logo
Election Commission urges amendments to ensure smooth polls to GBA corporations

Election Commission urges amendments to ensure smooth polls to GBA corporations

Time of India18 hours ago
Bengaluru: Karnataka's State Election Commission (SEC) has urged the govt to amend the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act-2024 to plug legislative gaps and enable smooth conduct of elections to the city's newly created multi-corporation civic agency setup.
In a letter to additional chief secretary of the urban development department, state election commissioner GS Sangreshi highlighted the absence of clarity in the current law regarding preparation of electoral rolls and conduct of elections.
In his letter, he said: "Section 35 of the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act-2024 does not specify whether the SEC should prepare electoral rolls or adopt the Legislative Assembly electoral rolls."
You Can Also Check:
Bengaluru AQI
|
Weather in Bengaluru
|
Bank Holidays in Bengaluru
|
Public Holidays in Bengaluru
To address this, the commission has proposed two options: Amend Section 35 to allow the SEC to prepare electoral rolls in line with the Registration of Electors Rules-1960, framed under the Representation of People's Act-1950; or alternatively, adopt the assembly rolls, provided the govt frames rules enabling their use.
"The letter also suggested aligning Section 35 with provisions in other state laws, such as the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act-1976, and the Karnataka Municipalities Act- 1964 which include clear guidelines for electoral roll preparation," a source said.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Gold Is Surging in 2025 — Smart Traders Are Already In
IC Markets
Learn More
Undo
The commission has asked the govt to frame rules under Section 68 of the Act to govern elections for key urban posts. "There is a need for the govt to frame rules under Section 68 of the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act-2024 for conducting elections for councillors, mayors, deputy mayors, and standing committee chairpersons," the letter states.
Currently, Karnataka Municipal Corporations (Election) Rules-1979 are in use for elections in other municipal corporations.
The SEC has recommended their adoption for Bengaluru's five city corporations to maintain procedural uniformity and avoid legal ambiguity.
The commission also stressed urgency of govt intervention. "The SEC urged the govt to take prompt action to amend Section 35, frame necessary rules, or adopt existing ones to facilitate the smooth conduct of elections under the Act," the letter stated. "These measures are essential for upholding the democratic process in the newly established multiple city corporations in Bengaluru," it added.
The govt is yet to respond to the proposal.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with
Friendship Day wishes
,
messages
and
quotes
!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pollution Control Boards have power to impose restitutionary damages under Water, Air Acts, says Supreme Court
Pollution Control Boards have power to impose restitutionary damages under Water, Air Acts, says Supreme Court

The Hindu

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Pollution Control Boards have power to impose restitutionary damages under Water, Air Acts, says Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Monday (August 4, 2025) gave Pollution Control Boards more teeth by declaring their power to impose and collect restitutionary damages to completely restore polluted air and waterbodies back to their original, pristine selves in an ecosystem. 'We direct that Pollution Control Boards can impose and collect as restitutionary and compensatory damages fixed sums of monies or require furnishing bank guarantees as an ex-ante measure towards potential environmental damage in exercise of powers under Sections 33A and 31A of the Water and Air Acts,' Justice P.S. Narasimha, who authored the judgment, held. The judgment came on an appeal filed by the Delhi Pollution Control Committee against a Delhi High Court decision that it was not empowered to levy compensatory damages in exercise of powers under Section 33A of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Section 31A of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. The Bench, also comprising Justice Manoj Misra, further directed that the power to impose or collect restitutionary or compensatory damages or the requirement to furnish bank guarantees as an ex-ante measure under the Water and Air Acts should be enforced only after issuing the necessary subordinate legislation in the form of rules and regulations under both statutes. The rules must incorporate the basic principles of natural justice. 'According to the polluter pays principle, the responsibility for repairing the damage is that of the offending industry… The focus has to be on restoration of the ecosystem as close and similar as possible to the specific one that was damaged,' Justice Narasimha observed. The judgment said the payment of restitutory damages was distinct from charging punitive damages. 'Bringing the culprits to face the proceedings is a different matter and restoration of the damage already done is a different matter,' the court distinguished. Enormous responsibilities Justice Narasimha held that the Pollution Control Boards had expansive powers and 'enormous responsibilities' under the Water Act and the Air Act. They had a broad statutory mandate to prevent, control and abate water and air pollution. The provisions under these statutes bestowed the Boards with the power to direct closure, prohibition or regulation of any industry, operation or process. Further, this power extended to directing the stoppage or regulation of supply of electricity, water or any other service. The laws allow the Boards significant flexibility in deciding the nature of directions. 'Our constitutionalism bears the hallmark of an expansive interpretation of fundamental rights. But such creative expansion is only a job half done if the depth of the remedies, consequent upon infringement, remain shallow. In other words, remedial jurisprudence must keep pace with expanding rights and regulatory challenges. It is not sufficient that courts adopt injunctory, mandatory and compensatory remedies… Remedial powers or restitutionary directives are a necessary concomitant of both the fundamental rights of citizens who suffer environmental wrongs and an equal concomitant of the duties of a statutory regulator,' Justice Narasimha wrote.

