Infected blood report to set out impact of compensation delays
Brendan West was given infected blood in the 1970s (Andrew Matthews/PA)
On Sunday the Cabinet Office announced that it was 'unlocking administrative barriers' to help the compensation body 'speed up payments to victims'.
Speaking ahead of the publication of the new Inquiry report, Kate Burt, chief executive of the Haemophilia Society, said: 'Delays and uncertainty about compensation continue to have a devastating mental and physical impact on the infected blood community.
'We hope the Infected Blood Inquiry's report on the government's handling of compensation will help to resolve remaining concerns about the scheme as well as maintain pressure to deliver fair payments as quickly as possible.'
Brendan West, who was given infected blood in the 1970s, told the PA news agency that many members of the infected blood community felt 'frustrated' while waiting to be called forward for compensation.
The former soldier lost his leg in 1979 and was given blood transfusions while at a British military hospital in Germany where his leg was amputated. Four decades later, he discovered that the blood he was given was infected with Hepatitis C.
The 64-year-old from Farnborough, Hampshire, now suffers from liver cirrhosis which causes exhaustion.
He said he hoped the Government will take 'fair and informed action' after the report is published.
'I'm fortunate enough to now in the process of going through compensation,' he said.
'I have no idea when I will be made an offer but at the moment I think I am being treated fairly.'
He added: 'As you're aware people were very frustrated with waiting but it seems to me that the IBCA have bought on a load more staff and they have been inviting people to apply for compensation in greater numbers.
'There is still a frustration from a lot of the community that they're having to wait, particularly those that are affected rather than infected.
'I hope the Government will look at the report recommendations and take fair and informed action on them.
'I think there will be huge backlash if those recommendations are either ignored or discarded.'
We've published our latest compensation figures today – these are accurate as of 1 July 2025.
We will continue to publish updated figures every two weeks.
Click the link to see the latest figures: https://t.co/CISQSHwRQ0 pic.twitter.com/KRWbpXunBg
— Infected Blood Compensation Authority (@IBCA_UK) July 3, 2025
More than 30,000 people in the UK were infected with HIV and hepatitis C after they were given contaminated blood and blood products between the 1970s and early 1990s.
More than 3,000 people have died as a result, and survivors are living with life-long health implications.
The Infected Blood Inquiry published its main report on the scandal in May last year, and a compensation scheme was announced a day later.
But in the same week a general election was called and officials from the Infected Blood Compensation Authority (IBCA) have described how in the early days of the organisation it consisted of two men, a laptop and a phone.
Some £11.8 billion has been allocated to compensate victims, administered by the IBCA.
As of July 1, some 2,043 people have been asked to make a claim, and 460 people have had their compensation paid totalling more than £326 million, according to IBCA figures.
On Sunday, the Cabinet Office said that it will 'reduce the administration and process delays' victims are facing, meaning the IBCA will 'be able to deliver services quickly, and require different supporting information from claimants'.
Des Collins, senior partner at Collins Solicitors and adviser to 1,500 victims of the scandal, said: 'In our view there has already been some recent progress in the number of infected people being invited to apply for compensation.
'However it remains the case that those affected – by virtue of the fact they lost husbands, fathers, sons and family members to infected blood/blood products – are still in the dark about the route to compensation for them.
'There has been absolutely no guidance on timeframes for when they will be invited to apply – these members of the community deserve better.
