We used to have hope and compassion. Where did it all go?
I'd a particular interest, as I was serving with the RAF detachment in Ethiopia in January '85 when Bob Geldof arrived on his first visit, and I joined his entourage on a trip to the port of Assab and the famine camp at Mekele. The latter was beyond horrific, and I have nothing but respect for Bob Geldof and the many others who, as Sting put it, planted a seed that showed signs of flourishing into a better world.
Advertisement
The documentary reminded me that, 20 years after Live Aid, there was Live 8 on July 2, 2005, held in eight cities around the globe, including Moscow. That was the time of the Make Poverty History campaign, of the G8 in Gleneagles when world leaders, including Vladimir Putin, signed up to an accord to cancel debt owed by the poorest nations of the world and to boost aid to Africa. It was a time when President George Bush committed $15 billion to the fight against Aids in Africa and the Caribbean, saying that compassion was an American value.
Looking at the hopes and aspirations of those times gone by and looking at the world as it is today, all I can ask is: where did it all go wrong?
Doug Maughan, Dunblane.
Who are they kidding?
Who are Prime Minister Starmer and President Macron kidding if they think that their "one in, one out" pilot scheme is 'groundbreaking", will have a 'deterrent effect beyond the numbers actually returned" and will 'finally turn the tables"? At least there was no further mention of the sound bite pipe dream of "smashing the gangs" ('Starmer and Macron detail 'one in, one out' migrant pilot to curb crossings", The Herald, July 11). It is worth noting their scheme is to curb crossings, not stop them.
Advertisement
A potential migrant was interviewed on TV this morning and unsurprisingly said it would not deter him. Hundreds come over each week and the risk of being one of those few selected (how?) to be returned is minuscule, and anyway the legal aid lawyers will be queuing up to challenge that selection and appeal again and again against it if necessary.
We have huge numbers of migrants coming here to seek asylum through legal routes and that will no doubt continue, but the illegal migrants are paying the trafficking gangs to avoid any scrutiny. How can it be in our national security interests to have thousands of mainly young men, about whom we know little or nothing, dispersed around the country ?
When will the Government act on its previous admission that it was its 'duty" to stop, not just curb, these illegal migrants? That will require it to enforce the sovereignty of the UK and its borders by legislating to create the real deterrent that illegal migrants are disqualified automatically, no ifs or buts, from staying here and will be arrested on arrival and held securely until they can be deported back to French waters from where they came. What else can we do to stop this illegal invasion?
Alan Fitzpatrick, Dunlop.
Read more letters
Advertisement
What hope now for Labour?
The only way to quiet the Farage foghorn is to turn the narrative away from 'irregular migration' to one of the many, many other pressing, sidelined issues.
There are two problems with this.
• The predominantly right-wing UK media loves the aggro and lazy one-trick-pony-ness of it as much as Nigel Farage.
• It would take real leadership from Keir Starmer (sprinkled with some belief in his own policies) to achieve.
Banging on about migration in wholly negative terms while doing precious little to fix the broken system that encourages the exploitation – including even acknowledging the disastrous role of Brexit – is too easy fuel for Reform UK and is lapped up by a swathe of the population, now comfortable in dressing their racism up as patriotism.
Advertisement
Angela Rayner, who might contend as a real leader, has just been carpeted by her union for her role in the Birmingham bin strike ("Angela Rayner suspended by Unite union over bin strike", heraldscotland, July 11). I didn't know Angela Rayner ran Birmingham City Council. And anyway, it is high time the major unions – including the ones who keep orchestrating rail strikes – cottoned on that in a country where everything is either privatised or de-facto privatised and the job of a lot of councils is simply working out whose mates to give the contracts to, strikes only actually affect the suffering public who are already paying through the nose for failing and dysfunctional services.
With Ms Rayner's wings clipped by an out-of-touch union, what hope is there that Labour leadership can change the discordant tune?
At least we've got Keir Starmer's Trump visit to look forward to.
Amanda Baker, Edinburgh.
Why should we pay for Trump?
It is said that the purpose of Donald Trump's visit is to open the new 18 hole-golf course at his resort in the north-east coast at Menie, north of Aberdeen. He is not expected to meet with King Charles in London. For all intents and purposes therefore, the visit is a business trip and the only political elements pertaining to the situation are due to the person making the trip.
