US envoy inspects Gaza aid sites as UN says hundreds of Palestinians killed
GAZA CITY : President Donald Trump's special envoy inspected a US-backed food distribution centre in war-torn Gaza today, as the UN rights office reported that Israeli forces had killed hundreds of hungry Palestinians waiting for aid.
The visit by Steve Witkoff came as a report from global advocacy group Human Rights Watch (HRW) also accused Israeli forces of presiding over 'regular bloodbaths' close to the US-backed aid points.
The UN's rights office in the Palestinian territories said at least 1,373 people had been killed seeking aid in Gaza since May 27 – 105 of them in the last two days of July.
'Most of these killings were committed by the Israeli military,' the UN office said, breaking down the death toll into 859 killed near the US-backed food sites and 514 along routes used by UN and aid agency convoys.
The US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, posted on X that he and Witkoff had visited Gaza 'to learn the truth' about the private aid sites run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which is supported by the US.
'We received briefings from IDF (the Israeli military) and spoke to folks on the ground. GHF delivers more than one million meals a day, an incredible feat!' Huckabee said.
'Hamas hates GHF because it gets food to people without it being looted by Hamas.'
The foundation, on its own X account, posted that it had been a 'privilege and honor' to host Witkoff and Huckabee as the group delivered its 100-millionth meal in Gaza, fulfilling Trump's 'call to lead with strength, compassion and action'.
Gaza's civil defence agency said 11 people were killed by Israeli fire and air strikes today, including two who were waiting near an aid distribution site run by GHF.
GHF largely sidelined the longstanding UN-led humanitarian system just as Israel was beginning to ease a more than two-month aid blockade that exacerbated existing shortages of food and other essentials.
'Beyond imagination'
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed to destroy Hamas and free the captives. (AP pic)
In its report on the GHF centres today, Human Rights Watch accused the Israeli military of illegally using starvation as a weapon of war.
'Israeli forces are not only deliberately starving Palestinian civilians, but they are now gunning them down almost every day as they desperately seek food for their families,' said Belkis Wille, associate crisis and conflict director at Human Rights Watch.
'US-backed Israeli forces and private contractors have put in place a flawed, militarised aid distribution system that has turned aid distributions into regular bloodbaths.'
Responding to the report, the military said GHF worked independently, but that Israeli soldiers operated 'in proximity to the new distribution areas in order to enable the orderly delivery of food'.
It accused Hamas of trying to prevent food distribution and said that it was conducting a review of the reported deaths, adding it worked to 'minimise, as much as possible, any friction between the civilian population' and its forces.
After arriving in Israel yesterday, Witkoff held talks with prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu over how to resolve the almost 22-month-old war, feed desperate civilians and free the remaining hostages held by Palestinian rebels.
Netanyahu has vowed to destroy Hamas and free the captives, but is under international pressure to end the bloodshed that has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians and threatened many more with famine.
Following his discussions with Witkoff, Netanyahu met foreign minister Johann Wadephul of Germany, another staunch Israeli ally, who nonetheless delivered a blunt message.
'The humanitarian disaster in Gaza is beyond imagination,' Wadephul told reporters after the meeting, urging the government 'to provide humanitarian and medical aid to prevent mass starvation from becoming a reality'.
'I have the impression that this has been understood today,' he added.
Hostage video
Yesterday, the armed wing of Palestinian resistance group Islamic Jihad released a video showing German-Israeli hostage Rom Braslavski, 21, watching recent news footage of the crisis in Gaza and pleading with the Israeli government to secure his release.
'Even the strongest person has a breaking point,' his family said in a statement released by the Hostages and Missing Families Forum in Israel.
'Rom is an example of all the hostages. They must all be brought home now.'
Today, Wadephul also met relatives of hostages still held in the Gaza Strip.
According to the German foreign office, among the 49 hostages still held, a 'single-digit' number are German-Israeli dual nationals
'Germany continues to do everything in our power to achieve the release of the hostages,' Wadephul said, expressing outrage at the video release.
