logo
SpaceX's Starship Flight 9 ends in failure after booster loss: 'Success comes from what we learn'

SpaceX's Starship Flight 9 ends in failure after booster loss: 'Success comes from what we learn'

Yahoo28-05-2025
SpaceX's ninth test flight of its Starship spacecraft, launched on May 27 from the company's Starbase facility in Texas, ended in failure shortly after liftoff. The mission aimed to deploy eight Starlink simulator satellites and test the vehicle's reentry system with 100 removed heat-shield tiles.
Despite a successful launch and initial ascent, the spacecraft began spinning uncontrollably due to a fuel system leak, rendering the heat-shield test unfeasible. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk posted on X following the flight test, writing, "Starship made it to the scheduled ship engine cutoff, so big improvement over last flight! Also, no significant loss of heat shield tiles during ascent."
Spacex Launch Scrubbed Hours After Hegseth Shares Message To Rescue Mission Crew: 'Wish You Godspeed'
Shortly after reaching space, the booster stage, critical for the spacecraft's reentry, was lost during its return to the atmosphere. Additionally, the payload door failed to open during the flight.Remaining parts of the ship which do not disintegrate from the heat of reentry are expected to land in the Indian Ocean, according to the company.
This marks another setback for SpaceX's Starship program, which has faced challenges in previous tests. SpaceX has previously experienced issues with the Starship system, including an aborted flight earlier this year in April.
In a statement following the incident shared via X, SpaceX acknowledged the failure and emphasized the importance of learning from each test. "With a test like this, success comes from what we learn, and today's test will help us improve Starship's reliability as SpaceX seeks to make life multiplanetary," the company said.
Read On The Fox News App
Msnbc Hosts Mock Elon Musk After Spacex Mishap: 'Go Back To Your Day Job'
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has been notified of the incident and is expected to conduct an investigation to determine the cause of the failure and assess any potential impact on future launches. "The FAA is aware an anomaly occurred during the SpaceX Starship Flight 9 mission that launched on Tuesday, May 27, from Starbase, Texas, and is actively working with SpaceX on the event. There are no reports of public injury or damage to public property at this time," the FAA wrote in a statement.
SpaceX has not yet announced a timeline for its next test flight but has indicated that the company will continue to refine the Starship system based on the data collected from this mission.
"Developmental testing by definition is unpredictable," SpaceX stated on their website. "But by putting hardware in a flight environment as frequently as possible, we're able to quickly learn and execute design changes as we seek to bring Starship online as a fully and rapidly reusable vehicle."
SpaceX did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.Original article source: SpaceX's Starship Flight 9 ends in failure after booster loss: 'Success comes from what we learn'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Castelion raises $350M Series B to scale hypersonic missile business
Castelion raises $350M Series B to scale hypersonic missile business

TechCrunch

timean hour ago

  • TechCrunch

Castelion raises $350M Series B to scale hypersonic missile business

Hypersonic weapons startup Castelion has raised a $350 million Series B led by Lightspeed Venture Partners and Altimeter Capital, according to sources and documents viewed by TechCrunch. The round, which values the company in the billions, is anticipated to close in a matter of weeks. The new round comes on the heels of $100 million in Series A funding that closed in January. That round was composed of about $70 million in equity and $30 million of debt. Lightspeed also led that round. Castelion declined to comment. It is notoriously difficult for non-traditional players to break into the sizable government defense market, but Castelion has made notable strides since it emerged from stealth in late 2023. The company, which was founded by former SpaceX executives, wants to transform the production of hypersonic missile systems, a critical national security technology. Despite the U.S. Department of Defense's massive budget, military leaders are sounding the alarm on China's ability to rapidly develop and field hypersonics. These weapons travel above Mach 5 — and China's capabilities are starting to outpace the United States. Castelion is proposing a solution. The business takes a similar approach to SpaceX: build quickly, test frequently, and vertically integrate to drive down costs. It has already won grants and awards from a suite of DoD offices, including the Air Force Research Laboratory and the Naval Air System Command. The company tested its hypersonic vehicle for the first time in the Mojave Desert in March as it looks to prove to the government that it can field low-cost hypersonic missiles at scale. Castelion appeared in the U.S. Army's fiscal year 2026 budget request published in June. In the budget, the military branch has requested $25 million under an initiative called Project HX3 to support the development and testing of an 'affordable, mass-produced hypersonic weapon' called Blackbeard Ground Launch (GL). As the document explains, Blackbeard GL will have around 80% of the capability of a long-range hypersonic weapon variant currently being developed by aerospace primes. But through the contract, the Army is saying it is willing to trade a little bit of speed and range for a lower-cost product. Techcrunch event Save $450 on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $450 on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW The forthcoming contract, which is essentially a done deal once President Trump signs the budget into law, has two phases: the first will see Castelion deliver a 'prototype proof-of-concept' that it will demonstrate in early 2026. If that is successful, the second phase will include the delivery of 10 prototype missiles in 2027 for additional testing using a standard launcher platform called High Mobility Artillery Rocket System. Blackbeard is also being designed to be compatible with a new launcher system that will have autonomous capabilities. All of Castelion's previous wins with the DoD are a pittance compared to the possibilities afforded by the lucrative hypersonic-weapons market. If the Army field testing goes well, Castelion could ink a larger contract and begin delivering Blackbeard missiles in early 2028. Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Northrop Grumman may want to watch their backs.

