Schools, NHS and ‘two-tier' police accused over antisemitism
The investigation, led by a former cabinet minister and the government's tsar on tackling discrimination against Jews, said decision-making and standards varied across the country.
The investigators' report, commissioned by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, is set to be published on Tuesday.
It includes warnings about a 'normalisation' of antisemitism, with prejudices against Jewish people evident across British society from the NHS to arts organisations.
Documents seen by The Times reveal concerns over police forces' approach to allegations of antisemitism. The report says: 'We would like to see consistent decision-making and standards across all police forces throughout the country. Our evidence shows that this is not the current reality. We recommend that the [National Police Chiefs' Council] and the College of Policing come forward with proposals on how such consistency can be embedded in dealing with antisemitic crimes.'
• Dozens of universities yet to adopt antisemitism definition
Among the most egregious examples concerned the alleged failure by Essex Police to protect Jews during a protest in Westcliff-on-Sea in April. Residents said police should not have allowed the route of a rally to pass five synagogues around the time of Passover, with worshippers intimidated into staying at home. Those who did venture out were targeted by demonstrators who shouted 'baby killers' at them, The Telegraph reported.
Police forces are told to take 'a consistent approach' towards those who 'act as organised crime groups by calculatedly planning to cause damage to buildings, property and people'.
The report is the culmination of a six-month research project led by John Mann, a Labour peer and the government's antisemitism tsar, and Dame Penny Mordaunt, the former Conservative cabinet minister.
Sir Michael Ellis, a former Tory attorney-general who is also Jewish, said: 'There is no doubt whatsoever in my mind that policing in this country is two-tier, and is completely failing the Jewish community and wider society.
'Having prosecuted in criminal cases for 17 years before becoming attorney-general I have been shocked at the double standards that exist when it comes to dealing with antisemitism in this country … it is critical that this report's recommendations are immediately actioned.'
Other measures suggested in the report include ensuring primary school teachers avoid passing on antisemitism in lessons or using Jewish 'tropes' in front of children. Faith schools are told that staff should receive training on biases in Christian sources used as teaching materials.
There are also claims of a 'specific unaddressed issue of antisemitism within the NHS'. Health service leaders are advised to hold a summit 'to begin to address this', and establish basic training on contemporary antisemitism at every NHS trust.
Jewish comedians and artists who had work cancelled after pressure from pro-Palestine groups are encouraged to pursue discrimination claims in the courts. The report says: 'Discrimination is illegal but costly to challenge legally and we received substantial evidence of more hidden barriers being put in front of Jewish involvement within the arts … there should always be a robust response for those who choose to discriminate and government at every level should ensure this.'
Also among the ten recommendations presented to ministers are categorising Judaism as an ethnicity as well as a religion; creating an antisemitism training qualification to standardise such courses; and including education about antisemitism in workplaces' equity, diversity and inclusion materials.
• Member of Board of Deputies of British Jews quits over Gaza row
Some of the largest police forces in the UK noted two spikes in types of religious hate crime in 18 months. Antisemitic offences recorded by forces including Greater Manchester, West Midlands and the Metropolitan Police soared after October 7 and the conflict that followed. The same forces logged an increase in Islamophobic offences after the stabbings in Southport in July last year and the subsequent violent disorder.
The Campaign Against Antisemitism said: 'The findings of this report rightly shock a lot of ordinary Britons. But sadly, to the Jewish community they are the everyday reality.
'The infiltration of antisemitic tropes into our primary school sector is particularly distressing, as this not only puts Jewish children at risk but instils the worst prejudices in the next generation at an impressionable age.
'It is critical that all educators and head teachers arm themselves with the tools to identify antisemitism so that it cannot find its way into the classroom and is challenged and confronted whenever it does. Educating against racism is among teachers' first responsibilities. Schools must redouble their efforts to stamp this hatred out.'