'Whilst the path to compensation for the infected blood community has been far from smooth, improvements can still be made.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
It's time Scotland's NHS got into the digital age
Anyone who's spent time in a Scottish hospital in recent years may have noticed pagers continue to be widely used by clinical staff. Figures show health boards have spent at least £4.6million on the ancient devices since 2019. Which begs the question, why? Surely, in the 21st century and the era of WiFi, a more up-to-date digital device could be issued to staff working in hospitals? It doesn't seem fair that nurses are reliant on pagers while the vast majority of the patients in their care will own smartphones. Bureaucracy in the health service is legendary but the multiple levels of managers running the organisation must surely be able to come up with a better solution. And that's not to mention the 13 fax machines still being used in some arm of the Scottish NHS. This isn't down to a lack of money. The health service will receive a record £21billion from the Scottish Government this year alone. If money can't be found from that to end the reliance on 80s communication devices, senior NHS figures deserve to be asked why. It's another reminder that, for all the respect Scots have for the health service, it is frequently failing to offer the standard of care all patients should expect. Pagers may not be the most pressing issue facing hospitals but they illustrate a wider story. The NHS needs reform, as well as adequate funding. It can't continue to rely on antiquated devices, no matter how small. Air solution It's deeply concerning that a summer of strikes at Glasgow Airport look set to go ahead. Around 100 workers, including airside support officers, engineers and managers, will down tools in a two-day walkout in an ongoing dispute over pay. Unite, the union representing the workers, said its members were struggling with chronic fatigue and understaffing. Members will walkout for 48 hours from 6am on Thursday, July 24, until 6am on Saturday, July 26. The disruption is expected to affect thousands of holidaymakers setting off on their summer getaways. It's on company bosses at the airport to get back around the table with union reps and iron out these issues. It's not fair on the thousands of Scots holidaymakers who have saved hard all year to have their travel plans thrown up in the air. It's vital a resolution is found to satisfy workers and passengers alike.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Ditch mayo when making tuna sandwiches as two ingredients 'enhance' flavour
Darren McGrady, who was a royal chef for 15 years and cooked for the late Queen Elizabeth II as well as a number of US Presidents, has claimed we should stop using mayo in tuna sandwiches Brits with a love for tuna sandwiches have been advised to ditch the mayonnaise and opt for two flavour-enhancing ingredients in its place. This culinary tip comes from Darren McGrady, a former royal chef who served the likes of the late Queen Elizabeth II, Princess Diana, Prince William and Prince Harry over an impressive 15-year tenure. With experience cooking for five US Presidents, it's safe to assume that Darren has his fair share of sandwich-making expertise. However, he suggests that we've been getting the lunchtime staple wrong. In a revelation that might surprise some, the chef proposes a rather contentious change to the traditional tuna and mayonnaise sandwich - eliminating the mayo entirely. According to Darren, mayonnaise "really takes away" from the taste of the tuna. Instead, he recommends following King Charles ' example and drawing inspiration from the increasingly popular Mediterranean diet. Speaking to Darren said: "I think the mayo just really takes away from the flavour of the tuna. We should go back to what King Charles does with the Mediterranean diet." He then revealed two ingredients that could elevate the beloved sandwich: "You just need a little olive oil and a splash of vinegar, and then some seasoning. That would really enhance the sandwich." Swapping out mayonnaise, high in fat and calories, for olive oil has obvious health benefits. Olive oil is a staple of what many consider to be the world's healthiest diet – the Mediterranean Diet – and is proven to improve heart health and reduce inflammation. Tuna sandwiches are also a hit stateside. In fact, the tuna salad sandwich is a top lunchtime pick in the US. The National Fisheries Institute reports that Americans consume an astonishing one billion pounds of tuna annually. Intriguingly, over half of this (52%) ends up in tuna salad sandwiches. On British shores, it was reported in 2016 that around 210 million tuna sandwiches are sold each year. King Charles is known to follow a predominantly plant-based diet and typically skips lunch altogether. In 2018, Clarence House released 70 facts to mark the then-Prince Charles' 70th birthday, with the 20th fact clearly stating: "The Prince does not eat lunch." Gordon Rayner, former royal correspondent at The Telegraph, has mentioned that the King considers lunch a "luxury" that interferes with his busy agenda. However, when it comes to lighter fare, the King seems to prefer something more unconventional than a classic tuna mayo sandwich. In 2020, Clarence House disclosed his preferred brunch selection. It seems that Charles is a fan of a delicacy known as "Cheesy Baked Eggs." Clarence House shared a picture of them on Instagram, accompanied by a caption that revealed that they were one of the King's "favourite recipes." The caption read: "The Prince has also shared one of his favourite recipes, Cheesy Baked Eggs, which can be made by using any number of our great British cheeses."
