
'Great British Energy solar panels' for schools were made in China
"I'm really excited about the principle of GB Energy," she told BBC News. "But it's taxpayers' money and we should not be supporting slave labour with that money. And wherever possible, we should be supporting good working practices and buy British if we can."She added: "That means that yes, unfortunately, in the short term, solar panels are probably going to be slightly more expensive."There are solar panels made around the world in Taiwan, Canada, even in the UK."Longi and Aiko both told the BBC they forbid forced labour in their production and supply chains.China is the world's leading producer of solar panels and the suppliers in the Xinjiang region have been linked to the alleged exploitation of Uyghur Muslims.Earlier this year, the law was changed to ban GB Energy from investing in renewables if there is evidence of modern slavery in their production.China has dominated the market and, according to the International Energy Agency, the country's global share in all the manufacturing stages of solar panels exceeds 80%.Champion, who is chair of the International Development Select Committee, said "abuse in renewable supply chains is insidious and hard to root out".But she urged ministers to exclude known human-rights offenders from winning public contracts.A GB Energy spokesperson said all of the solar contracts issued under the schools initiative complied with the UK's modern slavery rules.
The Xinjiang challenge
Up to 50% of the world's supply of polysilicon - a key component in solar panels - is estimated to come from the Xinjiang region.Mark Candlish is the director of GB-Sol, which calls itself the only manufacturer of conventional solar panels in the UK.He said polysilicon was "a key social issue facing our industry, with the risk of forced labour in the main mining areas".He added: "The global solar market is so dominated by China that it is difficult to avoid buying Chinese if you want the low cost energy and low carbon benefits of solar PV."Many businesses and governments - including the UK's - buy Chinese solar panels because they are cheaper than those made elsewhere.Two thirds (68%) of the solar panels imported by the UK came from China in 2024, according to HMRC trade data. That's an increase on the figure in 2023, when Chinese products accounted for 61% of UK solar imports.A report by Sheffield Hallam University in 2023 linked various solar companies to suppliers in the Xinjiang region.One of the report's authors, Alan Crawford, said the general lack of transparency in the entire solar supply chain was greater now than it was in 2023, when his Over-Exposed report was published."Companies that were willing to comment are now silent," he said.
'Ethical supply chains'
GB Energy is a state-owned company that was set up by the Labour government to invest in renewables, such as solar power.In its first big investment, GB Energy is spending about £200m on rooftop solar for 200 schools and NHS hospitals across the country.The first tranche of this funding has been spent on the Chinese solar panels for the 11 schools.The Department for Education told the BBC which companies had made the solar panels in response to a freedom of information request.A GB Energy spokesperson said the company would "lead the way in ethical supply chains" and insisted there was "no place for forced labour or unethical practices in the UK's energy transition".The spokesperson added: "That is why we are introducing a statutory duty on Great British Energy to prevent modern slavery in its supply chains, and reviewing supplier transparency and disclosure standards to ensure confidence in all public-facing renewable programmes."All contracts issued under this schools and hospitals solar initiative complied with UK procurement rules, including extensive requirements under the Modern Slavery Act."GBE will seek to uphold these requirements in its contracting arrangements and are actively engaging with international partners to raise the bar globally on solar supply chain accountability."
China has been accused of committing crimes against humanity against the Uyghur population and other mostly-Muslim ethnic groups in the north-western region of Xinjiang.In state-sponsored programmes, detainees are forced to produce goods including polysilicon, a core ingredient in solar panels, according to the US Department of Labor.The Chinese government has denied all allegations of human rights abuses in Xinjiang.Longi and Aiko are both members of the Solar Stewardship Initiative, which is a scheme designed to develop confidence in the supply chain and the responsible sourcing of solar panels.An Aiko spokesperson said the company was "committed to upholding the highest standards of ethical business conduct and responsible sourcing"."We take any concerns related to human rights and labour practices seriously and expect our suppliers to do the same," the spokesperson said."As part of our ongoing efforts, we engage with suppliers to promote transparency and continuous improvement in line with international guidelines. We are also closely monitoring global supply chain developments and remain committed to working with stakeholders to support a fair and sustainable solar industry."Longi said it regretted the findings of the Sheffield Hallam University report and "categorically affirms that forced labour has no place within our supply chain".A company spokesperson said the conclusions in the Over-Exposed report "may not fully reflect the comprehensive measures Longi has implemented to ensure full compliance with international labour standards"."Independent third-party audits play a critical role in verifying compliance and identifying potential risks," the spokesperson said."While the complexity of global supply chains presents challenges, Longi remains steadfast in its efforts to eliminate any risks associated with forced labour."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Afghan data leak inquiry to be conducted by Parliament's security watchdog
