logo
Trump Snubbed Jared Isaacman as NASA Chief, but the Private Astronaut Isn't Done With Space Yet

Trump Snubbed Jared Isaacman as NASA Chief, but the Private Astronaut Isn't Done With Space Yet

Gizmodo7 days ago

Although Jared Isaacman is out of the running for the position of NASA administrator, the space enthusiast is still very much interested in staying in the game. In a recent appearance, Isaacman revealed he would still like to pursue launching robotic missions to space.
This weekend, Isaacman received the National Space Society's Wernher von Braun Award for the privately funded Polaris Dawn mission that he led in September 2024. After his speech, Isaacman spoke of plans he would have executed as NASA administrator, as well as some that the private astronaut is still interested in pursuing outside of the agency, SpaceNews reported. This comes less than a month after President Donald Trump withdrew his nomination of Isaacman to lead NASA in a surprising switch-up that left members of the space community disappointed.
In comments to the press, Isaacman mentioned that one of the goals he had for NASA was to partner with academic organizations on science missions. 'My priorities would have been leadership in space and the orbital economy and trying to introduce a concept where NASA could help enable others to conduct interesting scientific missions, getting academic organizations to contribute,' he said.
'I wouldn't mind maybe trying to put that to a test and see if you could fund an interesting robotic mission, just to show that it can be done, and try and get some of the top tier academic institutions who want to perform,' Isaacman added. 'So that's on my mind.'
Isaacman previously funded the private missions he was a part of. In 2021, he purchased all four seats on board SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft for the Inspiration4 mission. Under the Polaris Dawn program, Isaacman contracted with SpaceX to fund a series of missions, the first of which launched on September 10, 2024 and pulled off the first commercial spacewalk in history.
Rather than focusing on human-led private missions, Isaacman is now looking to launch space exploration missions out of pocket. This comes at a time when NASA is facing severe budget cuts that threaten several science missions and put the agency's ability to pursue space exploration at risk.
The current administration's so-called skinny budget proposes a $6 billion cut to the agency, 24% less than NASA's current $24.8 billion budget for 2025. As part of the proposal, the agency's astrophysics budget will drop to less than half a billion dollars from $1.5 billion. Its planetary science budget would drop from $2.7 billion to $1.9 billion, while its Earth science budget would fall to just over $1 billion from about $2.2 billion. NASA's Mars Sample Return, a bold quest to bring bits of Mars to Earth, is on the chopping block as part of the 2026 proposed budget. Other missions, such as NASA's Juno that has been exploring Jupiter since 2016, face cancellation, while planned future missions, such as DAVINCI and VERITAS, may never launch.
Isaacman's nomination to lead NASA was a welcomed move by the space community as the agency struggles with pressure to return humans to the Moon and land astronauts on Mars. If he were given the helm, Isaacman would have focused on reusable hardware to launch the Artemis missions to the Moon while ditching NASA's Space Launch System (SLS), a giant, expendable rocket that has gone $6 billion over-budget, he revealed in a podcast earlier this month.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The rise of AI in CEO communications—and the credibility threat it poses
The rise of AI in CEO communications—and the credibility threat it poses

