Thailand and Cambodia ceasefire holds as wary displaced villagers return home - International
The ceasefire that was reached in Malaysia was supposed to take effect at midnight, but was quickly tested. The Thai army accused Cambodia of launching attacks in multiple areas early Tuesday, but Cambodia said there was no firing in any location.
The Thai army later said fighting has stopped after military commanders along the border from both sides met. They agreed to halt troop movements, avoid escalation and establish coordination teams ahead of a joint border committee meeting in Cambodia on Aug. 4, army spokesman Major Gen. Winthai Suvaree said.
Cambodian Defense Minister Tea Seiha said he spoke to his Thai counterpart about 'incidents' that occurred during the implementation of the ceasefire but stressed the Cambodian army abided by the truce. He said Cambodian defense officials will lead a delegation of diplomats, foreign military attachés and others to observe the situation.
The Thai government separately said it has lodged complaints to Malaysia, the U.S. and China about Cambodia's alleged breach of the ceasefire agreement.
Along the border, there were signs of calm with some of the more than 260,000 people displaced by the fighting returning to their homes.
The agreement was made under U.S. pressure
Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai had agreed Monday to an 'unconditional' halt in fighting that have killed at least 41 people.
The meeting was hosted by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim as annual chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. He called the ceasefire a 'vital first step towards de-escalation and the restoration of peace and security.'
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the U.S. applauded the ceasefire declaration. 'President (Donald) Trump and I are committed to an immediate cessation of violence and expect the governments of Cambodia and Thailand to fully honor their commitments to end this conflict,' Rubio said in a statement.
Hun Manet said Tuesday that Trump had called to offer congratulations for the peace move. He posted on social media that Trump pledged the U.S. would join the monitoring process along with Malaysia to ensure the ceasefire is implemented.
Trump also called Phumtham after his return to Bangkok. Phumtham said Trump told him that Thailand's talks with Washington to negotiate tariff levels on Thai exports could now proceed and that he would seek to make them as favorable as possible.
The ceasefire comes days before the U.S. is expected to announce new trade tariff decisions. Cambodia and Thailand have both been two of the hardest-hit countries as a result of Trump's trade war, with 36% tariff on goods from both countries taking effect this coming Friday.
Trump had warned that the U.S. might not proceed with trade deals with either country if hostilities continued, giving both sides a face-saving justification for halting the clashes.
Residents along the long-disputed border are wary
Cambodia and Thailand have clashed in the past over their 800-kilometer (500-mile) border. The fighting began Thursday after a land mine explosion along the border wounded five Thai soldiers. Tensions had been growing since May when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a confrontation that created a diplomatic rift and roiled Thailand's domestic politics.
Residents on both sides of the border expressed relief about the ceasefire but remained wary, unsure how long the peace would last.
'I am very concerned that new fighting may break out. Thailand often provokes the fighting first, but then accuses Cambodia. Their aims is that they want to occupy our temples (along the border). I really don't want to see any new fighting happen.' said Soklang Slay, as he helped his daughter move back into her home in Cambodia's Oddar Meanchay province, where heavy fighting had occurred.
Soklang Slay and his family dug a bunker to shield themselves from artillery when fighting started but fled on the second day when bombings intensified.
In Thailand's Surin province, village chief Kritsada Jindasri said he heard heavy firing and explosions Monday night before silence fell at midnight.
"We are still cautious. We still don't totally believe (that it would stop). We still wait to assess the situation,' said Kitsada, who had stayed back along with 60 other community leaders after some 400 villagers evacuated last week.
His brother, Jirayu Jindasri, returned home after seeking refuge with relatives. 'I still don't feel comfortable, because they just announced it for the first day. I'm not confident. If it breaks out again, I'll have to go,' he said.
Analysts said the ceasefire remains tenuous and politically complicated.
Kokthay Eng, a Cambodian researcher in history, politics, and international relations, said Trump's 'trade leverage and strongman mentality have helped save Thai and Cambodian people from further bloodshed.' But he warned that the ceasefire may not last if the Thai government fails to secure lower U.S. tariffs.
'It is risky and will require clear markers to build traction,' said Southeast Asian political expert Bridget Welsh. 'A proper border survey should begin immediately. Right now, it's on pause because the roots of the conflict have yet to be addressed.'