The government said ministers would consider the review's recommendations. The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: 'The poison of antisemitism has reared itself in the UK and across Europe and this government will work unrelentingly to stamp it out wherever it is found. Religious and racial hatred have absolutely no place in our society, which is why we're taking a strong lead in tackling it in all its forms.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
MPs vote in favour of measures to decriminalise abortion in move to make biggest law change in more than 50 years
MPs have voted in favour of measures to decriminalise women terminating their own pregnancies in the biggest change to the law on reproductive rights for half a century. Women will no longer face prosecution for aborting their own baby for any reason and at any stage up to birth under the proposed legislation, which was backed by 379 votes to 137 on Tuesday night. Tonia Antoniazzi, the Labour MP who put forward the amendment, said it will remove the threat of 'investigation, arrest, prosecution, or imprisonment' of any woman who acts in relation to her own pregnancy. She told the Commons the current 'Victorian' abortion law in England and Wales is 'increasingly used against vulnerable women' and said her amendment was a 'once-in-a-generation' opportunity to change the law. Ms Antoniazzi's amendment will be the biggest change to the law concerning women's reproductive rights since the 1967 Abortion Act. It will alter the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act - which outlawed abortion - meaning it would no longer apply to women aborting their own babies. MPs and pro-choice activists welcomed the abortion vote and said it will finally put an end to the prosecution of vulnerable women for ending their own pregnancies. But anti-abortion campaigners and MPs opposed to the reforms said the move allows women to end the life of their unborn child right up to birth, and for any reason, without facing repercussions. Under Ms Antoniazzi's amendment women will no longer be prosecuted for an abortion when it relates to their own pregnancy, even if they abort their own baby without medical approval or after the current 24-week legal limit. However it maintains criminal punishments for doctors who carry out abortions beyond the legal limit and abusive partners who end a woman's pregnancy without her consent. Ms Antoniazzi listed examples of women who have recently been investigated or prosecuted for having an abortion, adding: 'Just what public interest is this serving? This is not justice. It is cruelty, and it has got to end.' 'Women affected are often acutely vulnerable victims of domestic abuse and violence, human trafficking and sexual exploitation, girls under the age of 18 and women who have suffered miscarriage,' she said. Six women have appeared in court in the last three years charged with ending or attempting to end their own pregnancy - a crime with a maximum sentence of life imprisonment - while others remain under investigation. Tory MP Rebecca Paul said she was 'disturbed' by the decriminalisation amendment, which will mean that 'fully developed babies up to term could be aborted by a woman with no consequences'. 'The reason we criminalise late term abortion is not about punishment. It's about protection,' she added. 'By providing a deterrent to such actions, we protect women. 'We protect them from trying to perform an abortion at home that is unsafe for them. We protect them from coercive partners and family members who may push them to end late term pregnancies.' Conservative MP Rebecca Smith told the Commons she the amendment risks 'creating a series of unintended consequences which could endanger women rather than protect and empower them'. 'If offences that make it illegal for a woman to administer her own abortion at any gestation were repealed, such abortions would de facto become possible up to birth for any reason, including abortions for sex selective purposes.' Meanwhile Dr Caroline Johnson, a Tory MP and consultant paediatrician, said the proposed legislation creates a 'situation where a woman is able to legally have an abortion up until term if she wants to'. She tabled a separate amendment that would have made it mandatory for women seeking an abortion through the at-home 'pills by post' scheme introduced during the pandemic to have an in-person consultation with a doctor before they are prescribed the drugs. However this was rejected last night as 379 MPs voted against it - the same number who backed decriminalising abortion. Another amendment, put forward by Labour MP Stella Creasy, had also sought to repeal sections of the 1861 Act, decriminalise abortion up to 24 weeks, and ensure that late-term abortions did not result in prison sentences. Ms Creasy's amendment would have gone go further in making it a human right for women to access abortion so that parliament could not, in future, roll back abortion rights as has happened in other countries. However, Sir Lindsay only selected Ms Antoniazzi's to be debated by MPs this evening, which had more than 170 backers last night - compared to over 110 for Ms Creasy's. During a Westminster Hall debate earlier this month, justice minister Alex Davies-Jones said the Government is neutral on decriminalisation and that it is an issue for Parliament to decide upon. Though the Government took a neutral stance on the vote, several high-profile Cabinet ministers, including Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, were among the MPs who backed the amendment in the free vote. Abortion in England and Wales currently remains a criminal offence but is legal with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability. It is also legal to take prescribed medication at home if a woman is less than 10 weeks pregnant. Efforts to change the law to protect women from prosecution follow repeated calls to repeal sections of the 19th-century law the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, after abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2019. The measures to decriminalise abortion, which still need to complete