Infected blood report to set out impact of compensation delays
A report into the timeliness of compensation for those infected and affected is due to be published on Wednesday, following additional hearings of the Infected Blood Inquiry.
On Sunday the Cabinet Office announced that it was 'unlocking administrative barriers' to help the compensation body 'speed up payments to victims'.
Speaking ahead of the publication of the new Inquiry report, Kate Burt, chief executive of the Haemophilia Society, said: 'Delays and uncertainty about compensation continue to have a devastating mental and physical impact on the infected blood community.
'We hope the Infected Blood Inquiry's report on the government's handling of compensation will help to resolve remaining concerns about the scheme as well as maintain pressure to deliver fair payments as quickly as possible.'
Brendan West, who was given infected blood in the 1970s, told the PA news agency that many members of the infected blood community felt 'frustrated' while waiting to be called forward for compensation.
The former soldier lost his leg in 1979 and was given blood transfusions while at a British military hospital in Germany where his leg was amputated. Four decades later, he discovered that the blood he was given was infected with Hepatitis C.
The 64-year-old from Farnborough, Hampshire, now suffers from liver cirrhosis which causes exhaustion.
He said he hoped the Government will take 'fair and informed action' after the report is published.
'I'm fortunate enough to now in the process of going through compensation,' he said.
'I have no idea when I will be made an offer but at the moment I think I am being treated fairly.'
He added: 'As you're aware people were very frustrated with waiting but it seems to me that the IBCA have bought on a load more staff and they have been inviting people to apply for compensation in greater numbers.
'There is still a frustration from a lot of the community that they're having to wait, particularly those that are affected rather than infected.
'I hope the Government will look at the report recommendations and take fair and informed action on them.
'I think there will be huge backlash if those recommendations are either ignored or discarded.'
We've published our latest compensation figures today – these are accurate as of 1 July 2025.
We will continue to publish updated figures every two weeks.
Click the link to see the latest figures: https://t.co/CISQSHwRQ0 pic.twitter.com/KRWbpXunBg
— Infected Blood Compensation Authority (@IBCA_UK) July 3, 2025
More than 30,000 people in the UK were infected with HIV and hepatitis C after they were given contaminated blood and blood products between the 1970s and early 1990s.
More than 3,000 people have died as a result, and survivors are living with life-long health implications.
The Infected Blood Inquiry published its main report on the scandal in May last year, and a compensation scheme was announced a day later.
But in the same week a general election was called and officials from the Infected Blood Compensation Authority (IBCA) have described how in the early days of the organisation it consisted of two men, a laptop and a phone.
Some £11.8 billion has been allocated to compensate victims, administered by the IBCA.
As of July 1, some 2,043 people have been asked to make a claim, and 460 people have had their compensation paid totalling more than £326 million, according to IBCA figures.
On Sunday, the Cabinet Office said that it will 'reduce the administration and process delays' victims are facing, meaning the IBCA will 'be able to deliver services quickly, and require different supporting information from claimants'.
Des Collins, senior partner at Collins Solicitors and adviser to 1,500 victims of the scandal, said: 'In our view there has already been some recent progress in the number of infected people being invited to apply for compensation.
'However it remains the case that those affected – by virtue of the fact they lost husbands, fathers, sons and family members to infected blood/blood products – are still in the dark about the route to compensation for them.
'There has been absolutely no guidance on timeframes for when they will be invited to apply – these members of the community deserve better.
'Whilst the path to compensation for the infected blood community has been far from smooth, improvements can still be made.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economist
2 hours ago
- Economist
Why are British doctors so radical?
