Taiwan Considers Tougher FX Rules for Foreigners Buying Stocks
The central bank is mulling a policy that requires international investors wanting to buy the island's stocks to show proof of orders before they can purchase the Taiwan dollar, said the people, who asked not to be identified as they aren't authorized to speak publicly. The currency conversion would then take place the following day, the people said.
The proposal is Taiwan's latest attempt to push back at the local currency's almost 14% rise against the greenback this year, which has squeezed insurers and hurt its export-reliant economy. Last month, it told foreign investors to exit currency bets taken through exchange-traded funds.
The proposed rule change would make it harder for foreign investors to use currency transfers to speculate on the Taiwan dollar. But it could also add a layer of risk to equity trades, creating a lag between when foreign funds agree to buy securities and when they actually have the local currency to pay for them.
The current rule is that foreign investors are allowed to request currency conversion on the day they place orders for Taiwanese equities, and they don't need to provide any proof of those orders, according to the people. The proposed rule change is possible because local stock trades have a settlement period of two days, they said.
The central bank has asked foreign custodian banks for feedback on the rule and will hold a meeting with a group of banks next week, the people said. Taiwan's central bank didn't respond to requests for comment.
Taiwanese officials have taken various steps to ease the surge against the dollar, including instructing some banks to delay exporters' dollar sales. Earlier this week. the government announced a task force to help exporters and small-and-medium sized companies mitigate the fallout of the currency move.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Japan says $550 billion package in trade deal could finance Taiwanese chipmaker in US
Japan's $550 billion investment package agreed in this week's US tariff deal could help finance a Taiwanese firm building semiconductor plants in the US, Japan's top trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa said on Saturday. Japan agreed to the sweeping US-bound investment initiative, which includes equity, loans and guarantees, in exchange for lower tariffs on its exports to the US. However, the structure of the scheme remains unclear. 'Japan, the United States, and like-minded countries are working together to build supply chains in sectors critical to economic security,' Akazawa told public broadcaster NHK. To that end, he said projects eligible for financing under the package are not limited to US or Japanese firms. 'For example, if a Taiwanese chipmaker builds a plant in the US and uses Japanese components or tailors its products to meet Japanese needs, that's fine too,' he said, without specifying companies. The US is significantly reliant on Taiwan's TSMC for advanced chip manufacturing, raising economic security concerns due to geographic proximity to China. TSMC announced plans for a $100 billion US investment with US President Donald Trump at the White House in March, on top of $65 billion pledged for three plants in the state of Arizona, one of which is up and running. Japan will use state-owned Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) and Nippon Export and Investment Insurance (NEXI) for the investments. A recent law revision has enabled JBIC to finance foreign companies deemed critical to Japan's supply chains. Akazawa told NHK that equity investment would account for just about 1-2% of the $550 billion, suggesting that the bulk will come in the form of loans and guarantees. When asked about the White House statement that the US would retain 90% of the profits from the package, he clarified that the figure refers only to returns on equity investment, which would represent a small fraction of the total. While Japan initially hoped to secure half of the returns, a loss from the concession on the profit-sharing would be marginal compared to the roughly 10 trillion yen ($67.72 billion) in tariff costs that could be avoided under the deal, he said. He added that Japan aims to deploy the $550 billion investments during Trump's current term.
Mint
14 hours ago
- Mint
Germany's Budget Cuts Leave Heavy Industry Stuck with Dirty Tech
(Bloomberg) -- In Geseke, a small town in Germany's western industrial heartland, plans to launch a large-scale carbon capture project at a local cement plant have been put on ice. Operator Heidelberg Materials AG had received European Union subsidies for the green project that's set to save 700,000 tons of carbon emissions annually, and planned to start construction next year. But the company — which last month started capturing and liquefying emissions in Norway — is no longer staking out a timeline for its German project because the conditions for a prompt, final investment decision aren't given. Germany's new conservative-led government has thrown its weight behind carbon capture and storage, touting it as a pragmatic path to meeting legally-binding climate goals in sectors that are hard to decarbonize. But while Chancellor Friedrich Merz has pledged to fast-track the technology by lifting regulatory barriers, the government's sweeping budget cuts are undercutting the very projects it says it supports. The result is a climate strategy caught between political convenience and fiscal restraint — leaving the country's most emissions-intensive industries facing a rising cost of carbon emissions in the coming years with German industry already struggling to stay in business. Berlin recently revived a draft proposal that was left unfinished by the previous government to legalize CCS. Yet funds for a clean industry program — which was developed to support everything from hydrogen to carbon capture — are set to be slashed to €1.8 billion ($2.1 billion) from €24.5 billion in the mid-term, according to this year's draft budget law that's currently being discussed in parliament. While the ruling coalition has promised to stick to the nation's 2045 climate neutrality goal, it's becoming increasingly unclear who will foot the bill. 