logo
‘Harry still doesn't like being controlled': Royal family warned Prince Harry ‘won't change' after olive branch

‘Harry still doesn't like being controlled': Royal family warned Prince Harry ‘won't change' after olive branch

Sky News AU5 days ago
A Sussex insider has warned the royal family that Prince Harry 'won't change' his ways amid reports the Duke of Sussex is planning to sit down with the King.
Speculation the rift between Harry and King Charles is finally starting to mend has ramped up in recent weeks after five years of public betrayals by the Sussexes.
A fortnight ago, Harry's new chief communications officer Meredith Maines and UK-based PR rep Liam Maguire were photographed meeting with the King's top aide, Communications Secretary Tobyn Andreae, near Clarence House.
The meeting, first revealed by The Mail on Sunday, reportedly had "no formal agenda" but there were "things both sides wanted to talk about".
According to an insider who spoke to the same outlet, the meeting marked a turning point for the Sussexes, who have often been accused of timing publicity stunts to overshadow royal occasions.
Harry and Meghan's penchant for conveniently timing their cash-grabs with royal events began in the months following Queen Elizabeth II's death in 2022.
Since then, scarcely a Trooping the Colour or royal tour has gone by without Harry or Meghan dropping a media grenade on the same day.
'Before that meeting between their aides in London, conflicts of interest or clashes of publicity were relished and even perhaps encouraged by the Sussexes,' the insider told The Mail On Sunday.
'Now, Harry has shifted into a new way of thinking.
'The tone is now all about 'deconflicting' with his family.
'That's why his household agreed to draw up a 'grid' of his activities and share them with Buckingham Palace, and by extension with Kensington Palace.'
However, the source warned Buckingham Palace that Harry's 'olive branch' did not indicate the Duke of Sussex is open to working directly with Buckingham Palace.
'Harry still doesn't like being controlled by the Royal machinery, and that won't change,' the source said.
The report comes after another Sussex insider told Woman's Day that Harry is prepared to reconcile with his father without Markle's support.
'(Harry) reluctantly accepts his family hate (Meghan) so there's no sense involving her in peace talks because they'd turn him down flat if he were to try,' the source said.
'So Harry's new tactic is to do this solo. He's willing to fly to the UK, set up mediation meetings, whatever they'll agree to.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meghan's ex-BFF Jessica Mulroney ‘regrets' friendship amid marriage split: report
Meghan's ex-BFF Jessica Mulroney ‘regrets' friendship amid marriage split: report

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

Meghan's ex-BFF Jessica Mulroney ‘regrets' friendship amid marriage split: report

IN LONDON The Duchess of Sussex's former BFF Jessica Mulroney 'somewhat regrets' their friendship, according to a new report. It emerged this week that the Canadian stylist, 45, is divorcing her husband, Ben, after 16 years of marriage – and according to the Daily Mail, the scrutiny that came with her association to the Duchess of Sussex had 'later caused tensions … in her marriage'. The two women had been best friends for years after meeting in Canada, where Jessica had introduced Meghan – who was then based in Toronto while filming Suits – to the city's glittering social scene. They remained close during the early stages of her relationship with her future husband, and Jessica and Ben's children – twins Brian and John and daughter Ivy – even served as page boys and bridesmaid at their royal wedding in 2018. However, the friendship appeared to sour following Jessica's 'white-privilege' scandal in 2020, where the stylist was axed from both her TV gigs following her racially charged spat with black lifestyle blogger Sasha Exeter. Amid the rampant online — and professional — backlash, Jessica issued an apology and Ben quit his job as a television presenter to help her. 'If [Jessica] could go back, a part of her wishes she was never part of [Markle and Prince Harry's 2018] wedding,' an insider alleged to the Mail on Friday. 'While she enjoyed all the exposure it brought her at the time, that same exposure is what caused her social media rift to blow up in the way it did and led to the end of her friendship with Meghan and her marriage.' Sources further alleged that while Jessica 'did consider Meghan family' at one point, she now reportedly 'sees that whole time as a 'dark cloud.' Back when the scandal broke, it was reported that Meghan reacted with shock after hearing of Jessica's 'tone deaf' threats to sue Exeter, and swiftly decided she can 'no longer be associated with her'. 'Meghan is absolutely mortified that she's been dragged into this complete mess. She said Jessica is in no way a racist, but the way she handled the situation was tone deaf and heartbreaking,' a friend of Meghan's told the Daily Mail at the time. In 2020, Exeter publicly blasted Jessica in an emotional 12-minute Instagram video, describing how she had threatened her during an argument about 'speaking up' against racism and had left her feeling 'paralysed in fear'. Exeter claimed that Jessica had 'taken offence to a very generic call to action' posted online, causing the women to engage in an argument about racism and white privilege. Exeter then claimed that Jessica had sent her a series of offensive messages, which ended with a threat to her livelihood. Jessica herself commented on the video to apologise, and alluded to her friendship with Meghan, who has been at the centre of racist attacks since she began dating Prince Harry in 2016. 'I am unequivocally sorry for not doing that with you and for any hurt I've caused. As I told you privately, I have lived a very public and personal experience with my closest friend where race was front and centre,' she wrote. 'It was deeply educational. I learned a lot from that. I promise to continue to learn and listen on how I can use my privilege to elevate and support black voices.' However, Exeter then shared a screenshot on her Instagram story of a private message sent by Jessica shortly after her public apology, which appeared to confirm her intent to sue for 'liable' (sic). Jessica was subsequently dropped from featuring as an expert on a daytime lifestyle show and Meanwhile, Page Six reported on Tuesday about Jessica and Ben's split, alleging they'd broken up 'some time ago'. The publication added that Jessica shared the news with fellow guests at a recent Toronto wedding, with a source claiming she 'seemed sad, but also relieved to have some clarity'.

