or always use condoms, always.
That fear was effective when it came to getting the message across about safe sex, but these ads also created a lot of stigma around the queer community, particularly around gay men, because a HIV diagnosis was and still is most common among men who have sex with men, but some of that stigma still remains today.
NIKKI BRANDON: We're very much past that now. We've got excellent treatments for HIV. It's no longer the death sentence it was once perceived as being. We got treatments for people with HIV and we've got treatments to stop people developing HIV. We've absolutely come through that one.
But in the decades since the 1980s, the number of STIs recorded each year has been climbing. Over the last 20 years, chlamydia has roughly tripled in the number new cases diagnosed per year, bringing us to more than 100,000 cases last year. Gonorrhoea has increased massively over those same two decades, from 7,000 in 2004 to 44,000 in 2024, and syphilis, which we nearly got rid of in the early 2000s, has increased by almost ninefold to around 6,000 cases per year. It's fair to say STIs have become pretty common, to the point where one in six of us will get one at some stage.
SEX AND THE CITY, TV SHOW (2000): I always practice safe sex.
GLEE, TV SHOW (2014): Yeah, the doctor called me and said I tested positive. How is that possible? I don't know how. Well, do you wear condoms? No. Well, that would be how.
Well, a lot of us aren't actually being as safe as we could be, and that's what's leading to more infections.
NIKKI BRANDON: So we actually like to use the phrase safe first sex. Safe first sex will incorporate things like consent, using protection condoms is so important and I think that's getting a bit lost at the moment, but condoms are the one thing that does protect against sexually transmitted infections. Now people aren't so fearful of HIV. People aren't using condoms as much as they used to be and obviously along with those regular STI screenings.
While STI rates have gone up, testing has gone down. And a lot of that is because many of us don't actually know how testing works.
NIKKI BRANDON: You know, some people think, 'oh well, I had a test, you know, I've already had a test, so I should be fine.' It's not one and done, you need to have regular testing. Like going to the dentist, you know, it should be just a, a routine thing that people are talking about and caring about. For young people under the age of 30, it should be at least once a year. Ideally, to have a test before a new partner, that would be ideal, but yeah, certainly with changing sexual partners, or at least once a year. And another misconception is around screening. I think people think that you have to get undressed or you have show people bits and pieces. You don't.
STI testing is often as simple as a blood test, a urine test, or a swab. And in some cases, this can even be done at home. But sexual health clinics, your GP, Aboriginal health clinics or family planning centres are all good places to start. And each state has a sexual health service that you can call or email if you need more information. There's one more thing we have to do if we test positive for an STI.
THE OFFICE, TV SHOW: You need to contact every woman you've been with and notify them of your herpes infestation. It's the right thing to do.
SEX AND THE CITY, TV SHOW: She told me that I should contact all the people that I might've given it to, so they can all be treated.
HEARTBREAK HIGH, TV SHOW (2022): Just wanted to let you know that I have chlamydia, so you probably do as well.
NIKKI BRANDON: If people do test positive for an infection, you do have to tell your partners. So, telling people that you're having sex with is the most important way of actually eliminating all STIs.
Experts like Nikki say while we might find those conversations a bit embarrassing, we shouldn't feel any shame about having an STI. And proper treatment can put any misconceptions about how it impacts us long-term to bed.
