
Shipping Industry In Middle East On High Alert After US Strikes On Iran
The shipping industry was placed on high alert on Sunday with warnings that Tehran could retaliate against commercial vessels following US airstrikes against Iran's nuclear facilities.
Greece, home to more oil-tanker capacity than any other nation, cautioned its ship owners to think again if they're considering entering the Persian Gulf in the wake of US airstrikes. Vessels planning to sail through the Strait of Hormuz, the waterway that sits at the mouth of the region, should "reassess passage" until the situation normalizes, according to a circular seen by Bloomberg that its shipping ministry sent to vessel owners. It advised waiting in nearby safe ports.
Naval forces in the area warned that ships, especially US-linked ones, could be at heightened risk. Shipping giant A.P. Moller - Maersk A/S said it continues to transit Hormuz but is ready to re-evaluate its position based on the information available.
The actions of the maritime industry - and its risk tolerance - will be a critical detail in the wake of the strikes because of Iran's proximity to the Strait of Hormuz, a conduit for a fifth of the world's oil and an unavoidable searoute into the Persian Gulf.
Athens' warning is the latest sign of pressure on shipping markets as attacks on Iran escalate. Tanker earnings already soared by almost 90% since Israel first started conducting airstrikes on June 13. As one of the world's largest shipowning nations, advice to Greece's vessel owners would have a major impact on commodity transportation markets, especially oil.
There's every chance shipowners will ignore the advice because the Persian Gulf is too-important a region for them to avoid and rates can always rise to compensate for the risk of sailing in the region. Operators that do decide to transit Hormuz should adopt the highest security level available and maintain the maximum possible distance from Iranian waters, Greece's ministry added.
In Sunday's notice, the Greek ministry cited concern around a possible closure of Hormuz as a reason behind its message.
Officials at three Greek tanker companies said they were still assessing the situation. One did indicate he might still allow his tankers to enter the region, while another said their ships would likely stay away.
Greek government spokesman Pavlos Marinakis said in a statement that the government, via the shipping ministry, advised Greek-flagged and Greek-owned ships in the area of the Strait of Hormuz to go to safe port until the situation normalizes.
Bigger Risk
Naval groups are also warning of greater risk.
On Sunday, the Joint Maritime Information Center, a liaison between navies and merchant shipping in the region, said that the Washington's airstrikes mean US-linked ships sailing through the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden face a high risk of attack.
Yemen's Houthi rebel group issued fresh threats against American commercial and naval ships earlier in the day. There had been a ceasefire between the US and the Houthis in early May, geared toward limiting the group's attacks on the US navy. US-linked ships should consider re-routing, the JMIC said in its update.
Still, it said some US-associated vessels have successfully transited the Strait of Hormuz, "which is a positive sign for the immediate future."
Separately, the European Union's naval force in the region raised its threat assessment for US-linked vessels as a result of the strikes. It now sees a severe threat to ships linked to the US and Israel and a low risk for all other ships.
"This does not exclude the possibility of all merchant vessels being targeted in the future," it said in an update published by France's MICA Center, which helps co-ordinate global maritime security.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
32 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Let Bibi Go": Trump Defends Netanyahu Again Over Corruption Trial
Washington: US President Donald Trump on Sunday (IST) once again defended Benjamin Netanyahu and said his corruption trial was a "political witch hunt". In a post on Truth Social, he also said it was "terrible" what they are doing to Bibi, a nickname for the Israeli Prime Minister. Mr Netanyahu was indicted in 2019 in Israel on charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust - all of which he denies. His trial began in 2020 and involves three criminal cases. An Israeli court on Friday rejected his request to postpone giving testimony in his corruption trial, saying he had not provided adequate justification for his request. "It is terrible what they are doing in Israel to Bibi Netanyahu. He is a War Hero, and a Prime Minister who did a fabulous job working with the United States to bring Great Success in getting rid of the dangerous Nuclear threat in Iran," Mr Trump said, referring to the US strikes on three key Iranian strikes on June 22. "Importantly, he is right now in the process of negotiating a Deal with Hamas, which will include getting the Hostages back. How is it possible that the Prime Minister of Israel can be forced to sit in a Courtroom all day long, over NOTHING (Cigars, Bugs Bunny Doll, etc)," he wrote. Mr Trump called it a "political witch hunt" and said it was "very similar" to the one that he was "forced to endure". The 79-year-old was convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records in May 2024 in a case related to hush money payments to adult actress Stormy Daniels. "This travesty of "Justice" will interfere with both Iran and Hamas negotiations. In other words, it is INSANITY doing what the out-of-control prosecutors are doing to Bibi Netanyahu," he