Britain | A striking shift Photograph: Getty Images P ICTURE THE British Medical Association ( BMA ), the main doctors' union, and you may imagine a professional body of tweed-wearers. It is more like a giant version of Extinction Rebellion, albeit ready to block health care, not roads. Its latest strike, a five-day walkout by resident (formerly known as junior) doctors, is to start on July 25th. How did they get so radical? An overdue overhaul of an unloved industry Really out-of-the-way places can slip through the financial-reporting cracks Start with a proper look at what caused the problem The two countries hope it will alleviate a set of mutual ailments They have failed to focus on efficiency for the mass market A rotten episode over Afghan refugees implicates much of the British state
Rhyl Journal
3 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
BMA confirms resident doctor strikes will go ahead
Confirmation of the industrial action followed crunch talks between the union and the Health Secretary last week. After the meeting, Wes Streeting reiterated that 'we cannot move on pay after a 28.9% pay rise' but added that the Government was looking at ways to improve resident doctors' working lives. The BMA resident doctors committee said while members were happy to discuss non-pay issues, the row 'is at its core a pay dispute'. Strikes will take place for five consecutive days from 7am on Friday July 25. Dr Melissa Ryan and Dr Ross Nieuwoudt, co-chairs of the BMA's resident doctors committee, said: 'We have always said that no doctor wants to strike and all it would take to avoid it is a credible path to pay restoration offered by the Government. 'We came to talks in good faith, keen to explore real solutions to the problems facing resident doctors today. 'Unfortunately, we did not receive an offer that would meet the scale of those challenges. 'While we were happy to discuss non-pay issues that affect doctors' finances we have always been upfront that this is at its core a pay dispute. 'The simplest and most direct means of restoring the more than a fifth of our pay that has eroded since 2008 is to raise our pay. 'While we were keen to discuss other items, it was made very clear by the Government that this obvious course of action was going to remain off the table.' The statement added that 'student debt and the cost of training remain crushing burdens on the finances of resident doctors' and while the BMA hoped there would be 'new ideas' to tackle this, what was proposed 'would not have been significant enough to change the day-to-day financial situation for our members'. 'However our door remains open, and we are glad to have met with the Secretary of State in a constructive spirit. We want to keep talking but we don't accept we can't talk about pay,' they said. Reacting to the BMA's announcement, Mr Streeting said there was an opportunity for the union 'to work with us on a range of options that would have made a real difference to resident doctors' working conditions and created extra roles to deal with the bottlenecks that hold back their career progression'. 'Instead, they have recklessly and needlessly opted for strike action. 'The BMA would have lost nothing by taking up the offer to postpone strike action to negotiate a package that would improve the working lives of resident doctors. 'By refusing to do so, they will cause unnecessary disruption to patients, put additional pressure on their NHS colleagues and not take the opportunity to improve their own working conditions. 'All of my attention will be now on averting harm to patients and supporting NHS staff at work. 'After a 28.9% pay hike in the last three years and the highest pay rise in the public sector two years in a row, strike action is completely unjustified, completely unprecedented in the history of British trade unionism and shows a complete disdain for patients and the wider recovery of the NHS.' It came after research suggested public support for the strike is waning. A YouGov poll showed about half (52%) of people in the UK 'somewhat oppose' (20%) or 'strongly oppose' (32%) resident doctors going on strike over pay. A third (34%) of the 4,954 adults surveyed either 'somewhat support' (23%) or 'strongly support' (11%) doctor strikes. YouGov said the proportion supporting the strike over pay has dropped five points since it last asked the question in May, when 48% opposed the strikes and 39% supported them. A row between the BMA and health leaders also deepened on Tuesday. NHS Providers, which represents hospital trusts, hit back at the union's claims that health leaders were putting patients at risk, saying it was the 'costly' BMA strike that was risking patient care. Earlier, the BMA said NHS England plans for managing the strike could put patients at risk because it has ordered hospitals to continue with as much pre-planned care as possible. In a letter to trust leaders, it urged the health system to focus on maintaining emergency care, the flow of patients and elective care 'to the fullest extent possible', as well as 'priority treatments' such as cancer care. 'It will be important for systems and trusts to try and maintain normal levels of booked activity,' it said, adding: 'Reducing volumes of bookings and rescheduling of appointments and other activity should only happen in exceptional circumstances to safeguard patient safety.' On Tuesday morning, BMA deputy chairwoman Dr Emma Runswick told BBC Radio 4's Today programme this plan risked patient safety. She said: 'We think that a notional guidance from NHS England which is saying that basically all scheduled work should continue to go ahead has potential to be seriously risky for patients. 'Senior doctors are needed to be freed up in order to provide urgency and critical care. 'We think the vast majority of planned and unscheduled care should be shifted.' Speaking in the Commons on Tuesday, Mr Streeting said that before he came into office, 'strikes were crippling the NHS'. He added: 'Costs ran to £1.7 billion in just one year, and patients saw 1.5 million appointments rescheduled.'
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Junior doctors' strike to go ahead after talks fail
A five-day strike by junior doctors will go ahead from Friday after talks failed. The British Medical Association (BMA) is pushing for pay increases of 29 per cent, having already secured such a boost under the Labour Government. The walkouts by up to 30,000 medics will be the first national strike by a healthcare union under a Labour administration since the winter of discontent in 1979. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, opened talks with the BMA last week, since when health and union officials have been locked in discussions. Mr Streeting has said the Government will not negotiate on pay, but was prepared to make changes to improve working conditions. But on Tuesday afternoon, the BMA said the strikes would go ahead.
