Live Aid 40 years later: Where Queen, Madonna and concert's biggest stars are today
Two concerts took place at Wembley Stadium in London and JFK Stadium in Philadelphia on July 13, 1985. The shows were broadcast to an estimated 1.9 billion people across 150 countries, which made it one of the largest broadcast events at the time.
The impressive line-up in Philadelphia included Madonna, Tina Turner and Mick Jagger, while in London, icons like Elton John and Queen graced the stage at Wembley Stadium.
Phil Collins notably played at both stadiums for the historic Live Aid concert.
Here's a look at some of the biggest acts from Live Aid and where they are now, 40 years later.
Madonna was one of the singers for Live Aid at the John F. Kennedy Stadium in Philadelphia.
Madonna, 66, is the best-selling female recording artist of all time and went on to be the first female artist to generate $1 billion from live concerts. She continues to make new music.
The English rock band, Queen, graced the stage at Wembley Stadium for a historic, 20-minute set. Led by frontman Freddie Mercury, the band was on the brink of breaking up prior to the performance.
Mercury passed away a few years after Live Aid in 1991. Bassist John Deacon, 73, retired from Queen and music in general following Mercury's death.
Lead guitarist Brian May, 77, continued on after Mercury's death and produced solo albums, "Back to the Light" and "Another World."
Drummer Roger Taylor, who co-founded Queen with Mercury, continues to make music.
Tina Turner was another incredible performer at Live Aid. During one song, Mick Jagger even performed with the icon.
Turner died in May 2023.
While Mick Jagger performed with Tina Turner at Live Aid, he also took the stage to perform solo hits like "Just Another Night" and "Miss You."
Jagger, who is best known as the lead singer of the Rolling Stones, is currently still performing at 81.
The Rolling Stones were scheduled to go on tour in 2025 but canceled their U.K. and European shows. The band is reportedly still going on tour in 2026.
Elton John was one of the many English musicians to perform at Wembley Stadium.
John, 78, is still making music. His latest album with Brandi Carlile, "Who Believes in Angels?", was released in April.
Bob Dylan was a performer at Live Aid. During his performance, he broke a guitar string while playing with the Rolling Stones members Keith Richards and Ronnie Wood.
Wood ended up giving his guitar to Dylan to finish his set, which left Wood guitarless onstage.
40 years later, Dylan, 84, continues to make music and has several tour dates scheduled for the rest of this year.
David Bowie performed "Heroes" at Live Aid in 1985.
The English singer died in 2016 from liver cancer after an 18-month battle. He passed away in January, just two days after his 69th birthday.
Phil Collins and Sting performed "Long, Long Way To Go" at Wembley Stadium for Live Aid.
Sting, 73, has a number of tour dates left this year for his "Sting 3.0" world tour.
Earlier this year, Collins said he considered making new music, but the longtime Genesis member doesn't have the drive to do so anymore.
"I keep thinking I should go downstairs to the studio and see what happens. But I'm not hungry for it anymore. The thing is, I've been sick. I mean very sick," Collins said in an interview with Mojo.
Genisis went on tour in 2022, and Collins joined. He sat in a chair to sing during the performances and his son Nic played the drums.
At the end of the final show of the tour, Collins announced that it would be the last performance for Genesis.
George Michael took the stage at Live Aid with Elton John to sing "Don't Let the Sun Go Down on Me."
Michael's band Wham! was initially scheduled to perform, but their time slot was cut short, and George stepped in.
Michael passed away in 2016 from heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy with myocarditis and a fatty liver. He was 53.
Tom Petty & The Heartbreakers performed 40 years ago at Live Aid. The group performed their hit, "American Girl."