'Tired of way men treat Republican women': Marjorie Taylor Greene says she's losing faith in GOP;  accuses party of abandoning key issues
'Tired of way men treat Republican women': Marjorie Taylor Greene says she's losing faith in GOP;  accuses party of abandoning key issues

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

'Tired of way men treat Republican women': Marjorie Taylor Greene says she's losing faith in GOP; accuses party of abandoning key issues

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a prominent far-right Republican and close ally of US President Donald Trump , publicly voiced frustration with her own party, saying it is drifting away from policies that support everyday Americans and mistreating women within its ranks. She said she feels increasingly disconnected from the Republican Party as she continues to clash with both party leadership and Trump on several issues. In a recent interview with The Daily Mail, the Georgia congresswoman shared her views. Greene had previously condemned Israel's war in Gaza, calling it a 'genocide,' opposed Trump's executive order on artificial intelligence, and demanded the release of the Epstein Files. 'I don't know if the Republican Party is leaving me, or if I'm kind of not relating to the Republican Party as much anymore,' Greene said, as quoted by The Independent. 'I don't know which one it is.' Greene said the party is turning away from priorities that matter to regular Americans. She criticised the lack of action on cutting foreign aid, the diminished use of the department of government efficiency to reduce federal spending, and the lack of progress on inflation. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is this legal? Access all TV channels without a subscription! Techno Mag Learn More Undo 'Like what happened to all those issues? You know that I don't know what the hell happened with the Republican Party. I really don't,' she said. 'But I'll tell you one thing, the course that it's on, I don't want to have anything to do with it, and I just don't care anymore.' Greene has consistently opposed US military aid to Ukraine during the Russia–Ukraine conflict, a policy that remains in place. She has also criticised the administration's involvement in the Iran–Israel conflict. She noted that since Elon Musk , described as the de facto head of DOGE, left the White House, the administration appears to have shifted focus. While DOGE staffers remain in place throughout the government, reports suggest they now have less authority. Greene also expressed concern that the Republican Party is pushing away younger voters by continuing to back unpopular policies. She added that conservative women may also feel alienated by the way they are treated within the party. 'I think there's other women in our party that are really sick and tired of the way men treat Republican women,' Greene said. She cited the case of Representative Elise Stefanik of New York. Trump had nominated Stefanik for US ambassador to the UN, but later withdrew the nomination to preserve the Republican majority in the House. Former national security adviser Mike Waltz was nominated instead. Greene said Stefanik got 'screwed' by Speaker Mike Johnson and others in the White House, though she made clear she did not blame the president. Despite her dissatisfaction, Greene did not say she plans to leave the Republican Party.

SC agrees to examine plea to repeal Bodh Gaya temple law
SC agrees to examine plea to repeal Bodh Gaya temple law

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

SC agrees to examine plea to repeal Bodh Gaya temple law

Gaya: The long-pending issue of total control over management and administration of the Unesco world heritage Mahabodhi Mahavihara being raised from time to time by a section of Buddhists got a ray of hope, as a bench of the Supreme Court on Monday agreed to examine a plea for repealing the Bodh Gaya Temple Act, 1949. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The demand of Buddhists' included replacing the Act with a central law. The bench of Justices M M Sundresh and N Kotiswar Singh issued notice to the Centre and others seeking their responses on the petition and tagged it for further hearing. Earlier on June 30, the apex court had turned down the petition and asked the petitioner to move high court concerned. Mahavihara campus in comprises the sacred Bodhi (peepal) tree, around 50-metres tall shrine structure, the lotus pond known as Muchlind pond, several ancient stupas and other religious signs of Buddha's enlightenment journey. Practising meditation under the shadow of the tree, Prince Siddhartha attained enlightenment to be called Buddha, around 2,600 years ago. According to the temple Act 1949, an eight-member committee comprising four Buddhists and four Hindu members takes care of management and administration of the sacred shrine. District magistrate of Gaya happens to be ex-officio chairman of the committee, while the member secretary is nominated by home department of the state govt. Apart from seeking all members from Buddhist community in the committee, the petition has also sought removal of encroachment in the vicinity of the Mahavihara campus.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store