Trump momentum drives stablecoin urgency in Asian financial hubs
ADVERTISEMENT Recent developments in South Korea, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines point to a proliferation of stablecoins pegged to Asian currencies — even as authorities raise concerns about capital outflows.
Regional heavyweights including JD.com and Ant Group plan to capitalize by applying to become issuers. Shares in Kakaopay Corp. ballooned on expectations that it would do the same. Even China, which has for years imposed a sweeping crypto ban, appears to be warming to the notion of tokens that serve as yuan surrogates.
It all stems from the US, where lawmakers recently passed legislation that will promote wider use of digital tokens that seek to maintain a 1:1 peg with the dollar. The White House earmarked dollar stablecoins as a priority in a January executive order, days after Trump's inauguration. 'The Genius Act has opened the floodgates for stablecoin adoption,' said Benjamin Grolimund, General Manager for the UAE at crypto exchange Flipster. 'Whether you support it or not, stablecoins are now unavoidable.'
ADVERTISEMENT Overhanging Asia's flurry of activity is the fear of capital flight. The dollar reigns supreme in today's stablecoin market, with $256 billion in tokens pegged to the greenback. These maintain their price by managing reserves of cash-like assets, such as US Treasuries. By contrast, there's just $403 million of euro-backed stablecoins in circulation, despite a well established regulatory framework covering such products in the form of the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation regime.Koreans are already trading piling into dollar-pegged stablecoins. Transactions involving USDT, USDC and USDS — three of the largest dollar proxies — on five domestic exchanges reached 57 trillion won ($41 billion) in the first quarter, Yonhap News reported, citing Bank of Korea data.
ADVERTISEMENT Local lawmakers in recent weeks clashed with the central bank over whether to allow Korean companies to issue won-based stablecoins. President Lee Jae Myung's ruling Democratic Party on June 10 proposed the Digital Asset Basic Act, creating a pathway for local firms to become issuers.Two weeks later, Ryoo Sangdai, Senior Deputy Governor at the Bank of Korea, warned that stablecoins may shift the country's longstanding policy stance on capital liberalization and the won's internationalization. Central bank Governor Rhee Chang Yong went further, arguing that non-bank stablecoins would 'cause big chaos like in the 19th century,' when currencies issued by the private sector flooded the market.
ADVERTISEMENT 'Local stablecoins, while offering regulatory visibility at the point of issuance, carry the risk of becoming efficient bridges to global markets through seamless crypto-to-crypto swaps on decentralised exchanges,' said John Park, head of Korea at Arbitrum Foundation.Asian central banks need to find ways to channel the momentum, rather than fighting it, Park said. Regulatory frameworks should aim to preserve sovereignty while staying competitive, he added.
ADVERTISEMENT For digital-asset trading firms, a more diverse stablecoin market is a no-brainer.'Capital controls are a challenge,' said Yoann Turpin, co-founder of crypto market maker Wintermute. 'But stablecoins could provide a vetted, more efficient on-chain system.'
