Six Syrian security personnel killed after deploying to quell sectarian clashes, source says
DAMASCUS - Six members of Syria's security forces have been killed in the predominantly Druze city of Sweida, a security source told Reuters, after they deployed to halt deadly sectarian clashes that local media reported had resumed on Monday.
Sunday's fighting between Druze militiamen and Bedouin tribal fighters was the first time that sectarian violence erupted inside the city of Sweida itself, following months of tensions in the broader province.
The fighting left 30 people dead and prompted Syria's security forces to deploy units to the city to restore calm and guarantee safe passage for civilians looking to leave, the defence ministry said in a statement.
But intense clashes broke out again on Monday, local news outlet Sweida24 reported. At least six Syrian troops were subsequently killed, a defence ministry source told Reuters.
It marked the latest episode of sectarian bloodshed in Syria, where fears among minority groups have surged since Islamist-led rebels toppled President Bashar al-Assad in December, installing their own government and security forces.
Sunni Muslim Arab rebel groups which fought Assad during the war agreed in December to dissolve into the defence ministry but efforts to integrate armed factions from minority groups - including Druze and Kurds - have largely stalled.
In southern Syria, efforts have been further complicated by Israel's stated policy that it would not allow Syria's new army to deploy south of Damascus and that Sweida and neighbouring provinces should make up a demilitarized zone.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore HSA intensifies crackdown on vapes; young suspected Kpod peddlers nabbed in Bishan, Yishun
Singapore Man charged over distributing nearly 3 tonnes of vapes in one day in Bishan, Ubi Ave 3
Singapore High Court dismisses appeal of drink driver who killed one after treating Tampines road like racetrack
Singapore Singapore to train more aviation and maritime officials from around the world
Business Singapore's economy sees surprise expansion in Q2 despite US tariff uncertainty: Advance estimate
Singapore 18 years' jail for woman who hacked adoptive father to death after tussle over Sengkang flat
Singapore Jail, caning for man who had 285 child porn videos, including those that show infants
Singapore Three power companies chosen to study carbon capture and storage to help Singapore decarbonise
Interior Minister Anas Khattab said in a written statement carried on state media that the "absence of state institutions, especially military and security institutions, is a major cause of the ongoing tensions in Sweida and its countryside."
Sunday's violence erupted after a wave of kidnappings, including the abduction of a Druze merchant on Friday on the highway linking Damascus to Sweida, witnesses said. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump says Zelenskiy should not target Moscow
Find out what's new on ST website and app. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters, as he departs for travel to Pennsylvania from the South Lawn at the White House in Washington, D.C. U.S., July 15, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst WASHINGTON - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy should not target Moscow and that Russian President Vladimir Putin should agree to a ceasefire deal by a 50-day deadline or sanctions will kick in. His comments came after The Financial Times, citing people briefed on discussions, reported on Tuesday that Trump had privately encouraged Ukraine to step up deep strikes on Russia. The newspaper added that Trump asked Zelenskiy whether he could strike Moscow if the U.S. provided long-range weapons. "No, he shouldn't target Moscow," Trump told reporters on the South Lawn of the White House when asked if Zelenskiy should attack the Russian capital. Trump on Monday announced a toughened stance against Russia for its three-year-old war in Ukraine, promising a fresh wave of missiles and other weaponry for Ukraine. He gave Moscow 50 days to reach a ceasefire or face sanctions. Asked if he was now on the side of Ukraine, Trump said, "I am on nobody's side," and then declared he was on "humanity's side" because "I want to stop the killing." Trump defended the deadline he set for Russia to agree to a deal and head off tariffs and sanctions on countries that buy oil from Russia. "I don't think 50 days is very long and it could be sooner than that," he said. He did not say whether any talks were planned to try to work out a deal with Russia. "At the end of the 50 days if we don't have a deal, it's going to be too bad," he said. REUTERS
Online Citizen
an hour ago
- Online Citizen
PM Wong reaffirms ‘full support and confidence' in ST as netizens question its impartiality
