Bruno Manser Fonds Denies Baseless Allegations By Sarawak Minister Over ITTO Project Failure
Swiss NGO Bruno Manser Fonds (BMF) today denied allegations made by Sarawak Deputy Minister Len Talif Salleh in the Sarawak State Assembly (DUN) yesterday over the reasons for the termination of a flagship sustainability project
'We are not willing to take the blame for a dodgy policy change by the Sarawak government', BMF director Lukas Straumann said. 'Len should be honest and acknowledge that Sarawak dropped the late Chief Minister Adenan Satem's plan of protecting the UBFA's core zone of 79,000 hectares of primary forest – Sarawak's last primary forest outside the totally protected areas.'
Celine Lim, Managing Director of Sarawak-based NGO SAVE Rivers said:' We work with non-Penan communities and were part of the UBFA Project Steering Committee (PSC). So, it is not true that the overall communities were not well represented via the NGOs coalition. The response by YB Datuk Haji Len is intentionally divisive and incomplete to villainise the role of the NGOs, when we were only inquiring public information as per our role as rightholders in the PSC.'
In 2020, Malaysia submitted a proposal to the International Tropical Timber Organization for the conservation and sustainable development of a 283,500 hectare area in Sarawak's Upper Baram region. The proposal was drafted by the renowned late botanist Dr Paul Chai and endorsed by then Forest Director Sapuan Ahmad. A key element of the proposal was the conservation of a 79,000 hectare core zone of primary forest in Upper Baram.
After international funding was secured, the Sarawak authorities unilaterally changed the project design. The 79,000 hectares were no longer to be excised from the logging concessions but became part of a timber licence granted to Borneoland Timber Resources, a company controlled by the politically-linked timber tycoon Hii King Chiong.
Currently, massive logging activities on the western flank of the iconic Gunung Murud Kecil are threatening this habitat of extraordinary biodiversity in the core zone of the former ITTO project.
Neither ITTO nor the Sarawak state government answered NGO letters questioning the reasons for the policy change and highlightling governance failures in the ITTO project. The Swiss City of Basel, the Bruno Manser Fonds and the Japanese government had pledged to support the project with a total amount of USD 556,000.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
19 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Tāmaki Makaurau byelection: Labour's Peeni Henare hits back at Te Pāti Māori claim of ‘greedy' byelection contest
Kemp narrowly beat Henare in the 2023 general election, a result that Labour requested be recounted, which led to Kemp's lead growing slightly to 42 votes. Shortly after Te Pāti Māori last week announced former broadcaster Oriini Kaipara as its candidate aiming to succeed Kemp, Kiri Tamihere-Waititi – party media liaison, wife to co-leader Rawiri Waititi and daughter to Tamihere – wrote on social media how a vote for Henare was a 'wasted' vote and claimed it was 'greedy' of Labour to run an existing MP in the byelection. Kiri Tamihere-Waititi published her views on social media. Photo / Andrew Warner She encouraged voters to support Kaipara as it would mean two Tāmaki Makaurau-based Māori MPs were in Parliament. Tamihere-Waititi's strategy proved an effective one for Te Pāti Māori in 2023 when Labour secured the largest party vote share in the Māori seats while Te Pāti Māori candidates won six of the seven electorate contests. Henare, speaking from Parliament this morning, dismissed any claim Labour was being greedy. 'Every green seat in the House of Parliament is a contested seat, anybody who thinks a seat is going to be given to somebody is absolute folly,' he said. 'In the last election, I got over 10,000 votes. I owe it to them too to make sure that they're represented, and that's why I put my hand up.' He noted Labour's Georgie Dansey, a wahine Māori, would enter Parliament if he won the byelection. 'Any suggestion that I'm curbing a Māori voice in Parliament is absolute folly and those kinds of reckons don't help what should be a good contest between two good candidates.' Speaking to the Herald last week, Tamihere said Henare could risk leadership aspirations if he was unsuccessful. Henare, who held Tāmaki Makaurau for three terms from 2014, described Tamihere's jab as a 'bit rich' and referenced the former MP's failed attempts to win the seat in 2005 and 2020, as well as an unsuccessful Auckland mayoralty bid. Labour MP Peeni Henare speaking before select committee. Photo / Mark Mitchell Henare clarified he had 'huge respect' for Kaipara, despite alleged efforts from Tamihere to 'drag me into the trenches for an all-out, toe-to-toe fist fight'. Stating he would run a respectful campaign, Henare said he would be encouraging 'out-of-the-box thinking' to gain support as well as a stronger social media presence, which he admitted Labour could improve in the face of a formidable and established Te Pāti Māori online operation. Henare and Kaipara were the primary contenders. Vision New Zealand leader Hannah Tamaki would also contest the seat. National, Act and New Zealand First were not entering candidates. Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson, who has run for the seat three times, confirmed last week her party would not contest the byelection as it was not a 'responsible use of our resources at this time'. Tamihere had argued it would boost his party's support base but Labour's Māori caucus chair Willie Jackson believed support would go both ways. 'This is very much a 50-50 election. We're not over-confident at all, we respect Te Pāti Māori and the young movement out there, but we've got a long history with Labour.' He claimed no backroom deals had been reached between Labour and the Greens about the latter not standing a candidate. Jackson repeated Henare's assertion Labour would run a clean campaign, but also said he was up for a fight. 'If they want to have a fight, Te Pāti Māori, well, I'm up for it, there's no problems with that, but that's not how we're going to run this campaign, this is a respectful campaign.' Labour MP Willie Jackson wants a clean campaign but won't back down from a fight. Photo / Mark Mitchell Labour leader Chris Hipkins today confirmed Henare would not be given leave from his Parliament duties to spend more time campaigning in Auckland. '[Henare] still has his job, he still needs to fulfil his responsibilities as a Member of Parliament.' Hipkins maintained Labour would have a 'very, very active ground game' and believed Henare's experience in Parliament would benefit him in the byelection. Luxon yesterday repeated his criticism of Hipkins for not further challenging the 2023 Tāmaki Makaurau result, indicating he would have pursued an election petition, which goes beyond a recount. Hipkins today said Labour had been advised a petition was likely to have been unsuccessful, given Kemp's share of the vote increased after the recount. Adam Pearse is the Deputy Political Editor and part of the NZ Herald's Press Gallery team based at Parliament in Wellington. He has worked for NZME since 2018, reporting for the Northern Advocate in Whangārei and the Herald in Auckland.
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Reporting International Migration: Less Than The Truth
Yesterday I listened to RNZ's political commentators. The principal topic was an aspect of the recently released May 2025 international migration. Kathryn Ryan starts by reminding us of the "old saying, would the last person to leave New Zealand please turn out the lights" (a saying which has been used in places other than Godzone). The latest figure for net immigration was an inflow of 14,800; a net gain. But you wouldn't have realised this. Ryan went on to say there's a big migration outflow underway right now. And she's correct if you only count New Zealand citizens. (Non-NZ citizens are people too; indeed, in that timeframe, 53,400 non-NZ citizens emigrated!) Kathryn Ryan said there was a net loss of 30,000. There was actually a (provisional) net loss of 46,300 NZ citizens. (Possibly she – or her producer – had subtracted the all-migrant net inflow from the net loss of New Zealand citizens, having interpreted the overall 14,800 net inflow as a net inflow of non-NZ citizens.) In fact, this 46,300 net loss of NZ citizens was offset by a net gain of 61,100 non-NZ citizens. (We should also note that total arrivals – not just people classified as 'immigrants' – in the year to May 2025 exceeded total departures by 3,797; less than the 14,800 ascribed to net international migration. The sum of total net arrivals in the six years to May 2025 was 244,000; an average of 40,000 per year.) The total number of people who featured (in the period from June 2024 to May 2025) as either immigrants or emigrants was 264,000; that is, a number of people equivalent to five percent of New Zealand's total population featured as either a permanent arrival or a permanent departure. This 264,000 includes 114,500 "migrant arrivals of non-NZ citizens". Half of the 114,500 estimated permanent arrivals of non-NZ citizens were citizens of either India, China, Philippines or Sri Lanka. In addition to getting the numbers wrong, a key problem with the framing of the RNZ migration discussion is that it rendered invisible these citizens of Asian countries; as people of Asian birth have been largely invisible in our intense discussions in recent years on binationalism. This gaze aversion by the political class is a kind of passive or casual racism. It is ethnicism to simply ignore the new New Zealanders who provide so much of our labour, and who generally perform their labour roles with professionalism and competence. An important aspect of this problem is to ignore the 'mammoth in the room', that there is in Aotearoa New Zealand a substantial substitution of New Zealand born residents for non-New Zealand born residents; white citizens are leaving, brown denizens are arriving. In these latest statistics, for the year to May, there were 61,100 more new New Zealanders and 46,300 fewer old New Zealanders; 61,100 minus -46,300 equals 107,400. 