
3 Things I Wish I Knew When Founding a Company 20 Years Ago
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
Twenty years ago, I launched my company with a head full of optimism and a thin playbook. The market was smaller, capital was scarcer, and the word "scale" usually referred to manufacturing, not software.
Let me save you twenty years. Through three recessions, a pandemic and a Russian hack I'll never forget, I learned that every outcome — good and bad — was dictated by three things: approach to equity, obsession with speed and commitment to building for the future, not just the present.
If I could sit down with a new B2B founder today, these are the three conversations I'd make sure we had — the same ones I wish someone had with me early on.
Join top CEOs, founders and operators at the Level Up conference to unlock strategies for scaling your business, boosting revenue and building sustainable success.
1. Don't give it all away
Early on, most founders pay their first hires in equity. Each grant solves an immediate payroll problem but also sets the "going rate" for everyone who follows and nibbles away at the founder's ownership. Over time, as more hires come on board expecting similar equity deals, the option pool expands, and suddenly, there's not enough left to offer meaningful stakes to the senior leaders who matter most for the company's next phase of growth.
To fix this imbalance, you must recognize that you have precisely one window to fix it, and that's now. It means having the hard conversations about revisiting vesting, adding performance cliffs and making room for future partners. The pain of doing it now is nothing compared to the pain of explaining a broken cap table to new investors. We survived a similar case because we ripped that band-aid off, just before our next round made it impossible to do so.
Today, I tell founders to treat equity like a reserved seat at the board table: only give it to people whose judgment you'll still respect a decade later. If only I had known that timing and value alignment in equity partnerships mattered so much, I would have saved myself countless hours of renegotiation had it been available back then.
Related: 3 Things to Consider Before Going 'All in' on Your Startup
2. Move faster than feels comfortable
Another blind spot for most founders is velocity, which goes unnoticed until it starts costing real money. Founders who insist on flawless forecasts and endless debate often end up watching the market sprint ahead while their projects idle in "analysis" mode. It's crucial to remember that most opportunities have a shelf life, and the price of hesitation usually outweighs the cost of a measured mistake.
With that in mind, I had to make sure our teams embrace a bias toward action. Each year, we challenge ourselves to shorten our decision-to-execution cycle. We concentrate on the highest-payoff priorities, make the call, and then move immediately. While we may inevitably miss the mark at times, we correct them faster than we once made them.
Clearly, there's no substitute for experience. The older I get, and the more seasoned our leadership team becomes, the quicker we can weigh risks, spot patterns and avoid analysis paralysis. That pace creates its own momentum. Once speed becomes the expected culture, your team instinctively builds processes to protect it. So when early-stage founders ask me how fast they should move, my answer is always faster than you think, and then faster still.
Related: What Every B2B Brand Should Be Doing to Earn Trust in 2025
3. Build like you're already big
In hindsight, we made the classic mistake of building to match the previous quarter's demand instead of our initial goals. We told ourselves that fifty customers was a stretch, so we provisioned servers, support seats and deployment scripts for a company that size — nothing more. As we started to scale, sales momentum started inching us closer and closer towards the ambitious 5,000-site mark we'd only daydreamed about.
Many founders discover, right in the middle of a launch, that an early single-tenant setup and bare-bones deployment pipeline won't stretch to meet sudden demand. Deadlines start to drift while the team upgrades to multi-tenant architecture and spins up redundant cloud instances. The extra spend always outruns what a forward-looking investment would have cost, yet the experience makes scaling cheaper while it's still in theory.
That's why every roadmap review should open with a simple stress test. For example, for us, "What breaks if we need to bring 150 sites online next month?" — and why budgets must include the infrastructure to pass that test, even when today's revenue makes the line item look ambitious. Planning for surge capacity before it's urgent keeps launches on schedule and turns growth into a feature, not a fire drill.
The second truth is that infrastructure alone won't save you; the people building and running it will. Think of your core team as the "founding fathers" of a forever company. You need complementary skill sets, shared loyalty and relationships that hold under pressure because pressure will definitely come. Get that inner circle right, and you'll have the resilience (and the conviction) to keep investing ahead of your growth curve.