This 'horrible' footage reveals 'once again the utter depravity of the kidnappers', he added.
The Hamas-led October 2023 attack resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to a tally based on official figures.
Of the 251 people taken hostage, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27 declared dead by the Israeli military.
The retaliatory Israeli offensive has killed at least 60,249 Palestinians, most of them civilians, according to Hamas-run Gaza's health ministry.
This week UN aid agencies said deaths from starvation had begun.
Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties accessing many areas mean AFP cannot independently verify tolls and details provided by the civil defence and other parties.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Netanyahu seeks Red Cross help for Gaza hostages as emaciated videos fuel Israeli outrage
JERUSALEM, Aug 4 — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu requested the help of the International Committee of the Red Cross yesterday to aid hostages in Gaza, as outrage built at videos showing two of them emaciated. The premier's office said he spoke to the ICRC coordinator for the region, Julien Lerisson, and 'requested his involvement in providing food to our hostages and... immediate medical treatment'. The ICRC said in a statement it was 'appalled by the harrowing videos' and reiterated its 'call to be granted access to the hostages'. In response, Hamas's armed wing said that it would allow the agency access to the hostages but only if 'humanitarian corridors' for food and aid were opened 'across all areas of the Gaza Strip.' The Al-Qassam Brigades said it did 'not intentionally starve' the hostages, but they would not receive any special food privileges 'amid the crime of starvation and siege' in Gaza. Over recent days, Hamas and its ally Islamic Jihad have released three videos showing two hostages seized during the October 7, 2023 attack on Israel that triggered the ongoing war. The images of Rom Braslavski and Evyatar David, both of whom appeared weak and malnourished, have fuelled renewed calls in Israel for a truce and hostage release deal. A statement from Netanyahu's office on Saturday said he had spoken with the families of the two hostages and 'expressed profound shock over the materials distributed by the terror organisations'. Netanyahu 'told the families that the efforts to return all our hostages are ongoing', the statement added. Earlier in the day, tens of thousands of people had rallied in the coastal hub of Tel Aviv to call on Netanyahu's government to secure the release of the remaining captives. There was particular outrage in Israel over images of David, who appeared to be digging what he said in the staged video was his own grave. The videos make references to the dire humanitarian conditions in Gaza, where UN-mandated experts have warned a 'famine is unfolding'. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said the images 'are appalling and expose the barbarity of Hamas', calling for the release of 'all hostages... immediately and unconditionally'. Hamas must disarm Kallas said in the same post on X that 'Hamas must disarm and end its rule in Gaza'—demands endorsed earlier this week by Arab countries, including key mediators Qatar and Egypt. She added that 'large-scale humanitarian aid must be allowed to reach those in need'. Israel has heavily restricted the entry of aid into Gaza, while UN agencies, humanitarian groups and analysts say that much of what Israel does allow in is looted or diverted in chaotic circumstances. Many desperate Palestinians are left to risk their lives seeking what aid is distributed through controlled channels. Yesterda, Gaza's civil defence agency said Israeli fire killed nine Palestinians who were waiting to collect food rations from a site operated by the US- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) near the southern city of Rafah. 'The soldiers opened fire on people. I was there, no one posed any threat' to the Israeli forces, 31-year-old witness Jabr al-Shaer told AFP by phone. There was no comment from the military. Five more people were killed near a different GHF aid site in central Gaza yesterday while Israeli attacks elsewhere killed another five people, said civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal. Emaciated and desperate Braslavski and David are among the 49 hostages taken during Hamas's 2023 attack who are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Most of the 251 hostages seized in the attack were released during two short-lived truces, some in exchange for Palestinians in Israeli custody. Hamas's 2023 attack resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Israel's campaign in Gaza has killed at least 60,430 people, also mostly civilians, according to figures from the Hamas-run territory's health ministry, which are deemed reliable by the UN. The Palestine Red Crescent Society said one of its staff members was killed in an Israeli attack on its Khan Yunis headquarters, in southern Gaza. Contacted by AFP, the Israeli military said it was 'not aware of a strike' in that area. Media