Sesame Street's Pride Month post sparks backlash from Republican lawmakers amid PBS funding threats
The children's show went viral after it posted a short message on June 1, kicking off Pride Month.
"On our street, everyone is welcome. Together, let's build a world where every person and family feels loved and respected for who they are. Happy #PrideMonth!" Sesame Street's X post read.
The post reached over 23 million views and sparked criticism from conservatives, who slammed the kids' show for turning "woke."
Npr, Pbs Honchos Face Tense Grilling By Gop Lawmakers Over Biased Coverage, Taxpayer Funding
In response, Republican legislators called on PBS, which has been the historical home of Sesame Street for over 50 years, to lose its federal funding.
Read On The Fox News App
"PBS is shamelessly grooming our children while collecting taxpayer dollars. This is evil and should infuriate every parent in America. DEFUND!!" Rep. Mary Miller, R-Ill., posted to X.
"Federal funds aren't for grooming. Through Sesame Street characters or otherwise. Defund PBS," Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, posted to his personal X account in reply to a video of a 2020 episode of "The Not-Too-Late Show" with Elmo featuring Johnathan Van Ness of Netflix's "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy."
Van Ness is also scheduled to appear as a celebrity guest on Sesame Street this season.
Democrats Invoke Children's Shows In Bizarre Defense Of Pbs, Npr: 'Fire Elon, Save Elmo'
Miller's office did not immediately return a request for comment asking why she believed "Sesame Street" was "grooming" children with their post.
Lee's office told Fox News Digital the senator has been a consistent advocate of pulling taxpayer dollars from PBS for many years.
Republicans in Congress have long tried to pull government funding from public media organizations NPR and PBS that they argue are liberally biased.
PBS and Sesame Street did not immediately return Fox News Digital's request for comment.
In March, Rep. Ronny Jackson, R-Texas, reintroduced a bill to defund NPR and PBS, saying they have been "pushing Democrat talking points under the fake banner of 'public media.'"
Defunding Pbs And Npr Could Make Them Even Worse
President Donald Trump also signed an executive order on May 1 with the goal of eradicating federal funding for NPR and PBS. The order, titled "Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Biased Media," called for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) Board to cease direct and indirect funding to the two media outlets.
"At the very least, Americans have the right to expect that if their tax dollars fund public broadcasting at all, they fund only fair, accurate, unbiased, and nonpartisan news coverage. No media outlet has a constitutional right to taxpayer subsidies," the order reads.
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) receives about $500 million annually from Congress to distribute to public radio and TV stations, with some of that funding going to support NPR and PBS.
Pbs Sues Trump Administration, Says Executive Order Cutting Federal Funding Violates First Amendment
PBS and NPR responded to the executive order by filing lawsuits against the Trump administration in May.
"[In] an Executive Order issued on May 1, 2025, the President declared that government funding of private sources of non-commercial media is 'corrosive,' and singled out PBS (alongside National Public Radio) as failing to provide 'fair, accurate, unbiased, and nonpartisan news,'" the court filing obtained by Fox News Digital reads.
"PBS disputes those charged assertions in the strongest possible terms. But regardless of any policy disagreements over the role of public television, our Constitution and laws forbid the President from serving as the arbiter of the content of PBS's programming, including by attempting to defund PBS," it continued.
Fox News' Joseph A. Wulfsohn contributed to this report.Original article source: Sesame Street's Pride Month post sparks backlash from Republican lawmakers amid PBS funding threats
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas is redrawing congressional map for GOP gains, House Republicans acknowledge
Texas legislators are redrawing the state's congressional map to advantage Republican candidates, GOP lawmakers said at a state House hearing Friday, setting aside a legal justification offered by the U.S. Department of Justice and making their political motivations explicit for the first time. 'Different from everyone else, I'm telling you, I'm not beating around the bush,' Rep. Todd Hunter, the Corpus Christi Republican carrying the bill, said about the goal of the map. 'We have five new districts, and these five new districts are based on political performance.' Texas Republicans launched the redistricting effort after pressure from President Donald Trump's political operatives, who demanded state leaders redraw the map to help Republicans maintain their slim House majority ahead of a potentially difficult midterm election. The House redistricting committee released its proposed redo of the map Wednesday. It slices up districts in the Houston, Austin and the Dallas areas, yielding five additional districts that would have voted for Trump by at least 10 percentage points in 2024. In 2024, Trump won 56.2% of votes in Texas. Under the current lines, Republicans hold 66% of Texas' 38 House seats. The new map aims to push that share to 79%. 'Political performance does not guarantee electoral success — that's up to the candidates,' Hunter said. 'But it does allow Republican candidates the opportunity to compete in these districts.' Gov. Greg Abbott, in adding redistricting to the special session agenda, cited a letter from the Justice Department claiming that four Texas districts were unconstitutionally racially gerrymandered. But on Friday, state Republicans were unequivocal that their goal was not to fix racial gerrymandering — which several have testified under oath does not exist in the current map — but to give the GOP the greatest chance of controlling as many as 30 congressional districts. 'These districts were drawn primarily using political performance,' Hunter said, citing Republican gains made across the state since the Legislature last redistricted in 2021, especially among Latino voters. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2019 that states can draw electoral maps on partisan grounds. But under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the map cannot diminish the voting power of people of color. At Friday's hearing, Democrats argued that the proposed map unconstitutionally packed voters of color into some districts while spreading them throughout others to reduce their ability to elect their preferred candidates. 