Goodwill cash over three-year road closure
Some small, local businesses impacted by the delayed works on Botley Road will be eligible to receive one-off payments from an £850,000 government fund.
The road has been closed since April 2023 as part of a £261m Network Rail project to upgrade Oxford Station and is expected to reopen in August 2026.
Rail Minister Lord Hendy welcomed the additional support and said he was "glad the project is now on track".
When the rail operator first outlined its plans the road was expected to be shut over two six-month periods, with a six-month break in-between in April 2023.
But in September 2023 it announced there would be no break because works had run behind schedule.
Then in July last year it said it would not reopen in October as planned due to "highly complex" pipework and the discovery of a Victorian-era arch.
A new timetable was adopted in January this year, with reopening set for August 2026.
During a visit to the site on Friday, Lord Hendy said: "I'm pleased that Network Rail can now offer payments to those eligible small, local businesses affected, and while it can't undo all the hardship businesses have faced, it recognises the trouble the delays have caused.
"I will continue to hold Network Rail to account and engage with the local community," he said.
"I look forward to the scheme being completed, so Oxford can benefit from more frequent and accessible transport links to boost growth in this bustling city."
Businesses can apply for the one-off government payments through Network Rail, although a time scale has not yet been provided for when the funding would be handed out.
Layla Moran, Lib Dem MP for Oxford West and Abingdon, said the payments would go "some way towards repairing the damage caused by the chaos and disruption of this project".
"Today I breathe a massive sigh of relief, with support finally available for businesses struggling with the impact of the never-ending road closure," she continued.
"Our vibrant local businesses now have a better chance to come out of the other side of this difficult period and thrive."
The scheme follows the closure of Courtney Pianos after more than three decades - with the owner pinpointing the long delays to the Botley Road works as the main cause.
Owner David Hogben told the BBC the effect the disruption had on the shop was "like falling off the edge of a cliff", adding there had been a 40% drop in sales since the closure.
In April, five separate businesses affected by the works stopped paying their business rates and said they would not pay them until they received further financial support.
At the time, Network Rail said it was supporting local firms with "independent, tailored advice" to apply for a reduction in their business rates.
During Lord Hendy's visit to Oxford it was also revealed that costs for the scheme had risen to £261m - about £100m more than initially suggested.
A new walkway and cycleway is also set to be completed this summer.
Marcus Jones, Network Rail's western route director, said: "We know the delays to this project have been frustrating, and we're sorry for the disruption they've caused.
"The good news is that the project is now firmly back on track, and we're making strong progress.
"We're committed to keeping the community informed as we deliver a safer, more accessible Oxford station for everyone."
You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Piano shop blames closure on delayed road scheme
Businesses near major road closure being 'supported'
Business owner 'willing to go to jail' over rates
Network Rail
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
Truckers rejoice: Trump kills Obama plan to limit big-rig speed
Limiting truck and bus speeds to no more than 65 mph might have saved lives and fuel costs, but Trump administration says it would raise costs and stall traffic. The Trump administration is hitting the brakes on an Obama-era plan that would have created a de facto national speed limit as low as 60 mph for big rigs and buses traveling American highways. The proposal had been under discussion since 2016, and Trump officials on July 24 formally announced they're dropping the plan, which aimed to reduce the severity of crashes involving heavy vehicles. Obama-era regulators said limiting trucks and buses to no more than 65 mph would save between 63 and 214 lives annually, and save drivers more than $800 million in fuel and emissions costs. But federal regulators under Trump now say the proposal to install governors on all vehicles weighing more than 26,000 pounds would raise trucking costs and might actually make things worse by stalling traffic and putting more trucks on the road. Regulators said the proposal might have also slowed deliveries, hurt already-low driver pay and pushed more heavy truck traffic onto side streets instead of interstates. "Because drivers get paid by the mile, the more miles you can put in, well, the incentive is to not slow down," said Henry Albert, 62, an independent owner-operator based in Laredo, Texas. Albert said he understands why some safety advocates would support the speed restrictions, and said he personally limits his 2022 Freightliner Cascadia to 80 mph. He rarely drives that fast because higher speeds consume more diesel, he added. The exact speed limit being considered had not been decided but officials considered 