Startling rise of the super wedding
Startling rise of the super wedding

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Startling rise of the super wedding

The British village of Great Tew, population 162, is nearly universally described as 'sleepy'. The surrounding area might be home to the UK's best pie (pheasant and ham) and starriest new titleholders (Sir David and Lady Victoria Beckham) but still, it's a generally snoozy part of the world. Unless, that is, you were visiting last weekend. Dozens of American Secret Service agents swarmed about the place, blacked out SUVs were parked outside a quaint pub and former military personnel were busy putting up screens around a church. Inside the 11th century Saint Michael and All Angels lavish floral arrangements involving tree branches along with Persian rugs and 'tentlike' red curtains were reportedly being installed. For a good 72 hours there Great Tew was the stage for the latest billionaire must-have – the super wedding. The last six weeks have seen the emergence of something wholly new, uber 'I do's, which would have once only been covered by the society pages have instead become mass showbiz events in and of their own right like Oscars night or Glastonbury. They are power statements. Since mid June there have been three super weddings in three countries costing an estimated $96 million, impossible-to-avoid, grand multi-day festival-like demonstrations of wealth and connections, modern power statements of seven figure rose arches so extravagant they can probably be seen by orbiting satellites, and all of which has been breathlessly covered by the entertainment press. These nuptials have brought together concentric circles of extreme clout (Hollywood, Wall Street, Washington) while the multi-billionaire brides and grooms have demonstrated Kardashian-ish social media tendencies and the Daily Mail, Hello and People panted to keep up. We are in a strange place right now where billionaires now seem to want to be influencers and reality stars are becoming billionaires and us regular Joe Blows can watch live from our daggy sofas getting minute-by-minute updates about weddings of people who use Davos as a verb. Rich people a hitchin' is nothing new but this crop of 'I do's' is something different, bringing together tech royalty, fashion designer royalty, real royalty, the obscenely rich, Oscar winners, Victoria's Secret models, billionaire nepo babies, Olympic athletes, US presidential candidates, a former President, a former Vice President, a former US Secretary of State, five Kardashian/Jenners and Anna Wintour and engulfing social media feeds. First in mid-June, Alex Soros, son of George Soros, wed former Hillary Clinton right-hand-woman and Democrat powerbroker Huma Abedin in the Hamptons. The groom's family are worth $11 billion (and have donated $28 billion to their foundation) and invitees included Sienna Miller, Jennifer Lawrence, Mariska Hargitay, Jimmy Fallon, Adrien Brody, Nicky Hilton Rothschild, Diane von Furstenberg, Tory Burch, Karlie Kloss, three Clintons (Bill, Hilary and Chelsea), former Vice President Kamala Harris and La Wintour herself. Vogue ran the exclusive. Then, two weeks later, the love-in moved to Venice where Amazon's Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez Bezos walked down the aisle. The groom has about $200 billion and their guest list included Oprah Winfrey, Leonardo DiCaprio, Tom Brady, Bill Gates, four Kardashian/Jenners, Usher, Orlando Bloom, Queen Rania of Jordan, Sydney Sweeney, Jessica Alba, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Ellie Goulding, and Von Furstenberg and Kloss again. Vogue? They got the exclusive of course. And most recently, we arrive in Great Tew where Eve Jobs, daughter of the late Steve Jobs, whose mother Laurene Powell Jobs is worth about $17.5 billion, married British Olympic gold medal winning equestrian star Harry Charles, with Jennifer Gates Nassar (daughter of Bill), Jessica Springsteen (daughter of Bruce), Kourtney Kardashian and Harris watching on. (Kloss, Harris and Von Furstenberg must be foot sore from dancing to The Nutbush and entirely sick of slices of elderflower sponge by about now.) Billionaires have, just like us, always found love. They have dated, mated up and decided to lock it down since fortunes were being measured in nice shells or a few chunky bronze ingots. Also, displays of wealth are as old as time. (Have I mentioned how many ingots I have?) However, these weddings feel like something different entirely. Not that long ago the I do's of business elites would not have registered outside of the highest social and finance echelons and yet now these couples are being feted and obsessed over like regular flavour celebrities: A swarming flotilla of paps tracked the Bezos-Sanchez nuptials and their guests across Venice; Hello devoted a team of four people to live blogging Jobs' big day; and Abedin and Sanchez both enjoyed the lavish Vogue treatment. These billionaire celebrities now wield a certain power over pop culture and the Zeitgeist and are not exactly publicity shy. They are, on their own terms, happy to play at occasionally being stars (either via inviting certain cameras in or at times posting on social media) when once 0.001 percenters would have sniffily scurried away from such showmanship. I'm not sure ever before we've had events that are being simultaneously eagerly covered by The Wall Street Journal and TMZ. What a time to be alive. For us, for Anna Wintour, and for the sugared almond industry.