Follow us on:
Short link:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Egypt Independent
9 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
US support for Israel's actions in Gaza drops, as Democratic opposition grows and MAGA movement splits
Americans' support for Israel's military actions in Gaza is dropping rapidly, prompting pro-Israel Democrats and some of President Donald Trump's long-time allies to warn that the country could permanently damage its standing in the United States. A Gallup poll released this week found that just 32 percent of US adults support Israel's military actions in Gaza — a record low since the war was launched in response to Hamas' October 7, 2023, terror attack. The poll also found the strongest partisan split yet: Support among those who identify themselves as Republicans remained strong, at 71 percent. But just 8 percent of Democrats and 25 percent of independents say they back Israel's military actions. In perhaps the most ominous long-term sign for backers of Israel, the poll found just 9 percent support for its actions among those age 18-34 of all political parties. The shift in public opinion has crucial implications for both parties: Some key members of Trump's MAGA movement are vocally questioning whether the United States should keep supporting Israel, while plummeting backing for the country among Democrats will likely impact the party's primaries in key races in 2026 and 2028. The collapse in American support for Israel is part of a global trend. The United Kingdom said this week it would recognize a Palestinian state before the United Nations General Assembly unless Israel takes major steps to end the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The announcement followed France's decision to do so. United Nations agencies are warning that 'time is running out to mount a full-scale humanitarian response' in the besieged Gaza Strip. Data show that more than one in three people (39 percent) are now going days at a time without eating, the UN's World Food Programme said in a statement Wednesday, adding that over 500,000 people — almost a quarter of Gaza's population — 'are enduring famine-like conditions.' Rep. Brad Sherman, a California Democrat who co-chairs the bipartisan Congressional Israel Allies Caucus, told CNN that Israel is losing the battle for worldwide public opinion. He said Israel's military faces serious challenges in Gaza, where Hamas is willing to incur massive civilian casualties 'to undermine Israel's position in the world,' but said its objectives 'have to be balanced against each other.' 'Israel has to determine, what are its military objectives, and what casualties is it willing to incur to realize that national security includes your image around the world,' Sherman said. 'You can't get everything you want, and your worldwide image is important.' MAGA doubts Within the GOP, fissures over Israel's actions came into public view after Trump on Monday disputed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's weekend assertion that there is 'no starvation in Gaza.' 'That's real starvation stuff,' Trump said. 'I see it, and you can't fake that. So, we're going to be even more involved.' Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a prominent figure in Trump's 'Make America Great Again' movement, appeared to become the first Republican in Congress to describe the crisis in Gaza as a 'genocide' with a Monday night social media post. 'It's the most truthful and easiest thing to say that Oct 7th in Israel was horrific and all hostages must be returned, but so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza,' Greene said. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene arrives for a House Republican meeting at the US Capitol on May 20 in Washington, comment came in a longer post criticizing Florida GOP Rep. Randy Fine, a staunch supporter of Israel. Fine told CNN that 'those who claim that Israel is engaged in genocide are either antisemites or idiots or both.' 'If Israel had wanted to commit a genocide in Gaza, they had the ability to do it. And it would have been done 18 months ago, and it would have been over in two days,' he said. 'Israel has the capability to kill everyone in Gaza, but they haven't. … Hundreds and hundreds of Israeli soldiers have died in order to minimize the deaths of Gaza Arabs.' He argued that Israel should stop putting its own soldiers at risk 'to minimize the deaths of the enemy.' Fine added: 'Israel needs to stop worrying about what the rest of the world thinks and take care of business. Political opinion does not win wars.' While many Republicans still agree with Fine, Steve Bannon, the former Trump chief strategist, said Tuesday on his podcast that there is 'very little support for Israel' within Trump's MAGA movement among those under age 30. 'And now, even people who support Israel are sitting there going, what in the hell's going on here?' Bannon said. 'Total mindset change' for Democrats Inside the Democratic Party, the issue of support for Israel proved to be a difficult one in 2024 for President Joe Biden and then his replacement atop the ballot, Vice President Kamala Harris, particularly in the battleground state of Michigan. That state, with its large Arab-American population, will host a competitive Senate contest in 2026. And Democrats who hope to run for president in 2028 will surely be pushed on their Israel policies in primaries across the country. Progressive Pennsylvania Rep. Summer Lee, who was one of six members of Congress to support a recent Greene amendment to strip $500 million in funding for Israel's missile defense systems from a defense appropriations bill, said in a statement that, 'The United States has a responsibility to demand a permanent ceasefire, stop funding and supplying the bombs being dropped, and call for unconditional humanitarian aid to enter Gaza immediately. It is good policy, good politics, and the right thing to do.' More establishment figures in liberal media have also sharpened their criticism of Israel in recent days — offering a preview of what could become a significant long-term shift in the party. The former aides to President Barack Obama who host the 'Pod Save America' podcast argued this week that Democratic candidates should stop supporting military aid for Israel. 'There has to be a total mindset change in the Democratic Party,' co-host Tommy Vietor, a former Obama National Security Council staffer, said. 'When the war ends, we are not going back to the pre-October 7 status quo. It's not where the party is. It's not where the world is.' Eric Fingerhut, the president and chief executive officer of the Jewish Federations of North America and a former Ohio Democratic congressman, said the Gallup findings numbers reflect 'overwhelmingly negative media coverage of the war.' 'There's no question that we are in a very partisan moment in America, and that that is an overlay on how people react to the situation in Israel and in the war in Gaza,' Fingerhut said. CNN's Nadeen Ebrahim and Ibrahim Dahman contributed to this report.
