Posts falsely claim new Philippine law taxes bank savings
"This is something else. Isn't this discouraging people from saving up? Let me just take out my 345 pesos (US$6) now before it gets taxed hahaha!" the caption says.
Recto is a key figure in President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s economic team, whose members were retained despite a cabinet revamp aimed at reviving his administration's popularity after disappointing midterm election results (archived link).
Image
Screenshot of the false Facebook post captured on July 29, 2025, with a red X added by AFP
Similar posts circulated across social media, drawing concerns from users who believed the government had begun taxing all personal savings.
"It's already hard to save, and now they're imposing a 20 percent tax?" one user said.
Another commented: "Let's just put our money in a piggy bank. Recto is out of his mind."
Taxing interest income
The posts surfaced nearly two weeks after the Capital Market Efficiency Promotion Act (CMEPA) -- -- took effect in July (archived link).
But Carina Laforteza, head tax lawyer at SyCipLaw firm, said the law does not "impose a new tax on savings per se, as only the interest income -- not the principal -- is subject to tax" (archived link).
Laforteza explained that a 20 percent final withholding tax on interest income ith some exemptions: foreign currency deposit unit (FCDU) accounts were taxed at 15 percent, while long-term deposits of five years or more were exempt (archived link).
"CMEPA removed these exceptions," she said.
The Department of Finance (DOF) also rebuffed the false posts in a July 17 statement, clarifying it does not impose a new levy on money saved but standardises the tax rate on interest income to correct an "unfair system that favoured the wealthy" (archived link).
It noted that the law is not retroactive, so time deposits made before July 1 will continue to enjoy the preferential tax rates until maturity.
Mon Abrea, the chief tax advisor of Asian Consulting Group, said the removal of the tax exemption "brings both gains and drawbacks" (archived link).
"While it boosts government revenue, it also increases the tax burden on depositors, especially conservative, middle-income savers who relied on long-term deposits as a safe, tax-free option," he told AFP on July 29. "With the exemption gone, these products lose their financial appeal."
Terence Conrad Bello, a lawyer with the taxation and commercial law firm Baniqued & Bello, said the repeal "will obviously create a disincentive for long-term savings" and will "likely dampen the market" (archived link).
Laforteza noted that while some may continue with long-term deposits despite the removal of tax exemptions, others might turn to alternatives with higher returns or lower taxes.
"If a person is a 'saver', the removal of the tax incentive should not affect [their] decision to save, but it may affect where the savings are made," she added.
AFP has previously debunked claims about Philippine economic policies here and here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
2 minutes ago
- France 24
Lebanon plans to disarm Hezbollah by year end
The thorny decision follows heavy US pressure and comes as part of implementing a November ceasefire that sought to end more than a year of hostilities between Israel and militant group Hezbollah including two months of all-out war. The cabinet held a nearly six-hour cabinet session on Tuesday headed by President Joseph Aoun on disarming the group, which emerged badly weakened from the latest war, with its arsenal pummelled and its senior leadership decimated. The Iran-backed group is the only faction that kept its weapons after Lebanon's 1975-1990 civil war, doing so in the name of "resistance" against Israel, which occupied the country's south until 2000. Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said the government "tasked the Lebanese army with setting an implementation plan to restrict weapons" to the army and other state forces "before the end of this year". Under the ceasefire, government authorities including the army and internal security forces should be the exclusive bearers of weapons in Lebanon. The cabinet is to continue discussions this week on a proposal from US envoy Tom Barrack that includes a timetable for Hezbollah's disarmament. Timetable Information Minister Paul Morcos said Hezbollah-affiliated Health Minister Rakan Nassereldine and Environment Minister Tamara Elzein, who is affiliated with its ally the Amal movement, "withdrew from the session because they did not agree with the cabinet decision". Long the strongest political force in Lebanon -- with detractors accusing it of using the threat of its weaponry to impose its will on domestic decisions -- Hezbollah has also seen that influence diminish since the conflict. The group's chief Naim Qassem, in a televised address while the cabinet meeting was underway, said it would not disarm while Israeli attacks continue. "Any timetable presented for implementation under... Israeli aggression cannot be agreed to," he said. Israel has kept up raids on Lebanon despite the November truce, mostly saying it is striking Hezbollah targets, and has threatened to keep doing so until the group has been disarmed. On Tuesday, Lebanon's health ministry said an Israeli strike in Brital in the country's east killed one person. "Are we being asked to engage in dialogue, or to surrender our weapons without dialogue?" Qassem said. Hezbollah supporters on mopeds and motorbikes roamed Beirut's southern suburbs where the group enjoys strong support, brandishing the party's yellow flag and pictures of its leaders, an AFP photographer said. 