logo
Germany ends visa appeals: Costlier path for Indian students, workers

Germany ends visa appeals: Costlier path for Indian students, workers

Come July 1, Indian visa applicants to Germany will no longer be able to appeal a rejection through a simple letter to the consulate. The German government has decided to end its visa remonstration process globally, meaning any challenge to a visa refusal will now require formal court proceedings.
Germany has become an increasingly popular destination for Indian students and workers, particularly as visa hurdles grow in countries like Canada, the US, and the UK. But this change introduces a fresh layer of complexity for those hoping to travel, study or work there.
'In the past, on a rejected German Schengen visa application, a person could provide a remonstration letter to the consulate or embassy of Germany that rejected it,' said Mamta Shekhawat, founder of Gradding.com, a study abroad platform. 'This was an informal appeal of the application where the applicant could provide additional information or clarify any misunderstanding without going through the formalities of legal procedures. It was an affordable and convenient means of reviewing potential mistakes or oversights in the original application.'
Shekhawat said the change will affect Indian students in several ways:
Greater pressure for perfection: Small mistakes in documentation or confusion on the application could now lead to a flat rejection, requiring a full restart of the process
Increased costs and longer delays: Reapplying for a visa means paying fees again and waiting weeks or even months for another appointment
No middle ground: Legal appeals are costly and slow, often requiring a German lawyer and possibly taking up to two years for a decision
Emotional toll: Students who earlier had some hope of correction through informal channels may now find the process too stressful or uncertain to attempt
'Without the informal appeal, rejected applicants now face two main options,' said Sanjog Anand, co-founder of Rostrum Education. 'One, reapply and pay the fees again. Two, file a formal judicial appeal, which is a far more difficult, costly, and time-consuming path. A case must be filed with the Berlin Administrative Court. For many Indian students, this choice is too expensive,' he said.
Shekhawat added, 'The move also highlights the absolute necessity of filing a perfect first-time application. This requires careful preparation, detailed documentation, and expert advice.'
She said the German government's reasoning is that scrapping the remonstration process will free up consular staff, allowing them to focus more efficiently on new applications. 'It promotes transparency and creates higher documentation status,' she said.
Despite the tougher visa pathway, Shekhawat said Gradding.com's services for German university admissions remain unaffected. 'Our focus has always been on getting things right the first time.'
Anand noted, 'While initial processing might be faster, the absence of an informal appeal means that any rejection will lead to a complete restart of the application process or a lengthy legal battle, potentially causing significant delays in study plans.'
Skilled workers may hesitate to appeal
For professionals seeking to work in Germany, the impact is similar.
'The removal of the remonstration process is part of Germany's efforts to improve administrative efficiency, potentially leading to faster processing times for visa applications,' said Varun Singh, managing director at XIPHIAS Immigration.
'But on the downside, skilled workers facing visa denials will now have limited recourse, potentially affecting job opportunities and employer timelines. The formal appeal process may deter some applicants due to its complexity and expense,' Singh added.
Tourists and business travellers also affected
Visa rejections for short-term visitors will now be harder to contest.
'Streamlined visa processing could benefit travellers by reducing wait times for visa appointments and decisions,' said Singh. 'However, tourists and business travellers who experience visa rejections will no longer have a straightforward method to contest decisions, possibly impacting travel plans and incurring additional costs for reapplication or legal appeals.'
Consular Services Portal and rejection data
Germany introduced the Consular Services Portal in January 2025, offering step-by-step digital instructions for student, skilled worker, and family reunification visa applications. Early feedback from applicants suggests that the portal has helped reduce documentation errors.
'Dispensing with the remonstration procedure has released considerable staff capacity in visa sections,' said the German Missions.
In 2024, Germany rejected 206,733 Schengen visa applications, with a rejection rate of 13.7%. Indian applicants have faced some of the longest delays, with appointment wait times stretching to nearly nine months. The German Missions say they now expect this to drop to just a few days.
This change could benefit students applying close to term start dates or workers needing to relocate quickly for jobs.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nimisha Priya's death sentence overturned by Yemen authorities: Grand Mufti's office
Nimisha Priya's death sentence overturned by Yemen authorities: Grand Mufti's office

Mint

time28 minutes ago

  • Mint

Nimisha Priya's death sentence overturned by Yemen authorities: Grand Mufti's office

