SpaceX spacecraft carrying crew to splash down with sonic boom off San Diego coast
SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft undocked from the International Space Station at 7:15 a.m. Monday, carrying Ax-4 astronauts Peggy Whitson, Shubhandshu Shukla, Sławosz Uznański-Wiśniewski, and Tibor Kapu.
SpaceX launch seen from San Diego area
The crew will return to Earth at 2:31 a.m. PT on Tuesday, which will be streamed live on X @SpaceX.
After performing a series of departure burns to move away from the International Space Station, SpaceX says Dragon will conduct multiple orbit-lowering maneuvers, jettison the trunk, and re-enter Earth's atmosphere before splashing down off the coast of California 22.5 hours later.
SpaceX spacecraft splashes down off coast of Oceanside
SpaceX Monday evening on X said Dragon and the Ax-4 crew are on track to reenter Earth's atmosphere and splash down off the coast of southern San Diego County at 2:31 a.m. PT Tuesday.
The spacecraft is expected to create a sonic boom just before it splashes down in the Pacific Ocean.
The Ax-4 crew had been onboard the ISS since Falcon 9 launched the spacecraft from Launch Complex 39A (LC-39A) at Kennedy Space Center in Florida on Wednesday, June 25.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
24 minutes ago
- Forbes
Study: For 60 Years, Kids' TV Cast Boys As Doers And Girls As Passive
Research shows that there's gender bias in the language of kids' TV programs. New research reveals that the language in children's television is reinforcing harmful gender stereotypes, and that little has improved in 60 years. In some cases, the gender bias is getting worse over time. The new study, published this week in Psychological Science, examined scripts from 98 children's television programs in the U.S. spanning the years 1960 to 2018. The researchers employed natural language processing tools to examine which words were more likely to be associated with male characters and which were more likely to be associated with female characters. In total, they analyzed 6,600 episodes, 2.7 million sentences and 16 million words. Among the shows studied were classics like The Flintstones (1960) and more modern series like The Powerpuff Girls (2016) and Lost in Space (2018). In particular, the researchers examined how often male and female characters were portrayed as active agents (those who do) versus passive recipients (those who are done to). They found that boys are 'doers' while girls are the 'done-tos.' Perhaps most shockingly, when the researchers examined how this language has changed over time, they found that it hadn't. The gender gap in who takes action in these programs hasn't improved in six decades. Male characters also tend to dominate the dialogue in these programs, although this trend has shown modest improvement over time. In 1960, male words (such as he, him, boy, man) were used in the dialogue twice as often as female words (such as she, her, girl, woman). By 2018, children were still hearing the male words 50% more frequently than female words. Male characters also dominated money talk. The researchers examined how frequently male or female words were used in the same sentence as money-related words, such as "bucks" or 'income." When money-related words appeared in a sentence, the odds of also finding a male word in the sentence were a whopping 24% higher than the odds of finding a female word. Once again, this gender gap remained unchanged over time. Even in 2018, male characters were more likely than female ones to be involved in financial matters. The researchers found that male words were also more likely to appear alongside terms relating to power, achievement and reward. These terms all relate to agency, or a striving to act and reach goals. And, rather than narrowing, the gender gap in agency has actually been widening over time. 'The gap in the odds of finding a male versus female word in the same sentence as an agency-related word increased by about 4% each year over the span of our data,' the authors write. Given the amount of time children spend watching television, the study authors suggest that those who watch these programs will develop biased ideas about how women and men behave in the real world. 'These biases aren't just about who gets more lines; they're about who gets to act, lead, and shape the story. Over time, such patterns can quietly teach children that agency belongs more naturally to boys than to girls, even when no one intends that message,' Professor of Psychology at NYU and an author on the paper, Andrei Cimpian, explained in a press release. AI learning models that train on program scripts pose an additional threat of perpetuating the gender bias. The study authors explain in their paper, 'The rising popularity of script-writing programs powered by artificial intelligence (AI), which are trained on language from pre-existing screenplays, adds urgency to the goal of uncovering social biases in the language in children's media.' As technology continues to evolve, it becomes increasingly important to understand the messages we're sending. If women want to achieve equality with men, we need to start with our children and the stories they watch. That includes what is said in those stories and who gets to say it. If we continue to show our children programs where men have more agency, the children will become adults who believe this to be true.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