NBC News
8 hours ago
- NBC News
Kennedy's move to cancel preventive health panel meeting raises alarm
If you've ever been given a free or low-cost test for lung, breast, colon or cervical cancer which caught a tumor, it's likely due to a panel of 16 doctors and public health experts who reviewed the evidence and determined that a screening could save your life. That's why anxiety is growing after Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. abruptly postponed a meeting this week with the highly influential United States Preventive Services Task Force, a group of 16 independent volunteers that advise the agency about preventative health services and screenings, including mammograms, HIV prevention medications, recommending support for new moms to breastfeed and lifestyle interventions for heart disease. Health insurance plans are required to cover the task force's recommendations under the Affordable Care Act. The meeting, scheduled for July 10, was postponed without explanation. In an emailed statement, Andrew Nixon, an HHS spokesperson, declined to say why the meeting was canceled or whether it would be rescheduled. He did not respond to a follow-up request for comment. An HHS notice sent Monday afternoon to task force members said the agency 'looks forward to engaging with the task force to promote the health and well-being of the American people,' according to two people familiar with the task force meeting. Task force members were not given a reason for the canceled meeting or whether it would be rescheduled, said the two people interviewed, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retribution. Many task force members, however, fear Kennedy's move could signal that he's gearing up to fire them and install new members, as he did with a separate advisory committee, known as the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the sources said. Last month, Kennedy fired all 17 members of ACIP — which makes recommendations to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on vaccines, including for children — and replaced them with eight new members. The new panel includes well-known vaccine critics. 'If you look at how things played out with ACIP, this could be a warning signal,' one of the people said. The United States Preventive Services Task Force is a lesser known group that was first convened in 1984 during the Reagan administration. It includes physicians, nurses, pediatricians and public health experts. The task force plays an important role because the ACA , more commonly known as Obamacare, mandates that most private insurers provide the services that the group recommends to patients at no cost. The task force makes its recommendations using a grading scale. Under federal law, services that get an A or B grade but must be covered by insurance plans at no cost to patients. The advisory group has been subject to outrage for its past decisions, including from conservative groups over an 'A' recommendation to cover the HIV prevention pill, known as PrEP. Its controversial decision against routine blood test screening for prostate cancer in 2008 has been linked to rising rates of advanced cases of the disease. The task force currently advises against PSA-screening for older men, saying that men ages 55 to 69 should talk with their doctors about the benefits and harms. The group usually updates its recommendations every five years after reviewing the latest science on preventive care. For example, in 2021, the task force updated its guidance on heart attack prevention, saying most adults shouldn't take aspirin to prevent a first heart attack or stroke. Other recommendations from the task force include that all women begin breast cancer screening every other year starting at the age of 40, down from age 50. It also recommended that children and teens age 8 and up get screened for anxiety. Both have 'B' recommendations. The canceled meeting was set to discuss cardiovascular disease and prevention in adults and children, the people said. 'This institution proves vital,' said Arthur Caplan, the head of the Division of Medical Ethics at NYU Langone Medical Center in New York City. 'The task force provides one of the few independent evidence-based assessments of what ought to be covered, especially in the area of prevention, which Kennedy has made a priority.' 'Postponing the meeting makes me very nervous,' Caplan added. As health secretary, Kennedy does have the authority to remove and appoint new members of the committee, said Jen Kates, senior vice president and director of the Global Health & HIV Policy Program at KFF, a health policy research group. That authority was actually a factor in the Supreme Court's decision last month to uphold the Affordable Care Act provision that requires insurers to cover certain preventive services for free. The court agreed with the Trump administration that the task force members were 'inferior officers,' Kates said, because their work was directed and supervised by Kennedy. 'The Supreme Court basically ruled that the [health] secretary has the power to appoint members and remove them at will,' Kates said. 'So it basically affirms the argument that the secretary has the ultimate authority over the panel.' It's unclear which areas of health care Kennedy might target by shaking up the panel. PrEP, the HIV prevention pill, is 'one to watch,' Kates said, because the Trump administration has already moved to restrict access to the medication in other countries. Caplan said Kennedy could direct the task force to look into topics he's interested in, such as nutrition or processed foods. Health groups immediately pushed back when news broke that Kennedy postponed the meeting. On Wednesday, a letter signed by more than 100 public health groups — including the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics — urged U.S. lawmakers to 'defend the task force's integrity.'
