‘Brazen' illegal streaming kingpin who made £1 million from dodgy sites showing Sky Sports and 4,500 channels is jailed
Stephen Woodward, 36, splashed out on designer clothes and jewellery, expensive holidays and a Jaguar F-Type V8 coupe worth £91,000 from his ill-gotten gains.
3
3
Messages found on his phone bragged of making £100,000 a month from the operation.
Stephen ran three websites with access to Sky Sports and 4,500 other premium channels for a small fee.
This included IPTV Hosting, Helix Hosting and Black and White TV, which have all since been closed down.
Police believe he pocketed £1million overall.
"Stephen was brazen in running his illegal steaming websites," said Detective Constable Daryl Fryatt, from City of London Police.
"Despite being the subject of a criminal investigation, he had clearly not learned his lesson and yet again attempted to gain financially from his illegal activity.
"His sentencing and upcoming confiscation proceedings should send a message that there are significant consequences for criminals who enable illegal access to copyrighted content."
City of London Police's Intellectual Property Crime Unit secured an all-assets restraint order against a total of £1.1 million held in 15 bank accounts and 21 cryptocurrency wallets owned by Stephen.
A further £144,121 worth of cash, which was seized from Stephen during their investigation, was also frozen.
These funds, in addition to jewellery seized by officers from Stephen's address, will now be subject to confiscation proceedings.
The 36-year-old, from Thirsk, North Yorkshire, pleaded guilty at York Crown Court on February 21 to distributing articles infringing copyright and four money laundering offences.
He will serve three years and one month behind bars.
His brother Christopher Woodward, 34, who pocketed £126,000 from the operation, pleaded guilty to money laundering.
He was sentenced to 15 months imprisonment, suspended for 12 months, and must also complete 240 hours of unpaid work.
Officers first arrested Stephen back in November 2019 and searched his home address, where they seized almost £5,000, a computer, a hard drive, nine phones and around 100 SIM cards to help him open different PayPal accounts using false identities he bought online.
Analysis of his phone found evidence of communications with various companies to assist with the running of IPTV Hosting, in which he said he was making £100,000 a month.
Despite being released under investigation, Stephen launched two further illegal streaming websites, Black and White TV and Helix Hosting.
He was arrested and had his home searched a second time in July 2020, telling officers on the scene "the cash is in the same place as last time".
But that wasn't to be the only time Stephen landed himself in trouble with the police.
In November 2020, he was arrested again by British Transport Police at Kings Cross station on suspicion of money laundering, after a staff
member at Thirsk station saw him place a carrier bag behind a grit bin before boarding a train to London.
The staff member checked the contents of the bag and was shocked to find £20,000.
Kieron Sharp, Chairman of anti piracy organisation FACT, said: "This investigation and the outcome underline that illegal streaming is not a victimless crime.
"It harms the creative economy and funds criminality.
"FACT commends the work of PIPCU in bringing this long-running case to justice."
Warning over 'jailbroken' Fire Sticks
Illegal streaming can be delivered by a number of devices by one of the most common are 'jailbroken' Fire Sticks, which means a third-party media server software has been installed on to it.
The software most commonly used is called Kodi.
It can grant users unrestricted access to new features and apps the normal version of the device wouldn't allow – but it is not legal to use in the UK.
But it becomes illegal when a box is used to stream subscription channels for free.
It is also illegal to buy or sell these modified devices which have become known as "fully-loaded" - a term that describes how the software has been altered to allow access to subscription-only channels.
'These devices are legal when used to watch legitimate, free to air, content,' the government said at the time.