100,000 is two percent of five million. So, if 70% of New Zealand residents were NZ-born in May 2024, then about 68% of New Zealand residents will have been NZ-born in May 2025. (Just under 30 percent of New Zealanders were born overseas in March 2023, according to Statistics New Zealand.) The rate of 'replacement' is probably not quite that great, in that some of the citizens leaving permanently will have been naturalised rather than born in Aotearoa New Zealand. Another complicating factor is natural population growth – the excess of births over deaths – which was just over 20,000 in 2024. It would appear that about one-third of births in New Zealand (maybe more) are to mothers not themselves born in New Zealand. Population 'Replacement' is a sensitive subject. The 'far right' in much of the Eurocentric world indulges in 'replacement theory', a conspiracy theory that there is a liberal "elite" (sometimes "Jewish") agenda to replace 'whites' with 'non-whites'. (There used to be a comparable case on the 'far-left', whereby 'globalisation' was interpreted as an agenda rather than a description.) The descriptive reality of today's world is that there are disproportionately more – and substantially so – 'brown' and 'black' young people than their proportion among older age cohorts. White people are diminishing, and non-white people are increasing in numbers. That's not a problem. But it is perceived as a problem by many white people, especially disadvantaged white people in the economically polarised Euro world. If we tip-toe around this issue of changing global ethnic proportions, we leave the field to 'replacement theory' conspiracy theorists. We need to have adult conversations about the implications not just of aging populations, but also the re-culturation of our populations through demographic change. Applying this last matter to Aotearoa New Zealand, a nation state with rapid population turnover, the overall national 'personality' can be largely retained so long as immigrants come from a wide range of other countries. When I was in Sydney last year, I heard a story about the emergence of India's 'caste system' in Australia. This is the kind of cultural change that we do not want in New Zealand; such cultural colonisation can be averted by avoiding too much immigration from a single country. And through a process of cultural fusion, rather than either assimilation or the emergence of cultural silos. Keith Rankin (keith at rankin dot nz), trained as an economic historian, is a retired lecturer in Economics and Statistics. He lives in Auckland, New Zealand. Keith Rankin Political Economist, Scoop Columnist Keith Rankin taught economics at Unitec in Mt Albert since 1999. An economic historian by training, his research has included an analysis of labour supply in the Great Depression of the 1930s, and has included estimates of New Zealand's GNP going back to the 1850s. Keith believes that many of the economic issues that beguile us cannot be understood by relying on the orthodox interpretations of our social science disciplines. Keith favours a critical approach that emphasises new perspectives rather than simply opposing those practices and policies that we don't like. Keith retired in 2020 and lives with his family in Glen Eden, Auckland.
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
As Trump changes tariff deadline again, what will it mean for New Zealand?
In the most recent round of tariff threats, the US President said he would impose a 35% tariff on Canadian imports, and that could creep up if Canada retaliates. He also announced 30% tariffs on all imports from Mexico and the European Union, after negotiations failed. NZ Herald business editor at large Liam Dann told The Front Page Trump has also threatened that the base tariff, which would affect New Zealand, could go from 10% up to 15% or 20%. 'But, it's very hard to know how seriously to take that because that's the way Donald Trump negotiates. In theory, he's trying to put pressure on those negotiations with a big, scary number,' he said. In April, the Trump administration promised '90 deals in 90 days'. They have managed two: the UK and Vietnam. While a partial deal regarding rare earth exports was signed with China in late June, some significant duties remain. 'It's harder than it might seem from the outside to do these trade deals. They're very complicated. It can take years to do,' Dann said. So, what does it mean for New Zealand? 'We are still supposed to be just looking at a 10% base tariff. The businesses that are most affected, the beef and meat sector, the wine sector, have been working on talks with trading partners and customers, and I think largely we'll be okay. 'The cost is going to be borne by US consumers, unless it means they say no to our goods and we have to drop the price a bit to keep the same volumes up, and we don't have somewhere else to send the products. But if we've got other markets interested in our products, then we are not desperate. 'The US needs a lot of our beef. It doesn't generate enough low-grade beef for hamburgers and things like that. So it actually needs New Zealand, Brazilian, Argentinian and Australian meat to go into all those hamburgers. So, I think those sectors will be alright,' Dann said. Listen to the full episode to hear more about how the tariffs might affect the global economy, and whether Liam actually thinks they'll happen. The Front Page is a daily news podcast from the New Zealand Herald, available to listen to every weekday from 5am. The podcast is presented by Chelsea Daniels, an Auckland-based journalist with a background in world news and crime/justice reporting who joined NZME in 2016. You can follow the podcast at iHeartRadio, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.
