Labour must not rubber-stamp torture policy, say campaigners
The policies regulating British support for foreign security and intelligence services were blamed for facilitating injustices in cases like those of Jagtar Singh Johal and Ali Kololo and it was hoped Labour would strengthen them in government.
But NGOs and senior MPs say 'light-touch' government reviews of the overseas security and justice assistance (OSJA) guidance and 'the principles' that govern intelligence sharing are likely to leave in place 'very serious flaws'.
Their biggest concern is that Labour will not remove ministers' ability to approve UK cooperation in situations where there is a real risk of torture or the death penalty.
Johal, a British human rights activist, was allegedly tortured in India, where he remains in jail, after a tipoff from UK intelligence services. Kololo was wrongly convicted and sentenced to death over an attack on British tourists after the Met police provided assistance to Kenyan authorities.
The Conservative MP and former cabinet minister, David Davis, said: 'These policies are not a partisan issue; they are vital safeguards designed to prevent UK actions contributing to people being tortured or sentenced to death.
'Ministers should never be able to sign off on intelligence being shared or UK security assistance being granted where there is a risk of torture.
'That was true under the previous Conservative government and it's true now under Labour. We should never forget that it was bogus intelligence acquired under torture that led to the justification of the Iraq war.
'It would be a grave error to leave these failed policies as they are, and the government must avoid anything that looks like a Whitehall stitch-up not least as this would have profoundly negative consequences for the UK's global reputation.'
Reprieve, Amnesty International UK, Freedom from Torture, the Omega Research Foundation, the Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy and Unredacted UK have written a joint letter to the foreign secretary, David Lammy, expressing concern that the policy reviews 'may not sufficiently address the very serious flaws with the existing policy'.
The Liberal Democrat MP and former cabinet minister, Alistair Carmichael, said: 'I would never have expected a Labour government to rubber-stamp Boris Johnson's torture policy while paying lip service to human rights concerns, but that appears to be what is happening here.
'There is disturbing evidence that existing policies on intelligence-sharing and overseas security assistance leave the UK at risk of being mixed up in torture in some way. These policies need a proper overhaul, with input from victims of the previous failed approach, not the consultation-in-name-only that is going on at the moment.'
The government is being urged to consult Johal's family and others adversely affected by the policies as well as publish terms of reference for the reviews.
Sir Andrew Mitchell, a Conservative MP and former deputy foreign secretary, said: 'Any review worth its salt should be learning the lessons of Ali Kololo, and indeed seeking Mr Kololo's input after everything he has been put through. The OSJA policy's abject failure to prevent this case and others suggests it is fundamentally broken. No responsible minister would want to go beyond the law and get mixed up in torture or the death penalty, and the policy should make clear this is never permissible.'
Reprieve's submission to the OSJA review states that under the former government the policy failed to block UK assistance to human rights abusers in Libya, Sri Lanka, Bahrain, Pakistan, Sierra Leone and Saudi Arabia.
Dan Dolan, Reprieve's deputy executive director, said: 'These two core human rights policies of the British government have in the last decade left a trail of people who have suffered torture and the death penalty, with sadly the UK's assistance.
'If this government fails to follow through on its recognition in opposition that these policies are fatally flawed, then it will let down the survivors of human rights abuses where the UK has played a role.'