Advertisement
The trip of 2018 cost the UK taxpayer in the region of £18 million, £5m of which covered time spent in Scotland. Since the purpose of the 2025 trip is to further expand Trump business, why should the UK taxpayer be called to compensate the President for security/transport costs if they are in fact business expenses ("Police seek aid over cost of Trump Scots visit", The Herald, July 11)? The US taxpayer no doubt gazes dumbfounded as their Head of State boards Air Force One for yet another round of golf in warmer climes, but they voted for him. Scotland didn't.
Maureen McGarry-O'Hanlon, Jamestown.
• Do we really want to see US President Donald Trump in Scotland, pay at least £5 million for his security, and let him promote his golf courses?
No, no, no!
Advertisement
He's the most obnoxious, arrogant and ignorant numpty ever to inhabit the White House. Our police could instead deal with what really matters in our communities and I would urge our golfers to play different courses.
Andy Stenton, Glasgow.
• You report the news of a Presidential visit by The Donald this month. The last time around the security bill was many millions of pounds. The numbers of police being taken from their usual duties numbered thousands.
In view of his seemingly singular undiplomatic views on all things American and many other countries, it gives way as to how to view the visit. Does one join with a large demonstration, of which there will be many to choose from, or stay at home like the multitude who care nought for him and the ideology he professes?
Advertisement
It is a no-win situation for the police and the taxpayer.
R Johnston, Newton Mearns.
Wind industry is on holiday
During this current heatwave when we need electricity for air conditioning the most, I couldn't help but notice the wind industry has gone off on holiday.
The entire fleet of thousands of entirely parasitic, demonstrably useless giant wind turbines littering our once-beautiful countryside is barely able to provide the National Grid with 2% – reaching the dizzying heights of 1.46% to be precise.
Will we get a refund of the vast annual record-breaking subsidy for poor or non-existent service?
Advertisement
George Herraghty, Lhanbryde.
Keir Starmer pictured with Emmanuel Macron earlier this week (Image: PA)
Drink up, Canada
I note Ross Greer's advice to John Swinney to "switch" Scots whisky exports from America to Canada ("'Switch our whisky exports from US to Canada over Trump tariffs'", The Herald, July 11). Looking at this from the perspective of per head of population (335 million versus 40 million) this will require Canadians to increase their whisky consumption by a factor of 8.3. Good luck with that.
Another example of sound political logic?
Jon Cossar, Edinburgh.
McDermid on the warpath
Val McDermid has gone on the warpath ("Val McDermid: Politics is an 'absolute cesspit of misogyny'", heraldscotland, July 10). This is intriguing as Ms McDermid is very good friends with Nicola Sturgeon, who almost single-handedly removed the basic rights of all Scottish females to their own private space with her ill-thought-out gender reforms. Are we detecting yet more push-back against the very relevant Supreme Court decision on this matter which pointedly did not support Nicola Sturgeon's position ?
Advertisement
You could write a book about all of this.
Dr Gerald Edwards, Glasgow.
Rough treatment
Scotland looked wonderful yesterday (July 10) in the sun at the Scottish Open Golf at the Renaissance Club overlooking the Firth of Forth.
The golf was also pretty good, with some Scots in contention and of course the fans behaved impeccably. The only slightly sour note was provided by the two heavies escorting Rory McIlroy, who seemed intent on preventing the young fans touching hands with their hero, shame.
I am sure that Rory would not sanction such action.
W MacIntyre, East Kilbride.
Taps off, please
The backdrop to Carol Kirkwood's BBC weather forecast today (July 11) was Battersea Park. The 20-plus fountains were majestically performing in full flow. The previous news item had stressed the need to conserve water due to the current weather. The watery spectacle seemed to contradict the public warning.
Advertisement
Lack of communication or a complete disregard for common sense? Either way a prompt turn-off is required.
Allan C Steele, Giffnock.
Our 45 record
Kristy Dorsey's article on the Eastwood Twelve ("The revival of golf at Eastwood: '12 is plenty'", The Herald, July 11) mentions people not wanting to take out the whole day to play 18 holes.
