Andrew Tate's ‘Golden Passport' faces revocation in fresh blow; Here's what we know
In the United Kingdom, Tate is accused of rape, human trafficking, and regulating prostitution, while he is accused of rape and human trafficking in Romania. Tate has refuted all the charges levelled against him.
The Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) reported that he bought a passport for citizenship in Vanuatu in 2022, and he was charged around the same time in Romania.
The government of Vanuatu is currently investigating the purchase of his passport.
Speaking to ABC News, Vanuatu authorities' spokesperson Kiery Manassah stated: 'Once we have the files, definitely, the processes will be in place to revoke his citizenship. The government does not want to encourage people of questionable backgrounds to be granted citizenship.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Indian-origin man arrested for mid-air brawl on US flight, claims he was meditating
An Indian-origin man has been arrested in the United States after a mid-air fight on a Frontier Airlines flight led to chaos in the cabin. The accused, identified as 21-year-old Ishaan Sharma, allegedly attacked a fellow passenger 'without provocation,' leading to his arrest upon landing in Miami. According to a report by ABC News, the incident occurred aboard a Frontier flight headed to Miami International Airport, where the Miami-Dade Sheriff's Office responded to reports of an onboard assault. The arrest affidavit notes that Sharma approached the victim and grabbed him by the neck while returning to his assigned seat, triggering a physical fight. Videos from the flight, now circulating on social media, show the two men engaged in a violent fistfight as shocked passengers screamed for them to stop. Sharma sustained a laceration above his left eyebrow, which required medical assistance. The victim, who suffered minor injuries, declined treatment. Eyewitnesses told local media that after the brawl, Sharma was seen grinning, mumbling to himself, and taking selfies of his bloodied face, as cabin crew attempted to restore calm. He was taken into custody after being cleared by doctors at Jackson West Hospital and later transported to the Turner Guilford Knight Correctional Center. Sharma was formally charged with battery, and his bond has been set at $500. In a surprising turn, Sharma's lawyer claimed in court that the incident began while Sharma was 'meditating' as part of his religious practice. 'My client is from a religion where he was meditating. Unfortunately, the passenger behind him did not like that,' said defence attorney Renee Gordon, as reported by the Daily Mail. However, the explanation failed to convince Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Gerald Hubbart, who imposed strict restrictions. Sharma has been barred from contacting the victim, either personally or online, and must maintain a 500-foot distance from the victim's home, school, or workplace. Authorities have yet to determine a clear motive for the in-flight assault, and the investigation is ongoing.
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Is Iran planning something dangerous? Nuclear experts have a warning after US strikes
Iran could become more dangerous after the 12-day war with Israel and the US strikes on its key nuclear facilities last month, nuclear arms experts have warned. Iran has stopped its cooperation with IAEA and might be getting ready to pull out of the NPT.(REUTERS/ File) The US struck three key Iranian nuclear facilities last month using bunker buster bombs. These were Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz. While US President Donald Trump said the strikes obliterated the country's nuclear program, experts have given a big warning regarding Tehran's nuclear future. Nuclear proliferation experts, quoted in an ABC News report, believe the strikes could lead to a "fork-in-the-road" moment that results in Tehran taking a more dangerous and secretive path to obtaining nuclear arms if it chooses to do so. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian signed a bill approved last week by the parliament to halt cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the United Nations' nuclear watchdog. The country is also mulling a withdrawal from the 57-year-old Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty (NPT). "The last country to pull out of the NPT was North Korea," Howard Stoffer, a professor of international affairs at the University of New Haven and former deputy executive director of the UN Security Council's Counter-Terrorism Committee, told ABC News. The NPT, signed by 191 countries in 1968, said countries, other than those certified as nuclear powers, cannot develop nuclear weapons. However, it allows countries to pursue peaceful civilian nuclear programs, like those for energy use. "They can go right up to the brink, and basically do everything except assemble the weapons in their final form and still be technically in compliance with the treaty. That frightens a lot of countries that are Iran's neighbours, Israel in particular," John Erath, senior policy director for the Centre for Arms and Non-Proliferation, told ABC News. Iran has made it clear that it would 'act according to its own interest' regarding the NPT. The treaty also requires inspection by the IAEA, so it remains to be seen how Tehran fulfils that obligation in light of the new law if it decides to join it. The Iran-US nuclear deal Iran signed a nuclear deal with several world powers led by the United States in 2015, called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), under the Barack Obama administration. The agreement limited Iran's civilian nuclear program to peaceful purposes in exchange for lifting economic sanctions imposed on the country. President Donald Trump withdrew from the accord during his first term in 2018, calling it "defective to its core" and reimposed US sanctions on Iran. Since then, multiple attempts have been made to negotiate a new deal with Tehran, including by Trump himself, but it hasn't borne fruit yet.