An inquiry into the Afghan data leak that led to an unprecedented legal gagging order and an £850 million secret relocation scheme is set to be carried out by Parliament's intelligence watchdog. Lord Beamish, chairman of the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament (ISC), said the cross-party group would launch a probe after considering defence assessment documents related to the case. The peer has previously voiced concern over 'serious constitutional issues' raised by the handling of the breach that saw the details of 18,714 applicants for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) scheme released in 2022. The leak prompted an unprecedented superinjunction amid fears the Taliban could target would-be refugees for reprisals, meaning the ISC, which routinely reviews sensitive material, was not briefed. It also saw the establishment of a secret scheme, the Afghanistan Response Route (ARR), to bring some of those affected to the UK at a projected final cost of about £850 million. In a statement on Monday, Lord Beamish said the committee 'has agreed that, once it has considered the requested material, it will conduct an inquiry into the intelligence community's role and activity in connection with the loss of data relating to Arap applicants in February 2022'. The Ministry of Defence said it had been instructed by Defence Secretary John Healey to give 'its full support' to the committee. The ISC, which is made up of MPs and peers, had asked for the release of defence assessments that formed the basis of the superinjunction, as well as other material relating to the Arap scheme. It hard argued that under the Justice and Security Act 2013, classification of material is not grounds on which information can be withheld from the committee, given its purpose is to scrutinise the work of the UK intelligence community. Thousands of Afghans included on the list of people trying to flee the Taliban are unlikely to receive compensation after their details were accidentally leaked. A spokesman for the Ministry of Defence (MoD) said the Government would 'robustly defend' any legal action or bid for compensation, adding these were 'hypothetical claims'. It has also been reported that the MoD will not proactively offer compensation to those affected. In total, the Government expects 6,900 people to be brought to the UK under the ARR scheme, which was introduced under the previous Tory administration after a defence official leaked the data 'in error' in February 2022. Along with the Afghan nationals, the breach saw details of more than 100 British officials compromised, including special forces and MI6 personnel. An MoD spokesman said: 'The Government strongly welcomes the Intelligence and Security Committee's scrutiny of the Afghan data incident. 'We recognise the urgent need to understand how these significant failures happened and ensure there's proper accountability for the previous government's handling of this matter. 'The Ministry of Defence has been instructed by the Defence Secretary to give its full support to the ISC and all parliamentary committees. If incumbent ministers and officials are asked to account and give evidence, they will. 'We have restored proper parliamentary accountability and scrutiny for the decisions that the department takes and the spending that we commit on behalf of the taxpayer.'


Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Footsie closes above 9,000 for first time as round-the-clock trading idea sparks fierce City debate
The FTSE 100 closed above 9,000 for the first time yesterday – as a report that the stock exchange could introduce round-the-clock trading sparked a fierce debate. The UK index climbed 20.87 points, or 0.2 per cent to end the session at 9012.99. It is up by more than 10 per cent for the year to date. The Footsie reached the milestone even as politicians and City grandees worry that it is losing its relevance as a global financial centre. Reforms over the past couple of years have so far failed to revive valuations enough to spare the exchange from being raided by foreign predators. Some think it should follow rival exchanges in New York, which are already planning to bring in 24-hour or extended trading hours – but opinion in the Square Mile is divided. Record close: The FTSE 100 climbed 21 points, or 0.2% to end the session at 9013. It is up by more than 10% for the year to date. The Financial Times reported that parent company London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) was considering the move. Michael Healy, managing director of trading platform IG, said 24-hour trading would be 'a welcome and overdue step in the right direction' for the exchange. He said: 'If London wants to reclaim its place as a leading global financial centre, it must lead on this.' But Michael Brown at broker Pepperstone said it could have a 'negative impact' on liquidity with trading volumes spread over a longer period resulting in more volatility. He added that there was 'very little clamour for such a move'. LSEG declined to comment.


Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Funds network Calastone sold to US financial software provider SS&C Technologies in £766m deal
Calastone has been sold to US financial software provider SS&C Technologies for £766million. Based in London, the British funds network and data business began operating in 2008 and now has offices worldwide, serving 4,500 clients in 57 countries. US buyout group Carlyle bought Calastone from venture capital investors Octopus Ventures and Accel for an undisclosed sum in 2020. The group was put up for sale earlier this year and the Mail revealed two weeks ago that a deal was imminent. It is expected to complete later this year. The sale was described by Calastone as a 'strong endorsement of its network, technology and client relationships built by the team over the past 17 years'. After the deal is done, Calastone will operate as part of SS&C's global investor and distribution solutions division. Calastone chief executive Julien Hammerson said: 'This is a proud moment. 'SS&C's global scale and deep expertise across fund services and technology will enable us to accelerate innovation and deliver new digital capabilities to the market.'