Back in the day, three of us regularly played both of Hilton Park's courses, one in the morning and one in the afternoon, followed by nine holes on the shorter Allander course in the evening, only the twilight hours restricting our day's golf to 45 holes.
Advertisement
We were known as the lopers, admittedly with no wives and families to be brought into the equation.
David Miller, Milngavie.
• Samantha Whitelaw, the manager of the 12 -hole Eastwood Golf Course, lists the advantages of the club's limited number of holes compared to the more conventional 18-hole course. As a former "holiday golfer", one of the attractions would be to claim that I could manage a round at my course in fewer than sixty strokes – but only on a good day.
Malcolm Allan, Bishopbriggs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Concentration, removal and occupation: Inside Netanyahu's plan for the future of Gaza
Gaza was one of the most densely populated places in the world before the war. Today, the roughly 2 million Palestinians who still call it home have been forced into an area just a fifth of its original size by a year and a half of bombing, displacement orders and militarised zones. Under a bleak vision for the future pitched by Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Donald Trump in Washington DC this week, they could be forced into an even smaller area still, or out of Gaza entirely, unable to return to what is left of their homes. Netanyahu may have left Washington without a deal signed and sealed, but his proposals for Gaza continue apace. The plan would see those 2 million people concentrated into a 'humanitarian city' in southern Gaza, where anyone who wants to leave would be helped to emigrate and those who remain would live under the tight control of the Israeli army, which would hold on to specific territories, sources familiar with the plan have told The Independent. One idea being floated is that Israeli troops retain control of three connected strategic corridors in Gaza: the Philadelphi corridor, a nine-mile strip which covers the border region between Gaza and Egypt; the Netzarim corridor, a band that dissects Gaza in half; and a third strip in the middle, which is now being called the 'Morag Corridor'. Some details of the plan emerged in a briefing given by Israel's defence minister, Israel Katz, this week. In it, he said he had instructed the Israeli army to prepare for a 'humanitarian city' on the ruins of Rafah, which would eventually house the entire population of the Gaza Strip. Once inside the city, Katz said residents would not be allowed to leave, according to sources briefed on that meeting. Another proposal seen by The Independent, bearing the name of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), the controversial US-backed and Israeli-run aid group, describes the building of sprawling camps in the coastal south region of Gaza called 'Humanitarian Transition Areas'. Each compound could hold more than 2,000 people complete with homes, dining facilities, private bathrooms and even schools 'to temporarily reside, deradicalise, reintegrate, etc and prepare to relocate if they wish to do so'. The document proposes that some of these transition areas could also be located in Egypt and even Cyprus. This 'emigration plan' was also mentioned by Katz in his briefing. The Independent has been told he has already earmarked a division to carry out that plan, which would see Palestinians move from Gaza to other Arab countries. During a meeting with Trump on Monday, Netanyahu said Israel was 'working with the United States very closely' to find countries that would take Palestinians from Gaza. Destination nations that have been floated include Somalia. The Israeli defence ministry was approached for comment on the reports and details of the plan. The Independent understands that the idea is backed by Netanyahu, who has sought to float it publicly and discuss it with Trump. While Israel insists the emigrations would be voluntary and denies violating international law, human rights experts said they would likely constitute war crimes and, coupled with the forcible transfer of the population south into the 'humanitarian city', would amount to 'really grave atrocity crimes'. 'The plans that are being discussed by Katz and by the Israeli government, not just in recent days but going back months, would amount to an abhorrent escalation in these war crimes, crimes against humanity, and ethnic cleansing,' said Omar Shakir, Israel and Palestine director at Human Rights Watch. 'There's no voluntary emigration when you've deliberately made large parts of Gaza unliveable […] when you've deliberately attacked water infrastructure, when you've starved the population, when you've demolished civilian infrastructure, hospitals and schools.' Josh Paul, a former director of congressional and public affairs at the State Department, said it appeared that Israel had been working to make the plan a reality on the ground for some time. 