NIKKI BRANDON: Oh no, no, you can absolutely have sex again. But this is why safe first sex is important. You know, use your protection, make sure all your activities are consensual, and like I say, regular testing. The important thing with all STIs is that if you're given treatment for an STI, you need to take the entire treatment, and that's it, it will go. You'll be, you'll be good to go again.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
6 minutes ago
- ABC News
Thousands in NSW could be modern slavery victims, but one scheme may worsen the situation
Australia faces a potential escalation in cases of modern slavery, the NSW anti-slavery commissioner warns, as sectors such as aged care become increasingly reliant on temporary migrant workers. James Cockayne, who was appointed to the role in 2022, estimates more than 16,000 people in NSW are living in modern slavery conditions. Each week on average, his office receives four reports of slavery — through the 1800 FREEDOM hotline — but he fears many more cases go unreported. Some of the most common examples of modern slavery include forced labour, domestic and sexual servitude, debt bondage, deceptive recruiting and even human trafficking. Dr Cockayne said it was a "very hidden" issue, not widely recognised by the general public. "We all have the notion that slavery was abolished a long time ago and it was abolished as a legal construct, but it's still happening," he said. While there is evidence of slavery in "a wide array of industries", Dr Cockayne has singled out aged care as an emerging area of concern. This is because the Pacific Australia Labour Mobility (PALM) scheme — predominantly used to fill labour shortages in horticulture and meat processing — is now expanding into aged care. The PALM scheme allows eligible businesses to hire workers from Pacific Island nations on temporary visas, but there have been widespread concerns it puts migrants at risk of exploitation. Dr Cockayne said he was concerned the aged care sector had "not adequately" prepared for this risk. "What we've seen in other places, where there's been a move to rely on temporary migrant workers, is a significant increase in modern slavery. "In the UK, when temporary migrant workers were introduced into the healthcare sector, there was a doubling in one year of the number of reports of modern slavery from that sector." The peak body for the aged care sector, Ageing Australia, has been contacted for a response. NSW has often been touted as a leader in the fight against slavery — it was the first, and remains the only state or territory in Australia, to appoint an anti-slavery commissioner. But Dr Cockayne said NSW had been lagging other states in cracking down on "dodgy labour hire companies". He called for a licensing scheme to provide better oversight. "New South Wales is one of the only jurisdictions in the country that doesn't have licensing of labour hire companies," Dr Cockayne said. "That's certainly an area we'd like to see the government looking very hard at, and thinking about how they can strengthen regulation in that space." In a statement, a spokesperson for the NSW Government said it has been "actively engaged" with the Commonwealth and other states and territories about establishing a national licensing scheme. "Such a scheme would cover eligible workers in NSW," the statement said. "The NSW Government recognises the serious risk of exploitation and modern slavery faced by temporary migrant workers, particularly in rural and regional areas." It is not just within NSW that Dr Cockayne wants to see change — he argues anti-slavery policies adopted here could have global consequences. His office is focusing heavily on government agencies can ensure the products and services they obtain are not the product of slavery in other countries. Dr Cockayne argues NSW could be a world leader in eliminating this risk. "If you take defence spending out of the picture, New South Wales is actually the largest purchaser of goods and services in the entire Southern Hemisphere," he said. "It has a lot of commercial muscle to change the practices of businesses that produce goods and services with modern slavery." Dr Cockayne acknowledges the issue could become increasingly difficult to navigate, given the growing demand for solar panels and electric vehicles — both of which have been linked with slave labour. "The reality is that in certain contracts, for example around solar panels, it's very hard indeed to find slave-free supply," he said. However, he said in some cases it might be counter-productive to cut commercial ties with suppliers that are linked to slavery. "So we have to think about what the underlying policy goal is here," he said. "Is it to not be associated with slavery? Or is it to actually use the relationship with the supplier to ensure that the goods and services are made in a way that doesn't rely on slavery?" With his five-year term as NSW anti-slavery commissioner now past the halfway mark, Dr Cockayne said he had plenty of unfinished business. He now also has a national counterpart — Chris Evans, who last year was appointed as the first Australian anti-slavery commissioner — and is in regular contact on cross-border issues. "I do hope that we're able to demonstrate that we're driving down the frequency with which people are drawn into these really tragic horrible life events," Dr Cockayne said. "But we will have to stay vigilant because there will always be vulnerable people operating in circumstances where the institutional safeguards don't protect them adequately from exploitation."