Egypt Independent
9 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Another reason to be skeptical of Trump's Epstein concessions
The Trump administration's efforts to allay concerns about its handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files by pushing for more information have been suspect, at best. The moves seem to be geared more toward creating the appearance of action than producing anything that would amount to the extensive transparency it promised. The administration is practically daring people – including many MAGA supporters – to balk at the thin gruel it's serving up. And a new filing from the Justice Department overnight reinforces how little light the administration's moves could shed. The filing lays out its case for unsealing grand jury testimony, which was President Donald Trump's first announced concession. Plenty of experts regarded that move with skepticism. They noted the courts are often reluctant to disclose grand jury materials – an effort to unseal Epstein-related material in Florida already failed just last week – and those materials themselves will often be limited, even if they are released. That certainly appears to be the case here. In the filing, the Justice Department cites just two witnesses who remain alive whose testimony would be released. 'Here, there was one witness—an FBI agent—during the Epstein grand jury proceedings,' the filing says. 'There were two witnesses—the same FBI agent from the Epstein grand jury proceedings and a detective with the NYPD who was a Task Force Officer with the FBI's Child Exploitation and Human Trafficking Task Force—during the [Ghislaine] Maxwell grand jury proceedings.' That would suggest the testimony is largely second hand, relying on law enforcement officials relaying the accounts of witnesses. Indeed, the filing says these officials 'described statements of others, including statements of and concerning victims, many of whom are still alive.' And beyond that, the filing says many of those accounts were already aired in criminal and civil trials – and by the witnesses themselves. 'Many of the victims whose accounts relating to Epstein and Maxwell that were the subject of grand jury testimony testified at trial consistent with the accounts described by an FBI agent and the detective from the New York City Police Department ('NYPD') in the grand jury and some have also made public those factual accounts in the course of civil litigation,' the filing says. And finally, the Justice Department reiterates that even any transcripts that would be released would be subject to significant redactions. It again cited 'appropriate redactions of victim-related and other personal identifying information.' It's not clear precisely what redacting 'other personal identifying information' means, in practice. (The government's proposed releases and redactions are, of course, going to remain under seal.) But the government has previously expressed a desire not to 'expose any additional third-parties to allegations of illegal wrongdoing.' That certainly suggests the widespread appetite for learning more about Epstein's supposed clients would go unsatisfied, even if these materials are released. And indeed, that's basically the main thing people are interested in. A CBS News-YouGov poll this month showed Americans agreed 92-8 percent that the Epstein files 'probably include damaging information about powerful or wealthy people.' And they said 89-11 percent that the government should 'release all the information it has' about Epstein. A Reuters-Ipsos poll also found Americans said by a massive 69-6 percent margin that they believed the federal government was 'hiding information' about 'alleged clients of accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.' That was a bigger margin even than the percentage who believed the government was hiding information about Epstein's death (60-12 percent). (And even conspiracy theories about Epstein's death tie into the idea that there are unknown clients; they hold that powerful people wanted him dead and killed him because of what he knew, rather than that he died by suicide.) The DOJ's Tuesday night filing is merely the latest reason to be skeptical of the Trump administration's efforts to make this story go away. In addition to the judge in Florida already rejecting the release of grand jury materials (the rules are less stringent in New York, where the most recent memo was filed), the administration's second major concession was having Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche interview Maxwell. But we still don't know what came of that or how fulsome the disclosure of the interview will be. Maxwell is someone the Trump Justice Department once labeled a brazen liar. And the administration took very little care to insulate the situation from politics: Blanche isn't just a political appointee; he's also Trump's own former personal lawyer. And then Trump repeatedly dangled the prospect of a pardon over Maxwell, reinforcing her likely motivation to say what the Trump administration wants. On top of that, questions continue to be raised about the administration's one big, recent disclosure: video footage of the area near Epstein's cell on the night he died. The administration presented it as 'raw' footage and proof that he couldn't have been killed. But the video was missing at least one minute – potentially for technical reasons – and experts have said there's evidence it's not actually raw. The administration's handling of this case has been a mess in so many ways, from its promises of extensive disclosures to its conspicuously timed reversal on that to Trump's false and misleading claims about his past ties to Epstein. The question is increasingly whether people will view this as transparency – or just as a transparent ploy by the administration to try to move on without living up to its promises.