The death sentence of Nimisha Priya, an Indian nurse convicted of murder in Yemen, has been "completely overturned," according to a statement released Monday by the office of Indian Grand Mufti Kanthapuram AP Abubakker Musliyar. The Grand Mufti's office said the decision came following a high-level meeting in Yemen's capital, Sanaa, where authorities agreed to fully revoke the death penalty, which had previously been under temporary suspension. According to the statement, as reported by ANI 'The death sentence of Nimisha Priya, which was previously suspended, has been overturned. A high-level meeting held in Sanaa decided to completely cancel the death sentence that was temporarily suspended earlier' Nimisha Priya, a 37-year-old Indian nurse from Kerala, was scheduled to be executed on July 16, after she was convicted of killing a Yemeni national in June 2018, a decision that was upheld by the country's Supreme Judicial Council in November 2023. However, her execution was postponed, following "concerted efforts" by the Government of India. Earlier on July 17, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) stated that it was actively working to support Nimisha Priya and was extending all possible assistance in the case. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, during a press briefing, stated that the MEA had appointed a lawyer to assist Priya's family in navigating the complex legal process in Yemen. This includes exploring options for clemency or pardon under Sharia law. Nimisha Priya is a trained nurse and has worked in private hospitals in Yemen for a few years. Her husband and minor daughter returned to India in 2014 because of financial reasons, and in that same year, Yemen was gripped by civil war, and they could not go back as the country stopped issuing new visas. Later in 2015, Nimisha joined hands with a Yemeni citizen, Talal Abdo Mahdi, to set up her clinic in Sanaa. She sought Mahdi's support because, under Yemen's law, only nationals are allowed to set up clinics and business firms. In 2015, Mahdi accompanied Nimisha Priya to Kerala when she came for a month-long holiday. During the visit, he stole a wedding photograph of Nimisha, which he later manipulated to claim that he was married to her. A plea made by the mother of Nimisha Priya had stated, "After a while, Nimisha's clinic began, Mahdi manipulated the ownership documents of the clinic. He also began to take money out of her monthly earnings after telling everyone that Nimisha was his wife. Nimisha had alleged that Mahdi had been harassing her and her family for years. Mahdi also seized her passport. This was done to ensure that she would not leave Yemen. He tortured her under the influence of drugs. He threatened her at gunpoint several times. He took all the money from the clinic and her ornaments." The plea further alleged that, unable to cope with the torture, Nimisha complained to the police in Sanaa, but instead of taking action against Mahdi, the police arrested her and put her in jail for six days. It was further alleged that on her return from jail, the severity of the torture increased manifold. In July 2017, Nimisha took the help of a warden of a jail located near her clinic. The warden suggested that she should try to sedate him and then convince him to give her the passport. However, sedation did not affect Mahdi, who was a substance abuser. She tried sedating him again, using a stronger sedative in order to retrieve her passport, but he died within a few minutes due to a drug overdose. (ANI)

Jane Street to Argue That Retail Demand Drove Its India Trades
Jane Street to Argue That Retail Demand Drove Its India Trades

