Gnosall and Eccleshall by-election to replace Reform councillor
Party leader Nigel Farage was asked on a visit to Stafford last month about whether he considered the cost of this by-election, about £27,000 in taxpayers' money, "wasteful spending".He said: "It's unfortunate. This guy said some things on social media he shouldn't have said, as a result of that came under some pretty abusive online pressure, and would rather it hadn't happened."Boundary changes in the Gnosall and Eccleshall ward has meant campaigning in villages rich in Conservative, Reform, and Green voters. Candidates tell me it could be a three-way race. The result is expected to be announced on Friday.
Boundary changes in the Gnosall and Eccleshall ward has meant campaigning in villages rich in Conservative, Reform, and Green voters. Candidates tell me it could be a three-way race. The result is expected to be announced on Friday.
Who is standing?
Reform candidate Ray Barron has previously served as a borough and county councillor. He was a member of the Conservative party until 2022, when he became an independent, then joined Reform last year. Unsuccessful in the county election on 1 May, Barron said he could not have worked harder to campaign for this seat, and that he thought it would be a "coin toss" over who won it.He said if he won the seat he would use his experience as an ex-county councillor to help his politically inexperienced Reform colleagues.
While Labour start from a low base on the county council, having just one councillor representing the party in Staffordshire, their candidate Leah Elston-Thompson is hopeful. Following the election of a Labour MP in July 2024 when the party saw a landslide victory, Elston-Thompson said if she was elected in Gnosall and Eccleshall, she would carry on the good work the government does on a local level.
Conservative Jeremy Pert is hoping to use this opportunity to win his seat back. There were just 27 votes separating him and Titley in May.Pert said this by-election was about two things: holding the new Reform administration to account; and providing a strong local advocate to make sure the area "doesn't get overrun" with more than 1,000 houses planned for development. Pert served on the county council for eight years in the Eccleshall ward.
Green party councillor Scott Spencer is looking to build on the momentum the Greens have picked up since winning their first ever seat on the county council in May. He said "on a Reform-led council I would bring evidence based solutions, not empty promises." He added, in his view, "Greens can win here".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
The UK's Afghan data leak stinks of another miserable betrayal
One of the most enduring until he died some years ago of cancer was with a former mujahideen guerrilla commander whom I first met back in the days when he was involved in the resistance to the Soviet occupation of his country. Later, he would fight as part of the Northern Alliance against the Taliban, and it's for this reason that I'm not prepared to name him here. I do know that much of his immediate family were forced to flee shortly after I last saw them in Kabul in 2020, just before the Taliban came to power following the ignominious withdrawal in August 2021 of the US-led coalition forces of which Britain was a part. READ MORE: Former top judge says court would 'likely' rule Israel is committing genocide in Gaza My late friend's immediate family are now in neighbouring Iran, where they swapped the dangers of one war and repressive regime in Afghanistan for that of another because they had no choice. To stay would have meant almost certain death at the hands of the Taliban. I know for sure they are in Iran because one of my late friend's sons with great difficulty got a message to me asking for help to get his family out from Iran to the UK. His request is not the first I've had from old Afghan friends, and doubtless will not be the last. Another, still trapped in Afghanistan, also managed to contact me a few months ago seeking similar help. I have not heard from him since. To say I feel a sense of unease at being unable to do much would be an understatement, for friendships run deep in Afghan culture and our bonds were often forged in the most trying times of war, making them all the more profound. I mention all this right now in the context of the scarcely believable cock-up by the previous Tory government that was disclosed this week over the highly secret Operation Rubific. For those catching up with the story, in short, up to 100,000 Afghans could have been placed at risk after a British Royal Marine mistakenly emailed a database to multiple wrong contacts. That spreadsheet contained personal data on tens of thousands of applicants to the UK's Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP). In what ended up on Facebook, names, emails and phone numbers in the leak included up to 33,000 people connected to those who supported British forces. As the data was circulated even further, fears grew that it could provide the basis for a Taliban 'kill list', and this is where the whole affair gets even more shameful. For not only did the then Tory government defence secretary Ben Wallace obtain a 'super-injunction' preventing several media organisations who knew of the leak from reporting it, but by doing so added cover-up to cock-up. In panic, ministers then authorised a covert emergency relocation scheme known as the Afghan Response Route at an estimated cost of £7 billion to the taxpayer. That has now been closed according to current Labour Government Defence Secretary John Healey, who on Tuesday admitted the catastrophic data