SINGAPORE: Prime Minister Lawrence Wong has underlined the importance of trusted journalism, declaring that Singapore needs credible media more than ever to help society distinguish fact from falsehood in an increasingly complex world. Speaking on 11 July 2025 at a dinner celebrating the 180th anniversary of The Straits Times (ST), Wong reiterated the government's 'full support and confidence' in the publication's mission to inform, educate, and hold Singapore society together. His backing comes amid ongoing debate over the independence of Singapore's main English-language newspaper. Many Singaporeans have taken to social media to question whether ST can operate free of state influence, especially after substantial government funding was pledged to its parent, SPH Media Trust (SMT). In February 2022, the government announced up to S$900 million in funding over five years for SMT, which operates ST. This support, of up to S$180 million a year, is intended to sustain quality journalism and keep the national newspaper financially viable as advertising revenues fall and audiences move online. The injection of public money followed SMT's restructuring in 2021, when it was separated from Singapore Press Holdings to function as a not-for-profit entity. The move was aimed at ensuring that the nation's flagship paper could adapt to the challenges of digital disruption and remain a trusted source of news. PM Wong: Government support essential to keep public service media viable, independent, and accountable Wong acknowledged that globally, traditional news outlets face shrinking newsrooms and commercial pressures that threaten editorial quality. He cautioned against allowing Singapore's national newspaper to fall into the hands of private billionaires with partisan aims or to let public trust in the press erode as a result of poor funding. 'We cannot allow that to happen here in Singapore,' Wong said. 'We do not want our national newspaper to be owned by billionaires with narrow or partisan agendas. Nor do we want public trust in the media to be eroded.' He explained that government support is essential to keep public service media viable, independent, and accountable to Singaporeans. PM Wong: ST must adapt and stay relevant Wong also acknowledged that ST faces unprecedented competition, not just from other reputable outlets but from content creators and distractions across countless digital platforms. He called on the paper's editors and journalists to adapt boldly to remain relevant to future readers, even if that means significant changes to the newspaper's style, tone, or length in the coming decade. 'I believe there will still be a place for print, and we should all do our best to keep print newspapers viable in Singapore for as long as possible,' Wong said. He added that while the government supports ST's mission, it would not dictate the editorial choices needed to keep the paper meaningful to Singaporeans. Minister Josephine Teo echoes call for trusted news Communications and Information Minister Josephine Teo also emphasised the government's commitment to trusted media. She noted that Singaporeans must have reliable sources to inform decisions affecting their daily lives and futures. 'We remain very committed to ensuring that our public service media can continue to capture the attention of our audience,' Teo said. Public doubts over impartiality: 'Will ST pose hard questions to those in power?' Despite such reassurances, scepticism persists. Many Singaporeans have questioned whether the government's financial backing allows ST to remain truly independent. On social media platforms such as Reddit and Facebook, netizens have asked if journalists at ST will pose hard questions to those in power. Some doubt whether the paper can avoid serving as a government mouthpiece, given its reliance on state funding. One Reddit comment described the newspaper as a 'monopoly' that still requires government help despite diversifying its business interests into property and aged care. Concerns about media control Another comment criticised what they saw as irony in PM Wong's rejection of billionaire-owned outlets, pointing out that ST is already heavily funded and indirectly controlled by the state. Some argued that both billionaire ownership and state control can threaten true journalistic independence. One user wrote that Singaporeans should not have to choose between 'billionaire-owned media and state-owned media,' but should instead have independent journalists who report in the public interest. Comparisons to other countries Several netizens compared Singapore's situation to international examples. One noted that while government ownership carries a partisan slant, at least an elected government is accountable to citizens — unlike unelected billionaires. However, others countered that real media independence comes from autonomy, not state or corporate influence. One cited the BBC as an outlet that once enjoyed a reputation for neutrality but has struggled to maintain it amid funding debates. The user suggested that ST could position itself as a truly neutral outlet providing balanced coverage of both Eastern and Western perspectives, arguing that doing so could fill a gap left by declining trust in other global media brands. Ravi Philemon: ST already heavily funded and controlled by the state Ravi Philemon, Chief of Red Dot United, also weighed in the debate, criticised PM Wong's remark about rejecting billionaire-owned media as ironic, pointing out that The ST is already heavily funded and controlled by the state. 