Mint

time28 minutes ago

  • Mint

Jane Street to Argue That Retail Demand Drove Its India Trades

(Bloomberg) -- Jane Street Group LLC is expected to argue that its controversial Indian options trades were a response to outsized demand from retail investors, people familiar with the matter said. The trading giant has been working on its defense against market manipulation allegations from the Securities and Exchange Board of India. The regulator in early July alleged Jane Street had taken large positions that artificially influenced prices in the country's stock and futures markets, moving them in favor of its options bets on multiple days. Jane Street said on Monday it has sought an extension to respond to the interim order. Last week, SEBI lifted Jane Street's temporary trading ban after the firm deposited 48.4 billion rupees ($560 million) in alleged 'unlawful gains' into an escrow account. A 105-page order from SEBI detailing its preliminary findings devoted a long section to Jane Street's trading activity on Jan. 17, 2024, which was the firm's most profitable day over a roughly two-year period that the regulator scrutinized. The New York-based firm is expected to argue it was eager to facilitate options bets from the country's retail investors, knowing it would be largely unhedged, said the people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified discussing private information. The firm hedged less in India than in other markets and spread out its hedging activity over multiple hours on that day in January 2024 to reduce its market impact, the people said it is likely to explain. On that morning, the NSE Nifty Bank Index dropped 3.2% at the open and fell further during the day. SEBI alleged that Jane Street aggressively bought the index's constituent stocks in the cash and futures markets to manipulate the gauge's intraday levels, then reversed the trades in the afternoon to profit from a much larger bearish index options position. Jane Street is expected to say that high retail demand for options on that index was a key driver behind its trading in the morning, according to the people familiar with the matter. The firm will likely argue that individual traders bought about $4 billion worth of the gauge's stocks using options in the first half hour of trading, and that Jane Street — which was acting as a market maker — facilitated about $1 billion of that demand. Those numbers are based on net delta positions, which represent the value of cash equities the options positions are equivalent to when taking into account the derivatives' sensitivity to the underlying assets' price moves. SEBI's order said Jane Street's share purchases on that January 2024 morning represented between approximately 16% and 25% of the trading turnover for 10 of the 12 Nifty Bank Index stocks, making the firm by far the single largest net buyer. As Jane Street sold call options and bought puts, it amassed a bearish position that represented 7.3 times the size of its long cash and futures bets, according to the regulator. Jane Street is expected to argue that the high retail options demand created a gap between prices implied by the options and those reflected by the shares, and the firm sought to close it through a standard arbitrage trade, the people familiar said. The retail demand was so large that only 10% of it could have been hedged — partial hedging being a common practice among derivatives market makers internationally, the firm is expected to say. In the afternoon, Jane Street sold the stocks over more than three hours, spreading out its hedging to protect against settlement-price uncertainty as the options were about to expire, also a typical tactic globally, the people said it will argue. SEBI did not respond to a request for comment. Retail traders' enthusiasm for options has helped turn India into the world's biggest market for listed derivatives by contracts traded, with turnover of more than 300 times that of cash equities. Global trading firms have used their capital and technological edge to profit from that large imbalance, but local investors have cumulatively incurred billions of dollars in losses, leading the regulator to crack down on the trading frenzy. Critics of Jane Street say the sheer size of its positions built up over a short time would have given the firm market-moving power, even if the trades were within regulatory limits. Alexander Gerko, the billionaire founder of rival XTX Markets Ltd., has challenged Jane Street to show that its India trading strategy was 'legit' by proving it would work better after scaling it down by a factor of a 100. 'Any 'normal' strategy works worse as it scales up, due to market impact, unless your strategy IS market impact,' he wrote in a LinkedIn post earlier this month. The regulator's interim order presented serious allegations and a 'compelling narrative,' though it is not certain that Jane Street acted inappropriately based on the initial findings, said Abhiraj Arora, a Mumbai-based partner at law firm Saraf and Partners who once worked at SEBI's surveillance and investigations department. Arora, who isn't involved in the case, said too harsh a crackdown and excessive surveillance of market makers could lead to wider bid-ask spreads, poorer trade execution and increased price swings. The Jane Street case ultimately 'serves as a significant test for India's regulatory framework and its capacity to oversee increasingly complex global trading practices,' he said. --With assistance from Chiranjivi Chakraborty. More stories like this are available on

Best stocks to buy today, as recommended by Raja Venkatraman for 29 July
Best stocks to buy today, as recommended by Raja Venkatraman for 29 July