Egypt Independent
13 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Trump's frayed relationships with Putin and Netanyahu are impeding his foreign agenda
President Donald Trump hasn't found his recent phone calls with war-entangled leaders encouraging. 'Very disappointed,' Trump said of his last conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose war in Ukraine is only escalating, despite Trump's efforts to end it. 'It was sort of disappointing,' Trump said Friday of a call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whose war in Gaza continues amid a dire humanitarian crisis. With those two conflicts so far unresolved — impeding his chances for a Nobel Peace Prize — Trump is discovering the limitations of his complicated personal ties with Putin and Netanyahu, whose respective wars Trump once insisted he could quickly resolve. And he's clearly grown frustrated he can't seem to solve the crises any better than former President Joe Biden, who he regards as a failure on foreign policy in particular. In Trump's telling, Putin tells him one thing, then does another. The Kremlin leader, whose relationship with Trump has been the subject of fascination for a decade, has gone 'absolutely crazy' in his relentless waves of missile and drone attacks in Ukraine, Trump insists. Netanyahu, meanwhile, has tested Trump's patience with airstrikes in Syria and Gaza, where images of starving children have led to international outcry and new divisions within Trump's own party about how much to support Israel. The two men share a tumultuous history, with their relationship running hot and cold as Trump seeks an end to the war. Trump's challenges in leveraging his relationships extend beyond Russia and Israel. He has found a tough trade negotiator in his friend Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, despite once being Modi's guest of honor at a 125,000-person rally in Gujarat. And his onetime North Korean pen-pal Kim Jong Un is not currently responding to Trump's overtures; though Kim's sister said this week their relationship was 'not bad,' she said Pyongyang would never abandon its nuclear ambitions. Trump has always applied a uniquely personal approach to foreign affairs, handing out his cell phone number and encouraging his counterparts to call or text outside the usual diplomatic channels. That has resulted, often, in improved relationships that many diplomats say can yield real results, including Trump's success in boosting NATO members' defense spending. Yet the approach also has its limits. From Nobel prize to starvation crisis At the start of this month, Netanyahu dramatically presented Trump with a letter over dinner in the White House Blue Room nominating him for the Nobel prize. Trump seemed momentarily speechless. By the end of July, however, Netanyahu's actions in Gaza and Syria — including the bombing of a Catholic Church and the targeting of government buildings — were testing Trump's patience. And this week, Trump openly broke with Netanyahu, who has claimed there was no starvation in Gaza, after seeing images of the crisis on television. Palestinian civil defense try to extinguish a fire at a building hit by an Israeli strike in Gaza City in the central Gaza Strip, on July 2 amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Hamas militant group. Omar Al-Qattaa/AFP/Getty Images 'I think everybody, unless they're pretty cold-hearted — or worse than that, nuts — there's nothing you can say other than it's terrible when you see the kids,' the president said in Scotland, where he was visiting his golf properties. On the evening before he departed for Scotland, Trump was watching the footage of starving children in Gaza, telling aides he wanted to discuss the horrifying images with Netanyahu and asking what the US could do to help, two White House officials told CNN. 'It had already been on his mind before he left,' one of the officials said, adding Trump was deeply disturbed by the images he saw. Trump has previously been spurred to action by images of human devastation, and seeing the suffering of the children captured in photos helped motivate him to boost US aid efforts, the officials said. First lady Melania Trump was particularly affected by the images, they told CNN, and played a key role in Trump's shifting rhetoric. Trump acknowledged as much when speaking with reporters on Air Force One on his trip back to Washington from Scotland on Tuesday. It's not the first time the first lady has factored into Trump's views of the two intractable conflicts he's so far been unable to end. Trump has also cited his wife when lamenting what he says is Putin's duplicity about the war in Ukraine. 'I go home, I tell the first lady, 'I spoke to Vladimir today, we had a wonderful conversation.' And she says, 'Oh really, another city was just hit,'' Trump said this month in the Oval Office. The Trump-Putin connection Trump's exasperation with Putin has been building for months, fueled in part by the US president's inability to leverage what he once believed to be a positive relationship into a successful peace deal. 'We got along very well. And I never, you know, I never really thought this would happen,' Trump said this week. 