At least 20 killed in bombing at Damascus church
It was the first such bombing in Damascus since Bashar al-Assad was toppled by a rebel insurgency in December.
Syria's interior ministry said the bomber was a member of the IS terror group and had entered the church, opened fire and then detonated his explosive vest.
A security source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said two men were involved in the attack, including the one who blew himself up.
The terror group has been behind several attempted attacks on churches in Syria since Assad's fall, but this was the first to succeed, another security source told Reuters.
Syria's state news agency cited the health ministry as saying that 52 people were also injured in the blast.
A livestream from the site by Syria's civil defence, the White Helmets, showed scenes of destruction from inside the church, including a bloodied floor and shattered pews and masonry.
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, who led the offensive against Assad before taking over in January for a transitional phase, has repeatedly said he will protect minorities. "We unequivocally condemn the abhorrent terrorist suicide bombing at the Mar Elias Greek Orthodox Church in Damascus, Syria," the Greek foreign ministry said in a statement.
"We demand that the Syrian transitional authorities take immediate action to hold those involved accountable and implement measures to guarantee the safety of Christian communities and all religious groups, allowing them to live without fear."
The latest assault underscores the group's continued ability to exploit security gaps despite the collapse of its territorial control and years of counterterrorism efforts.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
13 hours ago
- The National
Best photos of July 27: Wildfire in Bursa to UFC fight night in Abu Dhabi
A man looks out from a bunker in Sisaket province as Cambodia and Thailand each said the other had launched artillery attacks across contested border areas early on July 27, hours after US President Donald Trump said the leaders of both countries had agreed to work on a ceasefire. Reuters
Middle East Eye
14 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Syria after Assad: Why Israel's vow to 'protect' the Druze is hollow
It is impossible to remain indifferent to the scenes emerging from southern Syria, particularly from Sweida province. These events are unfolding at a rare moment of regional consensus - among Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar and the United States - after 14 years of bloody civil war that displaced millions of people. For the first time since the fall of Bashar al-Assad's regime last December, there was real hope that Syria could finally enter a new chapter of national stability and reconstruction under President Ahmed al-Sharaa. But anyone who assumes this transition will be smooth is mistaken. The war left deep scars. Millions endured unspeakable horrors under Assad's rule, as a sectarian structure underpinned the regime's survival strategy. This legacy is now re-emerging. Last week, sectarian tensions reignited in Sweida as violence broke out between Druze communities and Bedouin tribes. These events demonstrated once again the dangers of sectarianism in a country still grappling with thousands of former fighters and youth who have yet to reintegrate into civilian life. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Syria faces years of structural and societal rebuilding - a process that hinges on the ability of the new regime to promote an inclusive, national dialogue. So far, this process has not been particularly successful, but only time will tell. Adding to the instability is Israel's recent decision to launch air strikes against regime forces, including military headquarters in Damascus. These actions suggest not a strategy for peace, but an effort to sow chaos and obstruct Syria's return to normalcy. Israel framed these attacks under the pretext of protecting the Druze. But soon afterwards, Israeli leaders issued veiled threats against the Syrian regime and even Sharaa himself. Some commentators have openly discussed dividing Syria and establishing a Druze autonomous region in the south. Strategic quagmire This discourse reflects Israel's strategic quagmire - a trap of its own making. The war in Gaza, alongside Israel's perpetual war doctrine, is not only morally catastrophic; it also serves as a distraction, allowing Israel to posture as the defender of Middle Eastern minorities. According to this narrative, Israel's violence in Gaza is legitimised through a vision of the region modelled after itself: fragmented, divided along ethnic and religious lines, and incapable of producing multiethnic, pluralistic nation-states. Israel has previously proposed dividing Syria into cantons. But beyond being logistically and politically unfeasible - requiring a rare international consensus - such proposals fail to grasp Syria's social complexities. Israel's prolonged war in Gaza has shown its limitations, even in a much smaller, besieged area and with the support of western powers Syria's diverse social fabric cannot be easily partitioned. Breaking it apart, even under the guise of 'protection', would only fuel further chaos. Such chaos may well serve Israeli interests. After all, Israel has historically viewed Syria's civil war as a strategic advantage. If Israel proceeds with a plan to divide Syria to 'protect' the Druze in the south, it would have to send ground forces into Sweida - an area nearly a quarter the size of Israel. Military conquest might be the easy part; holding the territory would be far harder. Israel's prolonged war in Gaza has shown its limitations, even in a much smaller, besieged area and with the support of western powers. An occupation of Sweida would further overstretch Israeli manpower at a time of domestic exhaustion and military burnout. Israeli officials understand this. The US and key regional actors oppose further destabilisation. Even within Israel's military leadership, there's resistance to expanding into Syria. The Gaza war has taught Israel a painful lesson: stable Arab countries tend to avoid entanglement in Gaza, while fragile states like Lebanon, Iraq and Yemen pose continuous threats. Mounting pressure Nevertheless, pressure is mounting within Israel from its own Druze citizens, who are divided into two distinct groups: those from historical Palestine, whose leadership - at least in part - chose to accept the state of Israel after 1948 and were gradually integrated into Israeli state structures, most notably through mandatory military service; and the smaller Druze community in the occupied Golan Heights, which has historically rejected Israeli rule. Around 80 percent of Druze men and women enlist in