restrictions and difficulties accessing many areas mean AFP cannot independently verify tolls and details provided by various parties. Provocation In Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem, far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir conducted a Jewish prayer at the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, Islam's third-holiest site, and called for the annexation of Gaza. The site is also revered by Jews as the Temple Mount, the holiest site in Judaism, though they are barred from praying there under a long-standing convention. This was the first time a government minister openly prayed inside the compound, Israeli media reported. In a statement filmed at the compound, Ben Gvir said that 'the response to Hamas's horror videos' should include annexing Gaza and the 'voluntary emigration' of its population.— AFP
Malay Mail
5 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Can you bomb Iran and still win the Nobel Peace Prize? Trump thinks so
WASHINGTON, Aug 4 — A craving for international prestige, a decade-long Obama rivalry and perhaps a dash of provocation: a mercurial melange of factors is at play in Donald Trump's obsession with the Nobel Peace Prize. 'It's well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on July 31, prompting reactions of disbelief and sarcasm from the Republican leader's opponents. Since his January 20 return to power, the US president 'has brokered, on average, one peace deal or ceasefire per month,' Leavitt said, citing as examples his mediations between India and Pakistan; Cambodia and Thailand; Egypt and Ethiopia; Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC); Serbia and Kosovo; and others. His leading spokeswoman also mentioned Iran, where Trump ordered US strikes against the Islamic republic's nuclear facilities, as evidence of decisions Leavitt claims have contributed to world peace. She made no mention of the conflict in Ukraine, which Trump pledged multiple times to end on 'day one' of his term, or the war in Gaza, which rumbles on and for which the US supplies Israel with weapons. Pakistan, Israel For some foreign leaders, mentioning the prestigious award has become a sign of diplomatic goodwill toward an American president who envisions himself as a peacemaker. Pakistan nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, as did Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. During an early July meeting at the White House, a journalist asked the presidents of Liberia, Senegal, Mauritania, Guinea-Bissau, and Gabon whether Trump deserved the award. Basking in the flattering responses from the African leaders, a smiling Trump said: 'We could do this all day long.' Tens of thousands of people can offer a nomination to the Nobel committee, including lawmakers, ministers, certain university professors, former laureates and members of the committee themselves. Nominations are due by January 31, with the announcement coming in October — this year on the 10th of the month. Law professor Anat Alon-Beck, who is an Israeli-American, submitted Trump's name to the committee's five members, who were appointed by the Norwegian Parliament. The assistant professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law told AFP she did so because of the 'extraordinary leadership' and 'strategic brilliance' he has shown, in her opinion, in advancing peace and securing the release of hostages held in the Gaza Strip. 'Never' getting the Nobel For some, the prospect of handing the prize to someone who has upended the international order is untenable. 'Nominating Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize is like entering a hyena in a dog show,' US history and politics researcher Emma Shortis wrote on news site The Conversation. 'Of course Trump does not deserve it.' The American president disagrees. Demonstrators holding a Trump balloon march front the Los Angeles City Hall to the Edward R. Roybal Federal and Detention Center building on August 2, 2025 in Los Angeles. — AFP 'I deserve it, but they will never give it to me,' Trump told reporters in February as he hosted Netanyahu at the White House, lamenting not ticking the Nobel box in his life. 'No, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do, including Russia/Ukraine, and Israel/Iran, whatever those outcomes may be,' Trump griped on his Truth Social platform in June. 'But the people know, and that's all that matters to me!' Trump is well-known as someone who is particularly fond of accolades and prizes, Garret Martin, a professor of international relations at American University, told AFP, 'so he would welcome this major international recognition'. And since the beginning of his presidential ambitions 10 years ago, 'he has put himself in opposition to Barack Obama, who famously won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009,' Martin added. The prize awarded to the Democratic former president, barely nine months after he took office, sparked heated debate — and continues to do so. 'If I were named Obama I would have had the Nobel Prize given to me in 10 seconds,' Trump bellyached in October 2024, during the final stretch of the presidential campaign. 338 candidates Three other US presidents have also been so honoured: Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Jimmy Carter. The prize was also awarded to Henry Kissinger in 1973 for his efforts to help end the war in Vietnam. The choice of the one-time US secretary of state was heavily criticised. The full list of Nobel Peace Prize nominees is confidential — except for individual announcements by sponsors — but their number is made public. In 2025, there are 338 nominees. Some betting sites have Trump in second place to win, behind Yulia Navalnaya, the widow of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny. — AFP