'Every citizen should have equal access to choose their representation, instead of crowding Black people to the point that all the Black people in the state only have two representatives, and all the Latinos in the state are crowded up to the extent that their voting power is diminished,' U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Dallas told state lawmakers during the hearing. Though people of color make up most of Texas and have driven almost all of the state's population growth in recent years, the new map creates 24 districts that are majority-white — two more than the current map, which is under trial for possibly violating the Voting Rights Act. Republicans rejected the idea that the proposed map would suppress voters of color, noting that it would create one new majority Hispanic district and two new majority Black districts. But all three are almost precisely 50% Black or Hispanic, which Democratic lawmakers said at the hearing is not enough to ensure they're able to elect their candidates of choice. U.S. Rep. Marc Veasey of Fort Worth, whose seat would be partially dismantled under the new lines, noted that his district was drawn by a federal court 'to ensure that communities of color, Black and brown Texans, could finally have a voice in Congress.' 'Now, that voice is again under threat,' he said. 'This is a map that was drawn behind closed doors — as we've heard here today — to dismantle representation and weaken our power in turn.' It could take months, if not years, to resolve any legal challenge against the proposed map. A lawsuit against Texas' current maps, passed in 2021, finally went to trial last month, almost four years and several election cycles after they went into effect. In the meantime, Republicans in the Legislature have the votes to pass the map as it's drafted. Chairman Cody Vasut, an Angleton Republican, said the committee, which has 12 Republicans and nine Democrats, will vote to advance the map Friday evening or Saturday. It could be on the House floor as soon as Tuesday, he said. Democrats, locked out of power in the statehouse, have few tools at their disposal to fight the map's passage. The nuclear option is to flee the state and deny Republicans a quorum to pass any legislation — an expensive and politically tenuous move that state House Democrats were still considering ahead of the full chamber vote. At Friday's hearing, the only time the public would have to comment on the House's proposed map, Democrats begged Republicans to slow or stop redistricting entirely. 'This is not a Texas map. It is a Trump map,' said U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, an Austin Democrat. 'It was imposed by President Trump, who has a stranglehold on Congress, and the only question here is whether he also has a stranglehold on this Texas Legislature.' The lineup for The Texas Tribune Festival continues to grow! Be there when all-star leaders, innovators and newsmakers take the stage in downtown Austin, Nov. 13–15. The newest additions include comedian, actor and writer John Mulaney; Dallas mayor Eric Johnson; U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota; New York Media Editor-at-Large Kara Swisher; and U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-El Paso. Get your tickets today! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
Who is Erika McEntarfer, labor statistics chief sacked by Trump
President Trump on Friday accused the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Dr. Erika McEntarfer, of faking jobs numbers, directing his team to fire the former President Biden appointee. Trump blamed McEntarfer for the bad Friday jobs report, showing that the country added 258,000 fewer jobs in May and June than previously reported. The U.S. added just 19,000 jobs in May, significantly lower than the 144,000 reported previously and saw an increase of 14,000 jobs in June, over 90 percent lower than the 147,000 initially shared. The country gained 73,000 jobs in July. In the last three months, the U.S. added 106,000 in total. An administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed to The Hill that McEntarfer was terminated from her post. A BLS official told The Hill that McEntarfer was sacked and that deputy commissioner William Wiatrowski will serve as acting head until the administration finds a replacement. Trump argued that McEntarfer, who was nominated by Biden in 2023 and confirmed to the post the following year, 'faked' the jobs numbers before the 2024 presidential election to 'boost' former Vice President Harris' chance of winning in November. 'This is the same Bureau of Labor Statistics that overstated the Jobs Growth in March 2024 by approximately 818,000 and, then again, right before the 2024 Presidential Election, in August and September, by 112,000,' Trump wrote in a lengthy Friday Truth Social post. 'These were Records — No one can be that wrong? We need accurate Jobs Numbers,' the president said, vowing that McEntarfer will be replaced by someone 'much more competent and qualified.' 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' he said. McEntarfer, a labor economist who has worked in the federal government for over two decades, was confirmed by the Senate in early 2024 in a bipartisan 86-8 vote. Her nomination was supported at the time by now Vice President Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the two former senators representing Ohio and Florida, respectively. Prior to working as the commissioner of BLS, which is part of the Department of Labor, McEntarfer held positions within the Treasury Department, the Executive Office of the President and the U.S. Census Bureau, according to her biography posted on BLS's website. She was the head of research for the Longitudinal Employer–Household Dynamics program at the Census Bureau. The labor economist, who earned a bachelor's degree in social science from Bard College and an economics Ph.D. from Virginia Tech, was a senior economist at the White House Council of Economic Advisors prior to joining BLS. In another post on Truth Social, Trump claimed that Friday's jobs report figures were 'RIGGED' in order to make the president and Republican lawmakers 'look bad.' 'Just like when they had three great days around the 2024 Presidential Election, and then, those numbers were 'taken away' on November 15, 2024, right after the Election, when the Jobs Numbers were massively revised DOWNWARD, making a correction of over 818,000 Jobs — A TOTAL SCAM,' Trump wrote. BLS often revises job number tallies, but the scale of the change on Friday surprised investors and experts after a solid week of economic data. 'Persistent policy uncertainty, tariffs, and diminished immigration flows paralyzing employers, the US economy is now flirting with job losses, revealing a labor market that is much weaker than most Fed policymakers had believed,' EY-Parthenon top economist Gregory Daco wrote. The collection of economic data can take time due to the slow response rates of those surveyed and the size of the economy. The delay does not necessarily mean the data is being manipulated. BLS said in August last year that the U.S. added 818,000 fewer jobs over a one-year period than what was previously reported. DOL Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said on Friday that she agrees with Trump's decision to fire McEntarfer and confirmed that Wiatrowski will work as the acting commissioner. 'A recent string of major revisions have come to light and raised concerns about decisions being made by the Biden-appointed Labor Commissioner,' Chavez-DeRemer said in a Friday post on social media platform X. 'I support the President's decision to replace Biden's Commissioner and ensure the American People can trust the important and influential data coming from BLS.' William W. Beach, who served as the BLS head during Trump's first term, disagreed with the president's decision to terminate McEntarfer, warning it would set a 'dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau.'