How Hubble revealed our sharpest view of Andromeda yet
Science How Hubble revealed our sharpest view of Andromeda yet July 17, 2025 | 2:16 AM GMT Astronomers deployed the Hubble Space Telescope over the course of a decade to conduct 600 separate observations to produce an extraordinary mosaic of the great spiral galaxy. Astronomer John S. Mulchaey explains why studying Andromeda helps us better understand the structure and evolution of our own Milky Way.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Nobel Laureates, experts gather at University of Chicago, call for action to avert nuclear war
Nobel Laureates and leading nuclear experts gathered at the University of Chicago on this week to talk about the continuing dangers of nuclear war and the need for prevention. Experts warned at a panel discussion Wednesday that the threat of nuclear war is increasing — but unlike in years past, many are oblivious to the threat. The laureates and other participants held closed-door discussions Monday through Wednesday, on topics such as the effects of nuclear war with threats having "only grown in volume and complexity," how nuclear risks can be reduced or exacerbated by AI and other emerging technologies, and the history and future of nuclear close calls. Also addressed in the closed-door discussions was the threat of a nuclear winter that could potentially end civilization after a nuclear war — described by the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists as "a significant and lasting cooling of the Earth that could be caused by massive amounts of smoke that cities immolated by a nuclear attack inject into the stratosphere." "Needless to say, it's a uniquely dangerous time, and there's been a growing awareness that that's the case," University of Chicago astrophysicist Daniel Holz said in a news article from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists. "And one of the main issues is, as the dangers have been increasing, I think the world's attention has been distracted by other things." At a public discussion Wednesday at UChicago's David Rubenstein Forum, theoretical physicist and 2004 Nobel Prize winner David Gross noted past cautionary declarations on nuclear proliferation and the risks of nuclear war going back seven decades. Gross noted that in 1955, Werner physicists Werner Heisenberg and Max Born signed a declaration at Mainau Island in the far southwest of Germany, reading in part: "With pleasure we have devoted our lives to the service of science. It is, we believe, a path to a happier life for people. We see with horror that this very science is giving mankind the means to destroy itself." Gross emphasized that 70 years later, this threat has not gone away. Just last year, 30 Nobel Prize Laureates gathered again at Mainau with a renewed warning: "In today's fragmented and polarized world, there is a significant probability that, either by accident or by deliberate act, these horrible weapons may be used — with the likelihood of the end of human civilization as we know it." The purpose of the discussion at the University of Chicago this week was to come up with recommendations to avoid such a horror. The event Wednesday coincided with the 80th anniversary of the Trinity test, in which the first nuclear bomb was detonated in the New Mexico desert under observation of scientists from the Manhattan Project — the secretive World War II program to develop the first nuclear weapons. Enrico Fermi, who had led the team that developed the first self-sustaining chain reaction at the University of Chicago in 1942, was among the Manhattan Project scientists present for the Trinity test on July 16, 1945 — along with Los Alamos Laboratory director J. Robert Oppenheimer, test director Kenneth Bainbridge, and several others. Dr. Robert Floyd, executive secretary of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization, emphasized that a ban on nuclear testing is crucial to averting the risk of nuclear war in the future. As recounted by the Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center, the test took place at a site in the Alamogordo Bombing Range, 210 miles south of Los Alamos, New Mexico. A plutonium device called "Gadget" was hoisted upon a 100-foot tower and detonated at 5:30 a.m. local time. The detonation vaporized the tower on the spot, and turned the asphalt and sand around it into green glass called "trinitite," the Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center noted. Meanwhile, seconds after the explosion, a huge blast "sent searing heat across the desert, knocking observers to the ground," the Air Force said. "Fermi proposes a wager that alarmed the guards — would the atmosphere itself catch fire, destroying the planet? Would anyone take the bet? Fortunately, that didn't happen," Floyd said. "But when the Gadget explodes, nothing like it has been seen in the Earth's 4.5-billion-year history — a vast explosion." Floyd talked about the development of nuclear weapons in terms of the human impulse to defy and defeat limits. He compared it to some of the most powerful narratives in ancient Greek mythology. "Prometheus defies the gods. He steals fire for us mortals. Pandora opens a box. Icarus