'Dictates' Qassem criticised the US envoy's plan on disarming the group. "Whoever looks at the deal Barrack brought doesn't find an agreement but dictates," he said, arguing that "it removes the strength and capabilities of Hezbollah and Lebanon entirely." Last month, Barrack urged Lebanon to "act now" to impose a state weapons monopoly. A Lebanese official with knowledge of the talks told AFP on condition of anonymity that Hezbollah will not surrender its weapons "without something in return -- the Americans know this well". Aoun last week said Lebanon was committed to removing "weapons from all armed groups including Hezbollah" and seeing them surrendered to Lebanon's army. Lebanon is at "a crucial stage" and must choose "between collapse and stability", Aoun had said. The international community has linked its support for the crisis-hit country to disarming the group, while Washington has failed to provide guarantees it will prevent Israel from attacking Lebanon. Qassem warned Israel against launching any new "large-scale aggression" because "if it does, Hezbollah will go on the defensive, "and this defence will lead to rockets falling inside the Israeli entity". Before discussing the fate of its weapons, which it considers a matter of domestic defence strategy, Hezbollah has demanded that reconstruction of areas destroyed during the war begin. It has also demanded that Israel stop its attacks, withdraw from five border areas it has occupied since the war and release Lebanese prisoners. Ahead of the cabinet meeting, David Wood from the International Crisis Group said the militant group could apply pressure by objecting officially or encourage its supporters to demonstrate but a domestic confrontation was "not in Hezbollah's interest".
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Medvedev vs Trump: Russia's ex-president becomes Putin's provocateur-in-chief
Russia 's ex-president Dmitri Medvedev found his way back into the headlines when his belligerent social media exchange with US President Donald Trump led to the repositioning on August 1 of two US nuclear submarines to what Trump called 'appropriate regions'. Medvedev has recently become an ultra-nationalist provocateur on social media, especially since Russia began its large-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. It's a major metamorphosis for a politician who during his time as president, from 2008 to 2012, embodied the liberal face of Russia. Accustomed to outrageous statements 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences,' Trump posted on his Truth Social platform after announcing his decision to re-deploy two submarines. Medvedev had taken exception to Trump imposing a new 10-day deadline for Russia to end its war in Ukraine, and posted that Trump was "playing the ultimatum game with Russia… Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war." On X, the former Russian president raised the prospect of a third World War if Trump persisted in trying to force Russian President Vladimir Putin to engage in peace negotiations with Ukraine. On Telegram, Medvedev referred to "Dead Hand' – the Soviet Union's system for launching a nuclear strike. Trump seems to have decided that he had had enough. But given Medvedev's long history of sabre rattling, Trump's reaction of 'taking the bait' instead of ignoring the posts is a bit puzzling, says Stephen Hall, a specialist in Russian politics at the University of Bath. Medvedev is a 'loose cannon ... trying to make himself relevant,' says Jenny Mathers, a specialist in Russian security issues at Aberystwyth University in the UK. If you want to know what Putin is thinking and above all 'what he wants to the world to hear', it's not Medvedev you should be listening to, but rather Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, Mathers says. Medvedev has made a habit of making outrageous statements in recent years, following his term as president and then as prime minister from 2012 to 2020. Medvedev has 1.7 million subscribers on Telegram, where he his posts tend to be aggressively nationalistic. He describes Ursula von der Leyen, the German President of the European Commission, as a 'crazy old lady'. France is accused of being nostalgic for the Vichy regime, while the Baltic states are simply described as 'wretched'. These insults are from recent posts seen by more than three million Telegram users. Why so much animosity? Medvedev boasts that 'hatred is the most important weapon' in the battle against what he calls European 'Russophobia'. He has always embodied a more extreme version of the image that Putin wanted to project to the world, Mathers says. 'So when Putin was being slightly liberal, Medvedev was quite a bit more so,' she says. The two faces of Dmitri Medvedev When Medvedev was designated to take over as Russian president in 2008, Putin had decided it was time for a rapprochement with the US and then president Barack Obama. 