logo
Pressed to confess: Japan's ‘hostage justice' under fire as man spends six years in solitary without conviction

Pressed to confess: Japan's ‘hostage justice' under fire as man spends six years in solitary without conviction

Malay Mail07-07-2025
TOKYO, July 8 — Yo Amano says he is unravelling in a cell where he has been confined alone almost 24 hours a day for over six years, despite not having been convicted of the fraud charges against him.
In Japan's harsh criminal justice system, critics say innocence is not presumed and coerced confessions help drive the 99 percent conviction rate.
'From the moment I was arrested, I've been treated like I'm a prisoner,' Amano, 36, told AFP through a glass screen at the Tokyo Detention Centre, where he is held alongside people convicted of violent crimes, including death-row inmates.
'I'm sure something is wrong with me mentally, but I can't tell for sure because I can't even get a decent medical diagnosis here,' he said.
Campaigners argue that lengthy pre-trial detention is meted out too easily in Japan, especially if suspects remain silent or refuse to confess.
That often makes confessions a de-facto condition for their release, one that rights groups say exists in few other liberal democracies.
This alleged use of confinement as a way to elicit confessions—or 'hostage justice'—is under renewed scrutiny after a group of victims recently filed a lawsuit challenging its constitutionality.
Lawyer Takashi Takano, who spearheads the suit, slammed the 'completely inverted chronology'.
In Japan, 'if you contest your charges, your bail is denied and detention drags on. You get punished and robbed of everything first, sometimes before the trial even begins, followed finally by a verdict,' he told AFP.
AFP obtained rare, court-issued approval to speak to Amano, who denies the charges against him.
Since his 2018 arrest, he has been locked up incommunicado, having 'lost everything', including his job, partner and mental health.
In summer, what little coolness there is in the detention facility filters through a small food slot into Amano's sweltering cell.
Three tatami mats fill the floor space, and there is no air conditioning.
For most of the day, Amano is not allowed to lie down or lean against a wall, so he spends hours sitting on a mat.
The former restaurant owner says he has lost 30 kilogrammes (66 pounds) since his arrest.
He can only contact his lawyers and is denied access to anyone else, including family, barring rare exceptions.
This has left him estranged from the 'daughter I doted on', now seven years old, and whom he last saw in 2019.
'I don't know if she still remembers me.'
This picture taken on May 16, 2025 shows Tomoya Asanuma, who endured almost four months of detention for charges including assault that he was ultimately acquitted of in January, playing with his pet ferret at his apartment during an interview with AFP in Tokyo. — AFP pic
'Extracting confessions'
'Hostage justice'—a term popularised by ex-Nissan chief Carlos Ghosn's months-long, 2018-2019 detention—has been repeatedly decried by international rights bodies.
The latest lawsuit challenges judges' ability to 'rubber-stamp' detentions, and to reject bail without demonstrating 'probable cause' that evidence will be destroyed, according to lawyer Takano.
In Japan, pre-indictment detention can last up to 23 days, extendable by multiple rearrests.
Only after indictment does bail become possible, but as with Amano, the option is often dismissed if the accused denies the charges, campaigners say.
Judicial data from 2021 shows that those who confessed were released much more quickly than those who denied the charges.
'In Japan, refusing to confess or remaining silent is seen as high-risk behaviour of someone likely to destroy evidence,' Kana Sasakura, a criminal law professor at Konan University, told AFP.
Furthermore, detainees are typically interrogated without attorneys—a stark contrast to most Group of Seven and East Asian democracies—which makes it harder to withstand the pressure of questioning.
This, coupled with gruelling confinement, attests to Japan's overall reliance on confessions, Sasakura noted.
'It's a structure where, by conducting interrogations behind closed doors and isolating the suspect from the outside world, extracting confessions is made easier,' she said.
'Fair' system
The justice ministry told AFP that 'prolonged detention solely on the grounds of remaining silent or denying charges isn't occurring'.
'We don't use physical detention to force confessions,' it added, defending Japan's 'fair' and 'evidence-based' system.
But Tomoya Asanuma, another plaintiff in the suit, recalls almost cracking under the strain.
Last year, the 36-year-old transgender activist endured almost four months of detention for charges including assault that he was ultimately acquitted of in January.
'Detectives would tell me, 'confess already, and we don't have to interrogate you so many times,'' Asanuma told AFP of the frequent, hours-long questioning.
Life under constant surveillance, including when he bathed or relieved himself, was a source of extra humiliation as his body still retained biologically female characteristics.
'The thought repeatedly crossed my mind that if I falsely confessed, I can maybe escape all this,' he said.
'Won't betray their trust'
And therein lies the secret to Japan's astonishing 99-percent conviction rate, lawyer Takano argues.
'After such endless interrogations, most people break and confess,' leading to statements adopted by courts as evidence, he said.
A case in point is Iwao Hakamada, who was once the world's longest-serving death-row inmate. His convictions—quashed last year—relied partly on confessions made during what the Supreme Court ruled were 'inhumane' interrogations.
'That's what undergirds the '99-percent' conviction rate. But do you really trust such guilty verdicts?' Takano said.
In his cell with an exposed toilet, Amano languishes with little sense of the time or weather outside.
The light remains on after bedtime, but he is not allowed to cover his face with bedding.
But still he will not confess.
'If I succumb now and choose an easy way out, I would disappoint people who still support me,' he said.
'I won't betray their trust.' — AFP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cancel culture is just public shaming with wi-fi — Hanan Addeena Arman
Cancel culture is just public shaming with wi-fi — Hanan Addeena Arman