breach. Everything about this whole shambolic affair stinks. To begin with, there is the utter incompetence of the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and its failure to safeguard all those in the dataset. READ MORE: 12 countries agree concrete steps to halt Gaza genocide Then there is the gagging of the press and the fact the super-injunction was allowed to continue to last for so long. All this before the unimaginable fear and pressure it must have placed on countless ordinary Afghans. Hard as it is to imagine, but the entire affair is on a par – if not surpasses – the betrayal meted out to Afghans back in 2021 as they were left to their fate at the hands of the Taliban. And before anyone simply lays the blame squarely on the previous Tory government, let's not forget that court documents revealed that the current Labour Government continued to defend the injunction after coming to power, citing national security concerns. What also sticks in the craw is that Healey this week told news outlets that 'most of those names on the list… didn't work alongside our forces, didn't serve with our forces, aren't eligible for the special scheme.' Healey also had the audacity to argue that their inclusion in the list did not automatically make them targets, citing an independent review which found it 'highly unlikely' that presence on the dataset increased the risk of Taliban reprisals. Really, Mr Healey, can you be absolutely sure of that? If the threat was so slight why then did both Tory then a Labour government tie themselves in knots adding to the cover-up of the leak? Are we actually supposed to take the word of UK Government officials – whose ineptitude appears to know no bounds – that they are categorically certain the Taliban did not benefit from the leak and target those inside the country related to those on the list? Justified as it is to focus on what led to the leak and the question over freedom of the press to report, it's vital to remember that at the core of this whole issue are people's lives and the terrifying threat they face daily from the barbarism of Taliban rule. Those in Westminster might think that the war in Afghanistan is over, but countless Afghans are still imperilled by its outcome – not least the country's women and girls. Rather than pulling out all the stops to make them safer – the least the UK could do after its earlier betrayal – it instead puts them in even greater danger than before. READ MORE: At least 20 Palestinians killed in stampede at food distribution centre Is it really beyond the intelligence of politicians – whatever their stripe – to put the obvious facts together and recognise the real reason why in 2023-24, Afghans topped the list of those trying to make that Channel crossing in small boats? For the bottom line here is that the UK screws up massively in terms of legal routes for legitimate Afghan asylum seekers to get here, while at the same time making their lives back in Afghanistan more dangerous than ever. What an indictment we have witnessed this week of the systems that are meant to protect the victims of war and oppression. There now needs to be a full independent inquiry into what by any standards is a scandalous affair on so many levels. In the meantime, should my Afghan friends once more be in touch seeking help, I will be more bereft than ever of offering any useful reply. I will also be hanging my head in shame at the UK's miserable betrayal – yet again.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
'Japanese First' party shakes up election with alarm over foreigners
TOKYO, July 16 (Reuters) - An upstart party is gaining support ahead of elections in Japan by railing against a 'silent invasion' of immigrants, pushing the government to tackle fears about foreigners as it drags into the mainstream rhetoric once confined to the political fringe. Birthed on YouTube during the COVID-19 pandemic spreading conspiracy theories about vaccinations and a cabal of global elites, the party, Sanseito, is widening its appeal with a 'Japanese First' campaign ahead of Sunday's upper house vote. And while polls show it may only secure 10 to 15 of the 125 seats up for grabs, it is further eroding the support of Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's shaky minority government increasingly beholden to opposition parties as it clings to power. "In the past, anyone who brought up immigration would be attacked by the left. We are getting bashed too, but are also gaining support," Sohei Kamiya, the party's 47-year-old charismatic leader, told Reuters in an interview. "The LDP and Komeito can't stay silent if they want to keep their support," Kamiya added, referring to Ishiba's Liberal Democratic Party, which has ruled Japan for most of the past seven decades, and its junior coalition partner. Kamiya's message has grabbed voters frustrated with a weak economy and currency that has lured tourists in record numbers in recent years, further driving up prices that Japanese can ill-afford, political analysts say. The fast-ageing society has also seen foreign-born residents hit a record of about 3.8 million last year, although that is still just 3% of the total population, a tiny fraction compared to numbers in the United States and Europe. Kamiya, a former supermarket manager and English teacher, says he has drawn inspiration from U.S. President Donald Trump's "bold political style". It remains to be seen whether he can follow the path of other far-right parties with which he has drawn comparisons, such as Germany's AFD and Reform UK. Yet the ingredients are there, said Jeffrey Hall, a lecturer at Tokyo's Kanda university who has studied Japan's