News.com.au
6 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Disorder to go: Tackling the deadliest psychological illnesses no one is talking about
Eating disorders are among the deadliest mental health disorders Prevalence among kids 10-19 has almost doubled in last decade Eating disorders cost Australia $67 billion every year in economic and wellbeing losses We've all had those thoughts. Maybe I should cut down on the beers. I guess I should go for walk. I should probably eat better. Maybe I could stand to lose a little extra weight here and there. Body dissatisfaction is a pretty universal experience, but for many it's a temporary thought, a passing moment of discomfort quickly forgotten. For too many people, especially young people, those uncomfortable, niggling thoughts have become a daily mantra they can't ignore – and it's almost certainly killing them. A matter of life and death Eating disorders are widely acknowledged as the deadliest psychological issues a person can be diagnosed with. That fact is further complicated by comorbidity; a startling 90% of people with eating disorders also have depression, with two thirds simultaneously suffering from an anxiety disorder. While that combination is deadly on its own – someone with Anorexia Nervosa is 18-times more likely to die by suicide, and those with Bulimia Nervosa seven-times more likely – the leading cause of death among people with severe eating disorders is cardiovascular damage. The compulsions that come with eating disorders starve the body of nutrients and energy, damaging everything from the heart and bones to the digestive and immune systems. Even worse, the growing epidemic of eating disorders is becoming entrenched in schools and on social media, affecting younger and younger people during vulnerable periods of social and physical growth. 'Eating disorders among children and young people aged 10-19 has almost doubled in the last decade,' said Dr Jim Hungerford, CEO of eating disorder not-for-profit Butterfly. 'Every month 100 people die from, and 10,000 develop, an eating disorder, and it is critical that the government invest to stop this emerging crisis in eating disorders.' A national crisis Deloitte's report, Paying the Price, underscores the heavy toll eating disorders take not just on individuals and families, but on our wider society, too. Eating disorders cost Australia $67 billion every year in economic and wellbeing losses. In February, Minister for Health Mark Butler called eating disorders 'a national crisis' – the federal government has earmarked $70 million in grants for programs to research and treat them. At the moment, treatment for eating disorders is almost entirely based on psychological interventions like cognitive behavioural therapy, family therapy, or more structured and specialised treatments like the Maudsley model of anorexia treatment for adults (MANTRA). These treatments often have good outcomes; some 60% of anorexia nervosa patients receiving enhanced CBT treatments recover to a healthy weight. Unfortunately, there are few alternatives for the 40% of patients that don't respond well to psychological intervention. There are currently no approved pharmacological treatment options at all, although some doctors treat their patients off-label with drugs approved for other mental health conditions. More direct types of intervention are quite recent – researchers are exploring everything from deep brain stimulation to hormone therapies and psychedelics like ketamine or psilocybin. It's a new frontier of medicine, led almost entirely by a handful of intrepid pioneers scattered across the globe. Hitting reset on neural pathways Interest in psychedelic compounds as a basis for psychological treatment has gained a lot of attention in recent years. Medicinal compounds based on marijuana, MDMA, ketamine and psilocybin or psilocin from magic mushrooms have been touted as miracle drugs set to revolutionise the treatment of mental health disorders. While we haven't obtained those lofty goals just yet, psychedelic compounds are already showing an incredible amount of promise in mental health disorders resistant to traditional psychological or medical intervention. The research is still thin on the ground, but it's thought these compounds have a 'resetting' effect on neurological pathways, disrupting habitual ingrained behaviours and encouraging new connections between different regions of the brain. You can imagine them a bit like a cleansing flood, washing away the old, worn and rutted pathways of the brain and offering a chance to forge new ones in their place. Companies such as Tryptamine Therapeutics (ASX:TYP) are working to transform these powerful compounds – once the realm of medicine men and shamans – into something the TGA or FDA can get behind. TYP is developing two such medicines; an intravenous (IV) infused synthetic psilocin compound, and an oral synthetic psilocybin