Malay Mail

time3 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

Cancel culture is just public shaming with wi-fi — Hanan Addeena Arman

JULY 21 — We all make mistakes. Some big, some small. But now, thanks to social media, a single wrong move can become a viral moment—and sometimes, it ruins lives. That's the reality of cancel culture. At first, cancel culture seemed like a good thing. It gave power to the people. When big celebrities or companies did something offensive or harmful, they were finally held accountable. No more sweeping things under the rug. It felt like justice. But somewhere along the way, cancel culture stopped being about accountability. Now, it often feels more like public punishment. Social media acts like judge and jury, with millions of people piling on, calling names, and demanding consequences—without context, without facts, and most importantly, without compassion. And it's not just celebrities anymore. It's random people, too. Regular folks caught on camera during a bad moment. Like that schoolboy who once ate on the MRT train. He was probably hungry, maybe just had a long day, and made a small mistake. But someone decided to film him, post it, and let the internet chew him up. His face and actions were shown to thousands—maybe millions. All because he brought food on public transport. He's a teenager. A kid. Not a criminal. But people online don't care. They just want something to be angry about. This is the scary part of cancel culture. It makes us forget that the people we're attacking are human. They have feelings, families, and personal struggles we'll never know. It turns the internet into a place where people feel afraid to speak, afraid to act, afraid to be imperfect. Of course, some actions deserve to be called out. Racism, abuse, corruption—those things shouldn't be ignored. But there's a big difference between calling something out and tearing someone down. Accountability means giving people a chance to understand, apologize, and grow. The scary part of cancel culture is that it makes us forget that the people we're attacking are human with feelings, families, and personal struggles and the internet into a place where people feel afraid to speak, afraid to act, afraid to be imperfect. — Unsplash pic Cancel culture doesn't always leave space for that. It's more like, 'You messed up. You're done. Forever.' And what message does that send? That people can't change? That one mistake defines your whole life? Even worse, cancel culture can silence important conversations. People stop sharing opinions or asking questions out of fear they'll say the wrong thing and be 'cancelled.' It creates a culture of fear instead of one of learning. And when we're too scared to talk, how can we grow? The media plays a huge role in this too. News outlets love stories that spark outrage. Headlines are designed to grab attention, not to explain. And when a person is being dragged online, the media often joins in instead of helping people understand the full story. The more clicks, the better. But at what cost? We need to start bringing empathy back into the conversation. Before we share that video, before we comment on something cruel, before we hit repost—ask: Who is this person? What's the full story? Are they really a villain, or just someone who made a mistake? Social media is powerful. It can expose injustice, uplift voices, and create change. But when it's used to destroy instead of educate, to shame instead of understand, we all lose. Everyone deserves a second chance. Everyone deserves to be seen as more than their worst moment. So maybe instead of cancelling people, we start teaching. Listening. Forgiving. Because a kinder internet starts with each of us choosing empathy over outrage. *The author is an undergraduate student of Universiti Malaya, taking an elective university course entitled 'Introduction to Journalism and Storytelling in Digital Age', and may be contacted via [email protected] ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.

4 drug dealers nabbed in raid on private party in Subang Jaya
4 drug dealers nabbed in raid on private party in Subang Jaya

Free Malaysia Today

time3 hours ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

4 drug dealers nabbed in raid on private party in Subang Jaya

Subang Jaya police chief Wan Azlan Wan Mamat said 12 of those arrested tested positive for drug use. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : A police raid on a private party by college and university students at a bungalow in Subang Jaya early this morning saw the arrests of four drug dealers. Subang Jaya police chief Wan Azlan Wan Mamat said police checked 38 people – 25 Malaysians and 13 foreigners – in the 12.30am raid. 'The majority of them were between 18 and 27 years old and were college and university students,' Kosmo reported him as saying. He said police arrested four men between 21 and 25 years, all Malaysians, for suspected involvement in drug distribution. 'Also seized were 6.5g of marijuana and 1.7g of ketamine,' he said. Wan Azlan said all those arrested were brought to the Subang Jaya police headquarters for urine tests, and 12 of them – nine Malaysians and three foreigners – tested positive for drug use. 'They have all been detained for further investigation,' he said.

Transport Ministry to tighten bus safety rules for broader enforcement after fatal UPSI crash, says Fahmi
Transport Ministry to tighten bus safety rules for broader enforcement after fatal UPSI crash, says Fahmi

Malay Mail

time3 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

Transport Ministry to tighten bus safety rules for broader enforcement after fatal UPSI crash, says Fahmi

KUALA LUMPUR, July 21 — The Transport Ministry will roll out stronger bus safety enforcement measures following a deadly crash last month that killed 15 Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI) students, Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil said today. He said Transport Minister Anthony Loke had presented preliminary findings of the incident during the Cabinet meeting last Friday, and that enforcement actions would follow soon. 'Last Friday, the Cabinet discussed the findings of the preliminary report presented by the Transport Minister. Among the matters to be followed up by the Ministry of Transport are enforcement actions, not only against those directly responsible, but also a broader review of safety aspects concerning bus drivers,' he said. 'God willing, the transport minister will soon implement more coordinated, structured, and comprehensive enforcement measures to ensure that, should any issues arise involving bus drivers, early action can be taken,' he told a press conference at Parliament today. Last Saturday, the Road Transport Department (JPJ) said it was detailing additional action to be taken against the express bus operator involved in the incident. JPJ director-general Datuk Aedy Fadly Ramli said based on initial findings, the issue needed to be tackled comprehensively, involving not only JPJ and the police but also other relevant agencies. He said this would ensure a more effective road safety system across the country. The preliminary report revealed that the bus had been travelling at twice the permitted speed limit, which was one of the causes of the crash.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store