
General Services Administration Workers Warned of Impending Staff Cuts
In an email, Josh Gruenbaum, a Trump appointee who currently helps oversee the G.S.A.'s Federal Acquisition Service, told employees that the organization would be 'cutting redundant business functions and associated staffing' and that the organization would not need workers in 'certain areas of the country.'
He also noted that the Federal Acquisition Service, which aids other government agencies in dealing with office supplies, technology and travel needs, would consider utilizing artificial intelligence to reduce costs.
His warning came as roughly 2 million federal workers around the country face a looming deadline Thursday to decide whether to accept an offer to resign but be paid through the end of September. Already, tens of thousands of federal workers have submitted their plans to leave, Trump administration officials said Tuesday.
Union leaders have urged employees not to accept the offer, questioning its legality and legitimacy.
Across the government, federal workers have been bracing for news of how the Trump administration's planned reductions will affect them as agency officials stressed their plans to cut costs.
'We'll be looking at operations in every portfolio to strengthen our business and comply with the directive from the president to reduce the federal work force,' Mr. Gruenbaum wrote in the email, which was seen by The New York Times. 'We can and must make tough decisions to create a leaner and more agile organization.'
The G.S.A., which manages the federal government's property portfolio, has about 12,000 workers across the country. On Monday, The Times reported that G.S.A. leaders have discussed eliminating as much as 50 percent of the agency's budget.
Mr. Gruenbaum, whose LinkedIn profile identifies him as a former director at private equity firm KKR, did not immediately return a request for comment. The G.S.A. did not respond to a request for comment.
In recent days, the Office of Personnel Management, the agency overseeing the resignation program, has tried to reassure workers about the legitimacy of the offer. On Tuesday, the agency issued a new memo that said that separation agreements would be legally binding, and that concerns about the legality of the program were 'misplaced.' The agency has also circulated template contracts to federal agencies 'to assuage any concerns about enforceability.'
On Tuesday, Mr. Gruenbaum encouraged recipients of the email to 'seriously consider the current offer' for deferred resignations from the Office of Personnel and Management.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
22 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
U.S. Dollar Eases as Tariff Deadline Looms
U.S. stocks closed at fresh record highs Thursday after U.S. payrolls rose more than expected. Meanwhile, President Trump is set to use the Independence Day holiday as the backdrop to signing his big tax and spending bill which passed through the House. Investors' attention has now turned to concerns about the U.S. 's ballooning fiscal deficit, and the end of a 90-day pause on so-called U.S. reciprocal tariffs due on July 9. Ahead of that, countries are racing to agree trade deals with the Trump administration. –U.S. bond and stock markets are closed Friday for the holiday, but the dollar and bitcoin eased, while stock markets in Asia ended narrowly mixed and were lower at the open in Europe.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Institutional investors control 75% of Pan African Resources PLC (LON:PAF) and were rewarded last week after stock increased 4.3%
Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Pan African Resources' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions 53% of the business is held by the top 7 shareholders Recent sales by insiders Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Every investor in Pan African Resources PLC (LON:PAF) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 75% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained UK£40m in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 86%. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Pan African Resources. See our latest analysis for Pan African Resources Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Pan African Resources. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Pan African Resources' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Pan African Resources. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Allan Gray Proprietary Ltd. with 12% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 10%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 53% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat. While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Pan African Resources PLC. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own UK£5.0m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying. With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Pan African Resources. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run. I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Pan African Resources (of which 1 is a bit unpleasant!) you should know about. But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. — Investing narratives with Fair Values Suncorp's Next Chapter: Insurance-Only and Ready to Grow By Robbo – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: A$22.83 · 0.1% Overvalued Thyssenkrupp Nucera Will Achieve Double-Digit Profits by 2030 Boosted by Hydrogen Growth By Chris1 – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: €14.40 · 0.3% Overvalued Tesla's Nvidia Moment – The AI & Robotics Inflection Point By BlackGoat – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $384.84 · 0.2% Overvalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Supreme Court to weigh transgender athlete bans
The US Supreme Court agreed on Thursday to wade into the hot-button issue of transgender athletes in girls and women's sports. The court said it would hear cases next term challenging state laws in Idaho and West Virginia banning transgender athletes from female competition. More than two dozen US states have passed laws in recent years barring athletes who were assigned male at birth from taking part in girls or women's sports. The conservative-dominated Supreme Court's decision to hear the cases comes two weeks after it upheld a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming medical treatment for transgender minors. The Supreme Court also recently backed a move by President Donald Trump, who campaigned on the issue of transgender athletes, to have transgender troops dismissed from the military. Trump issued an executive order in February aimed at banning transgender athletes from girls and women's sports. "From now on women's sports will be only for women," Trump said. "With this executive order the war on women's sports is over." The executive order allows federal agencies to deny funding to schools that allow transgender athletes to compete on girls or women's teams. In a high-profile case, the University of Pennsylvania agreed this week to ban transgender athletes from its women's sports teams, settling a federal civil rights complaint stemming from the furor around swimmer Lia Thomas. The Department of Education said that UPenn had entered into a resolution agreement vowing to comply with Title IX, the federal law which prohibits sex-based discrimination in any educational program. It follows an investigation by the department's Office for Civil Rights which found the university had violated Title IX by allowing transgender swimmer Thomas to compete in women's competitions. Thomas became a lightning rod around the debate over transgender athletes in women's sport after competing in female collegiate competitions in 2022. She had earlier swum on UPenn's men's team while undergoing hormone replacement therapy. Critics and some fellow swimmers said she should not have been allowed to compete against women due to an unfair physiological advantage. - 'Discriminatory laws' - The Idaho case accepted by the Supreme Court stems from the Republican-led state's 2020 "Fairness in Women's Sports Act." It was challenged by a transgender athlete at an Idaho university and lower courts ruled that it violates the equal protection clause of the Constitution. West Virginia's 2021 ban on transgender athletes was challenged by a middle school student who was not allowed to compete for the girls' track team. An appeals court ruled that the ban was a violation of Title IX. "We believe the lower courts were right to block these discriminatory laws, and we will continue to defend the freedom of all kids to play," Joshua Block, a senior counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement. "Like any other educational program, school athletic programs should be accessible for everyone regardless of their sex or transgender status," Block said. The Supreme Court will hear the cases during the term beginning in October and issue a ruling next year. cl/bgs