Plants emit insect-repelling chemical that could secretly be poisoning our air
In fact, the air we breathe carries traces of a quieter kind of warfare — not against people, but pests. Scientists at Michigan State University have cracked a 40-year mystery around isoprene, a natural chemical that some plants emit to repel hungry insects. But there's a twist: while it defends the plant, it could be polluting the air.
Isoprene is a colorless, volatile hydrocarbon, a simple organic compound made up of five carbon atoms and eight hydrogen atoms (C₅H₈).
It's naturally released by certain plants, especially in hot weather, and is one of the most abundant hydrocarbons emitted into the atmosphere, second only to methane.
Unlike the fragrant terpenes you'd smell in pine forests or poplar groves, isoprene is odorless yet highly reactive. Once released, it interacts with sunlight and nitrogen oxides from vehicle exhaust and industrial emissions, contributing to the formation of ozone, aerosols, and other pollutants that degrade air quality.
'Everyone understands what it smells like when you walk through a pine forest,' Sharkey said. 'In an oak grove, which has more hydrocarbons because it makes so much isoprene, you just don't notice it.'
Until now, scientists weren't entirely sure why some plants go to the trouble of producing isoprene at all, especially since it doesn't seem to help them grow. But the new research suggests the answer lies in defense, not just against heat stress, but against hungry insects.
In controlled greenhouse experiments, MSU researchers grew two types of tobacco plants — one genetically modified to emit isoprene, the other left unchanged. When whiteflies invaded, they swarmed the non-emitting plants while avoiding the isoprene producers altogether.
Further tests using hornworms confirmed the pattern. Worms that fed on isoprene-rich leaves grew smaller and weaker than those that didn't. But it wasn't the isoprene itself that harmed them. Instead, the chemical triggered a spike in jasmonic acid, a defense hormone that disrupts an insect's ability to digest protein.
'The defense was not the isoprene itself, but the consequence of what isoprene did to the plant,' Sharkey said.
Another surprise came from soybeans. Long believed to have lost the ability to make isoprene through evolution, soybeans were found to release it in small bursts when their leaves were damaged. The discovery suggests they still carry the gene to produce isoprene and switch it only under stress.
Researchers say this discovery could change the way we protect crops. But that upside comes with a downside. Isoprene is a hydrocarbon that can worsen air pollution, especially in areas where air quality is already poor. If more crops are genetically modified to emit isoprene, it could further harm the atmosphere. The findings also raise concerns about how soybeans might be contributing to air pollution.
'That's one of the questions that's most important to come out of this research,' Sharkey said. 'Should we add isoprene to crop plants so that they're protected against insects and put up with their effect on the ozone? Or should we genetically engineer plants to turn off the isoprene synthase as much as we can to improve the atmosphere?'
The findings come from two new studies published in Science Advances and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Medscape
24 minutes ago
- Medscape
FDA Declines to Approve New Melanoma Therapy
The FDA has declined to approve a new oncolytic immunotherapy, vusolimogene oderparepvec (RP1), to treat advanced melanoma. The agency recently issued a complete response letter to the company, Replimune Group, rejecting its biologics license application that sought approval for the new agent in combination with nivolumab (Opdivo) to treat adults with advanced melanoma. In the complete response letter, the FDA indicated that it can't approve the biologics license application for vusolimogene oderparepvec because the company's IGNYTE trial 'is not considered to be an adequate and well-controlled clinical investigation that provides substantial evidence of effectiveness,' Replimune explained in a press release. According to Replimune, the complete response letter also noted that the trial data 'cannot be adequately interpreted due to the heterogeneity of the patient population,' and that 'there are items related to the confirmatory trial study design which need to be addressed.' 'We are surprised by the FDA decision and disappointed for advanced melanoma patients who have limited treatment options, as highlighted by the granting of breakthrough status at the time we provided the IGNYTE primary data,' stated Sushil Patel, PhD, Replimune's chief executive officer. Vusolimogene oderparepvec is the lead product candidate for the biotech company. Patel further noted that the issues raised in the complete response letter were not 'raised by the agency in mid- and late-cycle reviews.' Additionally, he said, 'we had also aligned on the design of the confirmatory study.' The FDA's response to the biologics license application for the new agent, along with its recently announced policy requiring randomized, controlled trials for approval of COVID vaccines in healthy Americans younger than 65 years, may signal that the agency is taking a tougher stance on new drug approvals. Replimune plans to 'urgently interact with the FDA to find a path forward for the timely accelerated approval of RP1,' according to its statement. Sharon Worcester, MA, is an award-winning medical journalist based in Birmingham, Alabama, writing for Medscape Medical News, MDedge, and other affiliate sites. She currently covers oncology, but she has also written on a variety of other medical specialties and healthcare topics. She can be reached at sworcester@ or on X @SW_MedReporter.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Scientists make breakthrough with cutting-edge device that pulls clean water from thin air — here's how it works
