The world's safest countries to live in - amid rising fears of World War Three
War in Europe, escalating tensions in the Middle East and a reshaping of the post-WWII global order has sparked fears of nuclear war that could end life as we know it, with many wondering what countries are the safest in an increasingly dangerous world.
Russia's war in Ukraine shattered decades of peace in Europe with the UK and allies scrambling to increase defence spending to deter Moscow from further westward expansion. The missiles volleys and air strike exchange between Iran and Israel further highlighted the fragile situation in the Middle East after Tehran was accused of attempting to manufacture enough uranium to make nuclear weapons.
Unsurprisingly, an increasingly dangerous world has shifted leaders onto a war footing with Keir Starmer now looking to purchase at least 12 F-35 stealth bombers to bolster Britain's nuclear deterrence. But across the Atlantic, Americans also fear an emerging conflict with a July 2024 YouGov poll finding last year that 62 per cent of 36,421 surveyed US adults respondents believed a major war would happen "within the next 10 years."
A bleak outlook has no doubt led many people to ponder which countries are the safest in the world, particularly amid fears of a major war. Here are the 10 safest countries in the world, according to the Global Peace Index which measures the relative position of nations based on their apparent levels of peacefulness.
10: Finland
The Nordic country of Finland made the top 10 with an overall score of 1.42 on a scale of 1 to 5, with the lower a score indicating the more peaceful the country. Despite being on Russia's doorstep, the country earned its ranking thanks to a relatively low homicide rate, low political terror scale, low political instability and low violent crime rates.
But Finland was denied a higher ranking due to its comparatively high military expenditure, given its proximity to an increasingly aggressive Russia. This was also a major factor in not giving Finland a lower score as its relations with Russia were considered not peaceful, as Moscow may view its former duchy as ripe for territorial expansion.
9: Slovenia
Slovenia is a small country nestled between regional the European regional powers of Italy, Austria and Hungary. The Global Peace Index gave the former Yugoslavia member state a score of 1.409 based on its low criminality, homicide rate, political instability as well as its overall safety and security.
Following a brief conflict during the collapse of Yugoslavia, Slovenia was recognised as an independent nation and has been a member of the European Union since 1992. It has gone on to have a relatively high-income economy with multiple sectors.
8: Denmark
Denmark has cultivated a progressive image over the decades and has been named on several occasions as the happiest country on Earth with one of the most liveable capital cities, in Copenhagen. The Scandinavian country earned a score of 1.393 due to low criminality, homicide rates and political instability.
It was not all praise from the index though, with the organisation giving it higher marks for its large number of weapons imports and experts as well as its relations with neighbouring countries.
7: Portugal
Portugal might be known as a lovely holiday option for many Brits but it was also praised on the peace index for relatively low crime rates, terrorism impact and its overall safety and security. The Iberian country was awarded a score of 1.371 due to its overall safety.
But a medium level police rate and a comparatively higher political terror scale compared to other top 10 nations saw it fail to find a higher place on the list.
6: Singapore
The Southeast Asian city state of Singapore is the first country to make the list that is outside Europe. The tiny nation underwent rapid economic advancement after WW2 and is considered to be a major power in relation to its size and drew favourable remarks from British politicians who wanted to make the UK post-Brexit appear more like the country in regards to its economy.
It landed a score of 1.357 on the Global Peace Index thanks to a low crime rate, access to firearms as well as its safety and security. But Singapore earned the highest marks, which are viewed as less peaceful, for its weapons imports and higher points for its military expenditure and militarisation.
Joint 4: Austria
Austria was given a score of 1.29 in the index due to low perceptions of criminality, a low crime rate and low impacts from terrorism. The country did get higher scores for its police rate and the population's access to firearms.
Joint 4: Switzerland
Switzerland has long prided its neutral stance in regard to global affairs and is viewed as one of the safest places in the world due to this principle. The country also scored 1.29 on the index due to a low crime rate, political violence and cordial relations with neighbours.