is warned, 'Don't fly so high,' but higher and higher he goes," he said. "The common theme of these stories, the timeless urge to go beyond the limit of what we might know or what we're allowed to do." Floyd noted that with the enactment of a partial ban on nuclear testing in 1963, the establishment of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1968, and the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty in 1996, nuclear weapons testing has all but stopped. But Floyd noted that nine nations — among them the U.S., Russia, and China — have not yet ratified the 1996 treaty, though those three nations have all signed it. "Yet still, the world faces dangerous challenges, the likes of which have not been seen for decades," Floyd said. "Among so many risks, one risk stands out — the one that major nuclear weapons states might return to testing," Floyd said. "That would be catastrophic." But the experts speaking Wednesday identified far more risks besides a resumption of nuclear testing. Gross said the threat of mutually assured destruction that has long stood as a deterrent to nuclear weapon use since cannot be depended upon in perpetuity. "While the only way to truly eliminate the risks of nuclear war is to eliminate nuclear weapons, there are important, timely steps that can support the longer-term effort to achieve nuclear disarmament," the laureates and experts at the assembly wrote in their latest declaration issued Wednesday. With that in mind, the Nobel Laureates and experts issued a series of "pragmatic actions." Alexandra Bell, president and chief executive officer of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, noted that the U.S. and Russia together possess about 90% of all nuclear weapons — and next year, the current strategic arms reduction treaty between the countries is set to expire. The assembly called upon the U.S. and Russia to "immediately enter into negotiations on a successor to the 2010 New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, remain committed to the treaty's central limits in the meantime, and expand dialogue to address their full nuclear arsenals." Bell also noted that China is rapidly expanding its nuclear arsenal. The assembly also called on China to "immediately enter into substantive and sustained discussions" about its nuclear weapons, and called on all nuclear-armed states to hold dialogues about their arsenals "without preconceived notions of outcomes." Bell also said the placement of nuclear weapons in space is a major danger. With that in mind, the assembly called on all nations to reaffirm the obligations of the Outer Space Treaty, which prohibits any objects carrying nuclear weapons from being placed in the earth's orbit, placed on celestial bodies, or otherwise stationed in outer space. The assembly also called for expanded lines of communication between nuclear states given the risk of possible nuclear accidents or miscalculations, and dialogue about the "scientific, legal, and military implications" of the use of technology such as AI in among nuclear-armed states. Further, the assembly called for increased decision-making timelines for "determining the reliability of information received and the prudence of any decision on whether to use military force," and a rule that at least two people are involved in any decision on the use of nuclear force. Francesca Giovannini, executive Director of the Project on Managing the Atom at the Harvard Kennedy School's Belfer Center for Science & International Affairs, also called for an emphasis on humanity. "We are all connected in making sure that a nuclear war is never, ever fought," Giovannini said. Scott Sagan, a political science professor at Stanford University, outlined some specific events that could make nuclear proliferation worse. For one, he said that if Ukraine "loses badly and loses sovereignty" in its war with Russia due to nuclear threats by the latter country, other countries will be inspired by Russia's example to obtain nuclear weapons. Sagan also said what happens with the nuclear program in Iran in the future will determine the future of nuclear proliferation among other countries in the Middle East. Meanwhile, Gross noted that most people under 40 who did not live through the most anxiety-ridden days of the Cold War are not really afraid of nuclear weapons anymore — while in past generations, demands for nuclear disarmament involve people marching in the streets. He also noted that no politicians in power or running for office are about nuclear war. "It's astonishing," said Gross. "Our recommendations are great, but without the political will behind them, nothing will happen." The declaration issued Wednesday concluded: "There is no greater obligation than to prevent the catastrophe of nuclear war. These actionable and attainable steps will aid global leaders in this solemn task. We ask that they each be guided by the words of Nobel Laureates Bertrand Russell and Albert Einstein: 'We appeal as human beings to human beings: remember your humanity, and forget the rest.' "Our survival and the survival of future generations are at stake." On Wednesday evening, the assembly also sponsored a performance by the Kronos Quartet and Allison Russell of Bob Dylan's "A Hard Rain's a-Gonna Fall" at UChicago's Logan Center for the Performing Arts.