'His presidency was about wanting to reach out to the US, wanting to strike deals and have good relations,' Mathers says. Kremlin strategists successfully portrayed Medvedev as embodying a more modern Russia in tune with the West, someone who 'knew how to use Twitter and an iPad', Hall says. In Putin's eyes, Medvedev also had another advantage: he did not belong to the circle of ' siloviki ', agents of the Russian police and intelligence services. 'He's a lawyer by training, so he probably is a moderniser by the standards of Russia, or at least of the current Russian regime,' Hall says. 01:46 Putin's return as Russian president in 2012 marked the beginning of a more authoritarian and imperialist turn for Russia. Since then, Medvedev has discarded any semblance of moderation. 'He now says things that are much more extreme than what Putin says," Mathers says. For Hall, his nationalistic stance is partly a question of 'political survival". Medvedev's career has followed a downward trajectory since 2012. After his term as president, he was named Putin's prime minister, only to end up as deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council. Though he has been sidelined, he at least has 'an official position that allows him to speak out on matters of national security', says Mathers. Given his current job, his responsibilities are limited, says Hall. 'As deputy of the Security Council he is possibly very good at pushing paper around and setting up meetings' and having tea with officials like Nikolai Patrushev and Sergei Shoigu, the two secretaries-general of the Security Council. 'But other than that, he doesn't play a huge role." To provoke is to win? By being strident, Medvedev hopes to prove that he is still someone who counts in politics and that he can be useful. 'I think at the moment Medvedev is taking the Zhirinovsky role,' says Hall, referring to late ultra-nationalist politician Vladimir Zhirinovsky, whoseextremist and provocative declarations served as a way for the Kremlin to gauge what viewpoints might be accepted by the public. On the international stage, the Kremlin can let its new provocateur-in-chief Medvedev act without too much risk. After all, he doesn't hold a very important position, says Mathers. So if one of his statements goes too far, 'Putin can either ignore what he says' or indicate that it does not reflect the official position of Russia. The Kremlin can also hope that Medvedev's bellicose outbursts will prompt the West or a Western country to limit its support for Ukraine – better safe than sorry. Moscow knows that Western democracies cannot afford to completely ignore Medvedev's threats, even if 99 percent of the time, talk of nuclear Armageddon is just bluster, notes Hall. Western governments cannot totally rule out the possibility that Russia will "actually use nuclear weapons", he says. Has Medvedev managed to permanently antagonise Trump? That remains to be seen. The US president has for some time stepped up his rhetoric and threatened more concrete action against Russia. But Trump could hardly attack Putin directly, says Hall, because in order to end the war in Ukraine, 'he needs Putin to negotiate". In this respect, Medvedev appeared to be an ideal target for Trump's anger. He has the advantage of being a former president, notes Hall – and so has the stature to be an interlocutor in diplomatic exchanges with Trump via social media.
Euronews
4 hours ago
- Euronews
Trump warns EU: 35% tariffs if $600bn investment pledge unfulfilled
A controversial investment pledge forming part of the EU-US trade deal will need to be honoured by the EU or 35% blanket tariffs will be applied to the bloc, US President Donald Trump has warned. On Tuesday President Trump was quizzed on the deal he agreed by handshake with Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland on 27 July on CNBC's 'Squawk Box' via phone. He touted the US position - which a White House fact sheet stated - that the agreement included a pledge for the EU to invest $600 billion in the US by the end of his second term. "This new investment is in addition to the over $100 billion (that) EU companies already invest in the United States every year," the fact sheet stated following the deal. The European Commission is unable to design and implement investments on behalf of the private sector. The $600 billion has been described by the Commission as an indication based on the executive's contacts with industry. "It's not something the EU, as a public authority, can guarantee – it's something based on the intention of private companies," a senior official said last week. Asked on Squawk Box what teeth there were in the investment pledge element of the deal, Trump said, if it didn't happen, 'then they pay tariffs of 35%'. Trump said that the investment pledge was one of the reasons he had dropped tariffs to a blanket 15% rate, so if it is unfulfilled then higher tariffs will click back in. The EU has been approached for comment. The Commission on Tuesday suspended a package of trade countermeasures targeting €93 billions' worth of American goods which was scheduled to take effect on 7 August, as it continues to negotiate a joint statement formalising the agreement struck by von der Leyen and Trump in Scotland.
