
‘Between austerity and empathy': UK show celebrates late New York photographer Peter Hujar
Eyes Open in the Dark, which opens at Raven Row in London on Thursday, is the largest UK exhibition of photographs by Peter Hujar, who has been acclaimed for the warmth and compassion of his images but was little known during his lifetime.
Hujar died in 1987 of Aids-related pneumonia having published one book in his lifetime, Portraits in Life and Death, which received just four reviews. His sitters were some of the most culturally significant figures of 70s New York, including Susan Sontag and Fran Lebowitz.
Hujar is about to be played on the big screen by Ben Whishaw in Ira Sachs' film Peter Hujar's Day, which premiered at Sundance on Monday and is based on a 37-page book of the same name written by his close friend Linda Rosenkrantz.
It's an incredible turnaround for a photographer who, other than from a small, committed group of advocates including Nan Goldin, struggled for recognition in his lifetime and has only found it in the last decade.
Hujar's biographer John Douglas Millar said there was a desire that at the Raven Row exhibition more of Hujar's later work was shown, which is completely different from the portraiture for which he has become known.
For example, there is a particular focus on the photographer's work during one day in 1976. 'There's a single day on Easter Sunday when he made an extraordinary series of works,' Millar said. 'He shoots the faithful coming out of church uptown, then moves down to the west side piers where there was a cruising scene and an arts scene, and he ends the day by going to the top of the World Trade Center and takes an image of his world. He's moving across genres in a single day.'
Millar said the series showed the range of interests that Hujar had, which spanned portraiture, architectural studies and erotica.
Gary Schneider, a friend of Hujar and an artist, admitted Hujar could be unforgiving at times and was particularly short with gallerists, which could explain why his work is only now being sought out.
Schneider said: 'He was considered a great photographer by a very small group of people around him. He did exhibit but he was very contentious – if someone put a foot wrong he would cancel them.'
Raven Row's director, Alex Sainsbury, said: 'It's fair to say he was great at collaborating with the sitters but he wasn't good at working with anyone who ran a gallery or might promote his work.'
Despite Hujar's spiky reputation he has been embraced by contemporary art fans, primarily because of the tenderness of his photographs, many of which were of downtown art figures who went on to die during the Aids crisis.
'There's an increased interest in empathy in art, people are looking for it and Peter's work has it,' Salisbury said. 'It has this knife-edge quality between austerity and empathy.'
Millar said: 'What he's photographing is difficult for the mainstream to accept; he didn't fit in the 1970s. A lot of stuff he was shooting, especially his erotica, wouldn't have worked. He can get a much better reading now that it couldn't in the 1970s, it wasn't fashionable.'
Peter Hujar – Eyes Open in the Dark runs from 30 January to 6 April.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
6 days ago
- The Independent
Horror fans delight as In A Violent Nature sequel confirmed
The horror film In a Violent Nature, which premiered at Sundance in January 2024, is set to receive a "meaner" sequel in 2026. The original movie gained a cult fanbase for its unique approach to the slasher genre, telling the story from the perspective of the killer, Johnny. Despite mixed critical reviews, the Canadian film was noted for its "slow cinema" style, featuring longer takes and no musical score. Filmmaker Chris Nash will return to write and direct the sequel, with production scheduled to begin in September. Producers aim for the sequel to make Johnny "bigger, meaner, and his kills... more impressive", continuing to experiment within the genre.


Daily Mail
7 days ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Meghan Markle is a 'fraud' who is 'milking' her fame from Prince Harry to 'sucker people' into buying her products, leading US brand experts claim
Meghan Markle is a 'fraud' and As Ever is all about 'milking' her fame from marrying Prince Harry to 'sucker people into buying her stuff', two of North America's leading brand experts have claimed. Canadian lawyer Phillip Millar and California marketing executive Camille Moore, stars of popular The Art of the Brand podcast, believe the launch and concept of her lifestyle business has been one of the worst they have ever seen. 'I love sh***ing on people who suck. Meghan Markle sucks as far as I'm concerned', Mr Millar has said. 'It [As Ever] is run by a confederacy of dunces working on this platform that is just getting maximising the value from her fame that came from Suits and being a part of the Royal Family and they're just milking that for everything they can'. Millar and Moore, who have advised big businesses including Mercedes-Benz, L'Oreal, Olaplex, Dior, Van Cleef and Air Canada, say Meghan's business has been a 'royal disaster'. Mr Millar believes that As Ever lacks authenticity because he claims that Meghan is 'pretending' to be a domestic goddess and most people don't believe it. But he added that the people who have rushed to buy her wine, jam, crepe mix and tea shows 'how gullible a lot of consumers are'. Canadian lawyer Phillip Millar and California marketing executive Camille Moore, stars of popular The Art of the Brand podcast, believe the launch and concept of her lifestyle business has been one of the worst they have ever seen He said: 'She's not substantial. I'm agitated by her so much because it is a deliberate misrepresentation of what she is because she thinks she can pretend to be that while actually being this and sucker people into buying her stuff and every step of the way she's failing because it's not legitimate. It's not intelligent. It's not well executed. 