Aussie mum claims her job was so disgusting it left her unable to speak for SIX years
An Aussie mum says she lost her voice after being exposed to filthy conditions at her former workplace.
The 44-year-old was allegedly sent into urine and faeces-covered homes while employed as a disability support worker for Woodbine, a not-for-profit organisation that supports people with intellectual disabilities based in Warracknabeal in north-west Victoria.
In 2019, the fit and healthy mum-of-two, who has asked not to be identified, transported a client who required medical treatment to Warracknabeal Hospital.
She had to stay with him for several days as the hospital was unable to provide the necessary support for his needs, news.com.au reported.
During that time, the woman came down with a respiratory illness similar to that of other patients.
The woman, who worked for the not-for-profit for two decades, was off sick for three weeks before returning to work in allegedly unsafe conditions.
'Unfortunately [the clients] weren't able to keep their house clean, it would be filthy... urine, faeces, and mum would have to go there quite a bit,' her 21-year-old daughter told the publication.
'Mum didn't want to be rude. Woodbine was aware of the circumstances but there was nothing put in place to protect mum at all.'
The disability support worker's respiratory condition is said to have worsened following her return to work.
She was later diagnosed with a chest infection and pleurisy, inflammation of the lining of the lungs and chest cavity, which symptoms include a sharp, stabbing chest pain that worsens with breathing, coughing or sneezing.
She was hospitalised in March 2020, where she lost her voice completely.
Her daughter said her mum's condition 'developed into this vocal cord dysfunction from the recurrent infections'.
The mum-of-two never regained her vocal function and today, she can't speak for more than a few minutes at a time, and lives in constant pain.
She was left unable to work and moved to the Gold Coast in 2022.
Her daughter claimed her mum's life has been impacted severely by the condition and feels let down by her former employer.
Once fit and healthy, she requires medication to get through the day and is no longer able to exercise.
The financial implications have also been 'significant.'
The 44-year-old has received WorkCover payments at 80 per cent of her previous salary for more than five years.
However, the mum-of-two now intends to lodge an application for a serious injury certificate.
She is being represented by Shine Lawyers senior associate Nehad Elmassry, who described the case as a 'very bizarre and unique situation'.
The lawyer alleged Woodbine failed in its duty of care as an employer by not providing the mum with personal protective equipment.
Mr Elmassry said the her client had met the threshold to get compensation for losing her voice, but she would 'have to sue the Victorian WorkCover Authority, which steps into shoes of the employer' to get further compensation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
7 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Harvey Coyne is facing triple-heart bypass surgery. His social housing provider wants to evict him
Sitting on his hospital bed, his voice scratchy and strained, Harvey Coyne gives a bleak insight into what will happen if he's evicted from community housing in Perth. 'Without it, I'm pretty well buggered,' Coyne says. The Noongar elder, 66, is suffering from serious ill health. He has severe heart disease, requiring a pending triple bypass surgery, and this week had another heart attack, which left him hospitalised in Perth's Fiona Stanley hospital. Coyne has emphysema, hypertension and is blind in one eye. Earlier this year, he suffered a fall that left him with a broken hip. He was taken from his family as part of the Stolen Generations, leaving him with complex trauma. Coyne has been forced to fight another battle, too. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The provider of his community housing unit in Kenwick, on the south-eastern fringes of Perth, is trying to kick him out. The organisation, Housing Choices Australia, has used a no-fault eviction – something that Western Australia, unlike most other states, still deems lawful – to remove him. Coyne and his advocates say the decision to evict him will force him into homelessness, returning him to the rough sleeping that he endured before moving into the Housing Choices Australia property in 2021. Court documents allege the termination notice was sent while Coyne was both hospitalised and grieving for his nephew, who died while living with him. The documents allege he was subjected to 10 inspections in a single year. Each raised new issues that Coyne said he 'struggled to address … due to my age and health'. The case has led to an intervention by leading health researcher Emeritus Prof Fiona Stanley, a former Australian of the Year and namesake of the hospital where Coyne was being treated this week. Stanley earlier this year wrote to Housing Choices Australia expressing her 'grave' concerns about its treatment of Coyne – particularly given his pending triple-bypass. 'This is an extremely serious operation with a number of risks for Mr Coyne. It is imperative that he has stable and secure accommodation in which to prepare for this procedure and then to recover and rehabilitate afterwards,' Stanley wrote in March. 'Mr Coyne's condition is life-threatening, and it is inconceivable to me that he should face homelessness at this time.' Coyne is now fighting his eviction in the Perth magistrates court, which is due to deliver judgment next week. Housing Choices Australia said it was unable to comment on Coyne's case specifically due to ongoing legal proceedings and privacy concerns. 'Housing Choices Australia is committed to providing safe, secure, and appropriate housing for all our residents and supporting them to sustain their tenancies,' the chief executive officer, David Fisher, said. 'As a not-for-profit community housing provider, we operate under the same standards and regulatory requirements as government housing agencies, and we take that responsibility seriously.' It previously told advocates it was working with the state government to find a 'sustainable housing solution that considers both his immediate and longer-term needs'. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Court documents suggest it had previously raised concerns about noise, visitation and the cleanliness of the property, all of which Coyne disputes. Academics and Coyne's housing advocate, Jesse Noakes, say his case is symptomatic of a broader issue. Coyne's home would once have been part of the public housing system. Now, the state government has shifted it to community housing under the management of Housing Choices Australia. Experts say state and federal governments are increasingly relying on organisations like Housing Choices Australia to house low-income and vulnerable citizens. The trend is leading to unnecessary evictions and the erosion of tenant rights, they say. In a briefing paper on Coyne's case, David Kelly, a human geographer with RMIT's Centre for Urban Research, said community housing units had increased by 61.4% in the past decade, helped in part by heavy government subsidies. The stock of public housing units had declined by 7.4% over the same period. Kelly said the shift had 'redefined both the nature of the tenancy and the rights attached to it'. 'Tenants like Harvey, had they remained in public housing, would have been afforded stronger on-paper protections against eviction, and subjected to fewer behavioural interventions disguised as support,' he said. 'These homes have been steadily moved into the portfolios of community housing organisations (CHOs), who operate under different regulatory frameworks and priorities.' Housing Choices Australia receives public funding. Records filed with the ACNC suggest about half of its yearly revenue, or roughly $33m, comes from government funding. It also manages a huge number of dwellings. As of mid-2024, records show it owned 3,099 units and managed a further 4,395 units of housing. Its total assets are worth $1.2bn, according to its latest financial reports. The not-for-profit publicly states that its vision is for 'all people in Australia to have a safe, affordable home and the opportunity to thrive'. WA Greens MLC Tim Clifford said Coyne's case illustrated the dangers of outsourcing public housing. He said it was 'unconscionable' that he should face eviction, given his ill health. 'It is clear from Mr Coyne's case that the choice to outsource public housing to big NGOs means that there is less transparency, less accountability and less access to justice for renters,' Clifford said. Fisher said Housing Choices Australia strongly believed that community housing -operated social housing was an important part of the solution to the 'growing housing crisis in our country'.
