
Do you frequently order online or dine out? Know the major risks to your health and safe limits
ALSO READ: Skipping meals on weekdays and bingeing on weekends? Gastroenterologist explains how this habit harms your gut
Dr Manoj Jain, Director of Gastrointestinal, Bariatric, Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery at Nanavati Max Super Speciality Hospital in Mumbai, shared with HT Lifestyle that this practice of eating out or ordering food at home resulted in a steady decline in the health of the Indians.
Giving the reasoning behind this, Dr Jain explained, 'Food prepared in the restaurants often contains excessive calories, unhealthy fats, sugar, and sodium. Most often than not, what tastes great often lacks essential nutrients like fibre, vitamins, and minerals.' While the plating looks appetising, what goes into the food is rarely given a second thought. This requires a wake-up call for frequent diners and serial food app users by making them more aware of the health risks.
What are the risks of eating 'outside' food?
While eating out gives you dopamine boost by trying new things, it comes with serious health consequences.(Shutterstock)
Dr Manoj Jain cited a 2020 study published in BMS Public Health, where he highlighted that people eating out are at a higher risk of metabolic issues. It further accelerates the risk of many chronic ailments as well.
He said, 'Individuals eating out are at a higher risk for metabolic syndrome indicators such as abnormal blood pressure, increased waist circumference, and significantly lower levels of protective HDL cholesterol. This simply indicates that these individuals are more likely to develop obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases.'
How often should you order or eat out?
Banning something completely is often not the answer, as restriction only increases the craving. Dr Jain emphasised the value of moderation, suggesting that occasional indulgence, when done within limits, can be done. Those who regularly order online need to maintain caution because of the health implications.
Dr Jain recommended the limit, 'Considering the health implications, it is advisable to limit ordering or dining out to no more than 2-4 times a month. Moderation and mindful food selection, even when dining out, can help you manage the adverse health impacts associated with frequent consumption of meals prepared outside the home.'
How did the culture of preferring 'outside' food begin?
This growing preference, whether it's heading to the nearest eateries or tapping on a food delivery app, is alarmingly growing, replacing home-cooked meals.
Dr Saurabh Arora, PhD in Pharmaceutics, Managing Director at Auriga Research, pointed out COVID to be a prime catalyst.
He said, 'Over the last decade, we have all seen a change in eating habits, especially in cities, where we have moved from eating mainly home-cooked meals, prepared from scratch, to eating out and consuming ready-to-eat food at restaurants or delivered at home. This was slowly transitioning into eating out at restaurants, but after COVID, it very quickly shifted to heavily depending on ordering food and eating at home. The convenience of ordering through food delivery apps has changed our habits permanently. It is not uncommon for four members of a family to order from four different restaurants for the same meal.'
Now, it's not just food delivery apps, quick commerce is also shaping eating behaviour majorly, as he further added, ' With quick commerce, it has become even easier. Before you can even give a second thought to that midnight ice cream or snack, it is already at your door within 5–10 minutes. This heavy reliance on eating outside has changed our dietary dependence. We are now consuming more highly processed foods and exposing ourselves to unknown and potentially unhygienic practices. The nutritional value is lower, and the risk of foodborne infections is significantly higher.'
Since online food ordering has grown drastically, concerns around food safety and hygiene have also increased. Regulatory bodies like the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) have stepped in to address these issues by implementing guidelines for e-commerce food vendors.
Dr Arora shared, 'FSSAI has taken cognizance of this and is enforcing food safety requirements on e-commerce vendors. The risk associated with e-commerce suppliers is much higher than with a small shop or local restaurant. A small cloud kitchen could be sending out 200, 300, or even a thousand orders. So, FSSAI's insistence on license display, food safety training (like FOSTAC), and expiry date visibility is a very important step.'
Note to readers: This article is for informational purposes only and not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always seek the advice of your doctor with any questions about a medical condition.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
38 minutes ago
- India Today
As Mumbai shuts down kabootarkhanas, what about the pigeons left behind?