'They become illegal once they are adapted to stream illicit content, for example TV programmes, films and subscription sports channels without paying the appropriate subscriptions.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Student feared he would be ‘battered' to death by police officer, court told
A student has told a jury he feared he would be 'battered' to death on the ground by a police officer at Manchester Airport. Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, 20, is on trial at Liverpool Crown Court accused of assaulting three Greater Manchester Police (GMP) officers as they attempted to arrest him on the evening of July 23 last year. Pc Zachary Marsden and his colleagues, fellow armed officer Pc Ellie Cook and unarmed Pc Lydia Ward, entered the Terminal 2 car park paystation area after reports that a male fitting Amaaz's description had headbutted a member of the public. Giving evidence on Thursday, Amaaz said he acted in self-defence and in defence of his brother, Muhammad Amaad, 26, after he was grabbed at the ticket machine with no explanation. He said he turned and recognised a police officer, Pc Marsden, had hold of his left arm. Imran Khan KC, defending, said: 'By this point what, if anything, is going through your mind?' Amaaz said: 'At first he grabs me and then he just forces me against the ticket machine. All of a sudden I remember him grabbing the back of my neck and trying to force me to the ground. 'Honestly I was scared at that point. I didn't know what he was trying to do.' Mr Khan said: 'How did you feel at this point?' Amaaz said: 'I was frightened. I just didn't want to go down to the ground. Honestly I believed if he took me to the ground I thought he would have battered me to the point where I was dead and he would have killed me.' Mr Khan said: 'Why did you think that Fahir?' Amaaz said: 'Because it's not like it has not happened before in the past, that some police officers have abused their powers and as a result of that people have died.' Mr Khan said: 'Is that why you resisted?' 'Yes,' said the defendant. Amaaz said he stayed on his feet and looked up to see his brother, Amaad, being punched in the face 'repeatedly' He told the court: 'Honestly I was shocked. I thought 'what the hell are these lot doing? why are they punching him in the face'. 'We have police officers in our family.' Mr Khan said: 'Did you think there was a legitimate reason for them grabbing you in the way they did?' Amaaz said: 'If there was I would have expected them to give me that reason and communicated to us in some way.' He went on to strike the two female officers, who were both knocked to the ground, with Pc Ward suffering a broken nose. He said he kicked out at one of the officers to 'get him away' from Amaad and then punched Pc Cook for the same reason. He hit Pc Ward after he felt a punch go towards his throat, he said. Amaaz said: 'Honestly I feel a punch and instinctively I feel I needed to protect myself so I just turn and strike at the same time. 'I just threw a punch. I didn't know where it was going.' Mr Khan said: 'What did you intend to do?' Amaaz said: 'Just to stop the attack. Protect myself.' He said he then saw an officer (Pc Cook) 'literally running towards me with their hands up'. He said: 'I thought that officer was about to attack me. I felt I had got no choice but to protect myself. I struck out. I don't recall how many times.' Amaaz said then he saw Pc Marsden pointing what he thought was a gun – which was in fact a Taser – at his brother. He said: 'Honestly I believe this guy is about to shoot and kill my brother. I think I shouted 'no'. I didn't want him to pull that trigger.' He ran towards Pc Marsden and struck him from behind before Pc Cook fired her Taser at him, the court heard. Amaaz said: 'I believed I had saved my brother's life then all of a sudden if feels like all the energy has just gone out of me. It felt like the soul being sucked out of my body and everything went stiff.' He said he thought he was 'dying' as he held on to Pc Marsden as they both fell backwards. Footage of what followed as Amaaz lay on the floor later emerged on social media and went viral as Pc Marsden kicked him to the head and was seen to stamp near him. On the ground he heard 'shouting and screaming', he said. Amaaz went on: 'I remember hearing shouting from one side and lifting my head to see who is shouting. 'I remember a boot coming straight for my face. As soon as it hit me it knocked me out for a few seconds and I think the stamp woke me up. Mr Khan said: 'You couldn't see the stamp at the time?' 'No,' said the defendant. Mr Khan said: 'Did you fell something at your head?' Amaaz said: 'Yes. It was sort of a shove downwards to the floor.' Amaaz told the jury that he had no hostility towards the police and that another brother, Abid, was a serving GMP officer. He added that his uncle was a GMP officer for 30 years before his retirement and that six cousins were also employed by GMP. Mr Khan asked Amaaz: 'What was the reason you acted in the way you did on July 23?' Amaaz said: 'Throughout the whole incident, me and my brother was under attack. I was trying to protect myself and him. 'I just felt I was fighting for my life.' Amaaz is alleged to have assaulted Pc Marsden and Pc Ward, causing them actual bodily harm. He is also accused of the assault of emergency worker Pc Cook, and the earlier assault of a member of the public, Abdulkareem Ismaeil, at a Starbucks cafe in T2 arrivals. Amaad is alleged to have assaulted Pc Marsden, causing actual bodily harm. Both men, from Rochdale, Greater Manchester, deny the allegations.
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Murdered MP's daughter criticises Prevent report and reiterates inquiry calls
The daughter of murdered MP Sir David Amess has reiterated her calls for a public inquiry as she criticised a report into Prevent's contact with her father's killer, saying the review 'tells us there were failures but does not say why'. Katie Amess told the PA news agency the 'vast majority of our questions about Prevent's failures remain unanswered' and that an inquiry was the only way to ensure 'real accountability'. The report compiled by Independent Prevent Commissioner David Anderson KC said 'intensive' efforts have been made to improve processes within Prevent, but the 'jury is out' on some of the changes. It also said Sir David's killer, Ali Harbi Ali, was described as a 'great person' by a counter-terrorism case officer shortly before his case was dropped by Prevent. Ali was referred to the counter-extremism scheme seven years before the so-called Islamic State fanatic stabbed the veteran MP at his constituency surgery in Essex in October 2021. He was sentenced to a whole-life order the following year. Following the report's publication, Ms Amess told PA: 'Having been ambushed by the Home Secretary and given no time at all to have advance sight of Lord Anderson's report, I have now had the opportunity to read it, digest it, and take advice from my team on what it says and what the implications are. 