60, 65 and 68 mph. Many states have interstate speed limits of 75, and some even allow 80 mph, although trucks are sometimes restricted to lower speeds. Federal regulators received more than 15,000 comments opposing the proposal, including objections from states that a national policy violated their right to set their own speed limits. Trump has ordered federal agencies to consider withdrawing or voiding what he considers to be onerous regulations, and the Department of Transportation cited his order in killing the governor plan. Regulators also noted the rule didn't consider the potential risk of increasing the speed differential between passenger vehicles and big rigs or the increased number of trucks that would have been needed to carry the same amount of cargo in a given period. They also said new technologies, like radar-assisted emergency alert and braking systems, have substantially improved safety since the proposal was first introduced. In a statement, the American Trucking Associations, which had supported a version of the regulation that would have restricted big-rig speeds to 65 mph, said it has long worked with regulators to find reasonable middle ground. "We believe USDOT can successfully balance deregulatory actions while enforcing sensible regulations that are on the books, in line with its safety mission," Dan Horvath, the ATA's chief operating officer said. There's a growing push by safety advocates to use technology like governors to limit driving speeds nationally; California Gov. Gavin Newsom last year vetoed a proposed state law that would have required new vehicles to alert drivers whenever they are speeding. Albert, who said he's seen few true accidents but many crashes, said he thinks better speed-limit enforcement would help improve safety for everyone on the road. "The speed limit sign isn't a starting point," he said, referencing the number of cars he sees zip past his rig at 100 mph. "It's the limit."
Business Wire
3 hours ago
- Business Wire
Euna Solutions Releases 2025 State of Public Budgeting Report
ATLANTA & TORONTO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Amid ongoing fiscal uncertainty, a new national report from Euna Solutions® reveals how public sector finance teams are adapting to economic pressures, rising demands for transparency, and evolving citizen expectations. The 2025 State of Budgeting Report, based on survey data from 100 public sector finance professionals, offers a snapshot of how agencies are managing tighter budgets, leaner teams, and increasing complexity through the use of modern digital tools. "Finance leaders are embracing change, adopting smarter tools, and exploring emerging technologies like AI to solve persistent challenges," said Tom Amburgey, CEO of Euna Solutions Share 'Public sector budgeting has never been easy, but today's environment, from inflation to staffing shortages to rising expectations for transparency, makes it even more complex,' said Tom Amburgey, CEO of Euna Solutions. 'Yet what we're seeing isn't stagnation, it's adaptation. Finance leaders are embracing change, adopting smarter tools, and exploring emerging technologies like AI to solve persistent challenges. This transformation isn't just about efficiency, it's about enabling governments to be more responsive, transparent, and strategic in how they serve their communities.' The findings come at a critical time: federal COVID-era support programs are set to sunset, inflation continues to impact operational costs, and many local governments are facing budget cuts or bracing for a fiscal cliff, a sudden drop in government funding that threatens essential services and stability. Yet, the report highlights a wave of resilience and innovation across the sector, driven largely by the adoption of cloud-based budgeting technology and scenario planning tools. Key findings from the report include: Budget Cuts Are the Top Concern: Nearly half (49%) of public finance leaders cite budget cuts and shortfalls as their greatest challenge. With shrinking revenues and rising costs, agencies must stretch their limited resources while maintaining existing services and launching new initiatives, often without additional staff or modernized systems. Strategic Alignment Remains Elusive: Many agencies (37%) struggle to align their budgets with long-term goals, resulting in misallocated resources and underfunded priorities. In today's fast-paced environment, connecting financial planning to broader outcomes is crucial for driving measurable community impact and maintaining public accountability. Technology Is No Longer Optional: The report underscores that digital tools are essential, not optional, for modern budgeting. From scenario planning to digital budget books, technology empowers teams to make smarter decisions, collaborate across departments, and respond quickly to economic uncertainty. Transparency is a Growing Priority: The report highlights a persistent gap between budgeting goals and the tools in use. Despite growing expectations for transparency and efficiency, many finance teams still use spreadsheets (39%) to manage budgets, and a significant amount (81%) still rely on PDF files for sharing financial documents and budget books with the public. This gap presents an opportunity to leverage digital tools to support strategic goals, such as transparency, that make budget data easier to understand, explore, and act upon. Resilience Through Scenario Planning: More than half (55%) of finance teams now use scenario planning to test assumptions and model different outcomes, despite only 15% using purpose-built software and 16% using ERPs to support them. This strategic process reflects a proactive approach to revenue volatility, preparing agencies to sustain operations through potential fiscal cliffs and funding reductions – the adoption of digital tools will enhance the speed, accuracy, and collaboration needed to make scenario planning even more effective. 