the Israeli army, with 39 percent of conscripts serving in combat units. Amid a growing personnel crisis, the political withdrawal of ultra-Orthodox parties due to a dispute over draft exemptions, and declining reservist morale, the Druze - while comprising less than two percent of Israel's population - wield outsized influence in military decision-making. Their influence was evident this month, as hundreds of Israeli Druze breached the fence in the occupied Golan Heights and entered southern Syria. While most have since returned, dozens reportedly remained behind to contribute their military expertise. According to international law, they would now qualify as unlawful foreign fighters, violating the sovereignty of another state. How Israel's strikes on Syria are backfiring Read More » Despite Israel's militaristic rhetoric, it will not truly endanger its strategic interests for the Druze. The same country that denies Druze citizens symbolic recognition in its nation-state law and fails to protect them from organised crime is unlikely to risk open war on their behalf. Rather, Israel's intervention in Syria is an attempt to balance domestic pressures with its regional agenda. In doing so, it exposes both the emptiness of the professed Jewish-Druze brotherhood and its frustration with a new international consensus around Syria that contradicts its goals. But the greatest tragedy lies within Syria itself. The videos released by both sides recall Lebanon's civil war and the horrors of sectarian violence. The urgent task for Syrians is not to claim towns or military victories, but to ask hard political questions: what kind of shared society can be rebuilt? What will integration look like across religious and ethnic lines? Even if Druze separatists succeed in creating an Israeli-backed autonomous region, they will face social and economic fallout. Families will be separated, men will die fighting and communities will become dependent on Israeli interests. This would impact Druze populations in Lebanon, Jordan and across Syria. Ironically, some of the most powerful images from this conflict have been of Druze families reuniting across the Golan border - loved ones separated for decades by Israeli occupation. Should the crisis deepen, more families will be torn apart. And Israel will not come to their rescue. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Dubai Eye
17 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
Thai-Cambodia border shelling continues despite calls for ceasefire
Cambodia and Thailand each said the other had launched artillery attacks across contested border areas early on Sunday, hours after US President Donald Trump said the leaders of both countries had agreed to work on a ceasefire. Cambodia said it fully endorsed Trump's call for an immediate ceasefire. Thailand said while it was grateful to the US President, it could not begin talks while Cambodia was targeting its civilians, a claim that Phnom Penh has denied. "Our condition is that we do not want a third country but are thankful for his (Trump's) concern," Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai told reporters before heading off to visit border areas. "We've proposed a bilateral between our foreign ministers to conclude the conditions for a ceasefire and drawing back troops and long-range weapons." Cambodia said Thailand had started hostilities on Sunday morning and that Thai forces were mobilising along the border. Thailand said it had responded to attacks from Cambodia. "I made it clear to Honourable President Donald Trump that Cambodia agreed with the proposal for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire between the two armed forces," Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet posted on Facebook, noting he had also agreed to Malaysia's earlier ceasefire proposal. CITIZENS WANT PEACE Four days after the worst fighting in more than a decade broke out between the Southeast Asian neighbours, the death toll stood above 30, including 13 civilians in Thailand and eight in Cambodia. More than 200,000 people have been evacuated from border areas in the two countries, authorities said. Cambodia's Defence Ministry said Thailand had shelled and launched ground assaults on Sunday morning at a number of points along the border. The ministry's spokesperson said heavy artillery was fired at historic temple complexes. "For me, I think it is great if Thailand agreed to stop fighting so both countries can live with peace," a Phnom Penh university student Sreung Nita told Reuters. The Thai army said Cambodian forces had fired shots into several areas, including near civilian homes, early on Sunday, and were mobilising long-range rocket launchers. The governor of Surin told Reuters artillery shells had been fired into the province. "The soldiers will continue to do their job at full steam - so Thais do not worry - until the government has reached a clear agreement that there is no danger for the people and to ensure we maintain the country's interests in order to bring the peace we want to see," Phumtham said. In the Thai province of Sisaket, Reuters reporters heard shelling throughout Sunday and said it was unclear which side of the border it was on. "If there is a ceasefire, things will be better," Sisaket resident Thavorn Toosawan told Reuters. "It's great that America is insisting on the ceasefire because it would bring peace." TRUMP SPEAKS TO BOTH LEADERS Trump said on Saturday that he had spoken with the prime ministers of Thailand and Cambodia and they had agreed to meet immediately to quickly work out a ceasefire to end fighting that began on Thursday. Bangkok and Phnom Penh each say the other started the hostilities last week. "Both Parties are looking for an immediate Ceasefire and Peace," Trump wrote on social media, adding tariff negotiations with both countries were on hold until the fighting stopped. The countries have faced off since the killing of a Cambodian soldier late in May during a brief skirmish. Troops on both sides of the border were reinforced amid a full-blown diplomatic crisis that brought Thailand's fragile coalition government to the brink of collapse. Thailand and Cambodia have bickered for decades over undemarcated points along their 817-km land border, with ownership of the ancient Hindu temples Ta Moan Thom and the 11th century Preah Vihear central to the disputes. Preah Vihear was awarded to Cambodia by the International Court of Justice in 1962, but tension escalated in 2008 after Cambodia attempted to list it as a UNESCO World Heritage site, and skirmishes over several years brought at least a dozen deaths. Cambodia said in June it had asked the world court to resolve its disputes with Thailand, which says it has never recognised the court's jurisdiction and prefers a bilateral approach.