compound, both designed to offer precise dosing options without adverse effects. The company's main focuses are binge eating disorder (BED) and illnesses that induce chronic pain like fibromyalgia and irritable bowel syndrome. BED is the most common eating disorder in the US and the second most common in Australia, representing a high unmet need. Tryptamine is at the clinical assessment stage with its TRP-8803 IV infusion, currently engaged in a safety and efficacy trial in partnership with Swinburne University of Technology in Melbourne. The company is dosing 12 adult patients suffering from BED with its TRP treatment alongside simultaneous psychotherapy sessions. The oral version of the drug has already shown promise in treating BED, reducing daily binge eating episodes by an average of 80.4% in a phase II trial with the University of Florida. All patients experienced a reduction in episodes of at least 60% from baseline, with improvements in anxiety and depression scores as well. While the open-label study had a limited patient population with only five participants, it's nonetheless a very promising start. Overcoming psychedelic adverse effects One of the challenges in bringing psychedelic medicines to market is also a strength: the altered cognitive state they induce in patients. Both Tryptamine Therapeutics and its Israeli brethren Shortwave Life Sciences are working to unlock the therapeutic benefits of psychedelics while side-stepping the more intense adverse effects they can illicit in people. They're attempting to take the guesswork out of dosage and adverse impact by producing synthetic versions of psilocin and psilocybin compounds that are highly controlled, offering more predictable outcomes. Shortwave is focused mostly on Anorexia Nervosa, one of the deadliest eating disorders. The company is developing an oral drug combining psilocybin with a beta carboline, a type of tryptamine compound associated with neurotransmitters like serotonin and norepinephrine that directly influence mood. Shortwave is still in the pre-clinical stages with its drug combination, but early studies are indicating a good safety profile and active metabolisation. The company has partnered with the Sheba Medical Centre, considered a leading medical institution and eating disorder centre in Israel, to conduct an investigator-initiated, open-label, phase II study. The trial will investigate the safety and feasibility of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy for the treatment of anorexia nervosa, the first of its kind in Israel. Taking a molecular approach Not all pharmacological interventions being developed for eating disorders are based on psychedelics, but they share a distinct emphasis on resetting or rewiring disordered neurological pathways. Courage Therapeutics, a spinout of the University of Michigan, has just secured US$7.8 million to advance two drug development programs designed to tackle obesity and restrictive eating disorders. Head researcher Roger Cone identified two proteins thought to play a part in regulating energy balance and food intake – melanocortin 3 receptor and melanocortin 4 receptor (MC3R and MC4R). Courage Therapeutics is focusing on leveraging these proteins to directly hack into neurological circuits in the hypothalamus. Also at the pre-clinical stage, animal studies in mammals have shown great promise in influencing feeding behaviours and weight management. A rat animal model using CRISPR technology to induce MC3R deficiency showed a significant reduction in both body weight and decreased food intake, while those with an MC4R deficiency increased food intake and gained body weight compared to the control group. A long path ahead While research into pharmacological interventions for eating disorders is still in very early stages, the results so far have been incredibly encouraging. The science seems sound, but proving these treatments are not only effective but safe and predictable will take years of clinical trials and testing. The Butterfly Foundation is calling for urgent investment in eating disorder research as the number of people suffering from them rises year by year. 'We were incredibly disappointed that there was zero new funding for eating disorder prevention or treatment in the Australian government's 2025-26 budget announcement on March 25,' Dr Hungerford said, 'nor in the budget response from the Coalition.' 'It is clear from latest research that people in Australia want to know why. Without government investment in prevention, the consequences will be catastrophic. 'The time for talk is over, the time for action for the more than 1 million people living with an eating disorder is now.' At Stockhead, we tell it like it is. While Tryptamine Therapeutics is a Stockhead advertiser, it did not sponsor this article.
ABC News
6 minutes ago
- ABC News
Smartphones affect young people's mental health so are dumbphones the answer?