their legislative journey through both the Commons and the Lords before they can become law, were welcomed by leading abortion providers and physicians. Heidi Stewart, chief executive of the British Pregnancy Advisory Service, BPAS, described it as a 'landmark moment for women's rights in this country'. She said: 'There will be no more women investigated after enduring a miscarriage, no more women dragged from their hospital beds to the back of a police van, no more women separated from their children because of our archaic abortion law.' It was welcomed by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, with its president Professor Ranee Thakar describing the vote as a 'victory for women and for their essential reproductive rights'. And the British Medical Association also welcomed the vote as a 'significant and long overdue step towards reforming antiquated abortion law'. But Alithea Williams, from the anti-abortion campaign group the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC), said she was 'horrified that MPs have voted for this extreme and barbaric proposal'. She added: 'This change has been made after only a few hours debate, with little notice. It was not in the Government's manifesto, and it certainly doesn't reflect public opinion. 'We call on the Lords to throw this undemocratic, barbaric proposal out when it reaches them. We will never accept a law that puts women in danger and removes all rights from unborn babies.' How using medicines led to charges under 'outdated and harmful' laws Six women have appeared in court charged with ending or attempting to end their own pregnancy in the past three years. These included Nicola Packer, 45, who was cleared last month by a jury of 'unlawfully administering' herself with abortion pills at home during lockdown in 2020. Under emergency legislation in the pandemic, which has since been made permanent, the law was changed to allow the tablets to be taken in a system known as 'pills by post'. This let women access the medicine with no visit to a clinic up to a legal limit of ten weeks, compared to the normal limit of 24 weeks when assessed by two doctors. Ms Packer had taken prescribed abortion medicine when she was about 26 weeks pregnant. She told a court in London she did not realise she had been pregnant for more than ten weeks. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists said Ms Packer's trial demonstrated 'just how outdated and harmful' that existing abortion law was. Another of these women is Carla Foster, 47, who was found guilty in June 2023 of illegally obtaining abortion tablets when she was between 32 and 34 weeks pregnant. Ms Foster, from Staffordshire, was given the pills after claiming in a remote lockdown consultation she was only seven weeks pregnant. A court heard she had lied to a nurse on the phone about how far along she was to obtain the drugs, after searching online: 'I need to have an abortion but I'm past 24 weeks.' She pleaded guilty to a charge under the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act and got a 28-month sentence, with half to be spent in jail. This was reduced to a 14-month suspended sentence on appeal with a judge saying the case called for 'compassion, not punishment'. Ms Foster would not have faced prosecution under changes to laws approved last night.
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour quietly paves way for £174k civil servant salaries
Rachel Reeves has 'opened the floodgates' to bumper civil servant pay raises after removing the need for ministers to approve of salaries above £150,000. Under new civil service guidance issued by the Treasury, only earnings above £174,000 and bonuses more than £25,000 must be signed off, a rise from £150,000 and £17,500 respectively. The change will affect 260 civil servants who earn between £150,000 and £200,000 a year and 30 mandarins who earn more than £200,000. A further 2,915 staff earn more than £100,000 a year. William Yarwood, of the TaxPayers' Alliance campaign group, told The Telegraph: 'Taxpayers will be outraged that top civil servants are being handed even more generous pay raises with less oversight. 'This quiet rule change opens the floodgates to inflated salaries behind closed doors at a time when Whitehall should be making cuts. 'With the public sector already bloated and unaccountable, ministers must slam the brakes on these cosy pay arrangements and start defending the interests of taxpayers.' Pay control measures were introduced by the last Conservative government in an attempt to manage the public sector wage bill. However, the final years of the Tory government saw the size of the Civil Service balloon. The number of civil servants has increased by 21pc in the past five years, with the wage bill up by a quarter. The median salary increased by 25pc from £27,080 in 2019 to £33,980 in 2024. The Treasury defended increasing the threshold by £24,000 – equivalent to 16pc – arguing the £150,000 cap had been frozen since 2017. Impact on taxpayers However, that may prove little comfort to taxpayers. Income tax and National Insurance thresholds have remained frozen since 2021-22 with Sir Keir Starmer refusing last week to rule out extending the stealth raid until 2029-30. Chancellor Rachel Reeves used her maiden Budget last year to extend a freeze on inheritance tax thresholds until 2029-30, a threshold that has stayed the same since 2009. Conservative MP, Richard Holden, criticised increasing the Civil Service threshold, describing it as a 'grubby deal'. The shadow paymaster general told the Mail on Sunday: 'The state is far too bloated. 'They are a party in hock to public sector pay, and trying to sneak out bumper pay deals for mandarins and quangocrats by the back door shows they don't have the national interest at heart. 'A grubby deal for their public sector chums achieves nothing.' A Treasury spokesman said: 'The previous threshold for senior civil servants' salaries was set in 2017, and since then, average pay across the private and public sector has risen. 'The new, below-inflation, threshold rise would apply to a minority of senior civil servants and would be subject to rigorous scrutiny.'
