logo
Campaigners and industry respond to ‘once-in-a-generation' water reform report

Campaigners and industry respond to ‘once-in-a-generation' water reform report

Rhyl Journal2 days ago
Mike Keil, chief executive of the Consumer Council for Water (CCW), said public trust in water companies had been 'drained' by poor environmental performance and wider service failures.
The much-anticipated final report from the Independent Water Commission, led by former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, outlined 88 recommendations to the UK and Welsh governments to turn around the ailing industry.
Mr Keil said: 'The commission has set out significant changes to the regulatory system.
'But water companies have always had the freedom to do what's right by their customers – and many have made bad choices.'
Mr Keil said affordability must be a key focus of reform, with households already struggling following this year's sharp rise in water bills.
'More people are turning to CCW to complain about not being able to afford their bill,' he said.
'Over two in five households have told us they've cut spending on essentials like food to make ends meet.
'The case for a single social tariff for water has never been more urgent.'
He welcomed recommendations to make the existing voluntary ombudsman scheme mandatory, saying: 'We're delighted the commission has recommended building on our work at a time when we're seeing more people turn to us for help.'
But River Action chief executive James Wallace accused the commission of falling short, saying it had 'blinked' when faced with a chance to break with the past.
'This was a once-in-a-generation opportunity to reset a broken and corrupted system,' he said.
'Instead, we've been handed vague policy nudges that leave the current failed privatised water company model intact.'
Mr Wallace said nothing less than 'a credible plan to rescue Britain's rivers, lakes and seas' was needed, including a clear path to bring 'failing companies like Thames Water into public control'.
He called on the Government to put Thames Water into special administration as a 'powerful statement of intent', warning: 'Our water is our life-blood and not for sale.'
Water UK, the trade body for the water companies, welcomed the commission's findings, calling reform 'long overdue'.
A spokesperson said: 'Everyone agrees the system has not been working.
'These recommendations should establish the foundations to secure our water supplies, support economic growth and end sewage entering our rivers and seas.'
Richard Benwell, a member of the Independent Water Commission's expert advisory group and chief executive of Wildlife and Countryside Link, said a 'culture of rule-breaking and non-compliance' was harming rivers and wetlands, and called for a more powerful and independent environmental regulator.
He welcomed the proposal for new regional water authorities but warned reforms would fall short without proper funding and a clear steer from Government.
'Reforming regulators without fixing resourcing and remit would be painting over cracks,' he said.
Ali Morse, water policy manager at The Wildlife Trusts, said the report offered 'strong recommendations' for more integrated, regionally driven planning, but warned time was running out to act.
'The commission has set the framework – now the Government must act with purpose,' she said.
Gary Carter, national officer at the GMB union, said the report confirmed what the union had argued for years – that water privatisation had been a 'disastrous failure'.
He accused company bosses of profiting while the water infrastructure 'crumbles through lack of investment' and sewage pollutes rivers.
'It's a disgrace – and one Ofwat has overseen,' he said.
'Now is the time to fundamentally reform the water sector and renationalise this vital resource.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The great British public keeps being forced to bail out our incompetent political class
The great British public keeps being forced to bail out our incompetent political class

Telegraph

time3 hours ago

  • Telegraph

The great British public keeps being forced to bail out our incompetent political class

To the surprise of nobody, our water industry has been found wanting. An ineffective regulator allowed self-serving companies to enrich shareholders and directors at the expense of the public interest for decades. Instead of investing in our creaking Victorian infrastructure, water companies were saddled with debt by their private owners to pay out dividends. Billions of pounds were funnelled from Thames Water alone, funded largely through then-owner, Macquarie, which more than tripled the utility provider's debt burden to £10.8bn in just 11 years. Most recently, the firm paid 21 senior staff £2.5m in bonuses in April as a reward for taking on an eye-watering loan, partly to plug the gaps of said wealth extraction. Thames Water is not alone in this. Over the past decade, more than £112m has been paid in bonuses to senior staff at water utility firms, despite their consistent failures as either public good or private enterprise. These businesses dumped raw sewage into the nation's waterways for 3.6 million hours in 2024 because their ancient systems, left unimproved for decades, are overwhelmed by modern requirements. But of course it is we, the British public, who are being charged for cleaning up someone else's mess yet again. The eternal mugs, and doormats for the incompetent, we will be saddled with a hefty increase in our water bills to fund the ever-worsening services we enjoy. Don't forget, this comes on the back of a roughly 30-50pc rise three months ago, depending on your provider. But we can't be surprised they've taken us for fools again. This is just the latest kick in the teeth in a dense history of tooth-kicking. If there's one thing the British public can rely upon, it's paying for the privilege of decline. Draw an infrastructure project out of the hat, and you'll find a spiralling bill and a bumbling bunch of executives soon to be called in front of a committee hearing explaining why there's no sign of what was promised – and why they couldn't possibly return their fee. Promised to open in 2026 for a cost of £31bn, HS2 was set to connect London to Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds on high speed rail. Now, it will open no earlier than 2036 for a cost of more than £100bn, and will only run from London to Birmingham. If we're lucky. For more than triple the cost, we're set for a third of the railway to be delivered in double the time. And who'll be footing the bill? You guessed it. Even on our current tracks, we're being taken for a ride. Rail fares rose yet again this year, but only 68pc of services depart on time. We're finally set for a new nuclear power plant a decade from now in the form of Sizewell C at a bargain cost of just £38bn. Excellent news, but nobody mention the fact it was supposed to be operational by now for a total cost of £20bn. Don't forget our crumbling services. Councils continue to raise taxes while they shift our bin collections to once every three weeks. Yes, the burden of funding care costs leaves a large dent in local authority finances, but pouring £665m into an (alleged) sham can't help. It's not just the failed investments and obscene borrowing that our local councillors are learning from the water sector. They also enjoy golden parachutes for bankrupting their organisations, and saddling us with the bill. Not to mention how difficult it is to get a GP appointment (no wonder record numbers now use private healthcare) or an NHS dentist, find a local school or have the police investigate a burglary. At some point, the gravy train of incompetence will come to a juddering halt. Whether that's because we start to hold those responsible to account or simply run out of money to burn in its engines is anybody's guess.