Indian Express
8 hours ago
- Indian Express
Documentary on Diddy trial to stream online today; key reasons why jury didn't find him guilty of racketeering and sex trafficking
Sean 'Diddy' Combs may have dodged the most serious charges in his federal racketeering and sex trafficking case, but Judge Arun Subramanian isn't letting him out just yet. The Music mogul's bail plea was denied by the presiding judge as the legal battle continues. Meanwhile, ABC News aired a one-hour special, Verdict: The Diddy Trial, less than 12 hours after the verdict. The episode aired in the US on July 2 and is set to stream globally the next day. The special features defense attorney and ABC's legal analyst Brian Buckmire, criminal trial lawyer Sarah Azari, and investigative correspondents breaking down what went down in court. Though Combs beat the charges that could've landed him behind bars for life, he's still staring at a likely two-decade prison term. Where to watch Verdict: the Diddy Trial The TV special aired Wednesday (July 2) at 10 p.m. ET on ABC. Outside the US, it'll stream on Disney+ and Hulu on July 3. The special explores the key moments that flipped the case in Diddy's favour, with commentary, scene reenactments, and a breakdown of what legal doors remain open, both for the defense and the prosecutors looking to make their next move. Also read: Sean 'Diddy' Combs found guilty in sex trial, but cleared of trafficking and racketeering charges Diddy was convicted of two federal crimes, including transporting individuals across state lines for prostitution (violating the Mann Act.) Meanwhile, he was acquitted of three other, more serious charges, including: Sex trafficking of Cassie Ventura and another woman (identified only as 'Jane'). Racketeering, where prosecutors claimed Diddy ran an illegal criminal enterprise involving bribery, drugs, kidnapping, and sexual abuse. According to ABC, each of the two charges Diddy was convicted on carries a max sentence of 10 years, which means he's now staring at a possible 20 years behind bars. The decision came after two days of jury deliberation, with a final note sent at 9:52 a.m. on Wednesday confirming a unanimous verdict on all five counts. Also read: Sean 'Diddy' Combs acquitted of sex trafficking charges, convicted on prostitution counts Why the jury didn't convict Diddy on the most serious charges Former federal prosecutor Mark Chutkow, in a conversation with Forbes, pointed to one key reason the jury may have ruled not guilty on the biggest charges: lack of proof of coercion. Chutkow explained that to convict someone of sex trafficking, you have to show the victims were forced, tricked, or coerced. Despite Cassie Ventura and 'Jane Doe' testifying, both women continued seeing Diddy even after the alleged incidents, some even expressed care for him. That alone could've given the jury reasonable doubt. As for the racketeering charge, the jury might not have seen enough to believe there was a full criminal network. Diddy was accused of running an entire enterprise, but he was the only one sitting in court. If others were supposedly involved, who were they, and why weren't they on trial too? Why was Diddy's bail denied? Judge Arun Subramanian refused to grant bail. One major reason being a surveillance video presented in court that reportedly showed Combs physically assaulting Cassie Ventura. The judge called it part of a disturbing pattern of behaviour. Prosecutors added that Diddy continued breaking laws in 2024, even after learning he was under federal investigation and after his homes were raided. So for now, Diddy stays locked up at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. His team's pushing for house arrest at his Miami home until sentencing. But prosecutors are still arguing. What happens next? The sentencing process Sentencing is currently set for October 3, but Judge Subramanian has said he's open to moving it up if the defense requests. Before that, Diddy will have to go through a presentencing investigation led by the US Probation Office. They'll look into his criminal history (or lack of it), the severity of the charges, and anything else that might factor into what kind of sentence he gets.