Such a setup could streamline arbitrage trades across venues or between markets without the constraint of foreign exchange market hours, said Le Shi, Hong Kong managing director at market making firm Auros. 'There's a real use case for local currency stablecoins — particularly for enabling weekend liquidity and smoother capital movement.' Another possibility is that the growth of local stablecoins could enliven crypto economies in Asia. In South Korea, an estimated 18 million people, over a third of the country's population, are engaged in digital assets. Sam Seo, chairman of the Kaia DLT Foundation, said a won-backed stablecoin would serve different needs than US dollar alternatives.'In the short term, swaps between the won and USDT will dominate. But longer term, we'll need stablecoins from other countries to support direct pairings and faster settlement,' Seo said.Hong Kong, meanwhile, has quickly become the region's stablecoin laboratory. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority is particularly focused on 'viable and practical use cases,' not just capital buffers, Clara Chiu, founder of QReg Advisory said. Many of the issuers that have taken an interest in yuan-backed stablecoins are trading and payment firms that are already using the yuan in cross-border settlement. 'That's where the practical demand lies,' Chiu added. While China's next steps are far from certain, crypto firms including brokers are already preparing for the prospect of yuan-pegged stablecoins. Kennix Chan, vice president at Victory Securities, said the firm is in active talks with a range of would-be issuers in Hong Kong.The firm's affiliate, VDX, is close to securing a license to operate a digital-asset exchange, according to Chan, allowing it to offer new trading pairs — such as Bitcoin against stablecoins pegged to the Hong Kong dollar — and eventually yuan-backed equivalents. 'When a yuan-stablecoin is born, the market will definitely be exponentially bigger,' Chan said.Despite its blanket crypto trading ban, China appears to be warming to blockchain as a financial tool. People's Bank of China Governor Pan Gongsheng said in June that stablecoins could revolutionize international finance, as rising geopolitical tensions highlight the fragility of traditional payment systems.A recent licensing upgrade granted for a major Chinese state-owned brokerage to deal in digital assets through Hong Kong has also stirred optimism among Chinese players. 'It gave hope that there's a way,' Chiu said.
Still, few expect Beijing to open its doors to crypto trading anytime soon. Lily King, chief operating officer at digital-asset custodian Cobo, said Hong Kong will continue to serve as a testing ground for Chinese enterprises looking to build overseas. 'China may not feel the need to open itself,' she added.
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
a few seconds ago
- Hans India
Trump threatens more tariffs on India
Washington/New Delhi: In a fresh trade threat against India, President Donald Trump on Monday said he will "substantially" raise US tariffs on New Delhi, accusing it of buying massive amounts of Russian oil and selling it for big profits. Last week, the Trump administration slapped a 25 per cent duty on all Indian goods. The US President also announced a penalty for buying "vast majority" of Russian military equipment and crude oil, but no mention was made in the notification. "India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits," Trump said in a social media post on Monday. "They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA," he added. In its reaction, India said it will take all necessary steps to safeguard and promote national interest and that the implications of the tariffs are being examined. India's import of crude oil from Russia has risen from 0.2 per cent of total purchases before the Russia-Ukraine war to 35-40 per cent. New Delhi is the largest buyer of Russian oil after China. On August 1, Trump signed an Executive Order titled 'Further Modifying The Reciprocal Tariff Rates', raising tariffs for over five dozen countries, including a steep 25 per cent for India. The executive order, however, did not mention the 'penalty' that Trump had said India will have to pay because of its purchases of Russian military equipment and energy. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, in an interview to Fox News Sunday, stated that President Trump has said very clearly that 'it is not acceptable for India to continue financing" the Ukraine war by purchasing oil from Russia. Last week, Trump mounted a sharp attack on India and Russia for their close ties and said the two countries can take their "dead economies down together", a remark which prompted New Delhi to say that India is the world's fastest-growing major economy. Declaring that the US has a massive trade deficit with India, Trump had said that while 'India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the world, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any country.