'This State of Public Budgeting Report isn't just a snapshot of the present – it's a blueprint for the future,' said Amburgey. 'Public finance leaders are rewriting the playbook for how government budgeting works, making it more transparent, agile, and accountable. At Euna, we're proud to power that progress with technology that doesn't just keep up with change, it drives it. The future of public service is smarter, faster, and more connected, and it's already taking shape.' To download the full 2025 State of Budgeting Report or learn more about Euna Budget, visit About Euna Solutions Euna Solutions® is a leading provider of purpose-built, cloud-based software that helps public sector and government organizations streamline procurement, budgeting, payments, grants management, and special education administration. Designed to enhance efficiency, collaboration, and compliance, Euna Solutions supports more than 3,400 organizations across North America in building trust, enabling transparency, and driving community impact. Recognized on Government Technology's GovTech 100 list, Euna Solutions is committed to advancing public sector progress through innovative SaaS solutions. To learn more, visit
CNN
4 hours ago
- CNN
Trump officials are taking Wall Street's complacency as a green light on tariffs
President Donald Trump's vows to roll out punishing new tariffs on August 1 have barely made a ripple with investors who are convinced he'll once again back down. But at the White House, officials insist they're serious this time. And Wall Street's ongoing shrug over the potential fallout has them further convinced it's time to follow through. Trump aides preparing to raise tariffs on the United States' closest allies are taking the markets' complacency as validation for their policies, arguing that it shows corporations across the world are adjusting to the administration's disruptive trade strategy. Unlike in April, when widespread panic forced Trump to shelve his initial across-the-board tariffs, the stock market now is hitting new highs in spite of the heightened trade tensions. Predictions that retailers would jack up consumer prices en masse have yet to come true, and the labor market has remained steady. The prevailing Wall Street belief behind that stability is that Trump will ultimately ease off his threat to impose even bigger tariffs, a pattern he's repeatedly followed. But White House aides, emboldened by a sudden string of trade pacts, say they're drawing a different conclusion from the economic tranquility. 'It's definitely not the TACO sh*t,' one White House official said, referring to the newly popular Wall Street acronym that stands for Trump Always Chickens Out. 'They know POTUS is serious about this and they're making adjustments to their business models and supply chains to be able to absorb it.' Those directly contradictory takeaways in the White House and on Wall Street have further heightened the stakes ahead of Trump's self-imposed August deadline, as major trade partners like the European Union, South Korea and India race to strike deals with the administration to avert steep tariffs. So far, the Trump administration has only announced frameworks for trade deals with six countries — the UK, China, Indonesia, Vietnam and most recently the Philippines and Japan on Tuesday. Some are more specific than others, though all would impose significantly higher tariffs than the countries faced before Trump took office. The White House is still planning to hit dozens of other trading partners with double-digit duties next month, in a sweeping move that could disrupt global supply chains and spark retaliatory measures that further strain international trade and push up prices. On top of that, economic experts worry the developments will send shockwaves through the financial markets, putting billions of dollars at risk as investors scramble to factor in the impact all at once. 'They don't believe he's serious,' said Sarah Bianchi, a Biden-era trade official who is now senior managing director at investment bank Evercore ISI, referring to companies and investors who have assumed Trump will find a reason to further postpone his tariffs. 