A Foreign Office spokesperson said it was 'engaging with external stakeholders' and 'recognising the important perspectives of civil society'. They added: 'The guidance will set out how we ensure the UK's overseas security and justice assistance work will meet our human rights obligations and values.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
32 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Migrant can stay in UK after ‘far-fetched' claim he was shot by lover's father
An Iraqi asylum seeker has been allowed to remain in the UK after 'far-fetched' claims that he was shot by his married lover's father in an attempted honour killing. The unnamed migrant claimed that he was gunned down and left in hospital by his girlfriend's family following a secret affair. The Iraqi, in his late 20s, said he was outside his home in Iraq when his lover's disapproving father and brother shot him in the shoulder. He claimed the woman's father was a 'powerful' and 'influential' man who had connections with the Iraqi government. After arriving in Britain, he is now trying to claim asylum on humanitarian grounds by arguing that he cannot be deported because he is at risk of becoming an honour killing victim. A previous ruling at an asylum court dismissed his case, finding that he was not 'credible' and casting doubt on his 'far-fetched' story. However, the man has won an appeal after a new ruling said the original judge made legal mistakes. The case, disclosed in court papers, is the latest example uncovered by The Telegraph in which illegal migrants or convicted foreign criminals have been able to remain in the UK or halt their removal from the UK. Ministers are proposing to raise the threshold to make it harder for judges to grant the right to remain based on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects the right to a family life, and Article 3, which protects against torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. The Iraqi man, of mixed Arabic and Kurdish ethnicity, lodged his asylum claim in September 2020, having arrived in the country. On his way to Britain, he spent time in France and had an asylum bid rejected in Denmark. 'The basis of the [Iraqi's] claim is that he cannot return to Iraq as he fears he is at risk of an honour killing from the family of a woman with whom he had an extra-marital relationship,' the tribunal said. 'He claims that [her] father is a powerful person with connections to the Iraqi government.' The Iraqi said he was in a 'secretive' relationship with the unnamed woman and was not aware of her father's 'rank, power and influence' before he began the relationship, only finding out later from her and a friend. The woman was married and 'forced to return to her family home', according to the man. He said he never met the woman's family but was able to recognise them after seeing photos at her home. He alleges that her father and brother shot him outside his own home and that he had to be treated in hospital for a gunshot wound to his shoulder. Account 'not credible' When the Home Office tried to deport him, he appealed against the decision. However, a lower-tier tribunal ruled that his account was 'not credible' and that 'he does not face a real risk of suffering serious harm in Iraq'. The judge at the time cast doubt over whether he was able to recognise the father and brother during the shooting, saying it was 'far-fetched' that he recognised them during the 'moment of heightened anxiety'. The judge also said the Iraqi gave 'confusing' and 'varying' accounts of who had shot him while in hospital. There was also no direct evidence of the injury, with his medical notes merely stating that he had a 'historic shoulder injury'. However, after a further appeal to an upper immigration tribunal, a judge has ruled the lower tribunal made mistakes in law that meant it could not be said the Iraqi's account about being shot was not credible. The panel concluded that the legal mistakes 'cast sufficient doubt on the overall approach to the credibility assessment'. The case will be reheard at the first-tier tribunal.
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Barack Obama to be interviewed live on stage at London and Dublin events
Former US president Barack Obama is to be interviewed live on stage for two events in London and Dublin. The 63-year-old, who became the first black US president when he took office in 2009, will be interviewed by TV historian David Olusoga for the event at London's The O2 on September 24, before chatting with Irish journalist Fintan O'Toole at Dublin's 3Arena on September 26. An Evening With President Barack Obama will see the former president speak about his experiences in the role and the future for the US. Stuart Galbraith, chief executive of Kilimanjaro, and Alex Fane, chief executive of Fane Group, the groups organising the events, said in a joint statement: 'We are incredibly honoured to bring President Obama to the UK and Ireland for these truly special events. 'His message of unity and progress resonates deeply, and we anticipate an evening that will inspire and empower all who attend. 'We believe in providing exceptional experiences, and this event perfectly aligns with our mission to connect people with inspiring moments.' Tickets for the events go on sale at 10am on Thursday July 10, with 100 tickets set aside in each city for charitable organisations. Since his presidency ended, Mr Obama has signed a deal with Netflix, alongside his wife Michelle, to produce documentaries, documentary series, and features for the streaming platform under their Higher Ground Productions company. In 2022, he won the best narrator Emmy for his work on the Netflix documentary series Our Great National Parks, while he previously won Grammy awards for his audiobook reading of two of his memoirs, The Audacity Of Hope and Dreams From My Father. The Hawaii-born former president has also hosted a podcast called Renegades: Born In The USA in 2021, alongside singer Bruce Springsteen, with the pair also releasing a book based on the podcast.