The landlocked country did earn higher scores for its police rate, access to small arms and weapons exports.
3: New Zealand
The first, and only country, to make the list from Oceania is New Zealand. Despite having endured one of the deadliest terror attacks in recent history in 2019, the country has earned a reputation of being a safe country.
The Global Peace Index gave New Zealand a score of 1.28 due to a low crime and homicide rate as well as political violence. It did earn higher scores due to a higher level of weapons imports and perceptions of crime.
2: Ireland
Despite recent tensions around the rate of immigration and protests around it the country has earned its spot on the index with a score of 1.26. While perceptions of criminality and the police rate remain high, the incarceration and homicide rate in Ireland is relatively low.
Access to firearms remains does remain higher than it does with other nations on the list but low terrorism fears and good relations with neighbours see it remain in the second spot.
1: Iceland
It is no surprise that an island far away from most countries is considered one of the safest places on Earth, particularly amid fears of a nuclear war. Iceland holds an enviable score of 1.10 on the index and has been widely praised for its approach to egalitarianism as well as equality for its citizens.
The country also benefits from a incredibly low crime rate, access to firearms and political violence. General perceptions among the country's citizens is that is is a safe place to live.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
How Angela Rayner has become the most influential figure in Starmer's government
As Keir Starmer gathered his top ministers for a special away day in Chequers for a team-building reset on Friday, one figure arrived in a much more powerful position than she was in just two weeks ago. It is now widely recognised by Labour MPs, across the different wings of the party, that deputy prime minister Angela Rayner 's influence in this government is greater than almost anybody else. Certainly more than the wounded chancellor Rachel Reeves, who has been beset by economic woes, and even more than health secretary Wes Streeting who, like Rayner, has been tipped as a future contender for the leadership. She was, though, completely unprepared for the shot fired by the Unite union, after its general secretary announced it had suspended her membership for failing to resolve the Birmingham refuse collectors dispute. But while a trade union that looks set to peel off and back Jeremy Corbyn's new party gave her a headache, Ms Rayner nevertheless is enjoying a surge in influence – for now. Welfare rebellion The biggest reason for her rise is the result of the welfare rebellion just over a week ago. As one party whip put it: 'There's nobody more powerful in the government than Angela at the moment. 'She was the one who brokered the deal with Labour rebels, she was the one who talked people off the ledge from voting against the government.' As another ally pointed out that she did not even want the disability cuts and had already sent a leaked memo to Ms Reeves suggesting wealth taxes instead of austerity. Now, after last Wednesday's PMQs, it seems like the government has no option but to raise taxes. But the turnaround for Ms Rayner actually started with her holdout in the spending review, where she got a £39bn for housing and more than expected for local government. A spot of union bother Some may see the recent decision by Unite the union to suspend her membership (even though she left the union in April) as a problem. But behind the scenes it has confused people on the left and other unions, who believe Ms Rayner has turned Starmer's government leftward on disability benefits and steering through the bill on workers' rights. As a TUC source noted: 'The main metric we are judging this government by is the workers' rights legislation and that is on course.' Unite took action because of her position on the Birmingham bins strike. But an ally of Ms Rayner said: 'It's wild! They know full well that Angela cannot directly intervene in the way that they say, and to attack one of the few remaining cabinet members who is standing up for workers rights and real labour values is simply mad.' However, it remains to be seen if the escalating clash with Unite will halt Ms Rayner's rise. A rival court to Downing Street How the tide can turn. Just over a month ago, there was talk about Ms Rayner being demoted and losing the housing part of her portfolio. Now there is speculation in Westminster that the deputy prime minister could soon have her own official office, with its own staff and comms team. There is some scepticism, especially over what it would mean for Sir Keir himself and his chief of staff Morgan McSweeney. As one ally of Ms Rayner noted: 'Morgan will hate the idea and do everything he can to stop it. An Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) would create a rival court, an