'Israel's plan for Gaza has been clear for over a year: make the region unliveable, remove as many Palestinians from their land as possible, and concentrate the rest in densely packed enclaves where they can be surveilled, monitored, and controlled,' said Paul, who resigned from the Biden administration over its support for the war in Gaza. The war, sparked by a brutal attack on southern Israel by Hamas militants that killed more than 1,100 people, including more than 700 civilians, has transformed the territory and its people beyond all recognition. What was a troubled but vibrant land of packed cities, extensive farmlands and busy beaches is now a mostly destroyed wasteland, with more than 57,000 people killed, according to local officials and many more thousands buried beneath the rubble. Nearly one in three people are not eating for several days due to severe Israeli restrictions on aid entering Gaza, according to the World Food Programme. The Israeli government's plans to move masses of people to the south were met with suspicion and dismay by Palestinians in Gaza, many of whom have been forcibly displaced numerous times by bombing. 'I feel that what is happening is a plan for forced displacement,' said Ahmed Al-Brim, a 38-year-old father of five, currently in a so-called humanitarian zone along the coast, which has repeatedly been bombed. Youssef Al-Sheikh, a 44-year-old father of six who has also been displaced many times, added: 'The greatest fear is that gathering us in one area crowded with people is an attempt to completely and permanently displace us from the Gaza Strip. Why are they planning to herd us into a cage like animals?' Israel has been working to move Palestinians into southern Gaza for some time through a combination of military offensives, military exclusion zones and, some experts believe, through the takeover of lifesaving humanitarian aid. Almost all aid going into Gaza now runs through the GHF, which started operations in May following a months-long Israeli blockade of nearly all food and aid. Food is handed out at overcrowded and deadly sites overseen by American private security contractors and the Israeli army. Gaza's health ministry said that Israeli forces opening fire on crowds trying to reach the GHF food distribution points have killed hundreds of Palestinians and wounded thousands since aid deliveries were reinstated in late May. A document shared with The Independent bearing the name of GHF shows a $2bn plan to expand its work to corral Palestinians into specially made transition camps. GHF has denied any involvement in this document and has previously rejected claims it is complicit in the weaponisation of aid, calling the allegation 'false, dangerous and deeply irresponsible'. In a statement to The Independent, it said the 'only actor weaponising aid in Gaza is Hamas'. Experts from the United Nations, along with former USAID and State Department officials, have described the new system as 'grotesque', 'dangerous', and part of a larger plan to use aid to control the movement of Palestinians. 'What we're seeing now is the culmination of forced displacement seeking to confine up to 2 million people – the entirety of the population – into a closed-off, a fenced-off area where people are vetted on the ruins of Rafah,' Tamara Alrifai, of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, referring to Israel's plan for a 'humanitarian city'. 'There has been an engineering of forced displacement using access to food.' Jeremy Konyndyk, who oversaw famine relief at USAID for three years during the Obama administration and is now president of Refugees International, said it was 'not a coincidence' that most of the distribution sites were in the south of Gaza. 'A basic principle of humanitarian response is you move the aid as close as you can to where the people are. They're doing the opposite of that, the diametric opposite of that, which suggests that they want to draw people to the south. 'I think that is highly suggestive of the longer-term agenda here.' Under the Israeli government's current plan, some 600,000 Palestinians would be moved first to the detention camp in Rafah from the Muwasi area — a zone in the centre of Gaza already earmarked as a 'humanitarian area,' even though it has been bombed. An international force would manage the camp, while the Israeli army would secure the perimeter, Katz reportedly told reporters. However, officials briefed on the plans say there are no real details. 'It's not clear who is going to provide humanitarian aid, who is going to manage all these people coming from the north to the south – if they want all of them to be there,' said one source who asked not to be named as they are not authorised to brief the media. The reoccupation of Gaza has been a long-held ambition of Israel's far right, which now makes up a key part of Netanyahu's governing coalition. But the success of Netanyahu's plan and the scale of Israel's involvement in post-war Gaza will depend on the support of Trump. The US president's plans for Gaza have vacillated from the absurd to the disinterested since he returned to office for a second term in January. He first pitched his plan for the US to take over and rebuild Gaza as the 'Riviera of the Middle East' in February, calling the territory a 'demolition site' and suggesting that Palestinians would have no alternative but to leave. He has since cooled on that plan, but has not backed off from the idea of helping Palestinians leave Gaza. 