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘Should I pay my final salary pension into a Sipp to drop a tax band?'
However, when the lifetime allowance was abolished, anyone who already had fixed protection before March 15 2023 (the date of the Budget announcement) could resume paying into or getting pension contributions and keep their protections. So, although one part of the rules relaxing means you might be able to start paying in again, the tax relief rules might still get in the way of you achieving your goal of minimising your higher-rate tax, or mitigating it completely. Tax relief and earnings You can claim tax relief on the greater of 100pc of your UK earnings, or £3,600 in any tax year. For most personal pensions, including Sipps, contributions are typically taken from pay after tax and topped up by basic-rate (20pc) tax relief returned from the Government, which is paid directly into the pension. If an individual paid in £4,000, this would be topped up by £1,000 basic-rate relief, meaning £5,000 goes into their Sipp. A UK resident with no earnings can pay in up to £2,880 a year, which is topped up by pension tax relief to £3,600. You've mentioned that you receive income from a final salary pension scheme. Although pension income is taxed under income tax in the same way as salary or bonuses earned in your working life, it is not classed as earnings when calculating how much you can pay into a pension for tax relief. The same goes for investment income like dividends, savings income or property rental income, even if you are paying higher rates of tax on these sources. I'm afraid that unless you have earnings from another source, your ability to make pension contributions for tax relief is going to be very limited, meaning your strategy is unlikely to work. The full list of what counts as relevant UK earnings can be found in the Government's pension tax manual. Your question does raise some important points about how pension tax relief works, and the interaction with the personal savings allowance, so I've taken the chance to explain this below and it should help if you do have some earnings after all. The second lever the Government uses to limit the value of tax relief is the annual allowance. This allowance is £60,000 per tax year for most people, and applies to the total gross pension contributions made by or for you across all your pension schemes. So your own payments, the automatic government top-up and any employer contributions. The allowance is lower for people with very high incomes (usually £200,000 plus), or those who have already accessed a pension using a flexible income option, like pension drawdown. How pension tax relief works I've mentioned that schemes like Sipps automatically top up money you pay in personally by 20pc tax relief. So, for every £800 you save, £1,000 in total ends up in the pension pot. But people who pay more than 20pc tax on their earnings can claim more relief by contacting HMRC directly. This includes Scottish taxpayers paying intermediate tax (21pc) and above, and higher-rate (40pc) and additional-rate (45pc) taxpayers in the rest of the UK. The amount of extra tax relief on offer will depend on someone's earnings, and how much falls into those higher rates of tax. As you've pointed out, making a pension contribution and claiming that extra tax relief has the effect of expanding the basic-rate band, bringing all or some earnings out of higher rates of tax. For people earning between £100,000 and £125,140, the tax-free personal allowance is gradually removed, resulting in an effective tax rate of 60pc – or up to 67.5pc in Scotland. It's possible to use pension contributions to reduce taxable income, claw back personal allowance and boost retirement savings, if someone's UK earnings allow. Personal savings allowance You also mentioned the personal savings allowance. If someone can move out of a higher tax band thanks to pension contributions, it can help them get more of their savings interest tax-free. This is because the amount of personal savings allowance someone has depends on your tax rate. Basic-rate taxpayers get a £1,000 allowance, but the allowance is halved to £500 for higher-rate taxpayers and lost completely for those paying additional-rate income tax. How to claim extra tax relief The Government has recently introduced an online service to help claim extra tax relief, which makes things much easier for those who don't usually have to complete a tax return and avoids getting stuck on the telephone to the taxman. People who already complete a tax return will need to include their total gross (personal) pension contributions on the pension pages of their return to claim relief. Most of the above on pension contributions also applies to charity donations made under gift aid, except that pension income received does count as income on which gift aid can be claimed. So, if you don't have UK earnings and still want to reduce your marginal rate of tax, you could consider your favourite charity. I hope this has helped to answer your question, even though it might not be the tax outcome you were hoping for. With best wishes, – Charlene