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
People smugglers offering 'summer deals' post clips on TikTok, Instagram and Facebook to lure migrants into crossing Channel as July is set to be the busiest month ever for arrivals
People smugglers are offering migrants 'summer deals' for Channel crossings as the number using the dangerous route continues to surge. Adverts are still being shared on platforms including TikTok, Facebook and Instagram despite social media giants promising to clamp down on the content. Posts offer crossings to the UK for prices ranging from £900 to £5,000, and often include a WhatsApp number to contact. One advert shared on a Facebook page for Albanians wanting to work in the UK even included specific pick-up and drop-off times and locations, while another promised summer journeys for 'only £2,000'. Others mimic business sales tactics, urging viewers to 'migrate before it's too late' and tempting them with videos of successful crossings and images of British landmarks captioned 'welcome to London '. A total of 2,378 small boat migrants arrived in the UK this month up to Saturday. This puts it on course to be the busiest July on record, with 1,711 arriving in 2023 - the last busiest 12 days. It comes as Sir Keir Starmer announced a 'one in, one out' deal that will see one illegal migrant sent back to France in return for accepting one who has made a legal claim on the Continent. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has refused to say how many of the thousands arriving by dinghy will be removed under the pilot scheme, amid fears it will not serve as a sufficient deterrent. One advert shared on a Facebook page for Albanians in the UK even included specific pick-up and drop-off times and locations The National Crime Agency has been working with social media companies to get video footage of the crossings removed, with more than 8,000 taken down last year alone. But the number of videos still available online show the big platforms remain a key forum for smugglers looking to reach new clients. Dr Peter Walsh, a senior researcher at The Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford, believes content featuring migrants themselves could be particularly persuasive to anyone thinking of making the journey. 'Research suggests individuals are more sceptical about what smugglers say, but they feel more connection with migrants who are shown making the journey themselves, particularly if they share the same nationality,' he told MailOnline. 'The key thing is to share information about particular routes to take, how the process works and how much it costs. The countries migrants are going to are often presented as highly desirable, but often the information is not accurate. 'These are businesses a the end of the day, however disreputable, and prices go up and down. We've seen evidence of discounts being offered to people driving the boats. 'There are anecdotal reports of specific discounts being offered to some nationalities, such as Eritreans. I'm speculating, but it might be because smugglers are working out what kind of price point they'd be able to afford.' Several videos uncovered by the i showed the social media accounts of suspected smugglers celebrating successful crossings with gleeful captions such as 'Welcome to London'. One boasted 'we are masters' alongside celebratory emojis. Comment threads are often used by migrants to contact smugglers. In one comment to a TikTok clip, a user asks: 'Guys, how does one reach Britain', to which a suspected smuggler replies: 'Message me.' Ministers are under pressure to get a grip of the migrant crisis with 2025 on course to be a record year for small-boat crossings. A Home Office spokesperson said: 'It is unacceptable for any individual, whether they are a member of a smuggling gang or otherwise, to peddle these lies on social media and promote the criminal services of people-traffickers to others. 'It is also unacceptable for social media companies to host this type of promotional content, which is encouraging people to put their lives at risk in the Channel. 'As a result, we are working with the National Crime Agency and major social media companies, including TikTok, to seek the rapid removal of online content promoting dangerous small boat crossings. Since November 2021, the National Crime Agency has worked with social media companies to take down around 22,000 organised immigration crime related social media posts and accounts.' More than 21,000 people have already made the perilous journey across the Channel, and Iraqi Kurds now dominate the people smuggling networks. Yvette Cooper is set to strike a migrant returns deal with Iraq which would enable the UK to send more failed asylum seekers back. The Home Secretary is said to be in the 'final stages' of agreeing the pact to speed up cooperation between London and Baghdad. Ms Cooper is also planning to double down on Labour's controversial migrants return deal by banning repeat offenders from claiming asylum. Home Office sources said that any boat migrant who has been returned to France and then made a crossing again would not be able to apply for asylum. Their identities would also be stored on a biometric database. A source said: 'At about £3,000 a crossing it would be a total waste of money for them to try again.' Human-rights campaigners have said they will support court challenges brought by small-boat arrivals, while the EU says it is assessing whether the scheme complies with the 'spirit and the letter of the law'. Ms Cooper is also facing calls to extend the biometric testing into an effective revival of Sir Tony Blair's abandoned ID card plans, to stop migrants working illegally. In May, the Home Office's immigration white paper promised to roll out 'digital identity for all overseas citizens' to improve border management and 'enforcement against illegal working and misuse'. But there are increasing signs that ID cards could now be introduced for all citizens – not just migrants. Last month, Downing Street was said to be looking 'very closely' at a so-called 'BritCard' that could be used to check on an individual's right to live and work in this country. And yesterday, Labour MPs told the Mail on Sunday that on the back of the 'one in, one out' deal with France, now was the time to revive a modern version of those plans. Bury North MP James Frith said: 'There is considerable merit in revisiting digital ID now, given how far technology and public confidence in digitisation have come since this was last considered in our politics. 'From online banking to NHS apps, people are increasingly comfortable with secure digital services.' He added: 'In light of the new returns deal with France and efforts to strengthen the integrity of our asylum system, a carefully-designed digital ID could help protect access to public services, prevent abuse, and ensure faster, fairer support for those who need it.' According to TikTok, the platform proactively removed 96.9% of content that showed human trafficking and smuggling, including 70.4% within 24 hours of posting.