New Straits Times
12 hours ago
- New Straits Times
New York Declaration fails Gaza's reality
THE New York Declaration on the Peaceful Settlement of the Question of Palestine, issued late last month and endorsed by the Arab League, the European Union and 17 states is a masterclass in political evasion — fine words that dare not confront the central facts of the Israel-Palestine conflict. The declaration bluntly demands that Hamas relinquish power in Gaza and disarm, handing authority over to the Palestinian Authority (PA). Yet when it comes to Israel's decades-long occupation, its illegal blockade and devastating military campaign that has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians — most of them women and children — it retreats into euphemism. It is a deliberate choice to privilege political convenience over legal obligation. Under the Fourth Geneva Convention, Israel, as the occupying power, must protect the civilian population. The destruction of homes, hospitals, schools and water systems; the starvation of civilians; and the displacement of nearly two million people are not "collateral damage" but grave breaches under Articles 53 and 147, attracting individual criminal responsibility. The declaration rightly condemns Hamas' Oct 7 attacks as war crimes and crimes against humanity. But justice cannot be selective. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court applies equally to armed groups and states. If its authors truly believe in the rule of law, then they must apply it without fear or favour. The declaration's vision for Gaza's future is equally troubling. By proposing the transfer of authority to the PA backed by an international stabilisation mission, it risks turning the PA into an unelected subcontractor for the occupation — administering Gaza without real sovereignty. History shows that transitional administrations, from Timor-Leste to Kosovo, succeeded only when paired with credible elections, clear timelines for self-governance and respect for self-determination. The declaration offers none of these guarantees. Most tellingly, it evades the root cause of Palestinian resistance: the occupation itself. The International Court of Justice's (ICJ) 2024 advisory opinion reaffirmed that Israel's occupation is illegal and must end "as rapidly as possible" while the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 2334 demands the cessation of all settlement activity, calling it a "flagrant violation" under international law. Yet the declaration treats these binding norms as optional talking points. It says nothing of the siege imposed on Gaza since 2007, or the refugees' right of return under United Nations General Assembly Resolution 194. There is no insistence on lifting the blockade, opening humanitarian corridors or securing reparations for the destruction. In short, it offers Palestinians process without protection and symbolism without sovereignty. If the world is serious about peace, any credible agreement must meet three minimum standards: Impartial investigations into all alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity — whether committed by Hamas, Israel or any other actor — under ICC jurisdiction or an independent UN mechanism. Enforceable timelines for ending the occupation, dismantling illegal settlements and lifting the blockade, in compliance with the ICJ's opinion and existing UNSC resolutions. Guarantees of Palestinian self-determination through internationally supervised elections in Gaza and the West Bank, and constitutional processes reflecting the will of the Palestinian people — not the dictates of external powers. Without these, the declaration is not a peace plan but a blueprint for managing Palestinian submission. Some will argue that half-measures are better than none. But unjust peace is no peace. I have spoken to Palestinian children who have lost their entire families and represented them in legal proceedings. I have read the legal texts meant to protect them — and seen how those protections collapse when expedience trumps principle. The world does not need more declarations that appear balanced on paper but tilt towards power in practice. It needs the courage to hold every violator of international law accountable, and the resolve to end an occupation that is both illegal and immoral. Until then, Gaza will remain not a test case for peace, but the gravest indictment of the international system's unwillingness to enforce its own laws.