'If the government deprioritizes funding for the decarbonization of industry, this would be by far the most problematic measure in terms of climate protection,' said Jens Burchardt, co-founder of Boston Consulting Group's Center for Climate and Sustainability. The nation's manufacturers are already struggling with layers of red tape, high energy prices and a shortage of skilled staff. They will come under additional pressure in the coming years as costs for polluting the environment increase. 'Against this backdrop, withdrawing the financial support companies need to invest in green alternatives at the same time is a recipe for the further deindustrialization of Germany,' said Burchardt. Swiss building materials specialist Holcim AG, which plans a carbon capture project near Hanover, said the budget cuts have led to uncertainty throughout the industry as to how decarbonization funding will continue overall. A representative for industry group Carbon Management Alliance said the cuts are a setback for climate targets. The government's key program to help clean up its heavy industries relies on an auction instrument to bridge the pricing difference between conventional processes and cleaner, more expensive alternatives. While a first auction last October awarded contracts to 15 projects, an economy ministry spokesperson said preparations for a potential second round were 'complex,' though it's technically possible for another to take place this year. One company that could be eligible to participate is Hamburg-based copper recycler Aurubis AG. It installed two hydrogen-ready anode furnaces last year, but with no hydrogen available at competitive prices, it continues to burn natural gas in its state-of-the-art ovens. At an energy conference last month, economy minister Katherina Reiche explained that the expected demand for hydrogen isn't materializing, or is very delayed. Meanwhile, the German budget envisions slashing two-thirds of the funding the previous administration allocated to hydrogen. Of course, the lack of state support isn't the only reason why decarbonization projects are stuck or failing. For example, when steelmaker ArcelorMittal SA last month announced it would hand back a €1.3 billion subsidy for two local green steel units, it pointed to 'unprecedented' market pressure, weak demand, unfavorable European policy and high electricity prices. That's an even bigger problem for the chemical industry in Germany which is facing factory closures, layoffs and production cuts. 'I can only spend every euro once,' said Martin Naundorf from Infraleuna GmbH, operator of a chemical hub in the country's east. Given the current conditions, 'nobody can afford to invest in technologies where it's unclear when they'll become profitable.' However, the state could also change its procurement strategy to help climate technologies reach market maturity, a measure the coalition already agreed upon. Steelmaker Stahl-Holding-Saar GmbH is one company that would benefit from that approach. It says it's the only European rolling mill to offer CO2-reduced rails, for which the steel was produced with electricity instead of coal. The firm already concluded supply contracts with France's SNCF Réseau, Belgium's Infrabel and Swiss Railways, but hasn't received interest from any Germany customer, according to Chief Transformation Officer Jonathan Weber. Major industrial competitors, such as China, are investing massively in new technologies to help manufacturers decarbonize, said Julia Metz, director of think tank Agora Industry. 'If Germany wants to keep up, it must not miss the boat and must invest massive amounts of money in new climate protection technologies.' More stories like this are available on
Mint
18 hours ago
- Mint
NASA Says Thousands of Employees Set to Resign from Space Agency
(Bloomberg) -- NASA will lose roughly 3,870 employees through a voluntary resignation program, part of a broad push from President Donald Trump's administration to reduce the federal workforce. The numbers are subject to change as NASA reviews applications, including if an employee withdraws from the program or a resignation isn't approved, the US space agency said in a statement on Friday. 'Safety remains a top priority for our agency as we balance the need to become a more streamlined and more efficient organization and work to ensure we remain fully capable of pursuing a Golden Era of exploration and innovation, including to the Moon and Mars,' NASA said. NASA has offered employees two separate opportunities in 2025 to leave through the government's Deferred Resignation Program. The agency said its expected remaining civil servant workforce would be about 14,000 people, following both resignation programs, as well as normal attrition of about 500 people over the same time period. The first round came during the start of the Trump administration when federal workers received emails offering them the opportunity to take a buyout, an effort spearheaded by the Elon Musk-helmed Department of Government Efficiency. About 870 people, or 4.8% of the NASA workforce, took the offer then. NASA initiated its own second round of deferred resignation beginning in early June, with a deadline to opt in by July 25. About 3,000 personnel, or 16.4% of the workforce, took it up, the agency said Friday. Executives at the space agency, who have been working to reduce headcount to comply with the Trump administration's goal of shrinking the federal workforce, have spearheaded deferred resignation as a way to avoid layoffs. 'The reason we are doing this is to minimize any involuntary workforce reductions in the future,' NASA's former acting administrator Janet Petro said during an agency town hall on June 25, according to an audio recording obtained by Bloomberg. 'That is our whole goal, minimizing that.' NASA had sought a 'blanket waiver' in February to save all of the agency's probationary employees from layoffs. The prospect of a mass exodus of employees from NASA has raised alarm bells within the industry and at the agency, with some experts arguing that the the cuts will cause NASA to lose some of its best talent. In a letter to newly appointed NASA interim administrator Sean Duffy titled 'The Voyager Declaration,' hundreds of former and current employees warned Duffy, who is also the head of the Transportation Department, that workforce reductions could jeopardize the safety and efficiency of operations. 'Thousands of NASA civil servant employees have already been terminated, resigned or retired early, taking with them highly specialized, irreplaceable knowledge crucial to carrying out NASA's mission,' they wrote in the letter to Duffy. More stories like this are available on