The Guardian
22 minutes ago
- The Guardian
After four ‘heartbreaking' rounds of IVF at a private clinic, Cassie put her hopes in the hands of Victoria's public fertility service
Cassie Van Swol and her husband, Steven, spent $40,000 and took out a second mortgage chasing the promise of parenthood. 'The whole time they kept telling me, 'We'll just get you pregnant,'' she says of their private IVF provider. 'But the thing about IVF is there's no just 'getting pregnant'. Every round is just heartbreaking, jumping through these hurdles, hoping for a good outcome and not knowing if it's ever going to happen for you.' After four 'financially draining' rounds, the couple could no longer afford private care and underwent two additional rounds at Victoria's public fertility service. Doctors at Melbourne's Royal women's hospital looked at their medical history and found that the endometriosis Cassie had previously been told 'shouldn't affect' her fertility was doing just that. They ended up taking a different approach and the couple conceived their daughter, Xena – named after the warrior princess and born on Valentine's Day. 'Xena is an absolute miracle,' Cassie says. 'Sometimes I look at her and I just honestly can't believe how we got so lucky.' Amid the fallout of bungles at Monash IVF, Cassie – who wasn't a patient of the private provider – is part of a growing chorus of Australians calling for fertility care to return to public hands, where it all began nearly five decades ago. Australia's first baby conceived through in vitro fertilisation, Candice Elizabeth Reed, was born on 23 June 1980. Dubbed 'Australia's first test tube baby' and the 'million-dollar baby' by the Australian Women's Weekly, Reed was the culmination of a decade's research and work at the Royal women's hospital, the Queen Victoria medical centre, Melbourne University and Monash University. The Weekly reported that the program was at risk of closing down because it was running out of funds, with researchers seeking donations to keep going. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email A Royal women's hospital obstetrician, Ian Johnston – part of the team who delivered baby Candice – thought the fertility treatments they had developed were 'potentially enormous' and could ultimately help as many as 70,000 infertile Australian women. He wasn't exaggerating. In 2022 alone about 20,000 babies were born in Australia and New Zealand thanks to assisted reproductive technology. Forty-five years on from that birth, IVF is big business. Australia's 100 or so clinics are mostly privately owned and operated, and access often depends on what patients can afford. IVF costs up to $10,000 out-of-pocket for each cycle, with the price varying dramatically across clinics and depending on the treatments needed. Patients require an average of three cycles. 'All of the fertility treatment started off in the public women's hospitals and was to a certain extent publicly funded,' says Dr Manuela Toledo, the medical director of TasIVF and a board member of the Fertility Society of Australia and New Zealand. 'Then, after the success of the first IVF births around the world, groups split off and formed the private clinics. 'What's happened now is that IVF is in such high demand … every classroom at the moment has a child there as a result of IVF. One in five couples are now experiencing infertility and we need to understand that this is the new normal.' That shift has raised concerns about how people, desperate for a child, are being treated. There are worries that success rates are inflated, that non-evidence based 'add-ons' are being sold. And the expense makes it inequitable. Errors – at Monash IVF there have been two separate cases of the wrong embryo being implanted – have further shaken public trust. Now state and federal governments are examining the fertility industry's underpinnings, with a 'rapid review' looking at establishing consistent national rules and an independent accreditor. 'We need to inject some confidence and independence and transparency into that system,' said the federal health minister, Mark Butler. The Monash IVF mistakes may have sparked the review but its outcome could have much broader implications, including better and more affordable fertility treatments and a renewed focus on public funding. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'What will improve the birthrate in the long term are publicly funded IVF clinics, so patients can access them based on their need,' Toledo says. 'We know there's a lot of individuals and couples out there who will never see the inside of an IVF clinic because they can't afford it, and that is not right.' And 'the fact that people are accessing their superannuation … sends a very clear message that there needs to be more public funding'. The number of applications to the Australian Taxation Office for super to pay for IVF has been rising, from 3,380 in 2018-19 to 5,200 in 2023-24. Of those 5,200, 4,210 were approved for 3,460 individuals (each new cycle needs a new application). Individuals withdrew an average of about $18,500. 