right-wing politics, pointing to their online following, appeal among young men and warnings about immigration eroding indigenous cultures. "Anti-foreign sentiment that was considered maybe taboo to talk about so openly is now out of the box," he added. With immigration emerging as a top election issue, Ishiba this week unveiled a new government taskforce to fight "crimes and disorderly conduct" by foreign nationals and his party has promised to pursue "zero illegal foreigners". Polls show Ishiba's ruling coalition is likely to lose its majority in the upper house vote, in a repeat of elections last year in the more powerful lower house. While he is expected to limp on, his government may have to broaden its coalition or strike deals with other parties on policy matters, analysts say. Kamiya, who won the party's first seat in 2022 after having gained notoriety for appearing to call for Japan's emperor to take concubines, has tried to tone down some controversial ideas formerly embraced by the party. His election manifesto, for example, includes plans to cut taxes and increase child benefits, policies promoted by a raft of opposition parties that led investors to fret about Japan's fiscal health and massive debt pile. While Sanseito is the latest in a string of small far-right parties that have struggled for a foothold in Japan's staid politics, its online support suggests it may have staying power. Its YouTube channel has 400,000 followers, more than any other party on the platform and three times that of the LDP, according to There are still hurdles. Like right-wing parties in the U.S. and Europe, Sanseito support skews heavily toward men in their twenties and thirties. Kamiya is trying to widen its appeal by fielding several female candidates such as the single-named singer Saya seen as likely to clinch a seat in Tokyo. Earlier in the campaign, Kamiya faced a backlash for branding gender equality policies a mistake, as they encourage women to work and keep them from having children. "Maybe because I am hot-blooded, that resonates more with men," Kamiya replied to a question on the party's greater appeal to men.
Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
How could Japan's election affect economic policy?
July 17 (Reuters) - Japan's Liberal Democratic Party ruling coalition may lose its majority in the upper house in an election on Sunday, which could heighten calls for the government to boost spending and cut tax. Here is a guide on how the election outcome could affect Japan's fiscal and monetary policy: Recent media polls show the LDP coalition could lose its majority, heightening the risk of political instability when the country is struggling to strike a trade deal with the U.S., and stoking fears of an increase in debt. Japan's debt burden is the highest in the developed world at about 250% of GDP. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is regarded as a fiscal hawk, but concern over possible increased spending by parties to ensure political support on Tuesday pushed up bond yields to multi-decade highs. Yields may rise further if the chance of big spending or a sales tax cut increases. If the election loss is small, Ishiba could remain prime minister and seek opposition parties' cooperation to pass bills through parliament. Faced with a big defeat, Ishiba could step down and his party will hold a leadership race to choose a successor. Depending on the extent of loss, there is a slim chance a new premier could be chosen from an opposition party. Regardless of the election outcome, Japan will increase spending as Ishiba has pledged to offer cash payouts to households to ease the cost of living. The estimated 3.5 trillion yen ($23.6 billion) in payouts will be funded by tax revenues. But spending may balloon if the LDP coalition suffers a big loss, as it would heighten calls from within the party and opposition forces to take bolder steps to cushion rising living costs. Some analysts expect Japan to compile an extra budget around autumn this year to fund spending of at least 10 trillion yen, which will likely require additional debt issuance. Japan's sales tax rate is set at 10%, except for food items at 8%. Ishiba has shunned opposition calls to slash the sales tax, which funds social welfare costs for a rapidly ageing population. An election defeat could force Ishiba to cut sales tax, which would leave a huge hole in Japan's finances. Excluding proceeds from debt issuance, the sales tax is Japan's biggest source of revenue. In fiscal 2025, it collected 25 trillion yen, or 21.6% of total budget. Analysts say halving the tax rate would cut revenues by over 10 trillion yen. A sales tax cut will require passing legislation through parliament, so will not take place until April at the earliest. A worst-case scenario is a credit rating downgrade on Japan's sovereign debt, which could trigger a triple selling of bonds, yen and Japanese stocks - and boost the cost of dollar funding for Japanese banks. Moody's Ratings has said an increase in tax cut pressure could be negative for Japan's rating depending on the size and duration of the cut. It rates Japan A1, the fifth-highest level. The ruling coalition has given a quite nod to gradual interest rate hikes, as has the biggest opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan. If the clout of other smaller opposition parties increases, the BOJ could come under pressure to go slow in rate hikes. But the BOJ's long-term rate hike path is unlikely to be affected unless Ishiba is replaced by vocal advocates of bold monetary easing like Sanae Takaichi, who Ishiba narrowly defeated in a LDP leadership race last year. ($1 = 148.1800 yen)