Fast Company

time33 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

The rise of AI in CEO communications—and the credibility threat it poses

CEOs have become more than just corporate leaders—they're among the most valuable assets on the balance sheet. Great leadership can drive billions in market cap by shaping narratives and galvanizing stakeholders. But what happens when the communication tools they use to build credibility start to erode it? We're entering a new era in CEO communications, one where human messages increasingly filter through the lens of AI. Analysts and investors have long leaned on AI-powered language models and sentiment analysis to dissect earnings calls, parsing executive tone, word choice, and delivery for signals on strategy, risk, or future performance. Now, CEOs and their teams are flipping the script—crafting messages with the help of generative AI to appeal to the very same systems analyzing them. It's a feedback loop of machines talking to machines. And while the tech arms race might make earnings calls look polished and sentiment scores spike, it also risks creating a sentiment gap. In the end, credibility is still the most valuable currency in leadership—and AI can't replace that. The CEO Premium Meets the AI Arms Race Corporate valuation has always been about more than just numbers. Investors have baked intangibles like brand equity, leadership narratives, and cultural impact into their models. As NYU finance professor Aswath Damodaran puts it, valuation is as much about a company's story as it is about spreadsheets. The CEO's job is to integrate those stories with their strategies. Jensen Huang didn't make Nvidia a trillion-dollar company because of flawless financial execution—he did it by selling a vision of AI as the engine of the future, powering everything from healthcare to climate solutions. That's the CEO premium in action: the ability to turn a strategic story into market-moving value. But here's what no one's saying out loud: when that story is over-engineered with AI, something critical is lost. Consider this: Bank of America's S&P 500 corporate sentiment tracker, based on an analysis of thousands of earnings transcripts, hit an all-time high earlier this year, even as analysts lowered growth expectations for 2025. The disconnect is stark. While executives are optimizing their tone and language to look and sound bullish, it's masking underlying realities. We're looking at a sentiment bubble, where polished communications are designed to impress algorithms but are creating distance from actual performance. The result? A risk to long-term stakeholder confidence and broader market integrity. The Credibility Gap is Real–and Risky AI-powered communications is an incredible asset. It can help executives sharpen their messages, anticipate audience reactions, and streamline delivery. But when it starts to obscure reality—or worse, is used as a veil—it risks blowing up the most important thing any CEO has: credibility. Markets thrive on credibility. Investors place a premium on CEOs who communicate clearly and consistently, and are transparent about their strengths and challenges. When communication becomes engineered for algorithms rather than stakeholders, it creates a hollow effect—polished on the surface, but leaving questions below. This is more than theoretical. A recent study published in Harvard Business Review found that employees rated CEO messages as less helpful if they thought the message was AI-generated—even when it wasn't. Perception alone was enough to damage trust. That finding underscores the growing credibility risk CEOs face when misusing or leaning too heavily on AI. What CEOs Need to Do Now So where does this leave us? The CEOs who win in this new reality won't be the ones with the most AI-polished messaging—they'll be the ones who balance technology with authenticity. Here's how: Speak to Stakeholders, Not Just Algorithms: Say what you mean. Own the hard truths. AI should enhance a message, not sanitize it. AI-generated communications might score well with language models, but stakeholders—investors, employees, customers—aren't grading on polish. They're looking for clarity. Anchor Narratives in Performance: Narratives drive valuation, but they're meaningless without numbers. If the results are strong, show your math. If they're weak, explain why. Don't let AI overinflate optimism. Instead, use it to sharpen transparency. Ensure AI Augments, Not Replaces: AI is great for refining delivery and identifying blind spots, but it can't replace human judgment or instinct. Companies that over-rely on AI-driven clones or sentiment engineering risk losing the real connection that drives stakeholder engagement. Anticipate the Credibility Pivot: As sentiment inflation continues, markets will inevitably adjust. Investors will begin looking for the next differentiator, pivoting from polished delivery to deeper signals of authenticity. CEOs who lean into direct, unvarnished communication will stand out. Get Ahead of What's Coming: The tools analyzing your every word are only getting more advanced. The only sustainable strategy? Consistency. Authenticity. Messages that hold up under scrutiny—algorithmic or human. If your leadership story can't survive deep analysis, it was never leadership to begin with. The Way Forward: Still a Human Game AI is reshaping the rules of executive communications, but the most successful leaders will recognize that technology is a supporting act—not the star of the show. At the end of the day, the algorithms don't close deals, inspire employees, or build relationships with customers—CEOs do. In this next chapter of leadership, The CEOs who win won't be the ones scoring highest on sentiment trackers. They'll be the ones who use AI responsibly, stay grounded in performance, and lead with clarity and authenticity. Because when machines talk past each other, the whole system breaks down.

Which Immunoglobulin Route Best Prevents Infections?
Which Immunoglobulin Route Best Prevents Infections?

Medscape

time33 minutes ago

  • Medscape

Which Immunoglobulin Route Best Prevents Infections?