said. "The United States of America spends Billions of Dollar a year, far more than on any other Nation, protecting and supporting Israel. We are not going to stand for this," Mr Trump said. "We just had a Great Victory with Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu at the helm - And this greatly tarnishes our Victory. LET BIBI GO, HE'S GOT A BIG JOB TO DO," he added. Trump's Second Post Defending Netanyahu It was Donald Trump's second post in three days defending Benjamin Netanyahu. On Thursday, he said he was "shocked" to hear that Israel, which is "strongly" led by Mr Netanyahu, is continuing its "ridiculous" witch hunt against their "great wartime" Prime Minister. "Bibi and I just went through HELL together, fighting a very tough and brilliant longtime enemy of Israel, Iran, and Bibi could not have been better, sharper, or stronger in his LOVE for the incredible Holy Land. Anybody else would have suffered losses, embarrassment, and chaos," he said. "Such a WITCH HUNT, for a man who has given so much, is unthinkable to me. He deserves much better than this, and so does the State of Israel," he said, adding that Mr Netanyahu's trial should be "cancelled immediately". "Perhaps there is no one that I know who could have worked in better harmony with the President of the United States, ME, than Bibi Netanyahu. It was the United States of America that saved Israel, and now it is going to be the United States of America that saves Bibi Netanyahu. THIS TRAVESTY OF "JUSTICE" CAN NOT BE ALLOWED," Mr Trump said while backing the Israeli PM, who has held office six times and is in power for nearly 16 years. Corruption Case Again Netanyahu Benjamin Netanyahu and his wife, Sara, are accused of accepting more than $2,60,000 worth of luxury goods such as cigars, jewellery and champagne from billionaires in exchange for political favours. Netanyahu is also accused of attempting to negotiate more favourable coverage from two Israeli media outlets. The 75-year-old became the only sitting Israeli prime minister to be indicted. He took the witness stand for the first time in December last year, and his cross-examination began earlier this month. Several hearings have been postponed amid the war in Gaza, which began in October when Hamas attacked Israeli towns.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
40 minutes ago
- First Post
IAEA chief warns Iran will likely go back to producing enriched uranium ‘in a matter of months'
Rafael Grossi, the head of the UN nuclear watchdog, warned that Iran is likely to go back to producing enriched uranium needed for making bombs in a 'matter of months,' despite strikes from Israel and the US read more The United Nations nuclear watchdog boss, Rafael Grossi, warned that Iran will likely be able to begin producing enriched uranium 'in a matter of months", despite damage it suffered due to Israeli and American strikes. West Asia was rattled after Israel launched Operation Rising Lion , targeting Iran's nuclear and military facilities on June 13. At that time, the Israeli authorities argued that the strikes were necessary since Iran was just a few weeks away from developing nuclear weapons, an ambition the Islamic Republic has consistently denied. The US government subsequently bombed three key facilities used for Tehran's atomic program, with the country's President Donald Trump assuring that the sites were completely 'obliterated'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Meanwhile, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that the extent of the damage to the nuclear sites is 'serious'. However, Iran has kept the details of destruction hidden. When asked how far Iran's nuclear ambitions have been pushed back, Trump said that Tehran's nuclear program had been set back 'decades'. Grossi issues a serious warning On Saturday, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency warned that some of Iran's nuclear infrastructure 'is still standing'. 'They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that,' Grossi said in an interview with CBS News. Grossi maintained that another key question that emerges in the aftermath of the conflict is whether Iran was able to relocate some or all of its estimated 408.6kg (900lbs) stockpile of highly enriched uranium before the attacks. Before the strikes, it was found that Iran's uranium is enriched to 60 per cent above levels for civilian usage but still below weapons grade. If it is further refined, it would theoretically be sufficient to produce more than nine nuclear bombs. 'We don't know where this material could be,' Grossi admitted. 'So some could have been destroyed as part of the attack, but some could have been moved. So there has to be, at some point, a clarification," he furthered. Trump administration thinks otherwise In the midst of all this, Iranian lawmakers have voted to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, rejecting Grossi's request for a visit to the damaged sites. 'We need to be in a position to ascertain, to confirm what is there, and where it is, and what happened,' Grossi said. In a separate interview with Fox News, US President Donald Trump said he did not think the stockpile had been moved from the nuclear facilities. 'It's a very hard thing to do, plus we didn't give much notice,' the US president said, according to excerpts of the interview. 'They didn't move anything.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On Saturday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio reiterated Washington's support for 'the IAEA's critical verification and monitoring efforts in Iran,' commending Grossi and his agency for their 'dedication and professionalism.'
