Monsoon session: Answers MPs must seek in parliament
Hopefully, the MPs will not only raise the questions, but also question the answers! Here are a few issues that deserve attention and answers.
Operation Sindoor: The issue of national security and terrorism is expected to hold centre stage. The monsoon session is the first since the terror attack in Pahalgam in April. The government is expected to provide answers on intelligence failure, security lapse, if the terrorists were apprehended and, of course, the four day face-off. There is much attention on the ceasefire and whether it was imposed, as claimed repeatedly, by US President Donald J Trump, despite denials by India. The timing of the ceasefire is important but beyond when, how and who brokered it, there is the question of why the US pivoted to intervene. Was it the BrahMos hit on Nur Khan airbase? Is the Pakistani nuclear site and systems at Nur Khan airbase under US control, as claimed by Pakistan experts and, if so, what does this mean for India's security?
Air India 171 crash: The crash of the Air India flight from Ahmedabad to London that claimed 260 lives is the worst in recent aviation history. The how and why of the crash is critical both for Air India and beleaguered Boeing. The Air Accident Investigation Bureau of India, which investigated the cause, released a preliminary report that seemed to park the blame on the pilots by excerpting a cockpit conversation. Why not release the whole conversation, as was done in the case of Captain 'Sully' Sullenberger's US Airways flight 1549 report? Is it normal to release a preliminary report with an inference about fault—particularly when tradition requires explicit avoidance of blame—and then issue clarifications? Was the report leaked to US media, and by who? What explains the Directorate General of Civil Aviation's directive to airlines to check fuel switches? Over 350 million Indians fly every year and they deserve clarity and accountability.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump sparks outrage by demanding Washington Commanders name reversal request
Donald Trump sparks outrage by demanding Washington Commanders name reversal request (Image via Getty) On July 20, 2025, President Donald Trump used his Truth Social account to call for an immediate change of the NFL's Washington Commanders back to the Washington Redskins and MLB's Cleveland Guardians back to the Cleveland Indians. He wrote that 'our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen' and urged team owners to 'GET IT DONE!!!' Trump argued that restoring the old titles would honour Indigenous heritage rather than erase it. US President Donald Trump urges Washington Commanders to return to Redskins name US President Trump's post appeared on Sunday, July 20, on Truth Social, a platform he launched after leaving office. He declared that the Washington 'Whatever's' must 'IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team' and added that fans are clamouring for the move . He also insisted that the Cleveland Indians name carry more history than the current Guardians label, though baseball's 'original six' term applies to hockey, not baseball . Donald Trump said the renaming is not about disrespect but preserving 'heritage and prestige' for Native Americans. US President Donald Trump also wants Cleveland Guardians to bring back Indians name The football franchise began as the Boston Braves in 1932, became the Boston Redskins in 1933, and moved to Washington in 1937. The club used the Redskins name until 2020, briefly played as the Washington Football Team, then rebranded to Commanders in 2022 after criticism of the old name's offensiveness. Cleveland dropped 'Indians' and its 'Chief Wahoo' logo after 2021, adopting Guardians to respect calls against racial stereotypes. Both owners, Josh Harris of Washington and Chris Antonetti of Cleveland, have said they plan no further changes. Also Read: 'She Is Very Talented': Melania Trump Defied Donald Trump With Taylor Swift Praise While Travis Kelce Stood Loyal By Her Side Despite Donald Trump's request, neither franchise has signalled a reversal. Commanders owner Josh Harris told reporters in February that the new name embodies modern values and team spirit. Guardians president Chris Antonetti has similarly defended the current identity, saying it unites players and supporters under a fresh banner. FAQs 1. When did Donald Trump call for the Washington Redskins name return? On July 20, 2025, Trump posted the demand on Truth Social. 2. Why did the Redskins and Indians change their team names? They changed names due to criticism that the old names were offensive to Native Americans. 3. Who owns the Washington Commanders and Cleveland Guardians? Josh Harris owns the Commanders; Chris Antonetti leads the Guardians. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Parliament Set For Stormy Monsoon Session As Centre Shows Willingness To Debate Key National Issues
During the business advisory committee (BAC) meetings in both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, it was indicated that the weekly agenda will be finalised by the respective chairpersons. While the government is eager to move forward with legislative business, including the introduction and discussion of key bills, the opposition has made it clear that it wants direct responses from Prime Minister Narendra Modi on several pressing matters. Among these, likely to dominate is the one on India's response to US President Donald Trump's remarks on trade and the need for a detailed discussion on the recently concluded Operation Sindoor, India's response to the Pahalgam terror attack. Several opposition parties had earlier demanded a special session of Parliament for this, but were told that the monsoon session will serve as the appropriate platform for such a debate. Sunday's meeting of the INDIA bloc served as a curtain raiser, showcasing the opposition front's resolve to corner the government on issues ranging from foreign policy to national security and economic performance. On its part, the ruling BJP is not taking any chances. In addition to fine-tuning its legislative strategy, it is working closely with its NDA allies to ensure cohesion and maximise floor coordination. The sources said in the coming days, a series of internal briefings will be held where senior ministers will interact with NDA MPs, equipping them with talking points and data, particularly on matters relating to defence, foreign affairs, and trade. Amid the expected acrimony and sharp exchanges between the government and opposition, one issue that may see rare consensus across the political spectrum is the impeachment of Justice Yashwant Varma. Forward movement on this front is likely in the coming weeks, the sources said.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
A long list: on the U.S., designation of The Resistance Front group
The decision of the U.S. to designate The Resistance Front (TRF) group that claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam terror attack in April 2025, as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and a Specially Designated Global Terrorist is a development that should undergird the global fight against terror. The Ministry of External Affairs has called it 'a timely and important step'. For one, the U.S. State Department has acknowledged the severity of the Pahalgam attack. It also names the TRF as a 'front and proxy' for the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), which Pakistan claims it has rendered 'defunct'. Even though the U.S. added groups such as the LeT and the Jaish-e-Mohammad to its FTO list in 2001, they have masterminded attacks in India since then. The U.S. has also partially made amends for the TRF's name having been kept out of the UN Security Council (UNSC) resolution condemning the Pahalgam attack, apparently at Pakistan's behest, but with the concurrence of the U.S. and other P-5 members. It is hoped that the designation will now help India's case in designating the TRF at the UNSC, under the 1267 Committee for sanctions, also strengthening the trans-national legal pursuit of those behind the attack. While this is a positive step, it is necessary to put the Trump's administration's other actions since the Pahalgam attack into perspective. After India launched Operation Sindoor, the U.S. has countered India's narrative on the four-day conflict on several occasions. Mr. Trump, as well as Secretary of State Marco Rubio, have repeatedly made the claim that the U.S. negotiated the India-Pakistan ceasefire, and averted a nuclear conflict by using trade ties as leverage — an equivalence which Pakistan has been happy to endorse. Mr. Trump's unprecedented White House lunch and praise for the Pakistan military chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, came hours after the government had said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had cleared the picture with Mr. Trump, and brings into question just how much pressure the U.S. is willing to put on Pakistan to act against terrorism. The Trump administration had held out the promise of doing more to support India in its fight against terrorism by fast-tracking the extradition, in April, of Tahawwur Hussain Rana, who was wanted by India for the 2008 Mumbai attacks. It is hoped that the TRF's listing means that the U.S. is recommitting to that objective. Given that the real challenge lies more in credibly ending Pakistan's support to these groups, New Delhi must focus on its efforts, diplomatic as well as legal, to ensure justice for the victims and to prevent further terrorist acts.