OpenAI Blasts Robinhood for Selling OpenAI Tokens
OpenAI Blasts Robinhood for Selling OpenAI Tokens

Entrepreneur

timean hour ago

  • Entrepreneur

OpenAI Blasts Robinhood for Selling OpenAI Tokens

OpenAI warns consumers that Robinhood's sale of "OpenAI tokens" will not give them equity or stock in the company. On Monday, Robinhood, the stock, options, and crypto trading platform, announced it was making tokenized shares of OpenAI and SpaceX available to users in Europe. Robinhood said users in the European Union who onboard to trade stock tokens by July 7 will receive 5 euros worth of OpenAI and SpaceX tokens. CNBC reports that the company is offering $1 million worth of OpenAI and $500,000 worth of SpaceX. The news sent Robinhood's shares up nearly 13%, hitting a new all-time high for the company. That's all well and good for Robinhood, but OpenAI was not so pleased, and tweeted a response that leaves no doubt about how they feel about it: "These 'OpenAI tokens' are not OpenAI equity. We did not partner with Robinhood, were not involved in this, and do not endorse it. Any transfer of OpenAI equity requires our approval—we did not approve any transfer. Please be careful." These "OpenAI tokens" are not OpenAI equity. We did not partner with Robinhood, were not involved in this, and do not endorse it. Any transfer of OpenAI equity requires our approval—we did not approve any transfer. Please be careful. — OpenAI Newsroom (@OpenAINewsroom) July 2, 2025 When reached for comment, Robinhood spokesperson Rouky Diallo explained to TechCrunch that the OpenAI tokens giveaway is part of a campaign to give investors indirect exposure to OpenAI "through Robinhood's ownership stake in a special purpose vehicle." (A special purpose vehicle, or SPV, is a subsidiary created by a parent company to isolate financial risk, per Investopedia.) Related: Robinhood Strategies Could Be a Game-Changer for Young Investors TechCrunch says that the token release "suggests Robinhood owns shares of an SPV that controls a certain number of OpenAI's shares." Meaning they are offering ownership of the vehicle that owns OpenAI shares, not direct OpenAI shares. Robinhood's help center further explains: "When buying stock tokens, you are not buying the actual stocks — you are buying tokenized contracts that follow their price, recorded on a blockchain. You can buy, sell, or hold stock tokens — but you cannot send them to other wallets or platforms at this time." If that's confusing to you, perhaps this isn't the investment opportunity for you. And if it makes sense, you might be part-robot.

xAI gets permits for 15 natural gas generators at Memphis data center
xAI gets permits for 15 natural gas generators at Memphis data center

TechCrunch

timean hour ago

  • TechCrunch

xAI gets permits for 15 natural gas generators at Memphis data center

County regulators yesterday granted xAI permits to operate 15 natural gas turbines at its data center outside Memphis, despite the threat of a lawsuit. Elon Musk's AI company has been operating as many as 35 generators without permits, the Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC) said. Altogether, they're capable of producing up to 421 megawatts of electricity. The legal organization has said that it will sue xAI for violations of the Clean Air Act on behalf of the NAACP. The company recently raised $10 billion, split evenly between debt and equity. The permit issued by the Shelby County Health Department says that xAI can operate 15 Solar SMT-130 generators with certain emissions controls, which can generate up to 247 megawatts. The company has already been operating eight of the same model without permits, according to the SELC, though the group added that the ones in operation do have the appropriate pollution controls. Under the conditions of the permit, xAI will be still allowed to emit significant amounts of pollution on a rolling 12-month basis, including 87 tons of smog-forming NO x , 94 tons of carbon monoxide, 85 tons of volatile organic compounds, 73 tons of particulate pollution, and nearly 14 tons of hazardous air pollutants, including 9.8 tons of formaldehyde, a known carcinogen. The company is required to keep its own emissions records. Before the permit was issued, a Memphis community group said that it had $250,000 in funds to pay for an independent air quality study. The City of Memphis performed its own air quality testing in June, though the SELC raised several concerns about the way the tests were carried out. Techcrunch event Save $450 on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $450 on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW The testing contractor did not measure ozone levels, the SELC noted, and the tests were done on days when the wind was blowing xAI's pollution away from the two closest testing sites. The contractor also placed the testing equipment either directly against or in close proximity to buildings, which can interfere with results. Previously, the health department claimed that it did not have the authority to permit 'mobile' gas-burning turbines if they were in operation for less than 364 days, saying that under those circumstances, the EPA was the relevant regulator. The SELC said that the interpretation of the law was 'incorrect' and the letter justifying inaction was 'without any legal analysis.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store