How old were you when you got your first smartphone? For many Aussies born in the past two generations, such as Ekaager, 16, Kian, 15, Daiwik, 16, and Jiujiu, 15, smartphones have been a part of life since early childhood. "I think I was 12 or 11, around that age," Ekaager said. Kian said: "I think I was like 10 or 11." "I was definitely 12," Daiwik said. "Yeah, something like 12," Jiujiu said. A global 2024 study commissioned by tech company Human Mobile Devices (HMD) found that young people were being given smartphones at an average age of 11 years old. In some cases, smartphones were being introduced as young as three years old. This early introduction to smartphones has "dramatically reshaped childhood and adolescence", according to new research published in the Journal of Human Development and Capabilities. Using survey data from more than 100,000 18 to 24-year-olds, researchers found that the younger those surveyed got a smartphone, from the age of 13 and under, the worse their mental health was. The specific symptoms reported included suicidal thoughts, aggression and detachment from reality. When asked what they thought about the findings, the teens BTN High spoke to said it made sense. "Especially because a lot of the platforms I use, like Instagram, can be a little addictive … it's hard for me to put it down," Lily, 15, said. "I remember in year 10 I was really at my lowest and I think that social media was the significant contributing factor to it," Eric, 17, said. Harsimrat, 15, said it was not just the mental health impacts. "There are many issues like attention span," he said. "Because even myself, sometimes in class, I just doze off because I just can't spend that much time looking at the board." Child psychologist Michael Carr-Gregg led a review into phone use in schools in 2018, which has since resulted in a nationwide ban on phones in public schools. Dr Carr-Gregg said that while the study's results were new, it was something experts had suspected. "I think it was 2007, the Apple iPhone was launched, we started replacing a play-based childhood with a screen-based childhood," he said. "And right across the western world … we have seen an increase in depression and anxiety and self-harm. "Therefore, this is just a confirmation of what we already knew." The study also recommends "graduated access restrictions," keeping anyone under 13 from having a smartphone, which Dr Carr-Gregg approves of. "Smartphones tend to be a distraction. They do interfere with sleep," he said. "They do create, I think, avenues for cyberbullying, extortion, those sorts of things. "So, for me, the result is from the university of the bleeding obvious, which is why I think a restriction, a delay, on young people having smartphones is sensible." Some of the teens BTN High spoke to also agreed it was a good idea. Lachlan, 15, said: "It's just probably for the better in future life." Others, like Angus, 16, weren't keen on it. "Thirteen is past that age where we … enter high school," he said. "I feel like phones are a big part of socialising and that sort of connection that many people rely on. "So I think it's a bit harsh." A "dumbphone", also known as a feature phone, is a basic device with limited functionality. No internet browsing, no apps, no complex multimedia functions – and that's the appeal for some young people, such as 18-year-old Jameson Butler. She is the co-founder of The Luddite Club, a group of teens in New York dedicated to promoting the conscious consumption of technology. "My sleep schedule was off the charts," Jameson said. "I was staying up until 3am. I was staying in my room, you know, on my phone. "And I just felt bad … I didn't feel there were any options or ways to combat that." Jameson said after ditching her smartphone, life improved. "I'm more present at family dinners. I do my schoolwork faster, I have better grades, I've become a lot less scatterbrained, and I've just become a lot more driven and ambitious." The Luddite Club has been gaining popularity. Jameson told the ABC's Brain Rot Podcast that she was seeing Luddite Clubs starting to pop up in Florida and Philadelphia, and she had even had some enquiries from Australia. While the dumbphone trend has been growing in the US and Europe, I want to find out if it is something young Aussies are doing too. After sitting at the University of Adelaide for more than an hour, no young people I spoke to even knew of anyone who used a dumbphone. "Yeah, this is too old," said one student. Harsimrat agreed, saying, "No, that's back in the old days." None of Dr Carr-Gregg's clients are on board either. "I can honestly put my hand on my heart and say I don't have one who's doing that," he said. "Once you've got a smartphone, I think the likelihood of you going back to a dumbphone is very, very small. "And that's because really the way in which my clients communicate with one another these days is through social media. "And therefore the smartphone is absolutely essential." Alex, 17, said a loss of connection might be putting young Aussies off. "I think there's a big fear of missing out," he said. "It's like if people aren't connected with their screens and social media and stuff, they … can't see what other people are posting, [what] they're doing on it. "A lot of my friends live in different places throughout the world, and I wouldn't be able to call them on a phone like that," Lily said. Despite social media being a major part of smartphone use, some teens, such as Alex, reckon Australia's incoming ban for under-16s won't change too many minds. "There are other things you can do on [smartphones], like games and stuff, even though you don't have social media," he said. Simar, 16, said in her case, a smartphone was handy for her parents to know her location because she had to walk to school by herself. Ekaager thinks young people will keep their smartphones and find ways around the ban. Nevertheless, Ekaager was open to giving the dumbphone trend a go, as was Eric. "Maybe I should with the current exam season coming up," Eric said. Lily agreed that it would be "a nice experiment to try". And Alex said, "I'd probably struggle to, but I would maybe give it a try just to improve my mental health."