Mint

time28 minutes ago

  • Mint

Best stocks to buy today, as recommended by Raja Venkatraman for 29 July

The continuous overhang of geopolitical events is keeping the trends suppressed, as the global cues still have a very deep overhang, leading to market confusion. As the trends ahead show that clarity will be something that defeats the current market trends, we need to find some encouraging triggers to arrest the bearish mindset in the days to come. Here are three stocks to buy or sell as recommended by Raja Venkatraman of NeoTrader for 29 July: SBILIFE: Buy CMP and dips to ₹1,810 | Stop ₹1,790 | Target ₹1,950-2,000 MANINFRA: Buy CMP and dips to ₹177 | Stop ₹174 | Target ₹190-195 MANORAMA: Buy CMP and dips to ₹1,640 | Stop ₹1,620 | Target ₹1,770-1,825 Market today Indian equity benchmarks started the week on a subdued note, marking the third straight session of declines on 28 July as selling pressure outweighed supportive global markets. The Nifty opened below 24,800 and, although it managed an initial recovery in the early hours, it failed to gain traction and slid beneath the 24,700 mark for the first time since 13 June amid broad-based selling across sectors barring pharmaceuticals. The Sensex closed down 572.07 points, or 0.70%, at 80,891.02, while the Nifty fell 156.10 points, or 0.63%, to end at 24,680.90. Meanwhile, the mid-cap and small-cap indices retreated 0.7% and 1.3%, respectively. Sectoral losses were widespread, with realty plunging nearly 4% and media shedding close to 3%. Capital goods, metals, telecom, PSU banks, and private banks each dropped between 1% and 1.5%, underscoring the prevailing risk-off sentiment. Investors remain cautious ahead of upcoming corporate earnings and key macroeconomic data due later in the week. Outlook for trading Broader indices were unable to contain the profit booking that emerged at the start of the week, dragging the market lower. Despite a rebound on the back of US President Donald Trump keeping us guessing about his next move, the markets are clearly unable to hold on to the rebound convincingly. While every attempt was made to keep the markets in positive territory, the intermittent decline continues to retest the bullish resolve. Right now, the pronounced volatility is causing some disturbance in forming the bias, thus making the markets jittery. Trends have remained muted until the negative vibes in the Nifty Bank persisted to dent our confidence. With the trends after breaching the channel, it is showing some continued bearish pressure, as we can see that the markets are suppressed and even show some bearish signs as we enter the last trading day of the week. With the result season in play, the expectation from the Q1 numbers will be keenly tracked. As we operate in an environment of ad-hoc triggers, the markets shall continue to oscillate over the next few days. A volatile environment is now part of the ever-changing market scenario, forcing the sentiment to keep changing. Risk management is critical, as the lack of clarity is greater than ever. However, there is still some value discovery happening in mid and small caps that demonstrates a bullish sentiment. Among them, the Trump Tariff Saga has the global markets oscillating. With no clarity on the outcome, we shall continue to oscillate in a range between 24500 and 25000 on the Nifty Spot. Three stocks to trade, recommended by NeoTrader's Raja Venkatraman: SBI Life Insurance Co. Ltd (Cmp: ₹1850.50) Why it's recommended: SBI Life Insurance, incorporated in October 2000, is a leading Indian life insurance company. It operates as a joint venture between the State Bank of India (SBI), India's largest commercial bank, and BNP Paribas Cardif S.A., the life and property and casualty insurance arm of BNP Paribas. Strong demand recovery in this stock from lower levels and the rebound from demand zones support price stability and growth potential. With prices trading close to the 52-week high, more room for upside is possible. Key metrics: P/E: 74.55 52-week high: ₹1,936, Volume: 1.18M. Technical analysis: Support at ₹1,730, resistance at ₹2,050. Risk factors: Dependence on trends in the insurance sector and raw material price volatility. Buy at: CMP and dips to ₹1,810. Target price: ₹1,950-2,000 in 1 month. Stop loss: ₹1,790. Man Infraconstruction Ltd (Cmp: ₹182.46) Why it's recommended: Signs of reversal from oversold zones signal potential upside. Demand at lower levels showcases optimism for recovery in the coming sessions. The daily charts indicate that the volume-based rise seen in the last few sessions augurs well for the prices. Key metrics: P/E: 46.88 52-week high: ₹262.50 Volume: 1.86M Technical analysis: Support at ₹165 | Resistance at ₹205. Risk factors: Declining revenue and profits, as well as a decrease in operating profit margin. Buy at: CMP and dips to ₹177. Target price: ₹190-195 in 1 month. Stop loss: ₹174. Manorama Industries Ltd (Cmp: ₹1687.70) Why it's recommended: Gradual accumulation at critical support levels highlights strong investor interest, supported by consistent revenue growth. Steady higher lows with a thrust above value area resistance around 300 suggest more upside possibility. Key metrics: P/E: 67.18 52-week high: ₹1,632 Volume: 118.49K Technical analysis: Support at ₹1,470 | Resistance at ₹1,850. Risk factors: Competition in the banking space and regulatory issues. Buy at: CMP and dips to 1640. Target price: ₹1,770-1,825 in 1 month. Stop loss: ₹1,620. Raja Venkatraman is co-founder, NeoTrader. His Sebi-registered research analyst registration no. is INH000016223. Investments in securities are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Registration granted by Sebi and certification from NISM in no way guarantees performance of the intermediary or provide any assurance of returns to investors. Disclaimer: The views and recommendations given in this article are those of individual analysts. These do not represent the views of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store