The uncomfortable math of first principles
Looking back across twenty years, I see with perfect clarity how every triumph and setback connects to our first principles. Mind you that those choices were never comfortable in real time as they tug on payroll, patience and budgets that already feel stretched. But that discipline consistently bought us agility. It gave us the freedom to pivot when the market turned and the readiness to jump on a once-in-a-decade chance. That, more than any clever tactic, is how you build an institution designed to outlast its founding story.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Buffett's Berkshire takes $3.8 billion Kraft Heinz write-down
STORY: Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway said it took a more than $3.7 billion write-down on its stake in Kraft Heinz in the second quarter... an acknowledgment that the decade-old investment hasn't worked out. The write-down followed the struggling food company's announcement that it would consider strategic alternatives, which could include a breakup. It's Berkshire's second write-down for Kraft Heinz, following a $3 billion hit in 2019. Buffett acknowledged at the time that Berkshire overpaid in the 2015 merger of Kraft Foods and H.J. Heinz, one of his biggest investment missteps. Kraft Heinz has suffered as more shoppers favor healthier and private-label alternatives. Its approximately 200 brands include Oscar Mayer, Kool-Aid, Velveeta and Jell-O. Berkshire also reported a 4% decline in quarterly operating profit as insurance underwriting premiums fell. The conglomerate signaled it remains cautious about market valuations amid uncertainty about tariffs and growth in the broader economy. Related videos Europe's most expensive city revealed, as living costs near £3,500 per month £50k in savings? Here's how to unlock up to £4.5k in passive income overnight How will the Lloyds share price be affected by today's Supreme Court ruling? Meet the 75p dividend stock with a higher yield than Legal & General shares Shares of Berkshire have fallen more than 12% and lagged the S&P 500 by about 22 percentage points since Buffett, who's almost 95, announced in May that he would step down as CEO at year's end. Vice Chairman Greg Abel will succeed him, though Buffett will remain chairman. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Alabama farmer sees new interest within days of Trump's tomato tariff — and says former trade deal ‘never worked' for US
With President Trump's latest tariff announcement, the price of tomatoes could soon be going up in the U.S. On July 14, the Trump Administration announced a 17% tariff on tomatoes imported from Mexico, ending a decades-long trade deal that kept the price of importing tomatoes down in the U.S. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it 'Mexico remains one of our greatest allies, but for far too long our farmers have been crushed by unfair trade practices that undercut pricing on produce like tomatoes,' said U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick in the press release. 'That ends today.' And while some Americans may not be in support of additional tariffs levied against America's international trade partners, several U.S. farmers stand in strong support of Trump's latest trade move. 'Been two days now and we've actually had a lot more calls' For decades, U.S. and Mexican tomato operations worked under a trade agreement that allowed for relatively easy importation of Mexican tomatoes into U.S. markets. The deal was meant to protect American tomato farmers, but many believe the old trade agreement didn't do enough. 'There's been loopholes that the Mexican tomato producers have taken advantage of and continue to price dump, or lower the prices below the cost of production here in the United States and in Alabama," Blake Thaxton, executive director of the Alabama Fruit and Vegetable Growers Association, told WVTM 13 News. Chad Smith of Smith Tomato Farms in St. Clair County, Alabama echoed Thaxton's concerns with the old trade deal with Mexico. 'If they send the tomatoes over and it's supposed to be a set price and they need to move tomatoes, well, they may just give a load of bell peppers for free for them to take the tomatoes. So, it's never really worked,' said Smith. American tomato farmers had long felt as if they were hard-pressed to compete with the imports from Mexico, but several of them now see better times ahead with Trump's latest tariff news. 'It's only been two days now and we've actually had a lot more calls from people who have an interest in doing business," said Smith. 'And the price hasn't even changed.' As for Thaxton, he believes the potential of a sustainable future for U.S. tomato farmers is important. 'Food security is national security, and we need to be able to produce our own food here in the United States,' said Thaxton. Read more: Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can How the new tariff may affect your wallet While some American farmers are hopeful that the tomato tariff will impact their bottom line in a positive way, there's a concern that the changing policy will lead to higher prices at the grocery store. After all, the costs of producing tomatoes are higher in the U.S., thanks in part to American farms paying their workers up to 10 times more per hour than farm workers in Mexico. Thaxton believes the rising tomato costs won't be too dramatic, but other experts appear to be more concerned. In fact, some predict the new tomato tariff could push prices up by 10%. Since American farms face significantly higher production costs than Mexican growers — this includes wages, land, regulation, insurance, property taxes and equipment — these costs may be passed along to American consumers at the grocery store. At this moment, it's tough to predict the exact outcome that the tariff will have on the U.S. tomato market. While it looks like the tariff could help American farmers, it's unclear whether or not it will help American wallets. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tim Cook reportedly tells employees Apple ‘must' win in AI
Apple CEO Tim Cook held an hourlong all-hands meeting in which he told employees that the company needs to win in AI, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. The meeting came after an earnings call in which Cook told investors and analysts that Apple would 'significantly' increase its AI investments. It seems he had a similar message for Apple employees, reportedly telling them, 'Apple must do this. Apple will do this. This is sort of ours to grab.' Despite launching a variety of AI-powered features in the past year under the Apple Intelligence umbrella, the company's promised upgrades to its voice assistant Siri have been significantly delayed. And Cook seemed to acknowledge that the company has fallen behind its competitors. 'We've rarely been first,' he reportedly said. 'There was a PC before the Mac; there was a smartphone before the iPhone; there were many tablets before the iPad; there was an MP3 player before iPod.' But in his telling, that didn't stop Apple from inventing the 'modern' versions of those products. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data