'There was nothing about her brand that was good from the start to a distinguishing eye. She was a fraud what I can see from the beginning who was just using opportunities to advance herself. Her brand wasn't one built on substance. It was based on using people. 'They're not executing anything well on any show on anything. But it shows how gullible a lot of consumers are'. Mr Millar said that investors including Netflix appear to have failed to ask serious questions of Meghan before the launch. 'People who consider themselves smart because nobody ever questions them are running this business and telling her to use a playbook that works for products where scarcity matters. Confectionery scarcity doesn't matter. He added: 'There's an egocentric approach to it that if you achieve some level of celebrity, you think you can build a brand, but that's the start of your brand. You can make short-term money from it, but it's not a long-term strategy'. Phillip believes Meghan has failed to see what she really is - a 'disruptor' rather than a homemaker. He said: 'Her brand should be I'm a disruptor. I go into TV. I make noise. I go into the Royal Family. I make noise. She should brand herself as a rebel, but she's not consistent with what she is. 'She should be a disruptor and sell products that are not that expensive and that represent disruption, but that audience is not spending a lot of money'. Ms Moore said Meghan is responsible 'for really probably having the worst brand execution to date', adding: 'She's had zero ownership in this business. It's effectively like she's just like labeling her brand'. She added: 'I feel like she's doing such a brutal or good job, depending on how you're looking at it, of getting this like free PR and then absolutely s***ing the bed'. When she started posting links on the ShopMy e-commerce site, some thought that this was going to prove an irresistible source of serious income for the Duchess of Sussex. It couldn't be easier, really – influencers link posts from their Instagram to the online shop, and then rake in a percentage of every item of clothing, make-up or homeware sold as a result. Some of the top creators make up to $1million (£740,000) a year with a cut of between 10 and 30 per cent per item, depending on the retailer. The 'creators' are ranked in a tiering visible only to other ShopMy entrepreneurs; the biggest earners are 'icons' and the lowliest ranking is 'enthusiast'. After an initial flurry on the site, in which she directed shoppers to the sweaters she wore in her Netflix show With Love, Meghan, the denim dress she wore on a 'date night' with Prince Harry to watch Beyonce and her make-up and hair favourites, Meghan has fallen silent. Indeed, she's not posted in over two months on ShopMy and it seems that her ranking has dropped from icon to enthusiast as a result. While she continues to appear regularly on her own Instagram page and that of her brand, As Ever, she or her team are not linking through for 'easy money'. A spokesman for the couple did not respond to requests for clarification but a source says that – however lucrative – this potential revenue stream is simply not important to her. 'Her current priorities are centred on As Ever and expanding her business ventures. ShopMy represents an exploration into social media that she enjoys.' The source adds: 'The duchess has consistently approached ShopMy with a focus on authentically sharing products and designers she supports, particularly female founders she wants to uplift.' The deal is then: Meghan doesn't need the money, because she's making plenty already. As speculation grows over the couple attempting to renew links to the UK – with two key members of the Sussex team meeting the King's aide, Tobyn Andreae, earlier this month, as revealed exclusively by The Mail on Sunday – it's intriguing to examine what commercial successes the couple have had since moving their lives to California. The bottom line, of course, has always been significant for both Harry and Meghan. As they seemingly make steps towards rebuilding bridges with the Royal Family, you have to ask: How would a rapprochement serve the Sussexes? And, more than this, might they need to make up with the King for financial reasons. After all, he used to fund his son Harry's life ... right down to a wardrobe allowance for his wife. People who know the Sussexes say the reopening of communications doesn't mean they're any less committed to life in Montecito. I'm told: 'They're very happy living in and raising their family in California and, as it stands, have no plans to leave. The duke will of course continue, as he has done since he emigrated, to visit the UK in support of his charitable causes and patronages.' Indeed, Montecito is the epicentre of how they are marketing themselves. Meghan's As Ever brand was originally known as American Riviera Orchard, after the area in which they live. Five months after Megxit in February 2020, the Sussexes bought their house in Montecito for $14.65million (£10,890,000). And it's that purchase which seems to have fired the starting gun on the Sussexes' endeavours. In their tell-all interview with Oprah Winfrey the following year, which took place while Meghan was pregnant with daughter Lilibet, Prince Harry reflected on their money-making activities to date. He said their deals with Netflix and Spotify had both been driven by financial necessity. The prince said he was cut off by his family in the first quarter of 2020, shortly after he and Meghan announced they would step back as senior members of the royals. He added that he still had the money left to him by his late mother, Princess Diana. 