'But if he mans up and is like, 'I mean it, you're paying 30[%],' and there's true retaliation, then they'll learn.' In a recent note to her own clients, Bianchi warned that the market euphoria over the White House's deals with the Philippines and Japan could be short-lived if the successes 'embolden Trump even more to punish the countries who do not land a deal by August 1.' Trump has already imposed tariffs on trading partners at levels not seen in nearly a century, ratcheting up levies on allies like Canada and Mexico and taxing autos and some other imports at higher rates. The president initially sought to slap 10% tariffs on nearly every country in the world. The economic backlash, particularly in the now-steadier bond market, persuaded him to put those on pause. Since then, Trump has raised his administration's tariff rates in piecemeal fashion with far less resistance from Wall Street investors, who have grown desensitized to the president's stream of trade declarations and threats. In recent weeks, Trump — whose aides once promised to negotiate 90 trade deals in 90 days — has begun insisting that sending out a letter imposing unilateral tariffs now counts as a deal, in a sign of growing comfort with escalating his trade war. 'When I send out the paper that you're paying 35 or 40% tariff, that's a deal,' Trump said last week. In a statement, White House spokesman Kush Desai said 'the reason the markets and American people are roaring is that President Trump has been vindicated about the power of tariffs,' adding that the 'doom and gloom predictions of recession and inflation' have not come to pass. White House officials have expressed confidence they'll reach a major trade agreement with the EU that could avert further escalation with the 27-nation bloc, though the talks remain fluid. Investors have taken those ongoing negotiations as proof of their belief that Trump will seek an off-ramp, cheering each successive deal. But Trump allies who are skeptical of the administration's tariff strategy worry that even with those pacts, the market has grown overly optimistic about the longer-term impact of the president's plans. White House officials have expressed confidence they'll reach a major trade agreement with the EU that could avert further escalation with the 27-nation bloc, though they expect talks to run right up against the Aug. 1 deadline. And the two sides remain far enough apart that the EU is reportedly preparing harsh countermeasures should the discussions falter. Investors have taken those ongoing negotiations as proof of their belief that Trump will seek an off-ramp, cheering each successive deal. But Trump allies who skeptical of the administration's tariff strategy worry the market is being overly optimistic about the president's plans. Trump is still insisting that all countries pay at least a 10% tariff, meaning a wide array of US imports are likely to face substantially higher taxes relative to prior administrations — no matter what deals are negotiated. Even if the steepest levies never take effect, the Budget Lab at Yale University, a nonpartisan policy research center, estimates the nation's effective tariff rate — which is an average of all the US tariffs — currently sits at 16.6%, far above the 2.4% level at the end of Trump's first term. 'My view is that the market is pricing in trade deals that have not been either consummated or announced yet,' said Stephen Moore, an outside economic adviser to Trump. 'It's a dangerous strategy, because trade is so critical to the global economy and to the US. And so far it's worked out, but where we're headed in the future is really difficult to gauge.' Yet among Trump aides and advisers who weathered the initial market freakout in April, the muted reaction to their trade moves since then has solidified their conviction that widespread fears over increasing inflation and an economic downturn are overstated. Kevin Hassett, the director of Trump's National Economic Council, said this month that continued stable inflation readings through the spring and summer are proof that the extra cost of the tariffs aren't being passed to American consumers. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick later declared that 'you're going to see inflation stay right where it is' even as inflation readings ticked up in June. And the administration's growing confidence seemingly hasn't been shaken by other recent signs that the trade fallout might just be getting started, including a $1 billion hit to quarterly profits for US automaker General Motors. 'The message, at this point, has been signaled pretty loud and clear,' said Mark DiPlacido, a former Trump trade official and current policy adviser at the conservative think tank American Compass. 'This is a real United States policy and framework that needs to be accepted and internalized by people doing business here.' With a week left until Trump's August deadline, though, skeptics of the administration's tariff strategy question whether Wall Street is hearing that signal — and if investors are properly prepared for the potential economic disruption. Beneath the surface, critics argue, there are signs that the tariffs are starting to take their toll, with some major companies only just beginning to preview price hikes as their pre-existing inventories run low. In some parts of the economy, such as clothing and home furnishings, federal measures show inflation picking up even as prices for other goods remain stable. But the bond market has held steady, stocks are rising and, at least so far, neither the White House nor Wall Street are giving any indication they're worried about the other. 'This is emboldening the White House,' said Michael Strain, director of economic policy studies at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute. 'If you think the market is holding the leash, and the leash is not tight, then that means you've got more room to run.'