alternative centre of government.' The last person to have an ODPM was John Prescott under Tony Blair, but unlike Ms Rayner, Prescott was never seen as a candidate to replace Sir Tony. All about the leadership There is still a lot of fevered speculation about whether Sir Keir can survive as prime minister. The image of his chancellor in tears while he failed to guarantee her future this month became the image of a government spiralling out of control after just a month. There are many waiting to see the results of the elections in Scotland, Wales and English councils next May to decide whether to launch a putsch. If he is forced out, Ms Rayner is now the clear favourite to take over, despite her protestations that she does not want the job. Beware the 'Rayner's rise' trap While Ms Rayner is on top at the moment, there is some speculation that the spending review with Ms Reeves has laid a trap for her much more problematic than the issues with Unite. In getting her cash for local government and housing it appears that the deputy prime minister has signed up to council tax rises of 5 per cent. At the housing and local government select committee hearing this week in the Commons she denied that the increase was 'baked in', but MPs from her own party and the opposition were not convinced at all. The Independent has been told that already the term 'Rayner's rise' is being used for hefty council tax increases not seen since the Blair era two decades ago. Back in the Blair government it was Prescott and his Office of the Deputy PM which took the brunt of the anger over rising bills - it will be the same for Ms Rayner. Among her allies there is genuine concern that Ms Rayner's opponents inside and outside the party are 'preparing to weaponise' it as an issue when council tax bills land at the end of the year. There are fears that it will not take much to turn the public against her.
Daily Mirror
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
8 unhinged Donald Trump moments as Epstein row has top team on resignation watch
Donald Trump was swept back to power in November by an unusual and fraught coalition of voters. The biggest group were regular, struggling Americans who for some reason believed him when he said he'd make their shopping cheaper. But it's unlikely those Americans would have got him over the line without another contingent - who you might call the new MAGA hardcore. They're younger, more likely to be male, and much more likely to get their "news" from podcasts and social media. They're also much more likely to believe conspiracy theories about something fishy going on with the suicide of notorious paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, and subsequent investigations into his life, crimes and death. Some of them will have got these ideas from podcasters like Kash Patel, who is now, somehow, director of the FBI. Or maybe from Dan Bongino, another podcaster who is now Patel's deputy at the FBI. And Trump himself constructed a fable about a secret network of establishment bad guys operating in America - but he's not one of them, you understand. So the MAGA hardcore were delighted when Patel and Bongino got their jobs, because they would surely be able to reveal all about the shadowy paedophile rings operating at the highest levels of the deep state, or whatever. Then Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that, despite her telling Fox News a few months ago that Epstein's client list was "on her desk waiting for review", there was actually no more to see here and the investigation was to be closed. And then the other day Trump made a big show - on television - of saying he'd like very much to move on from questions about Epstein. Well, it looks very much like he's going to be very, very disappointed. Here's more on that, and how MAGA might be about to blow up in Trump's face - plus some more of the wildest goings on in Trump world overnight. Everything is fine. Here's what you need to know. According to the New York Times, Bongino and Bondi - along with Trump's chief of staff Susie Wiles - had a massive blow up over the Epstein investigation. It's said Bondi accused Bongino of leaking to conservative news outlets, blaming the AG for the backlash over the probe. Bongino denied it... but then didn't turn up for work on Friday. According to Laura Loomer, one of MAGA's best connected whisperers, he's now considering resigning over the row. It's important not to underestimate how much damage Bongino leaving in anger might cause for Trump. Before Trump installed him in the FBI, he was the host of a lucrative podcast with a huge audience of MAGA hardcore listeners - and his credibility with those listeners has been put at risk by the Epstein row. He blames Bondi for that - although it's hard to see how this particular buck doesn't stop with the President himself. Overnight Washington has been buzzing with rumours that Trump might think it's worth losing Bondi to stop Bongino heading to the nearest