'Without that, we wouldn't have been able to do this,' he said, referring to the family's move to California. If Harry and Meghan had really been getting $100million over five years from Netflix at a steady rate of $20million a year, then you could consider it taken care of. But a source with knowledge of the Netflix deal say it's never worked out like that But even the reputed £10million left by Diana wouldn't be enough to buy his house and sustain their lifestyle for long. The couple are widely reported to have taken out a mortgage, with repayments apparently standing at $480,000 a year. On top of this, property tax will be a further $68,000 a year. Utilities are estimated at $24,000 a year, staffing costs $250,000 and security – always a priority for Prince Harry, who made two tours of duty in Afghanistan with the Army Air Corps – is said to cost up to $3million a year. It all adds up to needing to clear around $4million a year after tax, which is quite a task. Sources also indicate that the price Harry and Meghan pay to run their Archewell production company is significant, 'probably $3million a year, which as an overhead commitment is quite big by Hollywood standards', though some of those costs come out of charity funds. If Harry and Meghan had really been getting $100million over five years from Netflix at a steady rate of $20million a year, then you could consider it taken care of. But a source with knowledge of the Netflix deal say it's never worked out like that. They said: 'From speaking to someone with knowledge of the deal, it looks like they've probably managed to maybe keep $10million-$15million or a touch more purely for themselves over the nearly five years so far – not bad business, but that kind of money doesn't last long with their lifestyle. 'Netflix paid for the production of [the tell-all hit documentary series] Harry & Meghan, which would have included a big fee for them. 'I'd guess [the money Netflix spent on it] works out at $20million all-in. 'Netflix haven't done too badly out of the relationship in as much as they've probably only gone out of pocket to the tune of around $40million or thereabouts, and they did at least get a huge hit documentary out of the investment, and a less successful show in With Love, Meghan. 'The whole arrangement was basically a trade-off for Netflix getting the Harry & Meghan documentary and they will regard it as a modest win.'


Scotsman
17-07-2025
- Scotsman
It's Never Over, Jeff Buckley: New trailer released for new documentary
The late musician would have turned 59 this year Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... A new trailer for the Jeff Buckley documentary has been released. 'It's Never Over, Jeff Buckley' presents audiences with never-before-seen archival footage of the late singer. The trailer comes a month before the film's release in the United States. The much-anticipated documentary on late musician Jeff Buckley has released a brand new trailer ahead of its release next month. 'It's Never Over, Jeff Buckley,' which had its premiere at Sundance earlier this year, collects never-before-seen footage of the late 'Grace' singer, with Billboard noting that the stirring imagery is paired with the 'haunting' comments from the singer. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The documentary also features accounts from some of those close to the musician, including mother Mary Guibert, former partners Rebecca Moore and Joan Wasser, former bandmates Michael Tighe and Parker Kindred, while musicians including Ben Harper also share their stories about the life and legacy of Jeff Buckley. Speaking about the work, director Amy Berg explained: 'It's difficult to imagine a time when I wasn't attempting to make the Jeff Buckley doc. It's been on my bucket list since I made my first film in 2006. And maybe, since I first heard Grace in 1994. It changed my life forever. It literally became the 'tear that hangs inside my soul forever.'' The documentary comes after Buckley's story was attempted to be turned into a big-screen outing numerous times, with Billboard reporting that Brad Pitt at one time was attached to a biopic, before it was 'shut down' by Guibert. The documentary is scheduled for release on August 8, 2025. Who was Jeff Buckley? A new trailer for the Jeff Buckley documentary has been released overnight, offering fans a chance to see what those at Sundance had the pleasure of watching in full. |Jeff Buckley was an American singer-songwriter and guitarist, known for his ethereal voice and emotionally resonant music. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Born in California, he was the son of acclaimed folk singer Tim Buckley. Jeff initially gained recognition in the early 1990s through his performances in New York City clubs, particularly at the avant-garde St. Ann's Church, where he performed a memorable tribute concert to his father. His debut EP, Live at Sin-é, released in 1993, captured the raw energy and intimacy of his solo acoustic performances. His only studio album, Grace, released in 1994, received widespread critical acclaim and is now considered a landmark album of the decade. Grace showcased Buckley's incredible vocal range, poetic lyrics, and eclectic musical influences, blending rock, folk, jazz, and blues. Tracks like 'Hallelujah', a stunning cover of Leonard Cohen's song, and 'Lover, You Should've Come Over' became signature pieces. Despite the album's critical success, mainstream commercial success eluded him during his lifetime. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Tragically, Jeff Buckley died on May 29, 1997, at the age of 30, when he drowned during an impromptu swim in the Wolf River in Memphis, Tennessee, while working on his second album. His sudden and untimely death left a profound impact on the music world, and his legacy has grown significantly in the years since, influencing countless artists and cementing his status as a cult icon. Are you a Jeff Buckley fan and have you been waiting for this documentary to emerge after years of waiting? Let us know your thoughts on the trailer by leaving a comment down below.