'There is now no doubt whatsoever, following Lord Anderson's work, that there must be a full public inquiry into why the string of failures that led to my dad's murder were allowed to happen, who was responsible, who is going to be held to account, and what is going to be done to ensure there is no repeat. 'We were told after my dad's death that lessons had been, and would be, learned by Prevent. And then, heartbreakingly, Southport happened three years later. 'The two cases are virtually identical. No lessons were ever learned.' Ms Amess said the report 'tells us there were failures but does not say why' as she criticised the way his family had been treated by the Government. She said: 'When we met with the Prime Minister and Home Secretary in March to repeat our call for a public inquiry into my father's murder, they asked my mother and me to go away and work with Lord Anderson to see if he could answer the dozens of questions we still have about why the killer slipped through the state's safeguarding nets. 'Against our better judgment, we did just that and have been patiently waiting for his report to be published, enduring several more months of needless stress and anxiety for our family. 'It feels to us that they are treating us, but more importantly, my dad, who served this country selflessly for 40 years, like dirt on the bottom of their shoes. 'They claimed to be his friends. They attended his funeral. That is not how friends behave. 'As we can all now see, that was a waste of time. This was not a review into why my dad was allowed to be murdered at all. It tells us there were failures but does not say why.' Ms Amess continued: 'My family and I remain deeply committed to understanding how the Prevent programme failed to stop the individual who took my father's life. 'We are determined to ensure that no other family has to endure such a loss due to systemic failings. 'Despite Lord Anderson's review, the vast majority of our questions about Prevent's failures remain unanswered. 'We still do not know why basic checks like social media monitoring or verifying school attendance were not carried out before the perpetrator was released from the programme. He was meant to have seven sessions. He had one, over a cup of coffee at McDonald's, and was then released. 'That is simply not good enough, yet Anderson skates over it as if it did not lead to the catastrophic consequences that followed for my family and our country.' Ms Amess called on the Home Secretary and Prime Minister to 'do the right thing and order the inquiry', saying it would ensure 'real accountability'. She told PA: 'A statutory public inquiry is the only way to compel witnesses to testify and documents to be disclosed. 'When we met with Chris Philp, he told us that if he becomes home secretary in any future government, he will order the inquiry. He knows it is necessary. 'On behalf of my family, I now call on the current Home Secretary and Prime Minister to do the right thing and order the inquiry, just as they rightly did for Southport. 'They told my mother and me that we could come back to them if we were not happy with Anderson. Well, we aren't, and I will be asking my team to write to them to request that further meeting they promised us. 'A public inquiry would honour my father's legacy by ensuring real accountability and preventing future tragedies.'
The Guardian
18 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Essex man who bought gun in MI5 sting denies writing kill-list of ‘race traitors'
A former Tesco worker caught buying a gun in an MI5 sting operation has denied compiling a kill-list of colleagues and customers branded 'race traitors'. Alfie Coleman was arrested by counter-terrorism police in an east London supermarket car park moments after picking up a Makarov pistol and ammunition on 29 September 2023. During a hearing at the Old Bailey on Thursday, the prosecutor, Nicholas de la Poer KC, reminded Coleman of a list he had compiled of people who had 'upset' him. Individuals fell broadly into two categories: people he categorised as 'undercover police officers', and 'race traitors', jurors heard. Describing the annotated list, de la Poer said a 'very large number of people are the subject of a racial slur by you or described as race traitors'. Coleman said: 'I cannot remember what was going through my head. I cannot say what I meant when I wrote those words down.' Referring to a colleague and her husband who appeared on the list, the prosecutor observed: 'This is a white woman married to a person of non-white heritage and you have described her as a race traitor. This is someone who you worked with. Why did you describe her as a race traitor?' Coleman said he could not remember. De la Poer asked the defendant: 'Was that a list of people who you thought needed to be killed?' Coleman replied: 'No.' Coleman said he understood 'race traitor' to mean someone who was friends or in a relationship with a 'non-white' person. He added that he also included those in the 'system' working against the interests of white people. The judge, Richard Marks KC, asked Coleman to clarify his stance, saying: 'Regardless of colour, if you cooperate with authorities and work in the government, you are a race traitor – people working for government means doing something against white people?' The defendant replied: 'That's the way I understood it, yeah.' De la Poer asked the defendant about his collection of extreme rightwing books, including one Coleman had described as 'captivating' and lifechanging. A chapter entitled 'the day of the rope' detailed public hangings of people it described as 'race traitors', the court was told. Coleman said he was not 'specifically' interested in that part. He denied he had read another book in his collection about a man who hunted down interracial couples as 'race traitors'. The prosecutor suggested: 'You were preparing to engage in illegal behaviour because you bought a firearm and so it's not a case that you did not do things because they were illegal.' The defendant replied: 'I agree to a certain extent. There are a lot of reasons why I did it.' De la Poer asked: 'In terms of publications likely to be of use to terrorists, you know the explosives manuals were describing how a person might make a bomb, is that right?' Coleman replied: 'I did not read them. It is only through the process of the trial I have seen excerpts and screen shots.' The defendant has accepted he had a large quantity of extreme rightwing material and has pleaded guilty to possessing 10 documents which contained information likely to be useful to terrorists. Coleman, 21, from Great Notley in Essex, has admitted attempting to possess both a firearm and ammunition but denies he was preparing for a terrorist attack. The trial continues.