Gizmodo
20 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Elon Musk Gave Millions to Trump After Publicly Blowing Up Their Bromance
Newly disclosed federal filings show that Elon Musk gave President Trump's super PAC $5 million and congressional Republicans $10 million during the same period when he was experiencing a very public meltdown over the president's One Big Beautiful Bill. Onlookers have interpreted it as a sign that the Tesla billionaire was vacillating between taking shots at Trump and making conciliatory moves designed to mend their fraying relationship. Last year Musk went all-in on Trump, MAGA, and the Republican Party, engaging in an unprecedented spending blitz designed to see the former reality TV star returned to the White House. Musk was successful in that gambit, but the relationship between him and his gold-haired 'buddy' has since soured. After briefly leading the Department of Government Efficiency (a quasi-agency designed to shrink the federal government), Musk began having problems with Trump over provisions in his spending bill that threatened the EV industry (and, you know, Musk's Tesla). At the end of May, Musk formally left the administration in a swirl of controversy, while also sporting a mysterious black eye (he claimed his son, X, had socked him in the face). Politico notes that Musk's contributions to Trump and the GOP took place not long after the blowup between him and the president, when Musk accused Trump of being in the Jeffrey Epstein files. The outlet writes: The contributions came weeks into Musk's public feud with Trump, as the tech billionaire was slamming Republicans for voting for the megabill that he argued would blow up the deficit. Still, the SpaceX CEO donated $5 million each to the Congressional Leadership Fund, the Senate Leadership Fund and MAGA Inc. on June 27, according to the groups' filings with the Federal Election Commission on Thursday. Those are the top super PACs supporting the House and Senate Republicans and the Trump political operation. If the point of the contributions was to try to make amends with Trump and the Republicans, it doesn't appear to have worked. Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill sailed through Congress, and none of the provisions that proved problematic to Musk's businesses were taken out. Since then, Elon's influence in the government has notably waned. This week, Politico reported that the administration was conducting a 'de-Muskification' at the General Services Administration, where DOGE had formerly holed up. One person close to the organization claimed that DOGE had 'lost all remaining influence' at the agency, which is responsible for supporting basic infrastructure (like office spaces and communications) at federal agencies throughout the government. Musk has since launched his America Party—a supposed third party—as revenge against the President and the GOP lawmakers who passed the One Big Beautiful Bill. Theoretically, were the party to ever take off, it could cause serious electoral problems for many Republicans by siphoning off votes from their political races. However, 'America' isn't much of anything yet, having not yet filed any of the proper paperwork necessary for it to be incorporated. It also doesn't seem like many people are interested in joining the America Party, should it ever materialize. Indeed, a recent poll showed that only 14 percent of surveyed participants had any interest in joining a political party created by Musk. The poll, conducted by Yahoo/YouGov survey, found that while nearly 40 percent of Americans are interested in the creation of a third party, 55 percent said they had no interest in such a party founded by the Tesla CEO. Meanwhile, Musk's businesses have also been flailing. Musk recently announced that Tesla—whose sales have recently plummeted all over the world—would start a robotaxi business, claiming that a driverless service would soon be launched. Tesla subsequently launched a ride-hailing service in California, but, instead of robotaxis, the cars are just normal Teslas driven by humans. Musk's behavior over the past year only seems to strengthen the argument that the billionaire class is a grossly inefficient, stupid, and wasteful segment of people, many of whom seem to feel that gobs of money can solve any problem. Elon has definitively proven this assumption to be false, since he reportedly spent close to $300 million on Trump's campaign last year and, now, less than twelve months later, can't be said to have gained much except the burning hatred of tens of millions of Americans. I'd call that a pretty bad deal.