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
41 minutes ago
- Business Standard
What's inside Trump's 940-page tax, spending bill now before Senate
Trump told Republicans, who hold majority power in the House and Senate, to skip their holiday vacations and deliver the bill by July 4 AP Washington At some 940-pages, the legislation is a sprawling collection of tax breaks, spending cuts and other Republican priorities, including new money for national defense and deportations. Now it's up to Congress to decide whether President Donald Trump's signature's domestic policy package will become law. Trump told Republicans, who hold majority power in the House and Senate, to skip their holiday vacations and deliver the bill by July 4. Senators were working through the weekend to pass the bill and send it back to the House for a final vote. Democrats are united against it. Here's the latest on what's in the bill. There could be changes as lawmakers negotiate. Tax cuts are priority Republicans say the bill is crucial because there would be a massive tax increase after December when tax breaks from Trump's first term expire. The legislation contains roughly $3.8 trillion in tax cuts. The existing tax rates and brackets would become permanent under the bill. It temporarily would add new tax breaks that Trump campaigned on: no taxes on tips, overtime pay or some automotive loans, along with a bigger $6,000 deduction in the Senate draft for older adults who earn no more than $75,000 a year. It would boost the $2,000 child tax credit to $2,200 under the Senate proposal. Families at lower income levels would not see the full amount. A cap on state and local deductions, called SALT, would quadruple to $40,000 for five years. It's a provision important to New York and other high tax states, though the House wanted it to last for 10 years. There are scores of business-related tax cuts. The wealthiest households would see a $12,000 increase from the legislation, which would cost the poorest people $1,600 a year, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office analysis of the House's version. Middle-income taxpayers would see a tax break of USD 500 to USD 1,500, the CBO said. Money for deportations, a border wall and the Golden Dome The bill would provide some $350 billion for Trump's border and national security agenda, including $46 billion for the US-Mexico border wall and $45 billion for 100,000 migrant detention facility beds, as he aims to fulfil his promise of the largest mass deportation operation in US history. Money would go for hiring 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, with $10,000 signing bonuses and a surge of Border Patrol officers, as well. The goal is to deport some 1 million people per year. The homeland security secretary would have a new $10 billion fund for grants for states that help with federal immigration enforcement and deportation actions. The attorney general would have $3.5 billion for a similar fund, known as Bridging Immigration-related Deficits Experienced Nationwide, or BIDEN, referring to former Democratic president Joe Biden. To help pay for it all, immigrants would face various new fees, including when seeking asylum protections. For the Pentagon, the bill would provide billions for ship building, munitions systems, and quality of life measures for servicemen and women, as well as $25 billion for the development of the Golden Dome missile defence system. The Defence Department would have $1 billion for border security. How to pay for it? Cuts to Medicaid and other programmes To help partly offset the lost tax revenue and new spending, Republicans aim to cut back some long-running government programmes: Medicaid, food stamps, green energy incentives and others. It's essentially unravelling the accomplishments of the past two Democratic presidents, Biden and Barack Obama. Republicans argue they are trying to rightsize the safety net programs for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse. The package includes new 80-hour-a-month work requirements for many adults receiving Medicaid and food stamps, including older people up to age 65. Parents of children 14 and older would have to meet the programme's work requirements. There's also a proposed new USD 35 co-payment that can be charged to patients using Medicaid services. Some 80 million people rely on Medicaid, which expanded under Obama's Affordable Care Act, and 40 million use the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Programme. Most already work, according to analysts. What's the final cost? Altogether, keeping the existing tax breaks and adding the new ones is expected to cost USD 3.8 trillion over the decade, the CBO says in its analysis of the House bill. An analysis of the Senate draft is pending. The CBO estimates the House-passed package would add USD 2.4 trillion to the nation's deficits over the decade. Or not, depending on how one does the math. Senate Republicans are proposing a unique strategy of not counting the existing tax breaks as a new cost because those breaks are already current policy. Senators say the Senate Budget Committee chairman has the authority to set the baseline for the preferred approach. Under the Senate GOP view, the tax provisions cost USD 441 billion, according to the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation. Democrats and others say this is magic math that obscures the true costs of the GOP tax breaks. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget puts the Senate tally at USD 4.2 trillion over the decade.