logo
N.S. housing construction starts must double for next decade to restore affordability: CMHC

N.S. housing construction starts must double for next decade to restore affordability: CMHC

CBC22-07-2025
The pace of housing construction starts in Nova Scotia needs to more than double for the next decade in order to restore affordability to pre-pandemic levels, according to a recent Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation report.
Canada's housing agency estimates that the province's current rate of housing starts is about 5,400 a year. According to the report, Nova Scotia will need to average more than 12,500 starts annually between 2025 and 2035.
"We need [supply for] rental, we need home ownership, we need everything across the board," said CMHC deputy chief economist Aled ab Iorwerth.
He said it will be a challenge to hit the housing starts needed. In the last few years, people in the construction industry have reported labour shortages that are having an impact on projects.
"It's a stretch goal, but that's why we need everybody [governments and the private sector] to work together on this," ab Iorwerth said.
He said governments need to make development processes more efficient while builders and developers need to find ways to improve productivity through approaches like prefab manufacturing.
The CMHC's latest update on housing supply gaps looks at what it would take to return house prices to being either no higher than 30 per cent of average gross household income or no higher than 2019 levels in less affordable regions.
The report's regional breakdowns show Ontario and Nova Scotia have the most significant supply gaps by province, while Montreal faces the largest gap of any major city.
Affordable housing researcher Catherine Leviten-Reid said the type of housing we build in the future matters and isn't something addressed in the report.
Some experts, including Leviten-Reid, have said more non-market housing like those owned by governments or non-profits is needed to ensure a more affordable housing system.
"Those providers are not profit-seeking and so they're not going to be charging the same kind of high rents as our for-profit housing developers are," said Leviten-Reid, an associate professor at Cape Breton University.
"Why not tackle the affordability issue by increasing supply specifically within those non-market sectors?"
Leviten-Reid added that regulations should also be considered, like vacancy control to prevent affordable apartments from being pushed to much higher market rents when new tenants move in.
Ab Iorwerth agrees more support is needed for low-income households, adding that "middle-class Canadians are also feeling the pinch and more housing is needed to get them … back to affordability."
If Nova Scotia can ramp up housing construction, the CMHC estimates home prices could fall from an average of about $511,000 to under $406,000 by the end of 2035. Rents could be six per cent lower than where they're currently projected to be by that time.
The CMHC has changed its target of affordability when making projections about supply gaps.
"Restoring affordability to levels last seen two decades ago isn't realistic, especially after the post-pandemic price surge," the report said.
It notes the new threshold of restoring affordability to pre-pandemic levels is not an official government target, but illustrates the scale of the challenge of making housing affordable.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sask. premier, industry leaders, highlight nuclear energy among tariff concerns
Sask. premier, industry leaders, highlight nuclear energy among tariff concerns

CTV News

time44 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Sask. premier, industry leaders, highlight nuclear energy among tariff concerns

As Hallee Mandryk tells us, Premier Moe answered questions alongside industry leaders about the importance of nuclear energy amid U.S. tariffs. The future of nuclear energy in the midst of a trade war proved to be a particularly timely discussion at the Midwestern Legislative Conference (MLC) Tuesday morning. Lawmakers from four provinces and eleven states have gathered in Saskatoon for the annual event, and the 'Fueling North America's Energy Sector' panel featured industry leaders and lawmakers discussing the future of energy. '[There's] no better place to have that broader, longer-term discussion on our collective energy security. We will find our way through this trade tariff discussion. I'm concerned that it's going to get tougher before it gets better,' Premier Scott Moe told media following the panel. 'But we need to find our way through it so that we can get back to doing what we do best, and that's trade with products north and south of the 49th parallel.' Much of the panel was spent discussing how North America is shifting towards nuclear energy. Cameco CEO Tim Gitzel was also on the panel, and shared how while the tariffs are a barrier, they are not a roadblock. 'We know we need electricity whether there's tariffs or not. The world and North America needs a lot more electricity, and so we continue to work on that. And, we're getting great cooperation between Canada and the U.S. on nuclear electricity, and so we'll continue,' Gitzel said. While Canada/U.S. relations have been strained since President Donald Trump imposed tariffs, the conference provided an opportunity for officials on both sides of the border to discuss the relationship between the two countries. 'For many of us, it's been embarrassing ... kind of horrific knowing that for years I've spent my whole life 60 years we have seen Canada as a very close ally,' Ann Johnson Stewart, a state senator from Minnesota said. 'Many of my friends are from Canada. We go to Canada. You know, I live in Minnesota, so I really appreciated what [the] premier said about we just need to push forward.' The state senator highlighted that this conference is an opportunity to build cross border relationships away from the shadow of the White House. 'We need to get back to ignoring the politics and ridiculous things coming out of Washington and work forward towards more collaboration, especially around energy. Johnson Stewart added. Both industry leaders and politicians agreed that the demand for energy is as important as ever, thanks to the rise of new technology such as artificial intelligence – which requires an immense amount of electricity. 'You need baseload 24/7 reliable power – and that's got to be hydro or nuclear or gas and so we're going to need all of the above,' Gitzel said. The discussion highlighted a desire for nuclear energy not only in Saskatchewan – but also for North America to become the main producer of nuclear technology and fuel for other nations. 'This is what makes free and free and fair trade between Canada and the U.S. such an advantage for us when it comes to determining our own future with energy security or general security,' Moe noted. '[But it] also provides us with the opportunity then to cost effectively export this type of technology to places like Western Europe where they're trying to move away from Russian reactors.'