'It is already funded to the tune of one billion dollars to keep a ruling party, one that seems more aligned with the filthy rich than with anyone else, in power,' Philemon commented in a FB post on 12 July. He argued that Singapore's ruling party uses public money to maintain a media system that serves its own power rather than true public interest journalism. He highlighted that despite claims of independence, the press avoids asking tough questions and fails to challenge the government meaningfully. Philemon warned that this controlled media environment keeps Singaporeans uninformed about real struggles like rising debt and inequality. He warned that the real threat is not foreign billionaires, but a media kept loyal through state funding, which preserves a system that benefits the wealthy and entrenches political power. Calls for media literacy and critical reading Some Singaporeans stressed the importance of critical reading and media literacy. They argued that citizens should consult a range of credible outlets rather than depend solely on one publication, whether state-backed or privately owned. One user commented that media must serve the people and retain enough autonomy to scrutinise those in power without fear or favour. Another urged fellow Singaporeans to read widely, pointing out that a healthy democracy relies on an informed citizenry capable of questioning any narrative. Singapore ranks low on press freedom, with RSF citing lack of editorial independence According to the 2025 World Press Freedom Index published by Reporters Without Borders on 2 May, Singapore ranked 123rd out of 180 countries. The report criticised Singapore as an example not to follow, citing a severe lack of editorial independence and little respect for press freedom. RSF noted that independent political journalism is scarce, with outlets like The Online Citizen forced into exile.
Independent Singapore
an hour ago
- Independent Singapore
AMK residents forced to use stairs thanks to persistent lift urination issue that remains unresolved despite complaints
SINGAPORE: A foul-smelling and persistent issue at Block 223 Ang Mo Kio Avenue 1 has left residents frustrated and some choosing to avoid the lift altogether. Residents say the lift at Block C has frequently reeked of urine and that the issue remains unresolved despite multiple complaints. Mike, a resident who moved into the block in January last year, told Channel 8 that he often encounters urine stains in the lift, and the stench has become part of daily life for those living in the block. 'It's very uncomfortable,' he said, 'I've been reporting this through the OneService app since August last year. I even contacted the town council via Facebook, but the problem still hasn't been solved.' According to Mike, while cleaners do remove the mess when reported, the urination continues to recur. 'The town council said it would investigate, but it has not solved the problem yet. After the cleaners cleaned it up, the problem continued to happen. I think it is only treating the symptoms and not the root cause,' he said. Mike shared that some residents have resorted to using the stairs whenever they spot urine in the lift, 'Residents here say they've complained many times, but nothing has happened. Everyone is very angry. If I see urine, I won't take it because it smells bad and is unhygienic.' He also believes the culprit is likely an adult, 'There are residents here who have pets. We all know each other. Everyone brings their pets downstairs to relieve themselves, and every time there is a large pool of urine, which doesn't look like it belongs to pets or children.' Other residents backed up Mike's concerns, with some recalling seeing what they believed to be urine stains regularly in the elevator — and in at least one past instance, even faeces. When a Channel 8 reporter visited the block on Tuesday (Jul 15), there were visible water-like stains in the lift. A sign inside urged people not to urinate in public areas. See also Domestic worker accused of abusing elderly woman in wheelchair Mr Deng, 58, a long-time resident who has lived there for 13 years, told the reporter that he had raised the same issue two years ago through the OneService platform. According to him, the town council made an effort to identify the culprit, but he never heard any updates after that. 'Urine stains can appear at any time, and the cleaners are slow to respond. Sometimes they're still there after hours,' he said, 'Some kind neighbours will lay newspaper down to cover it, but that just makes the area dirtier in my opinion.' Mr Deng added that the problem poses a serious risk to elderly residents, 'This puddle of water is unsafe for residents. It makes the floor slippery; you have to walk sideways and stuff like that. Some of the elderly here are in wheelchairs or on crutches. The urine contaminates their wheelchairs and crutches, and they bring it home. It's unhygienic.' Another resident, who declined to be named, expressed similar concerns, especially for young children. He told the Channel 8 reporter, 'I have kids at home and sometimes push them in a stroller. When I see water stains in the lift, I would rather walk further to use another one so my child doesn't step in it or dirty the stroller.' Several residents said they suspect the same individual is responsible, and pointed to the same unit in the block. However, when the reporter visited the unit, no one was home.
