logo
Three Wishes For Business Leaders

Three Wishes For Business Leaders

Forbes15-04-2025
Sonal Jain is the Global CHRO of EPL LTD.
Aladdin, a character from a Middle Eastern folktale, stumbles on an oil lamp that unleashes a powerful, larger-than-life genie who grants him three wishes.
As business leaders, don't we all want such an opportunity? Most leaders are hungry to face challenges and prove themselves as winners. But there are some situations that look daunting, unbeatable, hazy and chaotic. At these moments leaders must be saying in their hearts: "I wish ..."
Just as Aladdin was given three wishes, I believe there are three mindsets that can make leaders' dreams and wishes come true. I call these the "And Mindset," the "Growth Mindset" and the "I Am Worth It Mindset."
We live in a volatile world where geopolitical instability, changing consumer preferences and economic turmoil make the news seemingly every day. In this volatile world, we need to make choices that will deliver extraordinary outcomes on at least two fronts.
For example, consider how we might deliver profits and sustainability and ensure we make the right decisions for our organization and talent in both the short and long term. How might we keep investors and communities and employees and other stakeholders engaged and inspired? This "And Mindset" can guide us to make the right choices, which in my experience are never the extremes.
When an organization's collective leadership displays the "And Mindset," all of its functions will invariably work together and rally behind the purpose of the organization. When the "And Mindset" fails, one function becomes more powerful than the others, which starts seeding egos and failures in the long term.
I believe the "And Mindset" has the ability to identify simple solutions in a complex environment, since it forces a clear look at trade-offs. If we don't use the "And Mindset," we might choose a solution that looks simple in the beginning but is bound to create complications in the long term.
The second "wish" is the "Growth Mindset," which opens doors even in the haziest times to provide clarity and confidence. It's the belief that there is enough talent, commitment and drive to cut through all challenges and make positive progress.
Consider the famous quote by psychologist Abraham Maslow: "One can choose to go back toward safety or forward toward growth. Growth must be chosen again and again; fear must be overcome again and again."
Leaders often have to choose between different options. These options might be quite stark; they might create a dichotomy or sit at opposite ends of the spectrum of values of the leaders or organizations. At that moment, only good judgment grounded in the "Growth Mindset" will provide leaders with the ability to make the right decision for their chosen outcome.
My company's Global CEO, Anand Kripalu, often phrases it this way: "Growth is a virtuous cycle. Both winning and losing are habits, which depend on our mindset."
As the poet Maya Angelou once wrote, "You alone are enough. You have nothing to prove to anybody."
To me, this mindset is the foundation of the value system that good leaders and organizations stand on. It's the roots in the forest that nourish the trees, giving strength, solidarity and sincerity.
One of the organizations I work with was having a tough year, and one leader was getting hugely impacted, specifically by seeing his name in red on the dashboard the company used. To my dismay, the leader started feeling depressed rather than taking the actions that were most required. It was as if he were carrying the dashboard on his forehead.
Through coaching, he realized that it was his performance that needed attention; there were aspects of his leadership that required a shift in context. Ultimately, he was able to separate his performance from who he was as a professional and human being.
Resilience plays an important role in preserving this mindset, allowing leaders to bounce back from a setback or disappointment with what is needed at that point in time.
It's not easy, but it is possible to weave these mindsets together to help the magic happen through this four-step approach:
Step back and observe what the situation really is. What are leaders trying to solve for? Is it a short-term bump or a situation where the existence of the organization is at risk? What are the options available, and what are the trade-offs they entail? Most importantly, what are the non-negotiable value systems on which the organization and leaders stand?
Once all the above factors are articulated (the "ands," if you will), leaders should assess the possibilities and challenges. Here, a growth mindset assures them that the situation can be turned around and helps identify which blockers are not allowing the shift to happen.
Once a clear assessment has been made of the actions that need to be taken, leaders should act with speed and agility, which ensures they lose no more time in this process. (After all, when a wish is granted, it needs to be acted upon right away.)
Not all actions lead to meaningful results. Even after rounds of observation, pauses and acts, things don't always work to one's expectation. This is the time to bring the I Am Worth It Mindset, and with resilience, bounce back with a new start or a new path. And if a leader believes that they are not the right individual to solve the situation, they should gracefully make the path for a new leader to step in without any emotional drama.
Choose your wishes wisely, not hastily. Make a wish that not only serves you, but also serves a larger ecosystem. If your wish hurts the environment or ecosystem, it will come back to hurt you one day.
My own wish is that all leaders are able to compassionately weave the three mindsets together to create meaningful impact in their lives and the lives of others, which can make this world a better place.
Forbes Human Resources Council is an invitation-only organization for HR executives across all industries. Do I qualify?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UBS terminates Aladdin contract with BlackRock
UBS terminates Aladdin contract with BlackRock