microphone and speaking his mind. There's even talk of runners and riders to replace her - including Trump's original pick for AG, Matt Gaetz, who withdrew from consideration after Congress published a report which found evidence that he paid for sex - including with a 17-year-old - and abused illegal drugs during his tenure in the US House of Representatives. It would certainly be a punchy choice. Errant Brit turned MAGA bon vivant Raheem Kassam, whose Capitol Hill bistro Butterworths has become a prime hangout for Trump-adjacent movers and shakers, points out there might be another thing going on here. "There's an interesting NY vs FL thing going on here, too," he wrote in a Twitter thread last night - suggesting a fault-line between the 'Florida people' in Trump's orbit - which includes Wiles and Bondi - and the rest. Kassam went on: "Susie Wiles a long standing close and personal friend of Pam's. In the event Trump would consider keeping Dan (and maybe Kash if he wants out, too) it is likely his Chief of Staff will recommend against it. Which adds layers of problems…" Yes. Steve Bannon is wrong about a great many things, but he's able to count. He suggested at an event yesterday that the Epstein row, if not resolved to the satisfaction of the MAGA hardcore, could cost Trump both the mid-terms and the next Presidential election. He said: "For this to go away, you're gonna lose 10% of the MAGA movement. If we lose 10% of the MAGA movement right now, we're going to lose 40 seats in 2026, we're going to lose the presidency." "They've disheartened the hardest-core populists," he added. Trump has found a wizard wheeze that lets him send weapons to Ukraine while not annoying MAGA any more than he has to. He suggested in an interview with NBC that the plan would be to sell the weapons to other NATO countries, who would pass them on to the besieged nation. In the same interview, Trump was asked about concerns from the CEO of Hasbro - which manufactures Monopoly and My Little Ponies - that their prices would have to go up as a result of his tariffs. Trump brushed off the warning. "If you look at the numbers, inflation's gone down," he said. "I don't know. I didn't hear anything about Hasbro. I don't care about their prices." One has to imagine that as Christmas approaches, many Americans will start to care very deeply about the price of My Little Ponies. Trump later added: "But if they make their toys here, if they made their toys here, they wouldn't have a price increase." As the world attempts to keep up with Trump's antics, the Mirror has launched its very own US Politics WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest news from across the pond. We'll send you the latest breaking updates and exclusives all directly to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is , select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our . During a trip to survey the devastation following floods in Texas, Trump was asked about how well local officials were prepared and how quickly they acted - including if warning systems might have given more people time to evacuate. Trump replied: "Only a bad person would ask a question like that, to be honest with you, I don't know who you are, but only a very evil person would ask a question like that. This has been heroism." Follow our Mirror Politics account on Bluesky here. And follow our Mirror Politics team here - Lizzy Buchan, Mikey Smith, Kevin Maguire, Sophie Huskisson, Dave Burke and Ashley Cowburn. Be first to get the biggest bombshells and breaking news by joining our Politics WhatsApp group here. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you want to leave our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Or sign up here to the Mirror's Politics newsletter for all the best exclusives and opinions straight to your inbox. And listen to our exciting new political podcast The Division Bell, hosted by the Mirror and the Express every Thursday.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
French police slash up more small boats to stop migrants crossing the Channel - but that didn't prevent 900 coming over in last two days
Despite French police slashing people smugglers' boats in an aim to discourage dangerous journeys across the Channel, it hasn't deterred 900 migrants making the journey in the last two days. This comes after the announcement of Keir Starmer 's new deal which allows Britain to send some migrants who crossed the Channel in small boats back to France. A total of five boats carrying 353 came people crossed the English Channel yesterday and 573 arrived in 10 boats on Thursday, according to government data. MailOnline yesterday reported that only a day after unveiling the scheme alongside Emmanuel Macron, the Prime Minister was facing objections from Europe and charities that helped ground the Tories ' Rwanda plan. The new scheme was condemned by campaigners, who said they would support court cases brought by small-boat arrivals chosen to be sent