'President Trump has long advocated for creative solutions to improve the lives of Palestinians, including allowing them to resettle in a new, beautiful location while Gaza rebuilds,' White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly told The Independent. Trump was said to be keen to use Netanyahu's trip to press for a ceasefire in Gaza and a permanent end to the war, promising to be 'very firm'. He was also keen to build on the Abraham accords peace deal between Israel and several Arab states from his first term, specifically bringing Saudi Arabia on board. Netanyahu, meanwhile, has been resistant to any deal that would end the war, preferring instead to negotiate temporary ceasefires in exchange for the release of hostages. Hamas officials have already vehemently rejected any notion of moving the population south or corridors of control. Netanyahu spent several hours engaged in high-level meetings with Trump, and their teams were locked in talks for two days. But the Israeli prime minister left Washington without any formal announcement. Officials with knowledge of their discussions from the Israeli side said they feel that progress has been made and a truce deal is '90 per cent completed'. Israel has reportedly agreed to a compromise on aid, including that the GHF would not deliver aid to areas from which Israeli troops have withdrawn. However, there remain a few major sticking points, the sources said, including the planned 'humanitarian city', as well as the details of the continued presence of Israeli troops in Gaza. 'The differences have to do with the idea of withdrawal [of the military] from the designated areas the US wants them to withdraw from ... where Israel is evacuating from, and how, is the sticking issue at the moment,' one official said. Netanyahu will also likely face some opposition to his plan back home. The extreme-right members of his government, including finance minister Bezalel Smotrich, have thrown their support behind the idea, stating that victory would be Gaza 'entirely destroyed' and civilians sent to the south of the strip and even abroad. Sources have said the military is one of the main detractors 'because it puts a lot of strain on them'. Members of the military are already protesting the drawn-out, multi-front war and the soaring soldier death toll, with reports of people breaking their limbs to avoid being called up for reserve duty. Amos Harel, an Israeli defence correspondent and leading expert on Israel's military issues, agrees. Exhausted by 21 months of conflict, he believes the military fears possible repercussions in international courts from this Gaza plan, that pursuing it will definitively scupper any hope of a ceasefire deal, and that it will ultimately fail. 'Most generals I speak to would rather have an end to the war and not prolong it under these circumstances,' he said. 'It's not only the hostages, it's reservists. It's the soldiers dying.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
George Santos Has Truly WTF Response To Kevin Spacey's Call To Release Epstein Files
Actor Kevin Spacey asked on Tuesday that the Epstein files be released because 'the truth can't come soon enough,' and former lawmaker George Santos felt obliged to offer his two cents. Spacey took to X and publicly asked someone, anyone, to 'release the Epstein files. All of them. For those of us with nothing to fear, the truth can't come soon enough.' He added, 'I hate to make this about me — but the media already has.' Although Spacey's name does appear in unsealed documents related to the deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein, he hasn't been accused of helping facilitate Epstein's alleged child sex trafficking ring. The actor was accused of molesting a then-14-year-old actor in 1986, but he was found not liable by a New York jury in 2022. Spacey was also acquitted in London in 2023 on nine charges of sexual assault involving four theater actors. Release the Epstein files. All of them. For those of us with nothing to fear, the truth can't come soon enough. I hate to make this about me — but the media already has. — Kevin Spacey (@KevinSpacey) July 15, 2025 For some reason, Santos, a former U.S. representative now preparing to serve a seven-year sentence for federal wire fraud and aggravated identity theft, felt obliged to comment on Spacey's post. The former Republican lawmaker also used a homophobic slur in referring to Spacey, even though Santos is himself openly gay. Says the sexual predator!Sit the fuck down homo! 