Yahoo

time12 hours ago

  • Yahoo

UBS terminates Aladdin contract with BlackRock

UBS Group has terminated its contract with BlackRock's Aladdin technology platform, a multimillion-dollar agreement inherited from Credit Suisse, reported Bloomberg. This move is part of UBS's ongoing integration of the asset management operations of its former competitor. The decision to end the contract was made earlier this year. UBS is currently in the process of transferring key components, including numerous Credit Suisse funds, to its own systems. The bank aims to complete this transition by the end of the current year, the report said. UBS management has indicated that the removal of outdated IT and associated infrastructure is essential for enhancing shareholder value following the acquisition of Credit Suisse. The Aladdin contract, which began in 2019, generated revenue estimated between SFr50m and SFr100m (approximately $126m) since its inception, according to sources who requested anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the information. UBS's asset management division has been facing challenges due to declining revenues linked to reduced management fees. This situation complicates efforts to decrease operating costs, including through workforce reductions. The combined asset management units manage assets totalling $1.8tn and reported a pretax profit of $135m for the first quarter of the year. Aleksandar Ivanovic assumed leadership of the division in January 2022 following the retirement of Suni Harford. Subsequently, the bank restructured its leadership to streamline product offerings and cut costs, as outlined in an internal memo from Ivanovic. Aladdin, which stands for asset, liability, debt, and derivative investment network, offers trading, risk management, and portfolio management tools widely utilised by major money managers, pension funds, and corporate treasurers. BlackRock's CEO Larry Fink has prioritised technology in his strategy for the firm, which is looking to expand beyond public markets. The annual revenue of BlackRock's technology services division, which includes Aladdin, has increased by 45% to $1.6bn from 2020 to 2024. "UBS terminates Aladdin contract with BlackRock" was originally created and published by Private Banker International, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Anthropic's $150 Billion Goal: How Amazon and Alphabet Could Benefit From the AI Surge
Anthropic's $150 Billion Goal: How Amazon and Alphabet Could Benefit From the AI Surge

Business Insider

timea day ago

  • Business Insider

Anthropic's $150 Billion Goal: How Amazon and Alphabet Could Benefit From the AI Surge

Artificial intelligence start-up Anthropic is in early talks to raise between $3 billion and $5 billion in a new funding round. The raise could push the company's valuation above $150 billion, according to the Financial Times. That would more than double its current $61.5 billion valuation, reached just a few months ago. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Anthropic Is Growing Fast Anthropic is the company behind Claude, a large language model that competes with OpenAI's ChatGPT. It is backed by Amazon (AMZN) and Alphabet Inc. (GOOG), which have each committed billions in cloud credits and cash. Amazon has already invested up to $8 billion and is reportedly considering further investments to remain among Anthropic's largest shareholders. This funding round comes as competition in artificial intelligence intensifies. OpenAI is preparing to launch GPT-5 and is working with SoftBank (SFTBY) on a separate raise that could bring in tens of billions of dollars. Meanwhile, Anthropic has quietly increased its annualized recurring revenue from $1 billion at the start of the year to over $4 billion, driven mainly by enterprise subscriptions. Investors are closely watching the private AI space, but the real implications may lie with public companies that stand to benefit. Amazon and Alphabet have positioned themselves as infrastructure providers for leading model developers, such as Anthropic. A stronger Claude model, used widely in enterprise software and coding tools, could support growth in Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud revenue. The Middle East Is Calling The funding talks have also drawn interest from Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds. Anthropic's leadership has expressed concerns internally about taking direct investment from the region, citing political risks. Even so, the company sold $500 million worth of shares to a fund linked to Abu Dhabi in 2023. A broader shift toward sovereign capital could influence how other private AI start-ups raise money. Anthropic remains private for now, but its valuation jump and enterprise growth highlight how quickly the AI market is scaling. Investors seeking exposure are most likely to find it through public companies that enable and support that growth. Using TipRanks' Comparison Tool, we've brought Amazon and Google side by side and compared them to gain a broader look at Anthropic's two most notable backers.