TOPLINE: In patients with inborn errors of immunity who are prone to viral infections, immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT) administered via the conventional subcutaneous route showed lower viral infection rates than the intravenous and facilitated subcutaneous routes. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a cross-sectional study to compare the incidence of viral infections among immunocompromised patients who had been receiving IRT via different administration routes for more than 5 years. They included 58 patients (56.8% boys; median age, 17 years; median age at diagnosis, 11.5 years) with inborn errors of immunity. The intravenous route was the most common route of immunoglobulin administration (n = 32), followed by the conventional subcutaneous (n = 16) and facilitated subcutaneous (n = 10) routes. Patients underwent monitoring of immunoglobulin levels and had nasal swab collected monthly, with viral infections recorded when symptoms such as runny nose, cough, or fever were present. Infections from different immunoglobulin administration routes were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction testing of nasal swabs and serum immunoglobulin levels using nephelometry. TAKEAWAY: The overall viral infection frequency was 3.79%, with rates of 4.2% for the intravenous route, 2.5% for the conventional subcutaneous route, and 4.4% for the facilitated subcutaneous route of immunoglobulin administration. The conventional subcutaneous route associated with significantly lower infection rates than the other routes (P < .05). Adenovirus (21.8%), influenza A virus (16.4%), and human rhinovirus/enterovirus (16.4%) were the most frequently detected viral agents. At 3 months, patients with X-linked agammaglobulinemia (6.06%) and those with common variable immunodeficiency (3.65%) had the highest rates of viral infections. IN PRACTICE: 'Shared decision-making between patients and healthcare professionals is critical in determining the most appropriate administration route and product to minimize the risk of infections and achieve optimal treatment outcomes,' the authors wrote. SOURCE: The study was led by Hulya Kose, Department of Pediatric Immunology and Rheumatology, Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey. It was published online on May 30, 2025, in the European Journal of Pediatrics. LIMITATIONS: This research had limitations due to the small sample size within specific patient subgroups. DISCLOSURES: The study did not receive any specific funding. The authors declared having no conflicts of interest. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

Order.co Names Larry Robinett to Lead Partnerships and Drive Adoption of Its Workday Built Procurement Integration
Order.co Names Larry Robinett to Lead Partnerships and Drive Adoption of Its Workday Built Procurement Integration

Associated Press

time34 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Order.co Names Larry Robinett to Lead Partnerships and Drive Adoption of Its Workday Built Procurement Integration

NEW YORK, June 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- the world's leading B2B Ecommerce Platform, welcomes Larry Robinett as Head of Workday Accounts & Alliances. Robinett joins the company to expand strategic partnerships and scale adoption of exclusive Workday Built integration. Robinett brings more than two decades of experience in enterprise software and strategic alliances, with a long-standing focus on the Workday ecosystem. Most notably, he served as Vice President of Sales and Partner Alliances at Ascend Software. Here, he successfully spearheaded the company's strategic partnership with Workday to help customers streamline accounts payable operations. As a result of the partnership, customers experienced significant efficiency gains and cost savings through AP automation, allowing them to scale operations without adding headcount – all while maximizing their investment in Workday Financial Management. Now, as the Head of Workday Accounts & Alliances at Robinett will lead efforts to expand enterprise adoption of the company's innovative Workday integration. With the integration at customers' fingertips, they can unlock greater control, efficiency, and savings with a modern procurement experience from requisition to reconciliation. 'I'm thrilled to join at such an exciting stage of growth,' Robinett said. 'As someone who has worked extensively in the Workday ecosystem, I'm especially proud to join a company with a Workday Built integration, an achievement that reflects close collaboration with Workday's product teams to deliver meaningful value to joint customers. I look forward to building strong partnerships and helping Workday Financial Management customers simplify and modernize their procurement experience in Workday.' As a Workday Select Partner, worked closely with Workday to co-develop an embedded B2B Ecommerce experience directly within the Workday platform. Using exclusive 'Integrated Search', customers can purchase all the items they need from the best-fit suppliers without leaving the Workday portal. Teams can search for any item and browse pre-approved products within their custom catalog, complete with contracted pricing or cost-effective alternatives. Submitting an order automatically generates a pre-populated requisition, eliminating the need for manual, error-prone data entry. Once approved, handles vendor fulfillment, and pre-coded invoices load seamlessly into Workday. Some of the benefits of leveraging Integrated Search include: customers have raved about the integration, with Kyle Ingerman, Finance Transformations Senior Manager at WeWork, saying, 'I cannot tell you how much time, effort, and money [the integration] has saved us.' To learn more about Workday-built integration, visit About simplifies business buying by combining the ease of online shopping with the sophistication of world-class purchase order and AP automation. The result? Businesses cut costs and complexity with every order. Hundreds of companies, like WeWork and Hugo Boss, leverage to centralize purchase-to-pay workflows, scale operations, and gain total control over spending – saving an average of 5% on products. Founded in 2016 and headquartered in New York City, has raised $70M in funding from industry-leading investors like MIT, Stage 2 Capital, Rally Ventures, 645 Ventures, and more. To learn more, visit About Workday Workday is the AI platform for managing people, money, and agents. The Workday platform is built with AI at the core to help customers elevate people, supercharge work, and move their business forever forward. Workday is used by more than 11,000 organizations around the world and across industries – from medium-sized businesses to more than 60% of the Fortune 500. For more information about Workday, visit Media Contact Allison Reich Senior Manager of Brand, Content & Enablement [email protected]

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store