🙄💅🏻 — George Santos (@MrSantosNY) July 15, 2025 Many people on social media were shocked and confused by Santos' vitriol. One person advised the convicted former representative, 'You should probably sit this one out!' Uhmmmm sir, only one of you is a convicted felon who's going to prison, and it wasn't the award winning actor. You should probably sit this one out! — This oughta be good!! (@Djlfjr) July 15, 2025 Wow. The most savage post ever. Homo 😂 — Tom Schooley (@schooleyD) July 15, 2025 — Asclepius (@Beansthecat_) July 15, 2025 Santos is a man on the edge. Nothing left to lose. I love it! Only up from here buddy. — Raemi Eagle-Glenn (@RaemiEagle) July 15, 2025 Bro didn't you lie about like 22 things, get caught immediately, and promptly removed? — Matt (@RbiTriples) July 15, 2025 Kevin Spacey Says Release Epstein Files: 'Nothing To Fear' Trump Says Comey, Biden And Obama 'Made Up' The Epstein Files Congressman Writes Song, 'Release The Epstein Files,' And, Yeah, It's Cringe CNN Host Swats Down Republican's Epstein 'Nonsense' Talk With Searing Reality Check
Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
Crystal Palace Fans Begin Series Of Protests Over Europa League Exclusion
The Holmesdale Fanatics lead the first of what they promise will be a series of protests against ... More Crystal Palace's exclusion from the Europa League. Crystal Palace supporters marched through the streets of London Tuesday evening to protest against UEFA's decision to exclude the Eagles from the Europa League. Hundreds of fans of the south London club gathered at the clock tower in Norwood before marching to Selhurst Park, carrying a banner that read: 'UEFA: Morally bankrupt. Revoke the ruling now.' 'UEFA has taken something away from us unjustly. And we're not going to f—ing stand for it,' said a spokesman for the Holmesdale Fanatics, an ultras-style supporters' group that organized Tuesday's protest. 'This is Crystal Palace's first outing in Europe, and if it was Man City, Liverpool or Real Madrid, there wouldn't be no such problems,' he added. The group's spokesman also said that Tuesday's march was just the beginning of a series of protests, and they plan to send a delegation to UEFA's headquarters to continue their campaign for justice. Palace had qualified for the Europa League when they won the FA Cup, the first major trophy in the club's century-plus history. But UEFA announced last week that Palace was barred from entering next season's Europa League for breaching its rule on multi-club ownership on March 1. UEFA's rules state that no individual or entity can have 'control or influence' over two clubs competing in the same competition. At the time of UEFA's deadline, American businessman John Textor owned a 43% stake in Palace, while also holding a 77% stake in French club Lyon, who had also qualified for the Europa League. Palace had argued that Textor does not have decisive influence at the club because his investment in Palace only entitles him to the same 25% voting rights held by fellow co-owners Steve Parish, David Blitzer and Josh Harris. But UEFA's Club Financial Control Body (CFCB) did not accept the club's argument. Lyon had been provisionally relegated to the French second division because of the poor state of the club's finances, a decision that meant that they would not be able to participate in the Europa League. But last week, the French club won their appeal against relegation after Textor's investment vehicle Eagle Football Holdings received a cash injection of €87 million ($100 million) from shareholders and a bank guarantee for another €30 million. Lyon takes precedence over Palace because they finished in a higher position in their league. The seven-time French champions finished sixth in Ligue 1, whereas Palace was 12th in the Premier League. In June, Textor signed an agreement to sell his stake in Palace to Robert "Woody" Johnson, the billionaire co-owner of the NFL's New York Jets and former ambassador to the U.K. That deal was approved by the Premier League last week, Parish said in an interview with Sky News, and he estimated that the transaction would be completed this week. 'The club was up for sale before the first of March [UEFA's deadline]. Now, we have completed the sale,' Parish said. 'This is the thing that would be even more ridiculous to most football fans: Eagle Football will be a million miles away from us by the time the tournament starts in September.' UEFA's decision to strip Palace of its place in the Europa League was 'the most ridiculous technicality you could ever imagine,' Parish said. He also reiterated that the club was likely to lodge an appeal at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). As it stands now, Palace will compete in Europe's third-tier competition, the UEFA Conference League, a far less lucrative tournament, and their place in the Europa League will go to Nottingham Forest. But Palace supporters are vowing to continue their fight. The Holmesdale Fanatics said, 'We won the FA Cup. We should be going into the Europa League. That's the bottom line.' Palace supporters staged a noisy protest against UEFA's decision to exclude their beloved club from ... More the Europa League.
