Fed's Kugler looks to hold rates steady as she warns of higher inflation from Trump's tariffs
"I see greater upside risks to inflation at this juncture and potential downside risks to employment and output growth down the road, and this leads me to continue to support maintaining the FOMC's policy rate at its current setting if upside risks to inflation remain," Kugler said in a speech at the Economic Club of New York.
The Fed next meets on June 17-18, and is not expected to make any changes to monetary policy. It has not altered its benchmark rates so far in 2025 after reducing them by a full percentage point at the end of 2024, citing uncertainties about President Trump's policies.
"I view our current stance of monetary policy as well-positioned for any changes in the macroeconomic environment," Kugler added Thursday.
Kugler said she expects higher tariffs this year will continue to push up inflation over 2025. She referenced research from the Federal Reserve staff, which estimates that 20% tariffs on Chinese imports earlier in the year raised overall inflation as measured by the 'core' Personal Consumption Expenditures Index, by 0.2%.
But since tariffs on China are higher than 20%, and tariffs have increased for other countries, she added, 'these results tell me, first, that the pass-through of tariffs into prices is relatively quick, and, second, should elevated tariffs persist, even just in the short run, larger effects may be coming soon."
She added a surge in imports to get ahead of higher tariffs earlier this year has delayed the price effects associated with those tariffs, and the reversal in that surge that she expects in the next few months will likely signal larger price increases.
Kugler is also eyeing three channels through which tariffs could lead to longer-lasting inflation. She warned an increase in short-term inflation expectations could give businesses leeway to raise prices, increasing the persistence of inflation. Companies could also take advantage of price increases on goods impacted by tariffs to raise prices on items not impacted by the levies.
As well, Kugler cautioned that tariffs on parts used to make final products could lead to second-round effects on inflation. And the possibility of lower productivity, Kugler said, could also push up prices.
Meanwhile Kugler says so-called soft data — surveys of businesses and consumers — suggest that price increases are coming. Kugler pointed to surveys for May showing indexes for inputs and selling prices being elevated relative to the beginning of the year, and that probably reflects the effects from higher tariffs.
On the consumer side, she pointed to a handful of recent surveys including one from the University of Michigan that have shown short-term inflation expectations rising. Michigan's survey also revealed a pop up in longer-term inflation expectation.
But she noted that she still sees stability in most measures of longer-run inflation expectations.
Right now, Kugler says the job market remains resilient, but warned that trade and other policy changes could raise the unemployment rate.
And while the economy looks to be on solid footing based on official data measures, she noted that the Fed's May Beige Book showed stagnation, suggesting the economy might be starting to slow.
Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia Chips Are Flowing to China Again -- What That Means for AI Adoption Trends
Key Points The U.S. government just changed its rules to allow Nvidia to ship its H2O chips to China. Most AI is still limited to large companies, and as Nvidia expands into new regions and clients, the technology will scale up and become more affordable. As the support for AI infrastructure grows, Nvidia stands to gain in the long term. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) has had an almost unreal ascent over the past few years. It crossed the $1 trillion market cap threshold in 2023 and became the fifth-largest company in the world. And it has skipped over the front-runners in two years, increasing by 329%, to become the most valuable company in the world, as well as the first to reach $4 trillion in value. The stock got a further boost this week when President Donald Trump relaxed the government's stance on selling Nvidia's chips to China. Let's see why this is important for Nvidia and what it means about artificial intelligence (AI) adoption trends globally. Image source: Getty Images. Nvidia, the U.S., and China Nvidia is the premier graphics processing unit (GPU) company, making the most powerful chips for several industries. Before OpenAI changed the tech landscape with the launch of ChatGPT a few years ago, Nvidia was most known for its gaming chips. Today, its greatest growth and potential are in generative AI. Nvidia is based in California, and as a U.S. company, it's subject to government rules and guidelines. Both the Biden administration and today's Trump administration have leveraged the U.S. lead in AI in its favor and attempted to curtail some of the country's best technology outside of the U.S., specifically in China. The situation has changed several times, and from this past April until this week, the U.S. had implemented new restrictions on what chips Nvidia could export to China. In the short term, the company had to take a $4.5 billion charge on its fiscal first-quarter (ended April 27) financial statements related to its H2O chips for orders it couldn't fulfill in China. CEO Jensen Huang has been outspoken in his disagreement with these policies and how he sees this working against the U.S. in the long term. Without Nvidia's products, he believes, Chinese tech companies will figure out how to build their own AI chips and models. "General-purpose, open-source research and foundation models are the backbone of AI innovation," Huang said. "We believe that every civil model should run best on the U.S. technology stack, encouraging nations worldwide to choose America."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Fed officials, banking experts discuss regulatory rewrite effort at conference
