logo
How Trump's ‘big, beautiful' bill targets transgender medical procedures nationally

How Trump's ‘big, beautiful' bill targets transgender medical procedures nationally

New York Post18-06-2025
The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld Tennessee's ban on transgender medical procedures for minors — a controversial practice that could be outlawed nationally if President Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill clears the Senate intact.
The House-passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act includes a provision barring the use of taxpayer money to fund so-called 'gender-affirming care,' for both children and adults.
The provision, championed by Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas), would ban Medicaid, Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIPs) and Affordable Care Act (ACA) funds from being spent on puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and irreversible surgeries, such as double masectomies and genital reconstruction.
The so-called 'Crenshaw Amendment' — a last-minute addition to the massive piece of legislation — specifically amends the Social Security Act, halting federal payments for what the provision deems as medically unnecessary procedures.
3 Crenshaw's provision will save taxpayers $2.5 billions over the next 10 years, according to his office.
REUTERS
The provision will have to survive the Senate's strict rules governing the reconciliation process, specifically the Byrd Rule, to make it into the upper chamber's version of the legislation.
The Byrd Rule prevents the inclusion of measures deemed 'extraneous' to the budget process. For instance, provisions that don't directly affect spending or revenue.
The Byrd Rule is interpreted and enforced by the Senate parliamentarian.
Crenshaw's office notes that taxpayers will save 'about $2.5 billion over 10 years' if the provision becomes law.
'That's the estimated savings from blocking federal funding — via Medicaid, CHIP, and ACA — for gender transition procedures,' the congressman's office states. 'With transition costs running up to $75,000 per patient, the numbers add up fast. This amendment cuts it off—saving money and saving lives.'
Last month, Crenshaw vowed that his provision 'will become law,' arguing that it is 'long overdue.'
'Gender transition procedures are the lobotomy of our generation,' he said in a statement. 'So-called 'gender-affirming care' isn't healthcare — it's fringe science with no proven benefit and massive risks.'
3 The transgender surgery ban would codify and expand on President Trump's executive actions preventing federal agencies from using tax dollars to promote or fund gender transitions.
AP
3 The Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's transgender surgery ban on Wednesday in a 6-3 ruling.
REUTERS
In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court found that Tennessee's ban on transgender puberty blockers and hormone therapy treatments for minors does not violate the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.
More than half of US states have similar laws on the books.
'Today was not just a win for basic biology and common sense, but for human decency, sound medicine, and the dignity and safety of children everywhere,' Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) said of the high court's ruling.
'As a doctor for over 25 years, I understand the gravity of these harmful so-called treatments radical activists have been pushing on children. They leave permanent scarring, sterilization, and other horrible side effects,' he added.
'Make no mistake, there's more work to do, and I remain committed to eliminating taxpayer-funded transgender procedures on both minors and adults.'
Marshall's No Subsidies for Gender Transition Procedures Act is the Senate's companion legislation to Crenshaw's measure in the House.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Advised Zelensky to Take the Fight to Russia, Senior Ukrainian Official Says
Trump Advised Zelensky to Take the Fight to Russia, Senior Ukrainian Official Says

Wall Street Journal

time7 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Trump Advised Zelensky to Take the Fight to Russia, Senior Ukrainian Official Says

KYIV, Ukraine—President Trump counseled Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelensky, to take the war to Russia and asked whether Kyiv was able to hit Moscow and St. Petersburg, according to a senior Ukrainian official familiar with the exchange. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Tuesday offered a different account of the call between the two leaders on July 4. Asked about it, Leavitt said Trump 'was merely asking a question, not encouraging further killing.' She said he was 'working tirelessly' to stop the war.

Largest teachers union slams ‘unlawful' cuts to Department of Education after supreme court ruling
Largest teachers union slams ‘unlawful' cuts to Department of Education after supreme court ruling

New York Post

time8 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Largest teachers union slams ‘unlawful' cuts to Department of Education after supreme court ruling

The president of the nation's largest teachers' union, the National Education Association, slammed the Supreme Court's ruling on Monday for siding with the Trump administration on dismantling the Department of Education. 'Everyone who cares about America's students and public schools should be appalled by the Supreme Court's premature intervention in this case today, which stays preliminary relief ordered by the lower courts. Today's decision does not resolve the underlying merits of Trump's unlawful plan to eliminate the Department of Education,' Becky Pringle said in a statement. Advertisement She added, 'Parents, educators, and community leaders won't be silent as Trump and his allies take a wrecking ball to public schools and the futures of the 50 million students in rural, suburban, and urban communities across America. We will continue to organize, advocate, and mobilize until all students have the opportunity to attend the well-resourced public schools where they can thrive.' 5 Becky Pringle, president of the National Education Association, speaks during an immigrant rights protest outside of the Department of Justice headquarters. Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images 5 The president of the nation's largest teachers' union, the National Education Association, slammed the Supreme Court's ruling on Monday. 5 Protestors holding signs in front of the U.S. Department of Education building. Advertisement The Supreme Court cleared the way for the Trump administration to fire hundreds of Department of Education employees, a move that advances President Donald Trump's plans to dismantle the department. The high court's decision in McMahon v. State of New York was issued 6-3 along ideological lines. The decision temporarily pauses an order by a lower court judge that had reinstated roughly 1,400 employees at the Department of Education. In March, Education Secretary Linda McMahon laid off half of the department's workforce as part of the Trump administration's broader reduction in government efforts. Later that month, Trump announced in an executive order that he planned to shutter the department altogether. 5 The Supreme Court cleared the way for the Trump administration to fire hundreds of Department of Education employees. Advertisement 5 The decision temporarily pauses an order by a lower court judge that had reinstated roughly 1,400 employees at the Department of Education. The Supreme Court's order arose from two lawsuits, including one brought by 20 Democratic-led states that challenged the Education Department's layoffs and planned closure. McMahon praised the ruling, vowing that the federal agency can now 'carry out the reduction in force to promote efficiency and accountability and to return education back to the states.' Advertisement 'Today, the Supreme Court again confirmed the obvious: the President of the United States, as the head of the Executive Branch, has the ultimate authority to make decisions about staffing levels, administrative organization, and day-to-day operations of federal agencies,' McMahon said on X. 'While today's ruling is a significant win for students and families, it is a shame that the highest court in the land had to step in to allow President Trump to advance the reforms Americans elected him to deliver using the authorities granted to him by the U.S. Constitution.'

Thune says Senate on track to move $9.4B in funding cuts after locking down key vote
Thune says Senate on track to move $9.4B in funding cuts after locking down key vote

The Hill

time8 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Thune says Senate on track to move $9.4B in funding cuts after locking down key vote

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) says the Senate is on track to vote Tuesday evening on a package clawing back approximately $9.4 billion in congressionally approved spending, making the announcement shortly locking down Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), a key vote. Thune told The Hill that the Senate is on track to vote both Tuesday on both the motion to discharge the rescissions package out of the Appropriations Committee, and then to vote on the motion to proceed to the legislation on the floor. The schedule reflects Senate GOP leaders' confidence that they have the votes to pass the package. Thune said the bill has the green light to move, shortly after Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) said he would vote for the measure. 'I will now vote to support President Trump's rescissions package to clawback $9.4 billion in federal spending. We want to make sure tribal broadcast services in South Dakota continued to operate which provide potentially lifesaving emergency alerts,' Rounds announced in a post on X. Rounds said he worked with the Trump administration 'to find Green New Deal money that could be reallocated to continue grants to tribal radio stations without interruption.' He thanked Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought and Senate GOP leaders 'for working with us to favorably resolve this issue.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store