In a cool development for global sustainability, scientists have improved a device that pulls clean, drinkable water straight from the air. Inspired by musical instruments and the fog-drinking power of California redwoods, which get about 35% of their annual water intake from fog, researchers at Virginia Tech created a 3D-printed "mesh-harp" hybrid fog collector that dramatically outperforms other methods. A study published in the Journal of Materials Chemistry A revealed that in lab tests simulating both light and heavy fog, the best-performing prototype captured up to 12.7% of airborne water. This makes it 8.5 times more efficient than mesh nets and nearly four times better than standard fog harps. Much like a musical harp, this vertical wire array channels fog droplets downward. But unlike previous designs that faced clogging or tangling challenges, this hybrid model uses horizontal supports — inspired by guitars — to keep wires evenly spaced. This innovation matters because many conventional fog-harvesting systems either miss most of the microscopic water droplets or struggle with design flaws. These next-gen harvesters avoid both pitfalls, making them practical and affordable for use in remote or drought-stricken areas. The environmental impact could be huge. Unlike desalination and groundwater pumping, fog harvesting is nonpolluting and can support local ecosystems by reducing strain on freshwater sources. It's also a public health win, offering safe drinking water in areas with poor infrastructure. As urban areas grow hotter and drier, passive water-harvesting technologies offer a climate-resilient way to make daily life easier, providing hydration with no long treks to distant water sources, no power outages interrupting access, and no complex and expensive machinery to maintain. For consumers, it could also mean lower utility costs and a more resilient daily water supply. While there's no clear timeline for a large-scale rollout, the researchers said they are hoping to move toward mass production soon. The timing couldn't be more urgent. Over 4 billion people worldwide experience severe water scarcity for at least one month each year, according to a previous study in Science. In underserved and remote regions, where traditional water infrastructure is often unreliable or nonexistent, this low-cost, energy-efficient solution could be a life-saving breakthrough.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Thousands of river pollution tests cancelled because of staff shortages
Thousands of water tests to identify potential harmful pollution in rivers, lakes and estuaries in England have been cancelled in the last three months due to staff shortages, the BBC has learned. The Environment Agency confirmed the cancellations after campaigners showed us internal emails and documents with plans for extensive cuts to monitoring programmes. The cancelled tests are for so-called inorganic pollutants - substances such as nitrates and phosphates that can indicate sewage or agricultural pollution. The EA says its testing programme "remains robust" but this week a landmark report said it had "struggled to effectively oversee and manage the water system". In the three months from May to July the water regulator says that 10,000 scheduled tests at its main laboratory at Starcross in Devon did not take place due to staff shortages. Others were combined with other tests or postponed in what the EA says was an "optimisation" process. The Environment Agency said seven national inorganic testing programmes had been completely "paused". They include programmes that track chemical pollution in rivers, lakes and estuaries as well as one that monitors the regulator's plans for dealing with drought. Jo Bradley, who worked at the Environment Agency's water quality team for more than 20 years, told the BBC: "Some inorganic substances, such as copper and zinc, are directly toxic to aquatic organisms, including fish and insects," "Others, such as phosphorus and nitrogen, are nutrients and they can affect river health when they are present in high quantities. "These substances must be tested routinely, at many hundreds of locations, so that we can see trends in river chemistry and quickly identify problems." The EA said it "paused" 17.5% of its inorganic testing at the Starcross Laboratory from May to July. Over the entire year it said it was expecting to operate at 15% below capacity. A spokesperson blamed the reduction in tests on "fluctuations in staffing capacity" and could not say when the laboratory would be working at full capacity again. Five key takeaways from the landmark water sector review Serious water pollution incidents up 60% in England, Environment Agency says Sewage discharges to halve by 2030, minister pledges Staffing problems are nothing new at the EA. In 2023 its chairman Alan Lovell told parliament that it had "struggled with recruitment and retention of staff". Internal emails obtained by campaign groups Greenpeace and Desmog through freedom of information requests were shared with the BBC. They show EA officials discussing the impact of staff departures on testing and saying that others planned to leave. One senior official, writing an email to her colleagues, said it was "not good news I'm afraid" adding "this isn't where we want to be (again)". Helen Nightingale, who worked at the Environment Agency as a catchment planner, analysing data from its water quality programme until 2022, says that while she was there she saw a shift of focus away from serious investigation to trying to find "successes". She also said that morale was low: "The pay is not great – we didn't have pay rises for years due to austerity, "But a lot people are in it [the EA] because they want to make a difference – and when you're not even getting that - well, what's the point?" Documents seen by the BBC show that the work affected by the cuts to testing this year included investigations into the water industry in various parts of the country, and monitoring of protected areas including the River Wye, which is currently facing a pollution crisis linked to intensive chicken farming. Stuart Singleton White from the Angling Trust which has been running its own citizen scientist testing programme., said: "This spring, while the EA cut 10,000 water samples, our Water Quality Monitoring Network collected its 10,000th. "Our latest annual report showed that 34% of sites breached "good ecological status" for phosphate, and 45% showed signs of nitrate pollution. Pollution is out of control, and extensive testing is key to addressing the problem." Singer-turned-campaigner Feargal Sharkey said the cancelled tests are further confirmation of the EA's limitations. "When is a regulator not a regulator? When it's the Environment Agency," Mr Sharkey told the BBC. "With impeccable timing the Environment Agency reminds us all of exactly why they to should be added to Sir Jon Cunliffe's bonfire of the quangos [the Water Commission]. Institutionally incompetent, complacent and discredited." This week, Sir Jon recommended that a single water regulator be created, with the EA handing over responsibility for monitoring water pollution. A spokesperson for the EA said: "We are committed to protecting the environment and water quality testing remains a top priority having received an extra £8m in funding." "Our water quality testing programme remains robust and prioritised on the basis of need - only a small proportion of tests were impacted by this issue, with no impact on pollution incidents and bathing water testing."