Princess Anne's son, Peter Phillips, drops huge personal announcement
Princess Anne's son, Peter Phillips, drops huge personal announcement

News.com.au

time4 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Princess Anne's son, Peter Phillips, drops huge personal announcement

IN LONDON The King's nephew Peter Phillips has announced his engagement, four years after his divorce from ex-wife Autumn Kelly. Peter, who is Princess Anne's son and cousin to Prince William and Prince Harry, confirmed on Friday, UK time, that he is set to marry National Health Service nurse Harriet Sperling after one year of dating. Both King Charles and William are said to have been given the news before the official announcement and are delighted for the couple. 'Mr Peter Phillips, the son of HRH The Princess Royal and Captain Mark Phillips and Ms Harriet Sperling, daughter of the late Mr Rupert Sanders and Mrs Mary Sanders of Gloucestershire, have today confirmed their official engagement,' a statement released on their behalf read. 'Both families were informed jointly of the announcement and were delighted with the wonderful news of their engagement. Their Majesties The King and Queen, The Prince and Princess of Wales have been informed of the announcement. No date has been officially set for the wedding.' Peter and Harriet made their public debut as a couple at the Badminton Horse Trials, where Harriet was spotted chatting with Peter's mum, Anne, and sister, Zara. They've since attended a number of events together including Wimbledon and this year's Royal Ascot, where Harriet was included in the royal carriage procession. Harriet has a child, Georgia, from a previous relationship, while Peter shares daughters Isla and Savannah with Autumn, whom he was married to for 12 years. Peter and his former wife separated in late 2019, sharing the news publicly in 2020 in an emotional statement. 'While this is a sad day for Peter and Autumn, they continue to put the wellbeing and upbringing of their wonderful daughters Savannah and Isla first and foremost,' it read. 'Both Peter and Autumn are pleased to have resolved matters amicably with the children firmly at the forefront of those thoughts and decisions. Peter and Autumn have requested privacy and consideration for their children as the family adapts to a new chapter in their lives.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store