Am I Financially Ruined at 23 With $96,000 in Debt and Just a $75,000 Salary?
Am I Financially Ruined at 23 With $96,000 in Debt and Just a $75,000 Salary?

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

Am I Financially Ruined at 23 With $96,000 in Debt and Just a $75,000 Salary?

Key Points If you're deep in debt, you can probably still dig yourself out of it. Being very young can help your situation a lot, too. A bright financial future can lie ahead if you start making some smart moves. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › As always, The Motley Fool cannot and does not provide personalized investing or financial advice. This information is for informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional financial advice. Always seek the guidance of a qualified financial advisor for any questions regarding your personal financial situation. If you'd like to submit your question for feedback, you can do so here. Many of us occasionally worry that we're not doing a good job of saving and investing for the future -- something that is vital to do. A 2024 survey by SoFi Technologies found that 17% of respondents have no retirement savings and about 60% have saved less than $50,000. And per a 2024 Bankrate survey, fully 57% of American workers feel behind on their retirement savings. But not everyone who's worried should be worried. Someone on Reddit, for example, asked whether she was financially ruined -- at age 23 -- because she is in debt to the tune of $96,000. Here's a look at that question. A worried young person asks... The Redditor said: Am I Cooked? I'm 23 and 96k in debt. by u/Little-Bass0600 in personalfinance To summarize, the questioner is nearly 24 years old and has just started her first job, earning a salary of $75,000. She's living at home and has no savings. Her plan is to switch into a cheaper car as soon as she can and live on a strict budget, to help her pay down her debt. Is the poster really "cooked"? The questioner wonders whether she's "cooked." Many people responded to the post, with one person explaining that the situation might be "sizzling," but she's not cooked. That's very true. Here's why: The poster is very young, with lots of time to fix her problem and improve her financial condition. By living at home, presumably with her parents, she should have a low living costs; this allows her to used much (or most) of her earnings to pay down debt. (If her parents aren't charging anything for rent or food, the questioner is especially well situated.) One issue, the $36,642 in car loans, might be addressed relatively quickly by switching from a presumably expensive vehicle to a less costly one. Getting out of debt Many, many people are deep in debt, and many have paid off much greater sums than $96,000, even while earning less than $75,000 and even while living on their own and raising a family. It's almost surprising what we can accomplish when we're determined enough. There are many ways to pay off debts. Here are a few: Use balance-transfer cards: You might move some or all of your credit card debt to a new balance-transfer credit card that offers a 0% interest rate for an introductory period (which could be a year and a half, or potentially more). Once you do so, aim to pay off that debt within the introductory period. Start paying off your highest-interest-rate debts first because that will help you save the most in interest payments. Alternatively, pay off your smallest debts first, just to get rid of them and reduce the number of debts you have. This can be satisfying psychologically. Tap your home's equity, if you own one: If you know you will be disciplined about paying off your debt and you have some home equity you can borrow against, you might do so in order to pay off higher-interest-rate debts. There are other ways to tackle debt, too -- including just calling up your credit card lender and asking for a lower rate. A little digging online can turn up additional debt-reduction strategies. What else should the poster do? As this young questioner pays off her debt, what else might she do? Well, the advice below is for her and for us older folks, as well: Aim to live below your means, spending less than you bring in. This will leave you with extra earnings that can be used for savings and investments. A side hustle can be a big help, too. Build an emergency fund, so that you can stay afloat in the event of a job loss or costly setback. Read up on how to invest. Young people are in a particularly great position when it comes to investing in the stock market because their dollars have a long time in which to grow. Open an account at a good brokerage and start investing! The original questioner is actually in a pretty good place, having recognized and spelled out her financial problems and taken steps to start solving them. In a few years' time, she will likely be debt-free and have some money saved for her future. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these strategies.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store