Why Columbia gave in to Trump's extortion
Why Columbia gave in to Trump's extortion

The Hill

time2 days ago

  • The Hill

Why Columbia gave in to Trump's extortion

On July 23, Columbia University entered into a resolution agreement with the federal government to settle claims that it didn't do enough to prevent harassment of Jewish students. Columbia promised to pay $200 million in fines, plus $21 million to settle employment discrimination claims. It also agreed to a raft of policy changes, pledging to further support Jewish students, to comply with laws banning consideration of race in admissions and hiring, to provide the government with admissions data and disciplinary information about international students, to ensure its Middle Eastern Studies programs are 'comprehensive and balanced' and to roll back DEI efforts. In return, the government agreed to close multiple civil rights investigations, release most of the $400 million in previously frozen research funding and consider future grant proposals from Columbia 'without disfavored treatment.' Earlier this month, Paramount agreed to pay $16 million to settle President Trump's claims about prejudicial editing of a CBS News '60 Minutes' interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. Though many legal experts considered the suit baseless, Paramount executives feared it might become an obstacle to a multi-billion dollar sale of the company requiring approval by the Federal Trade Commission. That approval finally came, in a two-to-one vote, on July 24. In March, Paul Weiss, one of the country's top law firms, agreed to represent clients without regard to their political affiliation and perform $40 million in pro bono work for causes supported by Trump in return for termination of a manifestly illegal and financially crippling executive order restricting the firm's security clearances and barring its lawyers from federal buildings. The firm's offense? Primarily that it had a former partner who, while serving as a Manhattan prosecutor, had overseen the criminal investigation into Trump and then written a book urging his prosecution. These three cases demonstrate that, even in long-established democracies, a leader willing to ignore legal constraints and social norms ' has the cards,' as Trump would say, to settle personal scores with his long list of enemies, using one pretext or another. Columbia, Paramount and Paul Weiss could have all chosen to fight the Trump administration in court. Confronted with demands restricting its autonomy and authority, Harvard decided to sue. Rupert Murdoch, owner of the Wall Street Journal, seems inclined to fight Trump's lawsuit over his newspaper's reporting on Trump's birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein. Faced with executive orders similar to the one directed at Paul Weiss, four other law firms chose to litigate rather than capitulate. But Columbia lacks Harvard's resources. The Wall Street Journal is not for sale. The law firms that sued did not confront as grave a risk to their billings as Paul Weiss and the eight other firms who struck similar deals. Critics have praised those choosing to fight and pilloried those choosing to settle. It is worth noting, however, that lawsuits can turn into settlements and settlements can collapse into lawsuits. Also, in these three cases, those deciding to fight cannot be made whole. Lawsuits can stop some administration tactics but cannot stop them all. Suing may prompt Trump to double down on penalties, but may also serve as a bargaining chip in settlement talks. And settlements, especially with the Trump administration, can serve as the prelude to more demands. As Claire Shipman, Columbia's interim president, put it, 'The desire for a simple narrative: capitulation versus courage, or talking versus fighting' ignores the reality 'that real-life situations are deeply complex.' No tactic will immunize a university, media corporation or law firm from a government willing to color this far outside the lines. And individual institutions have no pathway to protect the rule of law against a government willing to ignore it. Columbia's settlement does set a dangerous precedent. As Joseph Slaughter, a Columbia faculty member, stated, the agreement normalizes 'political interference in teaching, research and the pursuit of truth.' The administration is already using the settlement as a template for negotiations with other universities, including Harvard, Cornell, Duke, Northwestern and Brown. In our view, Columbia — which cannot survive as a research university without substantial funding from the federal government — had little choice but to cut a deal. Harvard may yet come to the same conclusion. It has won some short-term victories and will likely win more. But even if the university wins every case it brings, it cannot compel the government to award it future grants, issue visas to foreign nationals seeking to study or work at Harvard or block every perversely creative form of intimidation the administration dreams up. So even when it loses in court, the Trump administration still wins. Its goal is not just to intimidate its direct targets, but the sectors the targets represent: higher education, the media and law firms. These are the mainstays of the civil society of any democracy. Not coincidentally, they also house many of the president's most visible critics. Colleges and universities that care about their research funding, or fear the burdens of trumped-up civil rights investigations, must think twice about pursuing any action likely to incur the administration's ire. For this reason, many of them are already engaging in ' anticipatory obedience ' — terminating DEI programs, mandating tougher punishments for campus protesters and shying away from public statements on sensitive issues. As U.S. District Judge Richard Leon wrote when striking down Trump's executive order against the law firm WilmerHale, 'the order shouts through a bullhorn: If you take on causes disfavored by President Trump, you will be punished!' Law firms are listening, and even though those that sue are winning, a growing number are declining to take cases likely to upset the Justice Department, which is on the verge of becoming on a wholly owned subsidiary of the Trump Organization. And as the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression has observed, Paramount's settlement in the '60 Minutes' case sends a 'chilling message to journalists everywhere.' Authoritarian governments routinely seek to undermine civil society, but strong popular opposition can force a change in behavior. Most Americans disapprove of Trump's assault on higher education and the legal system, but they can do more to make their voices heard — in the organizations they support, with their elected representatives and, of course, at the ballot box.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store