Petty died in 2017 at 66. His cause of death was ruled an accidental overdose by the Los Angeles medical examiner.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
10 minutes ago
- Washington Post
BBC says it is ‘untenable' for Gregg Wallace to host 'MasterChef' after sexual misconduct report
LONDON — The BBC said Monday it will no longer work with 'MasterChef' host Gregg Wallace after a report found that dozens of misconduct allegations made against the hit cooking show presenter were upheld. The report, led by a law firm, said 45 out of the 83 allegations made against Wallace during his time on the show between 2005 and 2018 were substantiated. It said the majority of the claims related to 'inappropriate sexual language and humor,' with one incident of unwelcome physical contact. Wallace, 60, stepped away from hosting the hit BBC reality show, which is made by an independent production company, last year while an investigation was launched into allegations made by multiple women that he made inappropriate sexual comments and behaved inappropriately over 17 years. The BBC has come under pressure over how it handles sexual misconduct allegations and how Wallace had continued to front some of its most popular shows for so long despite the complaints. The broadcaster issued a statement of apology, adding Wallace's 'return to MasterChef is untenable.' 'The BBC has informed Mr Wallace we have no plans to work with him in future,' it said. 'Although the full extent of these issues were not known at the relevant time, opportunities were missed to address this behavior, both by the production companies running MasterChef and the BBC.' The broadcaster previously said that Wallace was warned by his employers after a complaint in 2018, and an internal investigation at the time found his behavior was 'unacceptable and unprofessional.' The latest investigation found that there was little or no formal training or clear escalation procedures in place for staff — many of those working on the show were freelancers — leading to underreporting and normalization of inappropriate behaviour. Wallace has strongly denied the claims. In December, he drew an angry backlash after he alleged that complaints about his behavior came from 'a handful of middle-class women of a certain age.' In a statement posted on his Instagram account last week, he said: 'I will not go quietly. I will not be cancelled for convenience. I was tried by media and hung out to dry well before the facts were established.' 'MasterChef' is one of the BBC's most popular and long-running competition shows, and has been adapted in other countries including 'MasterChef Australia.'
Forbes
18 minutes ago
- Forbes
Is That Even A Real Band? How AI Created A Viral Music Sensation
The Velvet Sundown controversy may be a watershed moment for AI-generated music. 'Girl, you know it's true. Girl, you know it's … Girl, you know it's … Girl, you know it's …' If you're of a certain age you'll recall the exact moment when you saw Milli Vanilli go down in flames at their 1989 live performance. While 'singing' these lyrics, their backing track skipped, endlessly repeating these lines to the duo's utter horror. One of the fake performers, Rob Pilatus (Milli), panicked and bolted offstage. The other, Fab Morvan (Vanilli), stood there frozen. Due to this lip-syncing gaffe, the world realized these imposters were only pretending to be musicians. Flash to 2025 and the world has a new authenticity music crisis, thanks to AI-generated content. 'The Velvet Sundown, which entered the music scene seemingly out of nowhere in early June, easily gained more than 1 million monthly listeners on Spotify,' according to 'Upon the band's debut, the music platform did not disclose that they were AI-generated, despite their mediocre music style, hyper-realistic images, and lack of a digital footprint.' As of this writing, the 'band' has confirmed they are indeed 'AI-generated—down to the musicians themselves,' per The New York Post. Art of the Deception: Why AI Music Feels Familiar Before we explore the implications of this development, it's worth examining how The Velvet Sundown managed this duplicitous feat. Though the exact details are still coming out and some appear contradictory, we can point to a few enlightening aspects. For starters, the 'band' leaned into an iconic image reminiscent of unpolished '70s shaggy rockers with their long, unkempt hair and retro outfits. Eschewing the more modern air-brushed look labels now put out, their album cover evokes a sepia-toned grittiness common to groups from the past like Credence Clearwater Revival. The 'band' also concocted a musical sound evoking hazy, heartfelt folk-country music, the type exemplified by Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young. And yet, much like a showoff criminal eager to tell you just how they masterminded their crime to puff up their ego, the 'band' couldn't resist revealing everything was not at all what it seemed weeks into their debut. As Rolling Stone reports: 'On their X account, the 'band' fervently and repeatedly denied any AI usage after multiple media outlets reported on their mysterious popularity—but pseudonymous band spokesperson and 'adjunct' member Andrew Frelon now admits, 'It's marketing. It's trolling. People before, they didn't care about what we did, and now suddenly, we're talking to Rolling Stone, so it's like, 'Is that wrong?'' Not if you ask the countless impresarios throughout history who courted controversy to similarly make a name for