back to France. A border union boss said the legal challenges could take a year. Brussels ominously warned that it was assessing whether the scheme complied with the 'spirit and the letter of the law', while governments including Italy were said to be harbouring 'huge doubts' about its legality. It came as Home Secretary Yvette Cooper refused to say how many of the thousands arriving by dinghy will be removed under the pilot scheme, amid fears it could be even fewer than the 50 a week suggested by French officials this week. Migrants waiting in Calais camps on Thursday laughed off any suggestions the deal was a deterrent, and were already seemingly aware of how to defy attempts to send them back. On Thursday evening, Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp told the Mail: 'This pathetic arrangement may be sunk by legal challenges from activist lawyers and irresponsible charities who want to facilitate illegal immigration into the UK. 'With illegal immigration across the Channel so far this year hitting record levels, Keir Starmer must now be bitterly regretting his foolish decision to cancel the Rwanda deterrent scheme before it even started. 'After two years of legal challenges and legislation, the scheme was ready to go, but Starmer cancelled it just days before the first plane was due to take off last July. 'This would have enabled 100 per cent of the illegal immigrants to be immediately removed without judicial interference. 'The boats would soon have stopped. But Starmer is too weak and too mentally enslaved by his human rights lawyer friends to do what is needed to protect our country's borders.' Downing Street insisted the controversial 'one in, one out' agreement was legally sound and that Brussels supported it. But fearing that returned migrants could head to Italy, the country's interior minister told Sky News: 'We know the EU Commission is still evaluating the agreement, and EU countries, including us, have huge doubts about security and legal aspects of the deal.' A spokesman for the commission said: 'On the specific envisaged co-operation between France and the United Kingdom, the commission will assess the concrete modalities of this co-operation. Today a group of people thought to be migrants are brought in to the Border Force compound in Dover, Kent, from a Border Force vessel following a small boat incident in the Channel There is also no guarantee that after being stopped on their journey that migrants will not try again. Pictured: A group of people thought to be migrants are brought to a Border Force compound in Kent this morning 'And, of course, we continue to work with France and the UK, as well as other EU member states, to support solutions that are compatible with the spirit and the letter of EU law.' A YouGov poll yesterday found 23 per cent of people strongly opposed the scheme, compared to 34 per cent of people who said they 'somewhat' support the scheme. It has been a decade since a sporadic number of boats with migrants on board arriving off the Kent coast from France was reported in the media. At the time, the focus was mainly on the thousands of attempts by migrants in northern France, who were attempting to stowaway on lorries and ferries to the UK. In the nearby Calais Jungle thousands of people, including children, were living under canvass in a camp which was later cleared by the French authorities. But as security was tightened around the ports and Eurotunnel, within three years, significant numbers were using small boats instead to make the dangerous crossing. The cost for a single small boat journey can cost upwards of £1,500 for a single person with no guarantee that the journey will be a success. In Gravelines – where the Mail has witnessed multiple 'taxi boats', which pick up migrants already in the water, while police stand by barred from acting through fear of causing drownings – deputy mayor Alain Boonefaes said the scheme was unfeasible. Despite French police slashing people smugglers' boats in an aim to discourage dangerous journeys across the Channel, it hasn't deterred 900 migrants making the journey in the last two days The cost for a single small boat journey can cost upwards of £1,500 for a single person with no guarantee that the journey will be a success. Police deflate a boat with knives Referring to increasing disputes between people-smuggling gangs and penniless migrants, Mr Boonefaes went on: 'The residents are starting to get angry – some see campfires at the bottom of their gardens. Others have heard gunshots.' He added that he had opposed a British proposal to put a barrier across Gravelines' broad canal to the sea, where many of the taxi dinghies are launched – because it could make a sea rescue missions difficult, and interfere with the activities of a sailing school. With such disagreement over tactics, it is perhaps no wonder the migrants are laughing. There is also no guarantee that after being stopped on their journey that migrants will not try again.