Welsh Secretary heads to US and Canada to boost trade
Welsh Secretary heads to US and Canada to boost trade

South Wales Argus

time5 hours ago

  • South Wales Argus

Welsh Secretary heads to US and Canada to boost trade

The countries are among the most significant markets for Welsh exports. Goods and services worth more than £2 billion from Wales go to US and Canada each year, supports more than 50,000 Welsh jobs. The visit follows the signing of the UK's economic prosperity deal with the US in May. Car manufacturer Aston Martin, which has a base in St Athan in the Vale of Glamorgan employing more than 600 people, resumed exporting to the US following the trade deal. As part of the trip Ms Stevens will visit Aston Martin's new showroom in New York. Also during the visit the Welsh Secretary will raise awareness of this December's Investment Summit in Wales, encouraging North American business leaders and investors to participate in the event. She will also meet Canadian businesses with an interest in Wales at a roundtable event in Toronto and attend a business breakfast with investors in sport real estate in the UK in New York. Ms Stevens said: 'There are strong and important economic and cultural ties between Wales and North America and it is fantastic to be able to promote these and help strengthen them further. 'I want to build on this progress and while I am in the USA and Canada I will be discussing further opportunities for investment in Wales with companies like Aston Martin. 'My message is very clear – Wales is open for business.' Deputy trade commissioner for North America, Alan Gogbashian, said: 'From sports economy firms to the automotive industry, Wales plays a key role in the UK economy, and has strong trade and investment ties with Canada and the United States. 'It's fantastic to host the Secretary of State for Wales in New York and Toronto to engage with current transatlantic businesses including Aston Martin, and to connect with potential investors ahead of the Investment Summit in Wales later this year.'

Claim tourism tax will damage Monmouthshire's economy
Claim tourism tax will damage Monmouthshire's economy

South Wales Argus

time8 hours ago

  • South Wales Argus

Claim tourism tax will damage Monmouthshire's economy

The possibility of using new powers to tax overnight stays as soon as they become available was ruled out at Monmouthshire County Council's July meeting. Councillor Sara Burch, the council's cabinet member responsible for tourism, said it would hold talks with tourism operators before considering whether to introduce a charge and said: 'We've no intention of even getting to the point of consulting on a visitor levy within this administration.' The next council elections are due to take place in 2027 while the Welsh Government has said the earliest any local authority could introduce the tax, which it calls a visitor levy, is 2027. The Senedd, in July, approved legislation that will allow Wales' 22 unitary authorities to introduce a £1.30 per visitor, per night charge on overnight stays. It will be up to individual authorities if they wish to use the powers that also include a 75 pence per person, per night charge for hostels and campsites. An exception for under 18s would only apply at hostels and campsites. If every council in Wales introduced the charge it's estimated it could raise as much as £33m a year to invest in services and infrastructure to support tourism. While councils including Cardiff and Gwynedd have shown an interest in the charge it has been ruled out by Newport council, at the beginning of this yea, and Blaenau Gwent councillors say they believe it could have a negative economic impact. Figures produced for Monmouthshire council estimated in 2023 there were 2.29 million visitors, spending 3.53m visitor days in the county, generating more than £329m for the local economy, and supporting 3,462 full time equivalent jobs. The council was asked by its Conservative opposition group to commit to ruling out introducing the charge in June 2023, but at that time the ruling Labour group said it was too soon to make a decision on legislation that had yet to pass through the Senedd. At July's full council meeting Tory leader Richard John asked if the cabinet had given further consideration to his group's proposal the council 'should rule out introducing a tourism tax in Monmouthshire?' Cllr Burch said she assumed Cllr John was 'referring to the visitor levy' – to which he replied 'I am' – and she said: 'Our position remains unchanged we've no immediate plans to introduce a visitor levy.' The Abergavenny Cantref councillor said the council is working with tourism providers on destination management plans and to 'understand the advantages and how money raised could go to improving our offer to visitors'. She also said she welcomed the legislation as it also introduces a compulsory register of visitor accommodation. The destination management plans could go the council's scrutiny committees and cabinet in the autumn and Cllr Burch said: 'From there we hope to strengthen the Monmouthshire tourism partnership and discuss how any discussions may further take place but we've no intention of even getting to the point of consulting on a visitor levy within this administration.' Cllr Burch was prompted by council leader Mary Ann Brocklesby to say there were 'no plans on consulting' during the council term when responding to Cllr John. The Mitchell Troy and Trellech councillor said the response was 'disappointing to hear' and said 'the downsides of a tourism tax are really quite evident particularly in a boarder county like Monmouthshire.' He said families wanting to holiday in the Wye Valley will have a choice between staying in Gloucestershire or 'coming to Monmouthshire where a tourism tax will add an additional £40 for a week's holiday for a family of four. It could do enormous damage and as a council we should rule it out.' Cllr Burch said she considered the downsides and possible advantages to be 'evident' and said they would benefit from further discussion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store