Indian Express
a few seconds ago
- Indian Express
Express View: In the wake of Trump's latest moves, Delhi must push ahead with the trade deal
Days after US President Donald Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports, and an unspecified penalty for defence and energy imports from Russia, the Indian government has initiated an exercise to thrash out concessions across sectors that can be put forth in trade talks between the two countries. As reported in this paper, key ministries have been directed to examine what can be offered to make the deal more attractive to Trump, with the US said to be pushing for greater market access than what has been on the table so far, bringing down tariff walls and doing away with non-tariff barriers. Another round of talks is slated to be held in the last week of August. There will be red lines, of course. The government, for instance, is reluctant to give concessions on some agri items, even as it must negotiate to increase market access to the world's largest economy — in 2024-25, India exported goods worth roughly $87 billion to the US, led by electronics (17.6 per cent of exports), pharma (11.8 per cent) and gems and jewellery (11.5 per cent). The imposition of higher tariffs on the country as compared to those levied on its competitors such as Vietnam and Indonesia will impact export competitiveness and have implications for the broader economic momentum. Assessments by various agencies have provided some sense of the possible impact on the Indian economy — ICRA, for instance, has lowered its GDP growth forecast for the year to 6 per cent from 6.2 per cent earlier, while CareEdge Ratings has estimated the direct export loss to be around 0.3 to 0.4 per cent of GDP. Some of the options before the government reportedly involve increasing purchases of defence equipment and oil, and greater nuclear engagement, among others. Indian refiners have already cut down on oil imports from Russia to 1.6 million barrels per day in July, down 24 per cent from the month before. This decline has been offset by higher imports from countries such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE, the US and Nigeria. Concessions to the US could also be granted in areas of public procurement — in line with the India-UK trade agreement. Delhi's sober response, in the face of Trump's broadside — the US President has called India a 'dead economy' — reflects pragmatism when faced with pressure tactics designed to extract concessions. But, in a changed global order, where Trump is undoing the rules that underpinned the global trading system, a business-as-usual approach is unlikely to work. India should continue to sidestep the loose rhetoric, while moving ahead with negotiations to conclude a deal that delivers benefits to both sides. Alongside, it should press forward the domestic reform agenda to boost competitiveness, improve ease of doing business, and increase the attractiveness of the country as an investment destination.
Mint
a few seconds ago
- Mint
White House preps order to punish banks that discriminate against conservatives
The White House is preparing to step up pressure against big banks over perceived discrimination against conservatives and crypto companies with an executive order that threatens to fine lenders that drop customers for political reasons. A draft of the executive order, which was viewed by The Wall Street Journal, directs bank regulators to investigate whether any financial institutions might have violated the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, antitrust laws or consumer financial protection laws. Violators could be subject to monetary penalties, consent decrees or other disciplinary measures, according to the draft. The order could be signed as soon as this week, according to people familiar with the matter. It is possible the order could get delayed or that the administration's plans will change. The draft order doesn't name any specific banks but appears to refer to an instance where Bank of America was accused of shutting down the accounts of a Christian organization operating in Uganda based on the organization's religious beliefs. The bank has said it shut down the accounts because it doesn't serve small businesses operating outside the U.S. The draft order also criticizes the role that some banks played in an investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, riots at the U.S. Capitol. Banks have been on edge about potential action by the Trump administration. The Wall Street Journal reported that the administration was considering an executive order in June. Conservatives for years have accused banks of denying them services on political or religious grounds, and cryptocurrency companies have said they were shut out of banking services under the Biden administration. Banks, for their part, have said their decisions are driven by legal, regulatory or financial risks, including those stemming from the U.S.'s anti-money-laundering laws. They have blamed regulatory pressure for prior decisions to largely steer clear of the crypto industry. A Bank of America spokesman said the bank welcomed the administration's efforts to provide regulatory clarity. 'We've provided detailed proposals and will continue to work with the administration and Congress to improve the regulatory framework," he said. Over the past several months, banks have moved to head off action by the federal government, meeting with Republican attorneys general and updating their policies to clearly state they don't discriminate on the basis of political affiliation. The draft of the order viewed by the Journal directs regulators to strike any policies they have that might have contributed to banks dropping certain customers. It also directs the Small Business Administration to review the practices of banks that guarantee the agency's loans. Under Trump, banking regulators have said they would stop assessing banks for the so-called reputational risk posed by their customers—a practice that banks have cited for their decisions to avoid certain customers or industries. The draft order also calls for regulators to refer potential violations to the attorney general in some cases. The Justice Department in April said it was launching a task force in Virginia, to examine allegations of banks refusing customers access to credit or other services based on 'impermissible factors." Write to Dylan Tokar at and Alexander Saeedy at