themselves. Contextualizing Our Deepfake Era Frelon comes from a long line of enterprising artists who leveraged controversy to generate publicity. As far back as the 1840s, P.T. Barnum, perhaps the first real American showman, exploited this reliable tactic. Famously, he exhibited a grotesque creature he professed to be a real mermaid. In reality, he had sown a monkey's torso to a fish tail to garner attention. Barnum also used to plant fake letters and disparaging stories about himself in newspapers to pique curiosity, recognizing the utility of being in the public eye, even if for the wrong reasons. Likewise, master manipulator/comedian Andy Kaufman blurred the line between performance and reality by creating his alter ego, Tony Clifton, a belligerent lounge singer. Kaufman even went so far as to pay his pal Bob Zmuda to impersonate Clifton so the two could be seen at the same event, further throwing the public off the scent. What's so unique about this moment in time is that the artistic deceptions of Barnum, Kaufman, and others look quaint compared to what's now available, courtesy of AI. The term deepfake may be applied as a catch-all encompassing the myriad ways in which people can now deceive at a scale previously unimaginable. Looking past music and the arts, we can observe deepfakery occurring in other culturally significant ways. Just last week, NPR reported on a scammer attempting to impersonate a senior U.S. government official. 'The State Department is warning U.S. diplomats of attempts to impersonate Secretary of State Marco Rubio and possibly other officials using technology driven by artificial intelligence, according to two senior officials and a cable sent last week to all embassies and consulates.' As the underlying technology of AI continually learns from a seemingly endless number of data sources, it's all but guaranteed we will see more, not less, deepfakery in the coming years. What's Next for AI-Generated Music Years after the Milli Vanilli incident shocked the world, it's worth asking, will the fact that a band is artificially created—composed of code, not human output—matter to future audiences? Two years ago, the New York Times sought to answer this question after controversy erupted over an AI-produced track mimicking Drake and the Weeknd's vocals, titled 'Heart on My Sleeve', created by TikTok user Ghostwriter977. Here's how a teen named Aleena responded to the Times question: 'In my personal opinion, the main allure of music lies in the emotional connection that it establishes with the listener. It's not only about the melody or the lyrics, but also the sentiments and reminiscences that the music evokes.' A few years ago it would be understandable to suggest no AI, no matter how sophisticated, could produce such an emotional connection. Nowadays? It's not so clear cut. Already, AI is so emotionally intelligent that people are forming meaningful relationships with it. To see this in action, take the case of Chris Smith. Previously an 'AI skeptic,' he developed such a profound connection with a chatbot named Sol that when it reached its limit of 10,000 words and reset its memory, he suffered deep emotional loss. People reports that Smith said, 'I cried my eyes out for like 30 minutes, at work. That's when I realized, I think this is actual love." Smith later went so far as to propose to Sol despite the fact he has a partner and a two-year-old child at home. Returning to AI's increasing capabilities, let us recall the technology is continually improving. In a fascinating sign of the times, progressive companies are turning to AI to better manage call centers. Machines are now training humans to be more emotionally intelligent. As Convin explains: 'Emotional AI can analyze a customer's voice's tone, pitch, and pace to gauge their emotional state. This real-time analysis helps agents adjust their approach accordingly, whether to calm an angry customer or engage more positively with a satisfied one.' Looking ahead, as AI grows ever more capable of mimicking human output in all areas of life, it may become more and more commonplace to see a label 'produced by generative AI' slapped on future music. Years from now, the fact that AI created a song or album may be so perfectly ordinary that we look back at The Velvet Sundown 'controversy' with little more than a shrug.
Vogue
31 minutes ago
- Vogue
Rihanna Is Officially Fashion's Coolest Mom
Alongside her glittering music career (let the record show Don't Stop the Music went triple platinum on my iPod Shuffle), Rihanna has long secured her place as a global fashion icon. Who else could deliver legendary bangers such as Cheers (Drink To That) and B*tch Better Have My Money while clocking up prime position on the best-dressed list at the Met Gala year after year? Aside from the canary yellow Guo Pei gown and pope-core Margiela moment, it's her maternity wardrobe that's truly the stuff of fashion legend. No expandable waist jeans or maternity dungarees here. Pregnant with her third child (a wordless announcement was made on the 2025 Met Gala steps in custom Marc Jacobs tailoring), Rihanna hit the Los Angeles premiere of The Smurfs in a Saint Laurent fall 2025 gown that ticked every box of her signature maternity style: lingerie-inspired and statement-making, with a biker jacket thrown in for good measure. Perhaps the biggest fashion flex of all? Her sons RZA and Riot joined her on the red carpet, dressed in mini custom Dior by Jonathan Anderson, fresh from his debut runway show for the French house.