Once bustling with fluttering wings and the rhythmic coos of pigeons, Mumbai's iconic kabootarkhanas, once integral parts of the city's social and spiritual landscape, are quietly disappearing. What began as a charitable tradition, rooted in compassion and faith, now stands at a crossroads where public health, urban planning, and animal rights converge in a complex ORIGINS OF KABOOTARKHANASIn the heart of Mumbai's older localities like Dadar, Kalbadevi, and Bhuleshwar, kabootarkhanas were built by traders and philanthropists, many from the Jain and Marwari communities, who believed feeding birds was a sacred act of punya (virtue). These designated feeding spots became sanctuaries not just for pigeons, but also for people seeking a moment of stillness amid Mumbai's time, these circular structures with water troughs and feeding platforms grew into cultural landmarks. They were often located near temples, markets, and crossroads, symbols of coexistence between city dwellers and their feathered cohabitants. But as Mumbai changed, so did its relationship with PUBLIC HEALTH AND COMPASSIONOver the past decade, concerns over rising respiratory ailments, especially among senior citizens, have led to increased scrutiny of these pigeon-feeding zones. Medical experts and civic bodies point to hypersensitivity pneumonitis (often called 'pigeon fancier's lung') as a real risk in areas with dense bird populations. This has prompted the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) to begin cracking down on some of these traditional feeding animal rights groups caution against abrupt policy shifts.'The problem with pigeon-feeding areas is that they make the birds dependent on humans for their food,' said Sachin Bangera from PETA India. 'If you remove these areas, then the pigeons are left with nothing, which is cruel. The city should have a plan for weaning the pigeons away from the food in the area.'Indeed, kabootarkhanas are no longer just about religion or charity, they represent a fragile ecosystem. Pigeons that have become dependent on handouts often lack the instinct to forage, raising ethical questions about suddenly halting all feeding activity.'Since the pigeons who gather at Kabootarkhana have long been dependent on food from passersby, instead of ending pigeon-feeding there all at once, it should be phased out over time,' added GUESTS OR URBAN PESTS?For some, pigeons are charming city companions, curious, calm, and undeniably photogenic. For others, they're little more than airborne pests. The truth lies somewhere in the middle.'Pigeons are kind, inquisitive animals who deserve our respect and compassion,' says Bangera, gently reframing the narrative often dominated by fears of agree that, like all animals, pigeons thrive best in clean environments. The real issue may not be the act of feeding itself, but the lack of sanitation in the surrounding areas. Overflowing grain piles, stagnant water, and droppings left uncleaned for days have turned many kabootarkhanas into breeding grounds, not just for birds, but for bacteria.- Ends


Hindustan Times
38 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Vantara did not initiate relocation of elephant from Kolhapur to Jamnagar, says NGO
New Delhi, Vantara did not initiate or request the relocation of the elephant named Mahadevi from a monastery in Kolhapur to its facility in Jamnagar but served only as the 'court-appointed recipient facility", the NGO said in a statement. Vantara did not initiate relocation of elephant from Kolhapur to Jamnagar, says NGO Mahadevi, who was with a Jain monastery at Nandani in Maharashtra's Kolhapur district for over three decades, was relocated to the Radhe Krishna Temple Elephant Welfare Trust in Vantara's wildlife rehabilitation facility in Jamnagar, Gujarat, earlier this week following a court ruling. "Vantara was not the initiating party, and that the entire process has been conducted under judicial and statutory oversight, in coordination with the appropriate authorities. The organisation acknowledged Mahadevi's deep emotional and cultural significance in Kolhapur, but it acted solely as a court-appointed recipient facility. "The reasons for the transfer are fully documented in the judicial orders, which speak for themselves,' reads the statement from Vantara. The Bombay High Court on July 16 ordered Mahadevi to be rehabilitated at Vantara's facility in Jamnagar, after concerns raised by an NGO with the Maharashtra Forest Department and the Supreme Court appointed High-Powered Committee on her 'deteriorated health and psychological suffering'. The Supreme Court on July 25 upheld the high court order. The matter is now listed for compliance reporting on August 11, 2025, the Vantara statement said. Mahadevi is suffering from several health issues, including foot rot, arthritis, overgrown toenails, and repetitive behaviours such as constant head bobbing, an indication of deep psychological distress caused by prolonged isolation. The issue led to a protest march in Kolhapur. According to Vantara, the elephant received expert care from veterinarians, behaviourists, and caregivers, freed from chains, treated for an untreated fracture and painful broken toenail, and given space, nutrition, and emotional support to heal physically and mentally. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


News18
an hour ago
- News18
What's Missing In Your Sunscreen Routine? Sunscreen With SPF 25 Or Above Skincare Routine
In India, the average skincare routine may include a moisturiser, a face wash, and maybe a serum. BUT SUNSCREEN? For most Indians, sunscreen remains a cosmetic add-on, something associated with beach vacations or hot summers—not a daily health mindset needs urgent change, because science tells a different and dermatologists advocate that SUNSCREEN ISN'T COSMETIC, IT'S PREVENTIVE CARE. Multiple rigorous scientific studies have established that regular sunscreen use is one of the most effective ways to prevent skin cancer and premature skin ageing. News18 Mobile App -