'I thought we would be able to negotiate something, and maybe that'll still happen. But it's very late down the process. So I'm disappointed.' That frustration boiled over earlier this week, when Trump abruptly announced he would be moving up the deadline he had given Russia earlier this month — initially 50 days — to either make a deal, or face what the president has characterized as strict secondary sanctions and tariffs. On Tuesday, Trump said Putin had 10 days left to negotiate a ceasefire, after previously sniping that there was 'no reason' to wait when he didn't 'see any progress being made.' A White House official said Trump personally decided to ramp up pressure on Putin after the initial 50-day deadline failed to draw the Russian president back to the negotiating table. Trump decided a shortened timeline was a good negotiating tactic, they said. The president's relationship with Putin has drawn intense scrutiny, particularly during Trump's first term when he appeared to side with Putin over US intelligence agencies on the subject of Moscow's meddling in the 2016 election. Trump has suggested a certain kinship with the Russian leader after enduring investigations into the election interference efforts, saying in February Putin had been 'through a hell of a lot with me.' Trump's aides, including his foreign envoy Steve Witkoff, cited the two men's existing connection as a reason for optimism as he was seeking a negotiated settlement this spring. While Trump has insisted he wasn't 'played' by the Russian president, he isn't the first US leader to find that working with Putin is easier said than done. George W. Bush once described gleaning 'a sense of his soul' after looking into Putin's eyes, finding him 'very straightforward and trustworthy' — seven years before Russia invaded Georgia. Barack Obama ordered up a 'reset' with Russia, complete with red prop button presented by his secretary of state to her counterpart, five years before Russia invaded Crimea. Ukrainian soldiers carry the coffins of twelve Ukrainian servicemen and prisoners of war who died being held in Russian captivity during a funeral ceremony in Lviv, western Ukraine, on July 25. Yuriy Dyachyshyn/AFP/Getty Images Exerting pressure on Netanyahu So, too, have Trump's predecessors discovered that personal ties to Netanyahu only go so far in shaping the longtime Israeli prime minister's approach to the region. Biden had known Netanyahu for four decades when he became president in 2021. By the start of his final year in office, Biden was complaining to advisers and others that the prime minister was ignoring his advice and obstructing efforts to alleviate the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Last fall, some Biden administration officials even believed Netanyahu was prolonging the Gaza conflict in the hopes Trump would win the election. Trump did lift some restrictions on weapons transfers to Israel when he entered office. But his attempts to pressure Netanyahu and Hamas into a permanent ceasefire have so far fallen short. And a relationship that has seen its ups and downs — including a falling-out over Netanyahu's acceptance of Biden's victory in 2020 that Trump has never fully forgotten — has been tested. Just this summer, Trump heaped praise on Netanyahu, calling for Israeli authorities to drop corruption charges against the prime minister after the US and Israel joined together to strike targets in Iran. 'Bibi and I just went through HELL together,' Trump wrote, echoing his description of the experience he shared with Putin. But it was only a matter of weeks until Trump was on the phone with Netanyahu to demand an explanation for the church bombing in Gaza and the targeting of sites in Damascus, which caught Trump by surprise, according to the White House. This weekend, Trump's ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee denied any rift between the men, saying on Fox News the relationship was 'stronger than it's ever been.' Some of Trump's other counterparts hold out hope he may employ his leverage on Netanyahu to do more to alleviate the humanitarian suffering in Gaza. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, whose decision to fly to Scotland and meet directly with Trump this weekend was largely due to the unfolding humanitarian crisis, worked to persuade Trump to use his influence to help, including calling on the president to apply pressure on Netanyahu, sources familiar with the discussions said. Trump said Monday he had spoken directly with the Israeli prime minister regarding the issue, adding that he told Netanyahu he may need to approach the war 'in a different way.' White House officials did not divulge the substance of their call, but told CNN the president is dedicated to working with Israel to help solve the famine. Over the weekend, Israel's military said it began 'humanitarian pauses' in densely populated parts of the enclave and opened corridors for UN convoys to make aid deliveries. However, it said fighting would continue elsewhere. While the president's comments condemning the lack of resources being made available to the people of Gaza served as a major break with Netanyahu — who stated over the weekend that there 'is no starvation in Gaza' — one White House official told CNN that the divisions between the two leaders are being 'far overblown' by the media. 'I don't think having POTUS acknowledge that children are clearly starving represents some major break with Bibi,' they said, adding that Trump is still committed to fully supporting Israel in their efforts to end their war with Hamas.