By Pete Schroeder WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve continued work on its comprehensive effort to rewrite bank rules with a daylong conference at its headquarters on Tuesday. At the conference in Washington, regulatory officials, bankers, industry lawyers and other experts discussed a range of tougher bank rules put in place after the 2008 financial crisis, and ways to refine them. The outcome could save large banks billions of dollars in capital costs, which they argue would free them to engage in more lending and other activities, but skeptics warn could make banks less resilient in future shocks. "We need to ensure that all the different pieces of the capital framework work together effectively. Doing so will help maintain a safe, sound, and efficient banking system, for the benefit of the people we serve," Fed Chair Jerome Powell said in introductory remarks. The event was pushed by Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman, who stepped into the U.S. central bank's top regulatory post in June after being nominated for the role by President Donald Trump. Bowman, a member of the Fed's Board of Governors since 2018, has charted an ambitious agenda to reconsider a raft of longstanding bank requirements. The conference tackled nearly every major bank capital requirement imposed by the Fed and other U.S. bank regulators following the crisis 17 years ago, including leverage requirements, additional surcharges imposed on large global banks, and annual "stress tests" of large bank finances. Banks have increasingly complained over the years that the rules have become unnecessarily onerous and outdated, which has helped push financial activity out of the traditional banking sector into less heavily regulated non-banks. "It's really about striking that balance between economic growth and safety and soundness," said Sheara Fredman, chief accounting officer at Goldman Sachs. Many of those rules are being rewritten by regulators, or officials have discussed potential changes. The industry garnered a major victory last year when it effectively sidelined an effort to overhaul how banks gauge their risk known as the "Basel III endgame," which would have drastically raised large banks' capital requirements. Banks intensely lobbied against the initiative, which was pushed by Bowman's predecessor, Fed Governor Michael Barr. On Tuesday, much of the conversation was aimed at how remaining rules could be changed to ease bank burdens, including by advancing a new version of the Basel framework that minimizes the capital impact of new risk measurements. Sign in to access your portfolio
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
An Independent Fed Is Sacrosanct
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent persuaded President Trump not to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell by citing the negative effects on financial markets, the Journal reported. Mr. Trump responded Sunday on Truth Social: 'Nobody had to explain that to me. I know better than anybody what's good for the Market, and what's good for the U.S.A.' Broadening the point, he added that 'People don't explain to me, I explain to them!' The next morning, one of the advisers whose explanations are unnecessary went on CNBC to continue the administration's attack on the Fed. 'Has the organization succeeded in its mission?,' Mr. Bessent asked rhetorically. 'If this were the [Federal Aviation Administration] and we were having this many mistakes, we would go back and look at why has this happened.' Clearly, Mr. Powell's insistence on looking at the inflationary possibilities of tariffs before leaping into lower interest rates is annoying Mr. Trump and his top aides. But the president can't fire him. The Supreme Court has made clear that it will exempt the Federal Reserve Board from its steady broadening of presidential power over independent agencies. In an order issued in May, the Court wrote, 'The Federal Reserve is a uniquely structured, quasi-private entity that follows in the distinct historical tradition of the First and Second Banks of the United States.' Policy disagreements aren't enough to satisfy the legal requirement for firing Mr. Powell. Despite the president's transparent campaign to morph the Fed chairman's management of the board's headquarters renovation into a fraud charge that would meet the requirement, the odds are that Mr. Powell will serve out the remainder of his term, which ends in May. The real issue is what comes next.