'The psychological impact of not being able to conceive can be significant and it's unfair that some women are being forced to decide between their wellbeing in retirement and their health today,' says the Super Consumers Australia chief executive, Xavier O'Halloran. A range of third-party service providers now exist to help patients, for a fee, access their super. O'Halloran warns people to look out for other costs such as taxes, which are typically between 17% and 22% on an early withdrawal, as well as the compounding impact of that withdrawal on the eventual retirement amount. The Fertility Society of Australia and New Zealand has a 10-year roadmap for a sector overhaul, written by Greg Hunt, a former Coalition health minister, and Rachel Swift, a healthcare consultant and former Liberal candidate. It notes that as the age of hopeful parents keeps going up, so too will demand for medical help, and calls for uniform laws, a national fertility plan, an independent accreditation authority with a formal complaints process, and real-time reporting systems for adverse events and complications. It highlights that publicly funded IVF is 'limited and inconsistent' and economic barriers could be reduced by setting up more public units, or by providing a low-income subsidy to be redeemed through private clinics. There are some Medicare and pharmaceutical benefits scheme rebates for IVF. Some states, including New South Wales, provide additional rebates. Victoria has gone further, launching its public fertility service in 2021. So far it has treated 5,000 Victorians free of charge, with priority given to low-income families, regional patients and those needing fertility preservation due to illness. 'We wanted to ensure that decision to start a family was not made because of where you lived or because of how much was in your bank account,' says the state's health minister, Mary-Anne Thomas. Instead of subsidising 'a very profitable public sector' via rebates, she says, the service builds expertise and capacity in the public system. It's 'not in the business of upselling' and seeks to try the 'least-invasive treatments first', which Thomas says 'may not always happen in the private system'. Despite this progress, much of Australia still lacks accessible public fertility care. For Cassie, the contrast between the private and public systems couldn't be clearer. 'In the private system it felt transactional,' she says. 'They never told us we had about a 20% chance [of conception]. It was just 'try again next month'. 'But not everyone can do that – not everyone has the ability to spend massive amounts of money.' The public system 'took extra time', she says. 'They knew we had only two rounds with them and they wanted to make it work. 'I'm so grateful. They gave us our baby.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
This 10-year plan may be the last chance to save the NHS
The 10-year plan for the National Health Service that Sir Keir Starmer is expected to publish in the next few days is likely to be a somewhat incoherent document. From the advance publicity, it would seem to have a lot of disconnected ideas in it, some good, some not so good and some irrelevant. The government hopes that weight-loss drugs will offer the hope of a big advance against obesity-related illnesses – but this comes after new figures raised concerns about their safety. If large language models can speed up the development of new pharmaceuticals, so much the better. But we remain sceptical about whether supermarkets ought to be recruited into policing their customers' calorie intakes. What will decide the success or failure of the NHS over the next decade, however, will be the design of the structural reforms to the service. Wes Streeting, the health and social care secretary, has made a good start in two respects. He has welcomed private-sector providers to help deliver NHS services free at the point of need, and he has taken an axe to the central bureaucracy of NHS England. The test for the 10-year plan will be the extent to which it brings in further changes to incentives throughout the NHS so that it becomes responsive to patients. Sir Jim Mackey, the new chief executive of the NHS, says many of the right things. 'It feels like we've built mechanisms to keep the public away because it's an inconvenience,' he says in his first interview since taking up the post three months ago. He says of the current NHS: 'It takes forever. It costs a fortune. We need to 'de-layer it' because it's expensive, it slows decision-making down, it de-powers people who need to make decisions.' The sentiment is right, but again, some of his ideas seem better than others. We are not convinced that using patient satisfaction surveys to decide how much money NHS trusts receive is going to work. The evidence of reform under the last Labour government was that the mere existence of competition from private-sector providers had a dramatic effect on the performance of NHS units. Already, there are the very early signs that the extra resources put into the NHS are bearing fruit, less than 12 months after the change of government. Luke Tryl, the opinion pollster for More in Common, reported on BBC's Newsnight on Friday that people in focus groups are starting to report positive experiences of the NHS for the first time since the pandemic. 'If there is a bright spot for the government, it's the NHS,' he said. One of the biggest challenges for Sir Jim and Mr Streeting, however, is more political than structural. They have to send the starkest message to doctors: please do not go on strike; take responsibility; show leadership; it is up to you to make the NHS work, because if it cannot be turned round this time, then it probably is the end of this model of healthcare. Sir Jim appears to understand this. He says that his 'big worry' is that if the NHS cannot deliver a service that is better at listening to patients – the particular example he gave was maternity care – 'we'll lose the population; if we lose the population, we've lost the NHS; for me, it's straightforward: the two things are completely dependent on each other.' He is absolutely right. Universal healthcare free at the point of need is a noble idea, but it desperately needs Labour's reforms to work if it is to survive.
